Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
_______________
* SECOND DIVISION.
326
SERENO, J.:
This is a Petition filed under Rule 45 of the 1997 Rules
of Civil Procedure, praying for the reversal of the Decision
of the Court of Tax Appeals En Banc (CTA En Banc) dated
22 Sep-
327
_______________
1 Rollo, Decision, pp. 35-49; Rollo, Resolution, pp. 51-31; C.T.A. EB No.
477, penned by Associate Justice Juanito C. Castañeda, Jr., and concurred
in by Presiding Justice Ernesto D. Acosta and Associate Justices Lovell R.
Bautista, Erlinda P. Uy, Caesar A. Casanova, and Olga Palanca-Enriquez.
2 Id., at p. 11.
3 Id., at p. 139.
4 Id., at pp. 140-141.
5 Id., at p. 161.
328
_______________
6 Id.
7 Rollo, pp. 140-141.
8 Id., at p. 140.
329
_______________
9 Id.
10 Id., at pp. 142-143.
11 Id., at pp. 99-100.
12 Id., at pp. 160-171; CTA Case No. 7046, penned by Associate Justice
Lovell R. Bautista, and concurred in by Presiding Justice Ernesto D.
Acosta and Associate Justice Caesar A. Casanova.
13 Id., at p. 170.
330
_______________
14 Id., at p. 165.
15 Id., at p. 168.
16 Id., at p. 167.
17 G.R. No. 153205, 22 January 2007, 515 SCRA 124.
18 Rollo, pp. 172-179.
19 Id., at p. 173.
20 Id.
21 Id., at pp. 173-174.
331
_______________
22 Id., at p. 21.
23 500 Phil. 586; 462 SCRA 197 (2005).
24 Rollo, pp. 181-183.
25 An Act Amending Sections 27, 28, 34, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111,
112, 113, 114, 116, 117, 119, 121, 148, 151, 236, 237 And 288 of the
National Internal Revenue Code of 1997, as Amended, and for Other
Purposes
26 Rollo, p. 41.
27 Id., at p. 48.
332
_______________
28 Id.
29 Id., at pp. 9-33.
30 Id., at p. 164.
333
334
_______________
31 FURTHER AMENDING CERTAIN PROVISIONS OF THE NATIONAL INTERNAL REVENUE
CODE.
32 A DECREE TO CONSOLIDATE AND CODIFY ALL THE INTERNAL REVENUE LAWS OF THE
PHILIPPINES.
33 ADOPTING A VALUE-ADDED TAX, AMENDING FOR THIS PURPOSE CERTAIN PROVISIONS
OF THE NATIONAL INTERNAL REVENUE CODE, AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES.
34 AN ACT RESTRUCTURING THE VALUE-ADDED TAX (VAT) SYSTEM, WIDENING ITS TAX
BASE AND ENHANCING ITS ADMINISTRATION, AND FOR THESE PURPOSES AMENDING AND
335
_______________
35 Rollo, p. 194.
337
_______________
36 Id., at pp. 192-193.
37 Id., at p. 182.
338
“x x x. While the Burmeister case forms part of the legal system
and assumes the same authority as the statute itself, however,
the same cannot be applied retroactively against the Petitioner
because to do so will be prejudicial to the latter.”40
_______________
38 Id., at pp. 43-45.
39 Id., at p. 196.
40 Id., at p. 21.
41 Id., at p. 46, citing National Amnesty Commission v. Commission on
Audit, 481 Phil. 279; 437 SCRA 655 (2004).
339
_______________
42 Columbia Pictures, Inc. v. Court of Appeals, 329 Phil. 875, 907-908;
261 SCRA 144, 168 (1996).
43 Senarillos v. Hermosisima, 100 Phil. 501 (1956).
340
_______________
44 Supra note 23, at p. 605, citing Garner (ed. in chief).
341
_______________
45 Supra note 17, at p. 139.
342
“This can only be the logical interpretation of Section 102 (b) (2).
If the provider and recipient of the “other services” are both doing
business in the Philippines, the payment of foreign currency is
irrelevant. Otherwise, those subject to the regular VAT under
Section 102 (a) can avoid paying the VAT by simply stipulating
payment in foreign currency inwardly remitted by the recipient of
services. To interpret Section 102 (b) (2) to apply to a payer-
recipient of services doing business in the Philippines is to make
the payment of the regular VAT under Section 102 (a) dependent
on the generosity of the taxpayer. The provider of services can
choose to pay the regular VAT or avoid it by stipulating payment
in foreign currency inwardly remitted by the payer-recipient.
Such interpretation removes Section 102 (a) as a tax measure in
the Tax Code, an interpretation this Court cannot sanction. A tax
is a mandatory exaction, not a voluntary contribution.
x x x x x x xxx
Further, when the provider and recipient of services are both
doing business in the Philippines, their transaction falls squarely
under Section 102 (a) governing domestic sale or exchange of
services. Indeed, this is a purely local sale or exchange of services
subject to the regular VAT, unless of course the transaction falls
under the other provisions of Section 102 (b).
Thus, when Section 102 (b) (2) speaks of “[s]ervices other than
those mentioned in the preceding subparagraph,” the
legislative intent is that only the services are different between
subparagraphs 1 and 2. The requirements for zero-rating,
including the essential condition that the recipient of services is
doing business outside the Philippines, remain the same under
both subparagraphs.” (Emphasis in the original)46
_______________
46 Rollo, pp. 136-137.
343
344
_______________
49 Id., at p. 25.
50 Id., at p. 47.
51 Id., at p. 138.
345
_______________
52 233 Phil. 406; 149 SCRA 395 (1987).
53 Id., at p. 420 citing The Mentholatum Co., Inc. vs. Anacleto
Mangaliman, 72 Phil. 524 (1941); Section 1, R.A. No. 5455; and Pacific
Micronesian Line, Inc. v. Del Rosario and Pelingon, 96 Phil. 23, 30 (1954),
which in turn cited Thompson on Corporations, Vol. 8, 844-847 (3rd ed.);
and Fisher, PHILIPPINE LAW OF STOCK CORPORATION, 415.
346
_______________
54 Paseo Realty & Development Corporation v. Court of Appeals, 483
Phil. 254; 440 SCRA 235 (2004).
55 Rollo, p. 47.
347