Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Have any states decided to “opt out” and build their own RAN?
To date, no state or territory has decided to opt-out of the FirstNet network, over half have selected the FirstNet Plan
(“opt-in”). While some states have issued RFPs as part of their due diligence around the deployment of the RAN in their
state, to date, no governor has chosen to opt-out of the FirstNet RAN plan. FirstNet has supported states and territories
doing their due diligence to ensure that the governor is able to make the most informed decision about deploying the RAN
in his/her state or territory.
Can opt-out states keep the revenue from their RAN to fund projects that are not related to
the public safety broadband network?
No. As required by the Act, any revenue received by the opt-out state from the use of the Band 14 spectrum must be used
for the state-built RAN and NPSBN only. The Act does not allow the opt-out state to retain or use excess revenue for any
other purposes.
If a state elects to opt out, how long could it take for first responders to access public safety
specific services in the state?
An opt-out decision will delay the availability of network services, such as priority and preemption, to the state’s first
responders. This means they will have to wait to access public safety specific services until successful completion of the
state’s opt-out process and subsequent RAN deployment, or reversion to an opt-in situation if the state fails to obtain FCC
approval. Current timelines suggest a delay of approximately two years before RAN deployment begins in an opt-out state.
Conversely, by opting in, the state’s public safety entities have immediate access to priority services, with preemption
capabilities expected by the end of 2017.
What terms and conditions will a state be held accountable to under a SMLA with FirstNet?
Building, operating, maintaining, and improving the RAN portion of the Nationwide Network is a substantial responsibility –
a massive telecommunications infrastructure project that cannot fail our nation’s first responders. The SMLA is designed to
make sure this critical public safety mission is achieved and that the network is sustainable for 25 years. The SMLA includes
comparable terms and requirements to those that FirstNet’s network contractor is contractually bound and accountable
for in opt-in states. In other words, we are asking no more of an opt-out state than what we are requiring of our NPSBN
contractor to ensure the sustainability, interoperability, and security of the Network for public safety.
Why will opt-out state contractors be responsible for meeting public safety user adoption
targets?
The power of the NPSBN will lie in first responders’ use of the network. Public safety adoption of the Network is essential to
FirstNet accomplishing its mission as entrusted by Congress. Under the NPSBN contract, FirstNet’s partner is contractually
committed to public safety subscribership levels, or adoption targets, on the Network, including the RAN. This commitment
helps ensure that the NPSBN and the spectrum allocated by the Act are used by public safety subscribers as intended, at
certain minimum levels.
Under the SMLA, the state or territory’s contractor(s) is responsible for meeting the same public safety user adoption
targets as those established under the NPSBN contract. Requiring the state’s RAN contractor(s) to meet the same targets
preserves the fundamental goals of public safety use of the Network and the spectrum licensed to FirstNet at the levels
guaranteed in the NPSBN contract.
What are the risks associated with the failure of a RAN in an opt-out state? How is this
addressed in the SMLA?
Any failure of a state-built RAN over the next 25 years imposes considerable costs and risks on the nationwide network
and public safety, impacting both the state and every other state. Under this scenario, FirstNet would incur the costs of
reconstituting the RAN, including potentially finding another vendor, so that public safety users could continue to perform
their life-saving missions with minimal disruptions to their communications. To mitigate the consequences of a RAN
failure, the SMLA would require the state to pay the full cost of reconstituting the RAN in the state and operating it for
the remainder of the agreement’s term. FirstNet has provided estimates of these potential costs to the states to promote
transparency and increase their understanding of the significant responsibility of deploying, operating, and maintaining the
RAN. These estimates reflect building and operating a new Band 14 RAN for the remainder of the SMLA term given the
likely technical, operational, and financial complications that a new provider would face in reusing any components from a
failed RAN and the significant ongoing RAN operating costs.