0 Stimmen dafür0 Stimmen dagegen

1 Aufrufe10 SeitenApr 02, 2018

© © All Rights Reserved

PDF, TXT oder online auf Scribd lesen

© All Rights Reserved

Als PDF, TXT **herunterladen** oder online auf Scribd lesen

1 Aufrufe

© All Rights Reserved

Als PDF, TXT **herunterladen** oder online auf Scribd lesen

- Bp Macondo Estimate 2
- Hole Cleaning Guidelines
- Tank Draining
- Petro-gas.org Coursedetalies.php Sid=3024
- Solatron- Flow Computer
- h12
- 3_SPE-3830-MS_Permeability Damage from DriIl ing Fluid Additives.pdf
- Advanced OilWell DrillingEngineering Mitchell
- SQ - 4.7 - Pumps (Table Format) (1)
- drilg ndfluteds
- Question Smartcomp Ipw 2013 (Fix Fix) (Autosaved)
- Free Jet Lab
- Hole Cleaning
- Flo Darsensor f.t.
- Gf Planning Fundamental
- Well Test Introduction
- ULTRAFLUSHII
- 19 - Hole Cleaning
- GS01F06A00-01EN_023
- Two Column Paper

Sie sind auf Seite 1von 10

F. Sanfillippo, M. Brignoli and F.J. Santarelli, Agip S.p.A., and C. Bezzola, Geolog s.r.l.

1. in the field of drilling, the muds, the lost circulation

This paper was prepared for presentation at the 1997 SPE European Formation Damage materials (LCM) and the cement plugs can be selected

Conference held in The Hague, The Netherlands, 2–3 June 1997.

properly in order to avoid massive circulation losses and to

This paper was selected for presentation by an SPE Program Committee following review of

information contained in an abstract submitted by the author(s). Contents of the paper, as

minimize the damage due to mud invasion;

presented, have not been reviewed by the Society of Petroleum Engineers and are subject to 2. in the field of production engineering, the completion

correction by the author(s). The material, as presented, does not necessarily reflect any

position of the Society of Petroleum Engineers, its officers, or members. Papers presented at schemes and the stimulation operations can be optimized

SPE meetings are subject to publication review by Editorial Committees of the Society of

Petroleum Engineers. Electronic reproduction, distribution, or storage of any part of this paper

through the knowledge of the most conductive intervals;

for commercial purposes without the written consent of the Society of Petroleum Engineers is 3. in the field of reservoir engineering, a better modeling can

prohibited. Permission to reproduce in print is restricted to an abstract of not more than 300

words; illustrations may not be copied. The abstract must contain conspicuous be performed and a better exploitation of the naturally

acknowledgment of where and by whom the paper was presented. Write Librarian, SPE, P.O.

Box 833836, Richardson, TX 75083-3836, U.S.A., fax 01-972-952-9435.

fractured reservoirs can be achieved.

Introduction

Abstract

Detecting mud gains and losses is a standard practice during

When dealing with naturally fractured formations, the

drilling, as it provides the quickest warning sign of dangers

knowledge of the location and the permeability of the

due either to kicks or to massive circulation losses. Moreover,

fractures intersecting the wellbore has a strong technical and

when drilling naturally fractured reservoirs, mud loss data

economical impact upon drilling, production and reservoir

provide one of the most effective means to assess the

management strategies.

existence of conductive fractures intercepting the wellbore

This paper presents a methodology which allows to

and therefore to identify potentially producing intervals1.

perform a real time characterization of the conductive

The most used technique is monitoring the level of the

fractures intercepted by the bit while drilling. Such fractures

mud tanks with floating sensors or acoustic reflectors and

are detected by monitoring continuously the mud losses at the

measuring the cumulative volume of mud lost over a period of

rig-site using flow-meters measuring both the ingoing and the

time. In terms of formation characterization, the analysis of

outgoing mud flow. The accuracy of such measurements is

such measurements is generally restricted to the detection of

very high (mud losses as small as 20 liters can be monitored),

the presence of natural conductive fractures within a certain

and therefore also the smallest conductive fractures can be

interval and to the qualitative estimation of their conductivity

pinpointed.

on the basis of the cumulative volume of mud lost. However,

A simple analytical model describing the mud invasion

they are not accurate enough to be inverted in order to

into a single fracture is used to invert the mud loss data in

characterize the hydraulic properties of the fractures causing

order to estimate the aperture and permeability of each

the losses, in fact:

fracture. This model has been validated with core

• these measurements cannot discriminate the contribution

measurements, and it is used in real time to perform a quick

of each single fracture;

but sufficiently precise analysis.

The application of this technique to several field cases is • they measure the cumulative volume lost within a certain

also illustrated and discussed in terms of: interval, which depends not only on the conductivity of

the intercepted fractures, but also on other factors, such

1. interpretation of the process of fracture plugging; as the rheological properties of the mud, the fracture

2. real time evaluation of the hydraulic aperture of the density, the overbalance pressure, the plugging capacity

conductive fractures; of the mud, etc.;

3. generation of a “secondary permeability log”. • in the very best situations their accuracy is about 0.5

bbls, and smaller losses (and, consequently, smaller

Moreover some operative implications are discussed, such fractures) cannot be detected.

as: A better accuracy and a quicker response in detecting

kicks and losses can be achieved by monitoring the changes of

the mud flow rate by using flow meters measuring the inflow

2 F. SANFILIPPO, M. BRIGNOLI, F.J. SANTARELLI, C.BEZZOLA SPE 38177

and the outflow mud rate, respectively2. components of electromagnetic flowmeters available on the

Actually, the most accurate devices on the market are market were modified in order to perform high frequency

electromagnetic flowmeters. Their measuring principle is measurements (up to 100 Hz), which are less affected by

based on the Faraday’s law, that is the measure of the eventual anomalies of the flow.

magnetic field created by an electrically conductive fluid in Preliminary tests performed by the Mud Logging

movement. For this reason, when installed on drilling rigs, Company showed that the flowmeters used on rig are able to

they can work only when water-based muds are used, as the measure the mud rate with an accuracy of ±12 litres/min at the

small percentage of water contained in the oil-based muds best operating conditions, that is when only water-based fluids

provides a too low signal for the devices currently available. flow inside the measuring chamber. However, their accuracy

Such sensors have been installed while drilling in several is lowered by the presence of gas bubbles or solids, because

Agip wells where naturally fractured formations were they can alter the flow pattern inside the sensors.

expected. This paper presents the methodology developed to During drilling it was observed that flowmeters measuring

interpret such flow rate measurements in order to perform a the inlet mud flow rate always provided a stable signal. In

more precise characterization of the naturally fractured fact, air bubbles (if any) are very small because of the pressure

formations around the wellbore. The results, obtained during applied by the pumps and suspended solids are prevented to

the first two field applications of the technique, will be settle down and to be blocked inside the sensors, because they

presented. It was possible to demonstrate that the new can be easily installed in the standpipe in vertical position.

methodology was able to provide: Sensors measuring the outlet mud flow rate have generally

• an accurate localization of the conductive fractures a higher background noise. This is due to two factors: (1) the

intercepting the wellbore wall; poorer quality of the mud, which can dirt the electrodes and

• an estimate of the hydraulic aperture (and, consequently lower the intensity of the measured signal; and (2) the

also of the permeability) of each fracture; presence of drill cuttings, which can settle down inside the

• a qualitative description of the process of plugging of the sensors, as it was unavoidable to install them in horizontal

natural fractures by the mud filtrate. position just before the shakers, due to the rig normal

configuration (fig. 1).

Real-time mud losses monitoring This has two consequences: to lower the accuracy of the

Description of the studied formations. Two electromagnetic second sensor (up to a worst accuracy of circa ±50 litres/min)

flowmeters, measuring the inlet (Qin) and the outlet (Qout) mud and to affect the measurements of the absolute value of the

flow rates have been installed during the exploration and outflow rate by slowly drifting the signal. The sensor

appraisal phase of several Agip fields in the same measures an apparent higher rate if settled solids are present

geographical zone in order to quickly detect kicks and losses. or, more often, an apparent lower rate if the electrodes have

Oil-bearing formations are tight and naturally fractured been dirted. For these reasons the two sensors can measure

limestones all along the pay zones. Because primary porosity apparently different flow rates even in absence of mud losses

and permeability can be considered as negligible, the and, when analyzing their data, a manual recalibration has to

detection and the characterization of the most conductive be performed.

intervals is compulsory in order to optimize the exploitation of Flow data were recorded during drilling with an average

such fields. Furthermore, because of the presence of numerous sampling rate of one measurement every 5 seconds. All the

faults due to the high tectonic activity in this area, reservoir other drilling parameters (bottom hole depth, bit position,

modeling is very difficult and such analysis must be hook load, rotary speed, torque, weigth-on-bit, standpipe

performed on a well-by-well basis. pressure, etc.) were recorded with the same frequency and

Mud losses data appear to be the only way to detect and their analysis allowed to reconstruct precisely every event

characterize the conductive fractures in these reservoirs. In sequence. Moreover, it was possible to transmit these data in

fact, the cores show that almost all the natural fractures are real time to central offices in Milan via a network connection

cemented and only a few partially open fractures can be seen. with the rig-site.

When coring operations are not fully successful, it is difficult

to assess if poor recovery was due to the presence of open Individuation of conductive fractures around the wellbore.

fractures or to other causes. The discovering of open natural fractures produces a sudden

Furthermore, it is impossible to use image logs in order to decrease of the outlet mud flow rate (fig. 2), and each event

individuate potentially producing intervals, as they cannot can be identified by plotting the mud flow rate difference vs.

discriminate between open and closed fractures. Comparisons time or vs. the bottom hole depth.

between the cumulative volume of mud lost within a certain Apparent losses due, e.g., to a temporary blockage of the

interval and the fracture density computed from image logs annulus by drill cuttings, short trips, etc., can be also

were attempted, but no significative results were obtained. identified by analizing the other recorded drilling parameters.

Furthermore, losses caused by hydraulically induced

Field evaluation of the sensors’ accuracy. The electronic fractures - e.g. because of a packed annulus - can be

SPE 38177 CHARACTERIZATION OF CONDUCTIVE FRACTURES WHILE DRILLING 3

individuated by performing a double check: • the squeezing of the mud is a process having a radial

• by computing the bottom hole pressure and verifying if it symmetry; in case of an inclined fracture an equivalent

was or not around the estimated fracturing pressure; geometry was considered;

• by verifying if the value of the standpipe pressure • matrix conductivity is negligible with respect to fracture

decreased or not while the loss was occurring. conductivity;

Because of the adopted high sampling frequency, each • the effects of the plugging of the fracture by the mud

single loss, caused by the discovering of natural conductive filtrate can be considered as negligible in the first stages

fractures, can be identified and pinpointed. Furthermore, of the loss;

because of the high accuracy of the flowmeters used, losses as • the fluid is Newtonian;

small as 20 liters could be detected. Each event was associated • the flux is laminar;

with a single conductive fracture. In the cases which have • the Poiseuille law is valid; therefore the hydraulic

been analyzed, this is a reasonable assumption because the aperture of the fracture is linked with its permeability via

instantaneous ROP is low, and therefore the position of the bit the following equation:

can be measured with a precision of a few millimeters. There

were only a few cases of two or more merging signals due to h2

the presence of closely spaced fractures. k= .......................................................................(1)

12

Characterization of conductive fractures The output of the model is the hydraulic aperture of the

Description of the model estimating the aperture of the fracture. Its detailed description is given in appendix A.

fractures. The hydraulic aperture of the natural fractures,

which caused the circulation losses, has been estimated by Field applications of the technique.

developing a model which describes the process of mud Real-time estimations of the hydraulic aperture of the

squeezing into each fracture, after its discovering by the conductive fractures intercepted by the wellbore are currently

drilling bit. performed during drilling the reservoir section of each well of

This problem has been tackled renouncing to make a interest.

description which takes into consideration all the governing The values of the input parameters are choosen according

factors. Instead, it was decided to develop a model based on to the following criteria:

simple assumptions, thus allowing to solve its equations • mud flow rate into the fracture is:

analytically or with simple numerical techniques. This

decision was dictated by several considerations, such as: Qloss = Qin - Qout..........................................................(2)

• the real physical process is extremely complex and not

known in all the details: it deals with a non-Newtonian • bottom hole pressure is computed as the algebraic sum of

fluid squeezed into a system having an irregular and non- the hydrostatic mud column, the standpipe pressure and

symmetric geometry; the friction losses within the drillstring;

• most parameters necessary for a complete modelling are • fracture pressure is provided by RFT’s performed on

not measured or available with the required precision; adjacent wells or calculated;

• the scope of this work is to develop a versatile and quick • viscosity is given by the value of the plastic viscosity,

tool in order to be able to perform the analysis of measured several times per day on the rig according to

characterization of the fractures within times consistent API standards;

with the operative requirements, in particular from a • mud compressibility is assumed to be the same of water;

drilling perspective.

• having assumed the rock matrix as impermeable, the

Therefore, the results obtained are affected by these

value of porosity is put equal to unity;

intrinsic simplifications and they have significance only in

• the inclination of the fractures with respect to the

relative terms. As it will described below, it was possible to

wellbore axis is provided by core observations or, later,

perform a calibration in only one case, where a circulation

by image logs.

loss occurred during a coring operation.

Only the ascending part of the curve Qloss vs. time (that is

The simplifying assumptions can be summarized as

the part not yet influenced by the mechanisms of plugging) is

follows:

used as input into the model.

• every circulation loss has been associated with the

The hydraulic aperture of all the conductive natural

discovering of a single conductive fracture by the

fractures around two wells, A and B, has been estimated as

drilling bit;

first two field applications of this technique. Tables 1 and 2

• the fracture is plane and of uniform aperture; therefore it and fig. 3a and 4a summarize the results of such analysis in

forms on the internal wellbore wall a circular profile (if it the two wells. It should be noted that, except in a few cases,

is perpendicular with respect to the well axis) or an conductive fractures were identified by measuring very small

elliptical one (if it is inclined);

4 F. SANFILIPPO, M. BRIGNOLI, F.J. SANTARELLI, C.BEZZOLA SPE 38177

losses, not detectable with any other technique. Furthermore, • the plugging started almost immediately, because the

it is evident from fig. 4a that a faulty zone was reached during radius of invasion increased rapidly and therefore the

drilling of well B and it must be mentionned that the last event particles started to be blocked very soon;

recorded is the only case experienced of a total circulation • the mud loss rate decreased despite the fact that the bit

loss. In this case the estimated value of the aperture (0.8mm) moved forward, thus increasing the section of flow at the

is only an approximation by defect. wellbore wall. This is because the plugged zone was far

These estimations have been validated in the case of well away in the fracture and therefore it was not removed by

A, where two close losses were measured during a coring the action of the bit;

operation while the bit was moved circa 4cm forward. While • the first stages of the plugging are governed by the laws

the corresponding fractures were estimated to have an of static filtration, that is the cumulative volume of mud

hydraulic aperture of 0.32mm and 0.35mm respectively, on lost in the fracture was proportional to the square root of

the core a 4cm thick band of parallel, partially cemented time (fig. 6):

fractures, whose mechanical aperture was comprised between

0.2mm and 0.8mm, have been seen.

Vcum ( t ) = V0 + C t ...................................................(3)

Then, using the estimated value of the hydraulic aperture

of each fracture, the fracture permeability can be estimated

This confirms that in the plugged zone the moving fluid

through the Poiseuille’s law. Fig. 3b and 4b show the derived

could not erode away the blocked particles.

“secondary permeability logs” for both cases, where the

Moreover it could be observed that the coefficient of

average permeability per meter is plotted. These values are in

proportionality C depends on the differential pressure

agreement with the estimated permeability of the producing

between the wellbore and the interior of the fracture

intervals in the reservoir models as obtained from well testing

(Table 4), as it happens typically in the process of static

and early production data.

filtration.

Interpretation of the process of fracture plugging • The plugging process was very effective in the first

Data, concerning a massive circulation loss occurred during stages, but the loss was stopped very late. In fact, the

drilling of well A, have been used to analize the mechanism of solid particles could be easily blocked in the asperities

plugging of the natural open fractures by the invading mud. within the fracture, and therefore they reduced its

The main observations are summarized in Table 3 and in fig. aperture in the initial stages of the loss. However, being

5. This loss occurred into a single natural fracture, which, the solids 12 times smaller than the hydraulic aperture of

according to the image logs interpretation, has an inclination the fracture (and probably, even less in comparison with

with respect to the wellbore axis of about 70° and an the mechanical aperture), they were not coarse enough to

estimated hydraulic aperture of 0.62mm. block the biggest channels.

According to the drilling daily reports, no specific According to this interpretation, it should be concluded

plugging solids were used and therefore only standard that the granulometric distribution of the suspended solids in

weighting solids, having an average diameter of circa 50 the mud is the most important factor which determines the

microns, were suspended in the mud. The total amount of ability of controlling losses into natural fractures. Therefore in

fluid which entered into the fracture was between 14 and 18m3 order to prevent drilling problems and an unrecovable damage

and the loss was stopped only the day after. It is difficult to be of the most conductive fractures due to large volumes of

more precise because, at the end, the loss was monitored in squeezed mud, it should be recommended to use coarser

static conditions, and therefore the flowmeters were not particles than standard weighting materials while drilling

working anymore. fractured formations, thus allowing the solids to be blocked

The analysis of these data led to define an important within the fracture as near as possible from the wellbore.

feature of the mechanism of plugging natural fractures: that is However, as already pointed out by Lietard et al.3, the

the plugging occurs several meters away from the wellbore. process of fracture plugging can be interpreted also as an

In fact this loss reached its peak value of 1270 effect of the rheological properties of the mud, which

liters/minute after 20 seconds and then the mechanism of increases its viscosity when its velocity inside the natural

plugging began to be effective. At the end of this period of channels is reduced.

time circa 300 liters of mud were lost into the fracture: Both mechanisms explain qualitatively the field

assuming no leak-off through the fracture walls, the radius of measurements and in the authors’ opinion only by analyzing

invasion can be estimated to be circa 10m. At this distance the more field data about massive losses into natural fractures and

velocity of the mud was around 15cm/sec, that is low enough of the remedial operations done in order to cope with them it

to allow the suspended solid particles to be blocked within the could be possible to discriminate which mechanism is more

asperities in the interior of the fracture, while near the effective.

wellbore they were much more likely to be eroded away.

Having in mind this mechanism, four observations can be Conclusions

made: This paper showed that high accuracy flowmeters provide an

SPE 38177 CHARACTERIZATION OF CONDUCTIVE FRACTURES WHILE DRILLING 5

effective mean to characterize naturally fractured reservoirs. Conference, Cannes, France, 16-18 Nov. 1992.

From an economical point of view, such analysis has a 2. Shafer, D.M., Loeppke, G.E., Glowka, D.A., Scott, D.D.: “An

strong impact; due to the fact that: Evaluation of Flowmeters for the Detection of Kicks and Lost

Circulation During Drilling”, paper IADC/SPE 23935, presented

• the productivity impairment of natural fractures due to

at the IADC/SPE Drilling Conference, New Orleans, USA, 18-

the mud invasion can be prevented or reduced; 21 Feb. 1992.

• mud volumes lost during drilling can be reduced; 3. Lietard, O., Unwin, T., Guillot, D., Hodder, M.: “Fracture Width

• the completion strategy can be optimized; LWD and Drilling Mud / LCM Selection Guidelines in

• a more precise reservoir modeling can be performed, Naturally Fractured Reservoirs”, paper SPE 36832, presented at

thus allowing a better field management. the European Petroleum Conference 1996, Milan, Italy, 22-24

For these reasons the installation of the electromagnetic Oct. 1996.

4. Craft, B.C. and Hawkins, M.: Applied Petroleum Reservoir

flowmeters has became a standard for every Agip well in

Engineering, Prentice-Hall Inc., Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 212.

naturally fractured formations.

Nomenclature

Appendix A - Analytical model for the estimation of

the the hydraulic aperture of the natural fractures.

a= mayor semiaxis

b= minor semiaxis

Introduction. The process of squeezing the mud within a

c= coefficient defined in eq. A-14

single fracture has been described through the diffusion

ct= total compressibility

equation in radial coordinates as follows:

D= distance between the extreme points of the

elliptical profile already discovered

h= fracture aperture ∂2 p 1 ∂p µφ ct ∂p

+ = ..............................................(A-1)

k= permeability ∂ r 2 r ∂r k ∂t

l= length of the arc of ellipse already discovered

p= pressure A fracture inclined with respect to the wellbore axis

Qin= inlet mud flow rate describes an elliptic profile on the internal wall. Therefore, in

Qloss= mud loss flow rate (= Qin-Qout) order to use the above equation, an equivalent geometry was

Qout= outlet mud flow rate assumed by considering a system composed by a wellbore

r= radial coordinate intercepted by a perpendicular fracture (thus describing a

Rw= wellbore radius circle on the internal wall). The equivalent radius of the

req= equivalent radius wellbore is such that the length of the profile of the fracture is

t= time the same in the two systems.

tD= adimensional time

VD= adimensional volume Computation of the equivalent radius. The equation of the

xb= abscissa described in eq. A-4 ellipse described by an inclined fracture can be written in the

α= term defined in eq. A-17 standard canonical form:

β= term defined in eq. A-18 x2 y

2

+ 2 = 1 ...............................................................(A-2)

γ= wellbore inclination a 2

b

∆P= pressure difference

ε= eccentricity where the semiaxes a and b are function of the inclination

µ= mud viscosity angle γ and the wellbore radius Rw:

ξ= angle defined in eq. A-4

φ= porosity Rw

a=

cos γ ..................................................................(A-3)

Acknowledgements

b = Rw

The authors would like to thank Agip S.p.A. for permission to

publish this paper. Geolog s.r.l. engineers are particularly

acknowledged for the work done in order to modify and test The position of the bit when it has partially discovered the

the electromagnetic flowmeters, and for the acquisition of the fracture can be described by the abscissa xb and the angle ξ

field data. (see fig. 7):

1. Dyke, C.G., Wu, B., Milton-Taylor, D.: “Advances in

Characterizing Natural Fracture Permeability From Mud Log

Data”, paper SPE 25022 presented at the European Petroleum The length l of the arc of ellipse already discovered is

6 F. SANFILIPPO, M. BRIGNOLI, F.J. SANTARELLI, C.BEZZOLA SPE 38177

therefore:

h2 t

π tD = .......................................................(A-13)

12φµ ct r 2eq

l = 2a E ε; − E( ε; ξ) ..........................................(A-5)

2

The tabulated values have been interpolated with the

where E(ε;θ) is the elliptic integral of second kind: following analytical function (obtained correlation coefficient:

r2 = 0.99):

θ

E( ε; θ) = ∫ 1 − ε2 sin2 ϕ dϕ .........................................(A-6) tD

0 VD = c ............................................................(A-14)

ln t D

withε being the eccentricity of the ellipse.

The length of the profile described by the fracture below with c = 2.01.

the bit depends on the shape of the bit itself. In the cases And finally, the following equation was obtained:

considered in this paper it was assumed to be equal to the

distance D between the extreme points of the already h2 t

discovered arc of ellipse: 12φµ c t r 2eq Vcum

a − = 0 .....................(A-15)

h2 t 2 πφ ct r 2eq h∆P

x2b ln

D = 2b 1 − .........................................................(A-7) 12φµ ct r 2eq

a2

The total length of the profile of the fracture already which can be reduced in terms of the aperture of the

discovered is l + D. So, in order to compute the equivalent fracture as below:

radius of the wellbore, it must be:

h2 β

aα − = 0 .................................................(A-16)

2πreq = l + D ............................................................(A-8) ln(α h2 ) h

l+D t

req = ................................................................(A-9) α= ........................................................(A-17)

2π 12φµ ct r 2eq

Vcum

Particular solution of the diffusivity equation. The β= .....................................................(A-18)

2 πφ ct r 2eq ∆P

diffusivity equation was solved by considering the solution in

the case of transitory flux and by applying a constant pressure

difference as boundary condition. In this case the solution For every measurement of circulation loss, the root of eq.

cannot be given analytically and it can be found in literature4 A-16 was computed through a numerical iteration using the

in tabulated form in terms of adimensional time (tD) and Newton-Raphson formula.

adimensional volume of fluid entered (VD):

kt

tD = ...........................................................(A-10)

φµ ct r 2eq

Vcum

VD = .................................................(A-11)

2 πφ ct r 2eq h∆P

its aperture according to the Poiseuille law:

h2

k= ...................................................................(A-12)

12

below:

TABLE 1 - WELL A: LIST OF MUD LOSSES TABLE 2 - WELL B: LIST OF MUD

AND ESTIMATION OF THE HYDRAULIC LOSSES AND ESTIMATION OF THE

APERTURE OF THE CORRESPONDING HYDRAULIC APERTURE OF THE

FRACTURES CORRESPONDING FRACTURES

Depth (m) Total mud lost Aperture of the fracture Depth (m) Total mud lost Aperture of the

3 3

(m ) (mm) (m ) fracture (mm)

3621.4 18 0.62 2896.1 0.03 0.29

3892.8 0.018 0.32 2930.6 0.04 0.34

3892.85 0.042 0.35 2934.6 0.15 0.29

3979.8 0.4 0.28 3027.3 0.55 0.34

3981.1 0.4 0.32 3028.3 0.27 0.29

4009.7 0.02 0.22 3028.6 0.28 0.31

4009.9 0.028 0.22 3029.2 0.42 0.30

4010.1 0.018 0.21 3032.1 0.13 0.37

4029.9 0.022 0.21 3032.3 0.03 0.30

4048.75 0.038 0.21 3032.5 0.24 0.72

4049.3 0.06 0.21 3032.6 0.09 0.46

4065.3 0.029 0.25 3032.9 0.09 0.44

4096.8 0.038 0.19 3033.1 0.21 0.38

4097.8 0.05 0.20 3033.8 0.42 0.48

4098.6 0.053 0.19 3034.1 0.44 0.55

4098.7 0.03 0.18 3034.8 0.10 0.36

4098.9 0.031 0.18 3035.5 0.26 0.43

4101.7 0.022 0.21 3035.7 0.18 0.44

4101.8 0.019 0.17 3036.1 0.48 0.45

4102.3 0.035 0.20 3036.4 0.18 0.37

4102.4 0.025 0.23 3036.5 0.37 0.37

4103.8 0.055 0.22 3037.9 0.07 0.33

4104.2 0.057 0.23 3038.8 1.33 0.50

3039.2 0.30 0.42

3039.3 0.04 0.35

3039.7 1.56 0.49

3040.1 0.08 0.36

3041.0 0.33 0.40

3044.3 1.13 0.46

3045.8 total circ. loss >0.80

TABLE 3 - SUMMARY OF THE EVENTS OCCURRED DURING THE MASSIVE MUD LOSS IN WELL A

EVENT # BOTTOM STANDPIPE MUD RATE IN MUD LOSS RATE

TIME HOLE DEPTH PRESSURE (L/min) (L/min) NOTES

(m) (Kg/cm2)

Sudden loss increasing within 20

1 8:23 3621.44 92 1700 0 - 1270 seconds, then progressive decline.

2 8:25 3621.57 92 to 0 1700 to 0 200 (while Short trip and static survey.

circulating)

3 8:31 3621.57 28 860 180 End of static survey and beginning of

dynamic survey.

4 8:48 3621.57 50 750 120 Attempt of drilling, mud loss slightly

increases.

5 8:53 3621.73 28 860 100 Stop drilling, then dynamic survey.

Dynamic survey goes on. Since this

6 9:27 3621.73 28 860 90 time the flowmeters were re-

calibrated, and therefore their

measurements cannot be used from

now on.

7 10:00 3621.73 0 0 ? Beginning of the static survey.

8 F. SANFILIPPO, M. BRIGNOLI, F.J. SANTARELLI, C.BEZZOLA SPE 38177

DECREASING DIFFERENTIAL PRESSURE DURING THE MASSIVE

MUD LOSS OCCURRED IN WELL A (see also figure 6).

3 -1/2

Time Standpipe pressure Estimated differential Coefficient C (m /s )

2 2

(kg/cm ) pressure (kg/cm )

8:23 - 8:25 92 103 180

(events 1 - 2)

8:53 - 9:27 28 39 161

(events 3 -6)

Figure 1: Installation of the flowmeter measuring the outlet mud flow rate.

900

Qin

800

700

Mud flow rates (L/min)

600

500

400

Qout

300

200

100

0

0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000

Time (sec)

Figure 2: Example of detection of mud losses using the electromagnetic flowmeters.

SPE 38177 CHARACTERIZATION OF CONDUCTIVE FRACTURES WHILE DRILLING 9

0 0.5 0 10 20

3600 3600

3700 3700

3800 3800

Depth (m)

Depth (m)

3900 3900

4000 4000

a 4100 b 4100

Figures 3a and 3b: Well A: localization of all conductive fractures and estimation

of their hydraulic aperture and permeability.

0 0.5 1 0 20 40 60

2890 2890

2910 2910

2930 2930

2950 2950

Depth (m)

Depth (m)

2970 2970

2990 2990

3010 3010

3030 3030

a b

3050 3050

Figures 4a and 4b: Well B: localization of all conductive fractures and estimation

of their hydraulic aperture and permeability.

1400

1200

1000

Qloss (L/min)

800

600 2

400

3

4 5

200 6

1 7

0

0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000

Time (s)

Figure 5: Massive loss occurred in well A (numbered events are described in Table 3).

10 F. SANFILIPPO, M. BRIGNOLI, F.J. SANTARELLI, C.BEZZOLA SPE 38177

12000

6

10000

8000

5

4

6000

3

4000 2

2000

1

0

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80

time (s1/2)

Figure 6: Linear trend between the cumulative mud lost volume and the square root of

time observed during the massive loss occurred in well A. It can be explained with a

mechanism of static filtration (numbered events are described in Table 3).

Moving bit

P

ξ

D 2b

P’

PP’ = l

xb PP’ = D

2a

Figure 7: Parameters used to describe the geometry of the profile of a fracture intercepted by the bit.

- Bp Macondo Estimate 2Hochgeladen vonSimone Sebastian
- Hole Cleaning GuidelinesHochgeladen vonEya Hentati
- Tank DrainingHochgeladen vonsaimin
- Petro-gas.org Coursedetalies.php Sid=3024Hochgeladen vonNuring Tyas Wicaksono
- Solatron- Flow ComputerHochgeladen vonImam Buchairi
- h12Hochgeladen vonadvantage025
- 3_SPE-3830-MS_Permeability Damage from DriIl ing Fluid Additives.pdfHochgeladen vonIgnacio Aviña
- Advanced OilWell DrillingEngineering MitchellHochgeladen vontruong
- SQ - 4.7 - Pumps (Table Format) (1)Hochgeladen vonAmitav Mishra
- drilg ndflutedsHochgeladen vonAudrey Nguyen
- Question Smartcomp Ipw 2013 (Fix Fix) (Autosaved)Hochgeladen vonHanly Maurice
- Free Jet LabHochgeladen vonaeroscribble
- Hole CleaningHochgeladen vonumairahmedbaig
- Flo Darsensor f.t.Hochgeladen vonDanny Peter Llave Torres
- Gf Planning FundamentalHochgeladen vonWidhi Imranovich
- Well Test IntroductionHochgeladen vonPak Rio
- ULTRAFLUSHIIHochgeladen vonAquiles Carrera
- 19 - Hole CleaningHochgeladen vonmaicrv
- GS01F06A00-01EN_023Hochgeladen vonhaisamsarwar
- Two Column PaperHochgeladen vonIbrahim Salahudin
- The Application Range of the CMC1854scribdHochgeladen vonNatosha Sanford
- Normas de RefHochgeladen vonrolulbadel16
- flow element.pptHochgeladen vonTej Bahadur Kushwaha
- SPE 165335 MS Drilling in PermafrostHochgeladen vonVignes
- DGR#46 K-448 (KDN-21)Hochgeladen vonAhmed
- Valkyrie™ Abandonment System TS Performance_FINALHochgeladen voncatalin calin
- MMSCFD conversionHochgeladen vonvhiyo
- 3. Final Corrected Indl.instruHochgeladen vondhirajsingh_avit
- THEORY fm 2Hochgeladen vonAlimah Azeli
- Reserves Estimation in Tight Gas ReservoirsHochgeladen vonAbdou Chawi

- 6 Griffith Double Acting Hydraulic Mechanical Drilling Jar Series 431 428 440 441 480 411 437 Operating Manual(1)Hochgeladen vonAnonymous F2tu2TrzVt
- AutoTrak Operations Manual - Section 5 - Troubleshooting AutoTrak 3.0Hochgeladen vonpendexx
- AutoTrak Service LevelsHochgeladen vonpendexx
- Auto TrakHochgeladen vonpendexx
- Stinger BrochureHochgeladen vondiegoil
- AutoTrak_G3.pdfHochgeladen vonpendexx
- Supplemental Technical InformationHochgeladen vonpendexx
- Rubicon - Nighthawk - Logan Sup-R-Jar Operation Service ManualHochgeladen vonpendexx
- NOV ShockForce – Technical Assessment.pdfHochgeladen vonpendexx
- NOV ShockForce – Technical AssessmentHochgeladen vonpendexx
- NOV PowerStroke – Technical AssessmentHochgeladen vonpendexx
- NOV - Powerstroke Drilling JarHochgeladen vonpendexx
- NOV - Drilling Jars - General SpecsHochgeladen vonpendexx
- 17.500_TFFI716S-A4.pdfHochgeladen vonpendexx
- Dull Grade Book 2008Hochgeladen vonManuel Perdomo
- 8.500_DSF713M-B32Hochgeladen vonpendexx
- 8.500_DD5560M-A3Hochgeladen vonpendexx
- 8.500_DD5560-A2Hochgeladen vonpendexx
- 8.500_DD3560-A1Hochgeladen vonpendexx
- D391000177-MKT-001 Rev 06 WISE Catalog.pdfHochgeladen vonpendexx
- VAR-3199_IMax_Brochure_v5.0- Impreg BIT.pdfHochgeladen vondiegoil
- VAR-3486_PDC-UpdatedMay2014-v1.0-sm.pdfHochgeladen vonpendexx
- 086 Datasheet16531Hochgeladen vonpendexx
- 11_bt_0109_kaldera_br.pdfHochgeladen vonpendexx
- IPM Tapa de InformeHochgeladen vonpendexx
- Schlumberger HistoryHochgeladen vonpendexx
- axeblade-unit-petroleum-cs.pdfHochgeladen vondiegoil
- 12.25-MM75D-767489Hochgeladen vonpendexx
- 6.5_FXG64D.pdfHochgeladen vonpendexx
- 17.5-EBXT12DSLC-728812Hochgeladen vonpendexx

- ASSESSMENTHochgeladen vonmark jason perez
- Using Geographic Calculator to Convert From One Coordinate System to AnotherHochgeladen vonLuis Tinoco Lacayo
- 00062395Hochgeladen vonfranchisca9999
- 0606_y12_syHochgeladen vonrieszen
- Counting Chamber ErrorHochgeladen vonAayush Vijayvargia
- G3CC_C13L05Hochgeladen vonFrancheska Dolaota
- Sequence Balancing and Cobalancing NumbersHochgeladen vonbkrawat2008
- ESFUERZOSHochgeladen vonJuanCastro
- Gene Lecture 6Hochgeladen vonRenz L. Salumbre
- Waitable Timers in C#Hochgeladen vonLian Emerald Smith
- template-inc-9-fix.docxHochgeladen vonQq
- Atomic Packing and Short-To-medium-range Order in Metallic GlassesHochgeladen vonAlex
- MA1010-Notes-1Hochgeladen vonKaushik Ram S
- 144 Trend Shift Scalping Forex Trading StrategyHochgeladen vonEko Gatot Irianto
- Warehouse RoutingHochgeladen vonTit Nguyen
- advance mgt acc..pdfHochgeladen vonShivam Deora
- Buildsum_ Contours and Contouring from Grid Surveys_.pdfHochgeladen vonaron james
- All CodesHochgeladen vonIvan Amor
- compressible cake constant rate.xlsHochgeladen vonEduardo Paulini Villanueva
- Grade 6 Math Word Problems WorksheetsHochgeladen vonNick
- Algebra.pdf 2Hochgeladen vonJose Miguel Gomez
- 2012 ASNTHochgeladen vonDheeraj Ravichandran
- FIITJEE 40Hochgeladen vonBHAAJI0001
- IsomersHochgeladen vonSahadath Jameel
- Coherent Detection in Optical Fiber SystemsHochgeladen vontruvuong92
- ANSYS-CFD for Simulation of Wind Energy ConvertersHochgeladen vonnamtrungnghia
- Models.mph.Loaded SpringHochgeladen vonMário Neto
- 3 Hr Revision Test on 30th Oct 2018_1540899080703_WaMyBHochgeladen vonSathya Narayanan
- Composite CurveHochgeladen vonsun5555
- Algorithmic ModellingHochgeladen vonAdam Edwards

## Viel mehr als nur Dokumente.

Entdecken, was Scribd alles zu bieten hat, inklusive Bücher und Hörbücher von großen Verlagen.

Jederzeit kündbar.