Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Background:
Ventilator associated pneumonia (VAP) is defined as a hospital-acquired pneumonia that
develops within 48 to 72 hours after endotracheal intubation; the diagnosis hinges on a lack of
evidence suggesting that the infection developed prior to intubation. VAP is the most common
intensive care unit (ICU)-acquired infection, accounting for 25 percent of all ICU infections and
50 percent of ICU antibiotic use. At least 250,000 VAPs occur in the United States (U.S.) each
year. This condition causes complications in 8 to 28 percent of mechanically ventilated patients
and carries a mortality risk of approximately 10 percent (range 6% to 27%), resulting in a
possible 25,000 VAP-attributable deaths every year. Patients who develop VAP stay, on average,
4 days longer in the ICU. The per-case cost of VAP is estimated to be $23,000, and the total
incremental costs to the U.S. health care system are high: $2.19 to 3.17 billion USD per year.
With a mortality rate approaching 50 percent, VAP has been classified by the Institute for
Healthcare Improvement as one of the most dreadful infections that can strike a patient. VAP is
the leading cause of death amongst the hospital-acquired infections, exceeding the rate of death
due to central line infections, severe sepsis, and respiratory tract infections in the non-intubated
patient (source).
Nationally, Post-Acute Specialty Units pose a challenge because they do not fit the LTAC or SNF
criteria. They are an entity all to themselves. LTAC patients aren’t as acute as our Post-Acute
Specialty Program (PASP) patients. We send our PASP patients to LTACs after they stabilize.
When attempting to compare PASP VAP data to ICU VAP data, one would find that the amount
of data is limited to unavailable. The challenge for the Post-Acute area is that it is held to the
same standard as the acute care areas when the patients are actually more chronic.
Project/Project Description: (problem, how was it identified, baseline data, goals-how do you
know if you were successful)
University of Maryland Medical System- Midtown Campus is a teaching community hospital that
has a dichotomous structure. Its structure has the ability to serve not only acute inpatients but patients
that have Post-Acute Specialty needs. National efforts to reduce VAPs have primarily been focused
around the ICU rather than Post-Acute. Post-Acute care refers to a range of medical care services that
support the individual’s continued recovery from illness or management of a chronic illness or
disability. The PASP Unit is an acute care rehabilitation facility for chronic wound-care patients. We
provide a variety of patient care including a chronic vent weaning program, hemodialysis, wound
care (i.e. post-op fistulas, stage IV, etc.), nutritional support, respiratory support, pain management,
IV antibiotic therapy, or post-surgical care. Physical therapy, occupational therapy, and speech
therapy work with our interdisciplinary team to offer
therapy to any patients who may require the service. Each patient’s care is tailored to their
individualized need as determined by the interdisciplinary team of physicians, nurses, respiratory
therapists, physical and occupational therapists, wound care team, social workers and
pharmacists during our weekly care plan meetings.
PASP had 18 VAPs in 2014 and were up to 8 by April of 2015. February 2015 saw a VAP rate of
8.5/1000 device days. A drill-down on PASP VAP data revealed an increase in device days as
compared to Acute care (See Figure 1). Our team’s goal was to improve the monthly VAP rate to
no more than 2.2/1000 device days by using education, communication, and a strong
collaborative interdisciplinary team based model.
Furthermore, we hypothesized that a reduction in VAPs would coincide with increased patient
and family engagement, patient safety and care, resulting in fewer discharges to acute inpatient
units.
Process:
First, PASP leadership was reviewing a new patient centered care/interdisciplinary team model
with leadership. The patient centered/interdisciplinary team model proposal required additional
resources inclusive, but not limited to staff, education and renovations. Secondly, the department
of Quality and Infection Prevention initiated a root cause analysis with key stakeholders to
determine the root cause and contributing factors that were leading to ventilator associated
pneumonias. The team included: organizational leadership, respiratory therapy, PASP nurse
manager and staff, nurse manager and staff representation from ICU, central sterile processing,
as well as education liaisons. Additional people were included on an as needed basis to
comprehensively explore all facets of VAPs.
The PASP’s average length of stay hovers around 60 days which has the potential to increase the
patient’s susceptibility to infection. The PASP demographic consists of patients that have
multiple co-morbidities and range in age from 24 to 82. Our fishbone diagram and Pareto chart
revealed there were 4 major areas of focus that would assist with our reduction of VAP initiative:
collaboration of care, workflow process, bundle compliance and education.
Solution: (What solution was developed? How was it implemented?)
Fig. 1
Days
5 600
4 500
eDevic
300
PASP Number of VAPs
Total Number of
3 400
of
200
2 Rest of House Number of VAPs
Total Number
1
100
PASP Number of Device Days
0 0
Fig. 2
9
8
7
6
5
4
RateofVAPs/1000
3
2
1
0
Month
Innovative attributes
University of Maryland Medical System- Midtown Campus’s PASP unit has the privilege to care for
patients that have an unusually high acuity. PASP is a chronic hospital within an acute hospital. We
maintain our core values that remind us that our hands can either help to heal or hurt.
Our data shows that although our patient population presents with challenges, our compassion and
vigor propels us to seek better ways to increase safety and provide the best care possible for our
patients. This initiative was successful because it involved a holistic approach that included the hands
of our executive leadership, management, clinical and ancillary staff as well as our patients. Although
we are in the initial stages of implementation with our patient centered care model, we recognize that
the unique attributes of this model along with using employee engagement, restructuring of the unit
for better workflow allows for consistent communication and timely
feedback. Fostering and building relationships internally and externally, support from leadership,
continuous monitoring and sharing our success lends itself to continued success.