Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
KLEINROCK
Contributions by:
L. Edward O’Hara, Jr., CFP, EA
Capital Asset Management Services
12510 Prosperity Drive, Suite 150
Silver Spring, MD 20904-1663
(301) 680-0840
ISBN 1-933221-05-4
Kleinrock Publishing
11300 Rockville Pike
Suite 1100
Rockville MD 20852
1-800-678-2315
www.kleinrock.com
Contents Search Print
Contents
Introduction ........................................................................................................................1
Mixing and Matching the Education Tax Incentives........................................................1
About This Handbook ......................................................................................................2
ii
iii
Financial Aid.....................................................................................................................99
Financial Need ...............................................................................................................99
Cost of Attendance .....................................................................................................99
Expected Family Contribution .................................................................................101
Effect of Education Tax Incentives on EFC .............................................................105
Types of Federal Financial Aid ....................................................................................106
Pell Grants ................................................................................................................106
Supplemental Educational Opportunity Grants (SEOGs) .......................................107
Work-Study Programs ..............................................................................................107
Perkins Loans ...........................................................................................................107
Stafford Loans ..........................................................................................................107
Parent Loans for Undergraduate Students (PLUS Loans) .......................................109
Leveraging Education Assistance Partnership (LEAP) Programs ...........................109
Robert C. Byrd Honors Scholarship Program .........................................................110
iv
Introduction
For the 2003-2004 academic year, the average annual cost of tuition, fees, room, and board for
an undergraduate student at a four-year public college or university was $10,636. At a private
four-year college or university, the average annual cost was $26,854.1 At an increase of 8.6
percent for public schools and 5.7 percent for private schools over the year before, the cost of a
college education once again has risen at an annual rate far exceeding the rate of inflation. Since
higher education costs are expected to continue rising at a rapid rate, the total cost for obtaining
an undergraduate degree for a child born in 2003 will easily exceed $100,000 when incidental
costs such as books, supplies, transportation costs, and personal expenses are included. To ease
the financial burden on taxpayers who are trying to put their children through college or further
their own education, the Internal Revenue Code (Code) offers a diverse mix of tax incentives
designed to help taxpayers save for and pay educational expenses.
The education tax incentives provide savings from the time a child is born until well after he com-
pletes his education and come in the form of deductions, credits, and exclusions. For instance,
parents and grandparents (and others) can begin saving for a child’s education immediately after
birth using either a 529-plan account or a Coverdell education savings account (Coverdell ESA).
Earnings in both these accounts grow tax free, and distributions from the accounts are excluded
from income to the extent they are used to pay for certain education expenses. When the child
enters college, whoever is paying the tuition bills may be able to claim the Hope credit, lifetime
learning credit, or deduction for higher education expenses (a.k.a. the tuition deduction). A busi-
ness deduction is also available if the grown child furthers his education to maintain or improve
work skills, meet certain requirements of his employer, or retain his salary or job status. Certain
exclusions are also available for income used to pay for the child’s education expenses, such as
the exclusions for interest income from U.S. Savings Bonds, scholarship and fellowship grants,
payments under a school’s qualified tuition reduction program, and benefits provided under an
employer’s qualified education assistance program. Finally, a deduction is provided for interest
payments on loans taken out to pay for the child’s higher education costs. Since this deduction
is available for as long as loan interest payments are being made, it can be taken years after the
child graduates.
1
College Board (Oct. 2003).
Contents Search Print
are further reduced by the amount of any tax-exempt scholarship, veterans’ or military personnel
education assistance, or other payments for the student’s education that are excluded from gross
income (e.g., employer-provided assistance).
The Hope credit, lifetime learning credit, student loan interest deduction, tuition deduction, sav-
ings bond interest exclusion, and business deduction for educational expenses are also reduced
by the amount of any tax-exempt scholarship, veteran/military assistance, and other excluded
payment. In addition, neither credit can be used if a tuition deduction or business deduction
for education expenses is claimed (and the tuition deduction cannot be used if either credit is
claimed).
In addition to the reductions stated above, the student loan interest deduction and the tuition
deduction are decreased by the amount of any excluded Coverdell ESA or 529 plan distribution,
U.S. Savings bond interest, or education assistance program payment. The business deduction
for educational expenses is also reduced by exclusions for U.S. Savings bond interest and educa-
tion assistance program payment, while the savings bond interest exclusion is cut back for the
amount of educational expenses taken into account in claiming one of the education tax credits
or excluding distributions from a Coverdell ESA or 529 plan.
Quick Answers
Who can make contributions to a 529 plan or Coverdell ESA––
Any “person” can contribute to a 529 plan or Coverdell ESA. This includes individuals, corpo-
rations, companies, partnerships, associations, trusts, and estates. However, the $2,000 per year
contribution limit for Coverdell ESAs is phased out for individuals with modified AGI between
$95,000 and $110,000 (between $190,000 and $220,000 for joint filers). The phase-out rules do
not apply, however, to corporations and other entities. There are no annual contribution limits
for 529 plans.
Are parents penalized if they make contributions to a Coverdell ESA and a 529 plan on
behalf of the same child in the same year?
No, contributions may be made to both a Coverdell account and a Section 529 plan in one year
on behalf of the same beneficiary. In addition, tax-free distributions from both a Coverdell ESA
and a 529 plan can be taken in the same year. However, if the total distributions exceed the
beneficiary’s qualified higher education costs for the year (after reduction by amounts used in
claiming the Hope or lifetime learning credit), the beneficiary must reasonably allocate the ex-
penses between the distributions to determine the amount includible in income.
Can a tax credit be claimed for the costs of a single college course?
Yes. The lifetime learning credit is available for qualified expenses relating to any course at an
eligible educational institution if it is taken to acquire or improve the student’s job skills (i.e.,
students in school solely for personal, non-business purposes cannot claim the credit). Unlike
the Hope scholarship credit, which is only available if the student is enrolled at an eligible edu-
cational institution on at least a half-time basis, a student may take just one course and claim the
lifetime learning credit.
How much in employer-provided educational assistance can be excluded from an employ-
ee’s gross income?
An employee can exclude up to $5,250 for amounts paid or expenses incurred by her employer
for assistance furnished under a qualified educational assistance program. In addition, tuition
reductions offered by schools to teachers and staff are excluded from gross income if provided
under a qualified tuition reduction program. Finally, although generally taxable, scholarships
awarded under employer-related programs can be excluded from the recipient’s gross income
under certain conditions.
How many states offer state income tax deductions for contributions to their own
529 plans?
Twenty-four states offer deductions (as of September 30, 2004). They are: Colorado, Georgia,
Idaho, Illinois, Iowa, Kansas, Louisiana, Maryland, Michigan, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana,
Nebraska, New Mexico, New York, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Rhode Island, South Carolina,
Utah, Virginia, West Virginia, and Wisconsin.
Contents Search Print
Is it true that the deduction for qualified higher education expenses (the “tuition deduc-
tion”) expires soon?
Yes. Unless extended by Congress, the tuition deduction is only available for payments made
from 2002 to the end of 2005.
Is a student’s ability to obtain federal financial aid affected by use of the education tax
incentives?
It can be. Most federal financial aid is awarded on the basis of financial need, which is equal to
the difference between the student’s “cost of attendance” (COA) at a particular college or uni-
versity and her “expected family contribution” (EFC). A dependent student’s EFC is equal to
the sum of her parents’ contribution (based on income and assets), her own contribution from
income, and her own contribution from assets. Since the four main components of the EFC
formula (parents’ income, parents’ assets, student’s income, and student’s assets) are weighted
differently, education tax incentives can affect a student’s eligibility for financial aid to the extent
that they increase or decrease the income or assets of the parents or the student. For example,
Coverdell ESAs are treated as an asset of the student – even if the account is opened and funded
by the parents. Therefore, 35 percent of the account balance is counted toward the student’s EFC.
If the account were considered an asset of the parents, no more than 5.64 percent of the account
balance would be counted toward the student’s EFC (the lower the EFC, the greater the chance
of receiving financial aid).
Can I claim a tax credit or deduction for tuition payments to my child’s private high
school?
No, but you can use funds from a Coverdell ESA to pay for certain elementary and secondary
education expenses (including private or religious schools). Expenses that can be paid for with
tax-free distributions from a Coverdell ESA include tuition, fees, academic tutoring, books,
supplies, special need services, and other equipment necessary for the enrollment or attendance
at the school. Coverdell ESA distributions can also be used to purchase computers and internet
access for an elementary, middle, or high school age child. No other education tax incentive may
be used to save for or pay elementary or secondary school costs.
Can unused Hope or lifetime learning credits be carried forward to subsequent years?
No carryforward of unused education tax credits or excess qualified education expenses is per-
mitted.
Contents Search Print
1
Coverdell ESAs were originally called education individual retirement accounts (education IRAs).
2
Code Section 530(d)(2).
3
Code Section 530(d)(1).
4
Code Section 530(a). See Kleinrock’s Analysis and Explanation, Ch. 477, for a discussion of the unrelated
business income tax.
5
Code Section 530(f)
6
Code Section 530(c)(1).
7
Code Section 530(b)(1).
8
Code Section 530(b)(1).
Contents Search Print
9
Congress intends that IRS regulations will define a special needs beneficiary to include an individual who, be-
cause of a physical, mental, or emotional condition (including a learning disability) requires additional time to
complete his education. H. Conf. Rep. 107-84, 107th Cong., 1st Sess. 152 (2001).
10
A custodial account (such as a bank account established for a child) may qualify even though not a trust as long
as it meets the other requirements. Code Section 530(g).
11
Code Section 530(h).
12
Notice 2004-10, 2004-6 I.R.B. 433.
Contents Search Print
COMPLIANCE TIP: To allow additional time for trustees and custodians to imple-
ment recordkeeping procedures to enable them to report basis and earnings information,
the IRS has made modifications to the reporting requirements to remain in effect until
further guidance is issued.13 If a trustee or custodian is unable to calculate the earnings
and basis portions of a distribution from a Coverdell ESA, the reporting requirements
nevertheless will be satisfied if the Form 1099-Q includes:
(1) Gross distributions, including the amount of any excess contributions and earnings
thereon distributed to a participant during the calendar year, in Box 1;
(2) All other required information except for earnings and basis information in Boxes 2
and 3, which should be left blank unless the gross distribution includes a distribution
of earnings on excess contributions;
(3) The amount of any earnings on excess contributions in Box 2, computed using the
method for calculating the net income attributable to IRA contributions that are
distributed as a returned contribution under Notice 2000-39, 2000-2 C.B. 132, and
Regulation Section 1.408-11;
(4) If earnings on excess contributions are reported in Box 2, an indication in the empty
box below Boxes 5 and 6 that the amount in Box 2 includes earnings on excess con-
tributions;
(5) The fair market value of the Coverdell ESA as of the end of the calendar year, in the
empty box below Boxes 5 and 6; and
(6) A cross reference in the empty box below Boxes 5 and 6 to Publication 970, Tax Ben-
efits for Education, as provided in the instructions to Form 1099-Q, so that recipients
will know how to calculate the earnings portion of the gross distribution.
If the trustee or custodian does not have records indicating whether a gross distribution from
a Coverdell ESA was a trustee-to-trustee transfer, the trustee or custodian may leave Box 4 of
Form 1099-Q blank.
13
Notice 2003-53, 2003-2 C.B. 362.
Contents Search Print
However, allowing Coverdell ESA distributions to be used for elementary and secondary school
expenses enables taxpayers to obtain several years of tax-free income on investments and then
deplete the account by paying elementary and secondary educational expenses before the child
applies for college financial aid.
Contributions
A person may contribute up to $2,000 to Coverdell ESAs on behalf of each beneficiary in any
taxable year.14 Generally, contributions are taken into account for the year in which they are
made. Contributions made by individuals are deemed to have been made on the last day of the
preceding year if the contribution is made on account of that preceding year and is made by the
due date of the individual’s return for that preceding year (not including extensions). Thus, cal-
endar-year individual taxpayers (but not corporations or other entities) can make contributions
for a year as late as April 15 of the following year.15
PRACTICE TIP: Since individual taxpayers are allowed to make contributions for a
year as late as April 15 of the following year, tax practitioners can advise their clients
on whether to contribute to a Coverdell ESA in conjunction with the preparation of their
returns.
Contributions to the account are treated as completed gifts to the beneficiary for purposes of the
estate and gift tax. Consequently, a gift tax is not due on the contribution unless the contributor’s
aggregate gifts to the beneficiary exceed the gift tax exclusion in a given year. Further, to the
extent the contribution may exceed the exclusion, it may be taken into account ratably over the
subsequent five-year period.16
14
Code Section 530(b)(1)(A)(iii).
15
Code Section 530(b)(5).
16
Code Section 530(d)(3).
17
Code Section 530(c).
Contents Search Print
Generally, the amount that can be contributed is reduced for individuals with modified AGI
over $95,000, and contributions are completely prohibited for individuals with modified AGI of
$110,000 or higher (in the case of a joint return, the corresponding dollar amounts are $190,000
and $220,000).18 Individuals whose modified AGI is between the two phase-out levels must fig-
ure their contribution limit by multiplying the $2,000 limit by a fraction, and then subtracting the
result from the applicable limit. The fraction’s numerator is the amount by which the individual’s
modified AGI exceeds the lower phase-out level, and the denominator is the amount by which
the upper phase-out level exceeds the lower phase-out level.
EXAMPLE: John, a calendar-year taxpayer, is single and has modified adjusted gross
income of $96,500 for 2004. John can contribute up to $1,800 for 2004 for each of his
designated beneficiaries. John determines this limit by first calculating the appropriate
fraction:
Then John multiplies the $2,000 limit by 1/10, which equals $200. Finally, John sub-
tracts the $200 from the $2,000 limit, which gives him a reduced limit of $1,800.
COMPLIANCE TIP: The Instructions for Form 8606, Nondeductible IRAs and
Coverdell ESAs, contain a worksheet that can be used to compute the amount an indi-
vidual can contribute.
Corporations and other entities, including tax-exempt organizations, are allowed to make con-
tributions to Coverdell ESAs. However, only contributions made by individuals are subject to
reduction based on modified AGI.19
PRACTICE TIP: High-income taxpayers who control corporations or other entities
may want to have these entities make contributions to avoid the modified AGI limita-
tion. However, the tax consequences of doing so are not entirely clear. The corporation
or other entity should be able to deduct the contributions as fringe benefit expenses, to
the extent otherwise allowable. However, the contributions probably would have to be in-
cluded in income either by the individual on whose behalf they are made, or, more likely
if the contributions are made in connection with the provision of services, the employee
or other person who provides the services in connection with which the contribution is
made.
18
Code Section 530(c)(1).
19
Code Section 530(c)(1).
Contents Search Print
✔ PLANNING POINTERS
Since there is no limitation on who can make contributions to a Coverdell ESA on behalf of any
individual, taxpayers who are prevented from making a contribution to a Coverdell ESA for a
child because of the modified AGI limitations can have other individuals make contributions on
behalf of the child or other beneficiaries, and can even make cash gifts to those individuals to
make the contributions possible.
EXAMPLE: George and Suzanne are married taxpayers with two children, Cindy
and Randy. They file a joint return and have modified adjusted gross income equal to
$240,000 in 2004. George and Suzanne cannot make contributions to Coverdell ESAs on
behalf of either child, because their modified adjusted gross income exceeds $220,000.
However, other relatives, such as grandparents, can make contributions for Cindy and
Randy, if their modified adjusted gross income permits. Alternatively, George and Su-
zanne could give Cindy and Randy each $2,000 and have them make the contributions
for themselves.
There is also nothing to prevent a parent from making a gift to her child under the Uniform Gifts
to Minor Act (UGMA) or the Uniform Transfers to Minor Act (UTMA) and, in turn, having the
child contribute the UGMA or UTMA funds to a Coverdell ESA.
Furthermore, since neither the beneficiary’s modified AGI nor the contributor’s modified AGI
when the funds are distributed is relevant, Coverdell ESAs are particularly valuable for couples
who have their children before they reach their peak earning years.
EXAMPLE: Sam and Diane, who are married and have a modified AGI of $100,000,
make $2,000 contributions for each of their two children (one 12 and one 8) in 2004, and
continue doing so for each of the next four years. In 2009, their modified AGI has in-
creased to $250,000, so that they are no longer eligible to make contributions. However,
when they use the distributions in 2009 to pay their older child’s tuition, the tax-favorable
treatment is available, regardless of their modified AGI.
Excess Contributions
If contributions in excess of the permitted amount are made to a Coverdell ESA in any taxable
year, a tax is imposed in the amount of 6 percent of the amount of the excess contribution deter-
mined as of the close of the taxable year.20 The tax must be paid by the holder of the account. The
tax is imposed in each year that the excess contribution remains in the account, not just in the
year that the contribution is made. The amount of excess contributions for any one beneficiary
is the total of the following amounts:
20
Code Section 4973(a).
Contents Search Print
(1) The amount by which the total contributions for the beneficiary for the taxable year
exceeds $2000, or, if less, the amount by which the total contributions for the benefi-
ciary for the taxable year exceeds the sum of the maximum amount each contributor
is allowed to contribute for the year under the modified AGI limit; and
(2) The amount determined to be an excess contribution for the preceding taxable year,
reduced by distributions out of the account and the excess (if any) of the maximum
amount that may be contributed for the taxable year over the amount contributed for
the year.21
PRACTICE TIP: Since excess contributions are defined in terms of aggregate amounts
contributed on behalf of the beneficiary, rather than in terms of amounts contributed by
one individual, a contributor to a Coverdell ESA can inadvertently cause an account to
be subject to the tax on excess contributions by not being aware of other contributions
to the same account. Therefore, anyone wishing to establish a Coverdell ESA for a child
should first check to see if other contributions to Coverdell ESAs on behalf of the child
have been made by other taxpayers.
Since the existence of an excess contribution is determined as of the close of a year, the tax on
excess contributions may be avoided if the excess amount is returned before the close of the
year. In addition, a contribution made during a taxable year will not be counted in determining
whether an excess contribution exists at the close of that taxable year if the contribution is dis-
tributed before June 1 of the following taxable year. However, the distribution must include any
income attributable to the excess contribution, and that income must be included in the income
of the contributor.22
COMPLIANCE TIP: Coverdell ESA beneficiaries should receive Form 5498-ESA,
Coverdell ESA Contribution Information, showing the amount contributed during the
year on their behalf. If the total amount contributed – as shown on all Form 5498-ESAs
received – exceeds $2,000, the excess contributions should be withdrawn before June 1
as described above.
COMPLIANCE TIP: A taxpayer who is subject to the penalty must file Form 5329,
Additional Taxes on Qualified Plans (Including IRAs) and Other Tax-Favored Accounts.
Form 5329 generally is filed with Form 1040. A taxpayer who is not required to file a tax
return must file Form 5329 where and when Form 1040 would be required to be filed.
Finally, rollover contributions do not trigger the excess-contributions tax.23 See Rollover and
Change of Beneficiary, p. 19.
21
Code Section 4973(e)(1).
22
Code Section 4973(e)(2)(A).
23
Code Section 4973(e)(2)(B).
Contents Search Print
Distributions
A distribution is potentially included in the income of the beneficiary only to the extent it ex-
ceeds the contributions to the account.24 Since contributions are not deductible when made, tax
has already been paid on the amount contributed. Therefore, in effect, any tax that must be paid
on a distribution is paid only on the earnings of the account. To achieve this effect, distributions
from a Coverdell ESA are deemed to consist of pro rata shares of contributions and earnings.25
Thus, the portion of a distribution that is treated as paid from contributions is determined by
multiplying the distribution by the ratio that the total amount of contributions bears to the bal-
ance of the account at the time that the distribution is made.26
EXAMPLE 1: Joyce receives a $2,000 distribution from a Coverdell ESA. On the dis-
tribution date, the total account balance is $10,000, consisting of $6,000 in contributions
and $4,000 in earnings. The portion of the $2,000 distribution that is treated as a non-
taxable return of contributions is $1,200 ($2,000 × $6,000 ÷ $10,000). If Joyce’s quali-
fied education expenses are at least $2,000, then the $800 of earnings are also excludable
from income.
Any distribution from a Coverdell ESA is excluded from the income of the designated benefi-
ciary if that person’s qualified education expenses for the year (see Qualified Education Ex-
penses, p. 15) are equal to or more than the aggregate amount of the distributions in that year. If
the distributions exceed the expenses, the amount of the distributions that would otherwise be
included in income is reduced by an amount that bears the same ratio as the qualified education
expenses bear to the aggregate amount of the distributions.27
EXAMPLE 2: Same facts as in Example 1, except that Joyce’s qualified higher educa-
tion expenses are only $1,500. In that case, Joyce may exclude only $600 from income
($800 × 1,500 ÷ $2,000). Joyce must include the remaining $200 in income.
COMPLIANCE TIP: The beneficiary of a Coverdell ESA must file Form 8606, Nonde-
ductible IRAs and Coverdell ESAs, in any year in which he receives a distribution. Form
8606 is filed with Form 1040, 1040A, or 1040NR, or, if the beneficiary is not otherwise
required to file a tax return, it is filed at the same time or place Form 1040, 1040A, or
1040NR would be.
In determining if Coverdell ESA distributions exceed qualified expenses, the amount of quali-
fied expenses is reduced by any amount excluded from the beneficiary’s income as scholarships
or similar payments, as well as by any amount taken into account in determining the amount
of the Hope scholarship credit or lifetime learning credit. See Hope Scholarship and Lifetime
Learning Credits, p. 39. In addition, if the distributions from a Coverdell ESA and a 529 plan
exceed the amount of qualified expenses, the taxpayer must allocate the expenses between the
distributions from the two types of programs. See Qualified Tuition Programs (529 Plans), p. 21.
24
Code Section 530(d)(1).
25
Code Section 72(e)(9).
26
Code Section 72(e)(8)(B).
27
Code Section 530(d)(2)(A), (B).
Contents Search Print
If any qualified higher education expenses are taken into account in determining the amount of
the exclusion for a distribution from a Coverdell ESA, no other deduction, exclusion, or credit
will be allowed with respect to such expenses.28
In addition to the regular tax, a 10 percent additional tax generally applies to a distribution that
is included in income.29 See Additional Tax, p. 18. However, a distribution from a Coverdell
ESA that is includible in gross income solely because the student’s qualified higher education
expenses were reduced by an amount representing expenses used to claim an education credit is
not subject to the additional tax.30
COMPLIANCE TIP: Except with respect to any designated beneficiary with special
needs,31 any balance in the account to the credit of the designated beneficiary on the date
on which the beneficiary attains age 30 must be distributed within 30 days after that date
to the beneficiary or, if the beneficiary dies before attaining age 30, must be distributed
within 30 days after the death of the beneficiary.32 Any change in the beneficiary of a
Coverdell ESA is not treated as a distribution if the new beneficiary is a family member
of the prior beneficiary and, unless a beneficiary with special needs, has not reached the
age of 30.33 Distributions from any Coverdell ESA are reported on Form 1099-Q, Pay-
ments from Qualified Education Programs (Under Sections 529 and 530).
CAUTION: A Coverdell ESA is disqualified if the account owner is engaged in certain
prohibited transactions, generally involving an improper use of the account.34 In that
case, the entire account is treated as distributed on the first day of the taxable year in
which the prohibited transaction takes place. Furthermore, if an account owner uses
a Coverdell ESA as security for a loan, any portion of the account that is assigned or
pledged by the owner (or agreed to be assigned or pledged) is treated as a distribution to
the owner.35
28
Code Section 530(d)(2)(C), (D).
29
Code Section 530(d)(4)(A).
30
Code Section 530(d)(4)(B)(v).
31
According to Congress, a special needs beneficiary is an individual who, because of a physical, mental, or emo-
tional condition (including a learning disability) requires additional time to complete his education. H. Conf. Rep.
107-84, 107th Cong., 1st Sess. 156 (2001).
32
Code Section 530(b)(1)(E).
33
Code Section 530(d)(6).
34
See Code Section 4975 for the transactions triggering disqualification.
35
Code Section 530(e).
36
Code Section 530(b)(1).
37
Code Section 530(b)(2)(A).
Contents Search Print
assistance).45 In addition, if a taxpayer claims a Hope scholarship or lifetime learning credit and
the Coverdell ESA distribution income exclusion, the amount of qualified higher education ex-
penses available to be paid with a distribution from a Coverdell ESA is reduced by the amount
of such expenses that were taken into account in determining the credit allowed to the taxpayer
or any other person.46
EXAMPLE: Mark enrolls as a freshman at State University in 2004 and must pay $3,000
in fees and other qualified expenses. He withdraws $1,000 from a Coverdell ESA (which
has a balance before the withdrawal of $5,000, consisting of $4,500 in contributions and
$500 in earnings), and his parents pay the remaining $2,000. Mark’s parents can use the
$2,000 they pay to claim a $1,500 Hope credit (the credit is equal to 100 percent of the
first $1,000 of tuition and 50 percent of the next $1,000). After subtracting the $2,000
used to determine the Hope credit from the total expenses, $1,000 in expenses remain.
Thus, Mark can exclude the full amount of the $1,000 from income.
Normally, if the total of qualified expenses is less than the amount for which an education credit
is claimed plus the amount withdrawn from the Coverdell ESA, a portion of the income distrib-
uted from the Coverdell ESA is included in income and subject to a 10 percent additional tax.
However, the additional tax does not apply if the distribution is included in income solely be-
cause the student’s qualified higher education expenses were reduced by an amount representing
expenses used to claim an education credit.47
EXAMPLE: Adam enrolls as a freshman at State University in 2004 and must pay
$2,500 in fees and other qualified expenses. His parents pay $2,000 and Adam withdraws
$1,000 from a Coverdell ESA (which has a balance before the withdrawal of $5,000,
consisting of $4,500 in contributions and $500 in earnings). Adam’s parents can claim
the full $1,500 Hope credit. However, after subtracting the $2,000 used to determine
the Hope credit from the total expenses, only $500 in expenses remains. Since Adam
withdrew more than this amount from his account, the excess is not considered to have
been withdrawn to pay qualified expenses, and the income portion (equal to 1/10, or
$500/$5,000) of the excess $500 is included in income, resulting in a taxable amount of
$50. However, the additional 10 percent penalty tax does not apply.
PRACTICE TIP: By electing not to claim a Hope or lifetime learning credit,48 the
taxpayer can avoid the potential tax attributable to the qualifying expenses being ab-
sorbed by the credits. However, since the qualifying expenses for the Hope scholarship
and lifetime learning credits are not identical to the qualifying expenses for Coverdell
ESAs, distributions from a Coverdell ESA might not be adversely affected by claiming
the credits.
45
Code Section 530(d)(2)(C)(i)(I).
46
Code Section 530(d)(2)(C)(i)(II).
47
Code Section 530(d)(4)(B)(v).
48
See Code Section 25A(e).
Contents Search Print
✔ PLANNING POINTERS
Some taxpayers might not want to set up Coverdell ESAs to pay for higher education out of con-
cern that it might reduce their child’s financial aid eligibility. See Financial Aid Considerations,
p. 9. However, parents who are not inclined to use a Coverdell ESA to save for future college
costs should at least contribute sufficient amounts so that accrued tax-free earnings can be used
to make future home computer purchases and to pay for internet access costs. Currently, to
purchase a non-business-related home computer for $1,000, a taxpayer in the 28 percent federal
income tax bracket and 7 percent state income tax bracket must earn $1,539, and pay $539 in
federal and state income tax to have $1,000 available to purchase a computer. Using a Coverdell
ESA to make a similar computer purchase in the future will avoid the $539 federal and state
income tax liability.
49
Code Section 530(b)(4).
50
See Code Section 21. See Kleinrock’s Analysis and Explanation, Ch. 53, for a discussion of the child care
credit.
Contents Search Print
Additional Tax
In addition to the tax on the income, a 10 percent additional tax generally applies to any distribu-
tion from a Coverdell ESA that is included in income (i.e., any distribution in excess of qualified
higher education expenses for the year).51 There are, however, several exceptions to this rule. For
instance, the additional tax will not apply if the distribution is:
(1) To the estate of a beneficiary after the beneficiary’s death;
(2) Attributable to the disability of the beneficiary;
(3) Made on account of a qualified scholarship, educational assistance allowance, or
other education-related payment excluded from income under any law of the United
States as long as the distribution does not exceed the amount of the scholarship, al-
lowance, or payment;
(4) Made on account of the attendance of the designated beneficiary at the United States
Military, Naval, Air Force, Coast Guard, or Merchant Marine Academies, to the ex-
tent that the amount of the distribution does not exceed the costs of advanced educa-
tion attributable to the attendance;
(5) Includible in gross income solely by application of the rule requiring a reduction
of qualified higher education expenses by the amount of such expenses that were
taken into account in determining the Hope scholarship or lifetime learning credit
allowed to the taxpayer or any other person (see Qualified Higher Education Credits,
p. 15).52
In addition, the 10 percent tax will not apply to the distribution of a contribution made during
a tax year if the contribution is returned before the first day of the sixth month of the following
tax year. For example, for calendar-year taxpayers, the 10 percent additional tax will not apply
to a distribution of a contribution made in 2004 if that contribution is withdrawn (with earnings)
by May 31, 2005.53
COMPLIANCE TIP: A taxpayer who is subject to the penalty must file Form 5329,
Additional Taxes on Qualified Plans (Including IRAs) and Other Tax-Favored Accounts.
Form 5329 generally is filed with Form 1040. However, a taxpayer who is not required
to file a tax return must file Form 5329 where and when Form 1040 would be required
to be filed.
51
Code Section 530(d)(4)(A).
52
Code Section 530(d)(4)(B).
53
Code Section 530(d)(4)(C).
54
Code Section 530(d)(5).
Contents Search Print
55
Code Section 530(d)(6).
56
Code Section 530(b)(1); H. Conf. Rep. 107-84, 107th Cong., 1st Sess. 156 (2001).
57
Code Sections 529(e)(2); 530(d)(5), (6).
58
Code Section 530(d)(7).
Contents Search Print
1
Before 2002, 529 plans were formally known as “qualified state tuition programs.”
2
Private colleges and universities, as well as public educational institutions, can establish certain 529 plans. H. Rep.
107-84, 107th Cong. 1st Sess. (2001).
3
Code Section 529(b)(1).
4
Code Section 529(c)(1), (3).
5
Prop. Reg. Section 1.529-1(c); Code Section 7701(a)(1).
Contents Search Print
CAUTION: A number of states, including Colorado, Kentucky, Ohio, Texas, and West
Virginia, have suspended enrollment in their prepaid tuition programs because of a com-
bination of rising costs and plummeting investments. In states where programs have
been suspended, individuals with money already invested in prepaid plans are being
allowed to keep the funds in the program or are being offered other investment options.
Individuals contemplating participation in such a program should check with the state
agency involved to explore the continuing viability of the program.
Under a savings plan, which can only be sponsored by a state, the taxpayer still makes contribu-
tions to an account and the contributions are still invested by the plan administrator. However,
there is no guaranty that the amount in the account will meet the student’s actual educational ex-
penses when the student attends college. Instead, the taxpayer relies on the success of the invest-
ments (which could either exceed or fall below the rate of increase in educational expenses) to
grow the account. See Determining Appropriate Contribution Amounts for 529-Plan Accounts,
p. 111.
PRACTICE TIP: Most state-sponsored 529 plans allow contributions from existing
Uniform Gifts to Minor Act (UGMA)/Uniform Transfers to Minor Act (UTMA) ac-
counts. However, special restrictions often accompany 529 plan accounts funded with
UGMA/UTMA assets. For example, rollovers to another beneficiary may be prohibited
and the minor/beneficiary usually becomes the account holder when she turns 18. Fur-
thermore, because contributions to a 529 plan must be made in cash (see Cash Contri-
butions, p. 31),6 investments in UGMA/UTMA accounts must be liquidated, which is
generally a taxable transaction, in order to invest the proceeds in a 529 plan account.
If a student is using a 529 plan to pay for educational expenses, the student or the student’s par-
ents may also claim a Hope credit or a lifetime learning credit for qualified expenses covered by
the 529 plan if the other eligibility requirements for the credits are met (but only to the extent
the 529 plan distribution is used for different educational expenses).7 See Planning Pointers, p.
26. In addition, contributions can be made to both 529 plans and Coverdell ESAs for a single
beneficiary in the same year. Distributions from a Coverdell ESA can also be used to make con-
tributions to a 529 plan (although the basis in the contract establishing the 529 plan account is
not increased for any portion of a contribution that is made with a non-taxable distribution from
a Coverdell ESA).8
6
Code Section 529(b)(2).
7
Code Section 529(c)(3)(B)(v); Notice 97-60, 1997-2 C.B. 310.
8
Code Section 530(b)(2)(B).
Contents Search Print
student’s financial need. See Financial Aid, p. 99, for a general discussion of the federal financial
aid system.
If a student’s parent is the owner of a 529 savings plan account, it is assessed at the parent’s as-
set rate (maximum rate of 5.64%). However, if the student is the owner of the account, it is as-
sessed at the student’s asset rate (35%). If a savings plan account is owned by anyone else (e.g.,
a grandparent), the account assets will not increase the EFC, since it is not included in either the
parent’s or the student’s asset base.
CAUTION: If a savings plan is funded with assets owned or deemed to be owned by
the student, such as assets held in a UGMA/UTMA account, the plan is treated as the
student’s asset and assessed at the 35 percent rate.
No taxable income is generated when the funds from a 529 savings plan are withdrawn. How-
ever, to the extent they consist of plan earnings, distributions from a savings plan are chargeable
to the student’s income for purposes of determining EFC (assessed at a 50 percent rate). This
reduces the student’s ability to receive financial aid in later years.
Prepaid tuition plans are not treated as an asset of either the parent or the student in calculating
EFC. However, colleges often include it as an asset in computing the student’s financial need. In
any event, tuition credits generated by the account reduce the student’s cost of attendance and,
therefore, any financial aid on a dollar-for-dollar basis.
Designated Beneficiaries
Contributions to a 529 plan must be made on behalf of a designated beneficiary. The beneficiary
must be designated at the commencement of participation in the program, although there may
be a change in beneficiaries. See Income Tax Treatment of Distributions and Rollovers, p. 23,
for a discussion of tax-free beneficiary changes. If a state or local government or a tax-exempt
organization purchases an interest in a 529 plan as part of a scholarship program it operates, the
individual receiving the scholarship is the designated beneficiary.9
OBSERVATION: There are no restrictions on who qualifies as the designated benefi-
ciary. The beneficiary does not have to be a dependent or even a relative of the account
owner. Even the account owner can be the beneficiary.
9
Code Section 529(e)(1).
10
Code Section 529(e)(3)(A)(i).
Contents Search Print
11
Code Section 529(e)(5); Notice 97-60, 1997-2 C.B. 310.
12
Code Section 529(e)(3)(A)(ii).
13
H. Conf. Rep. 107-84, 107th Cong., 1st Sess. 156 (2001).
14
Code Section 529(e)(3)(B)(i).
15
Costs of attendance is defined in 20 U.S.C. 108711, as in effect on June 7, 2001.
16
Code Section 529(e)(3)(B)(ii).
Contents Search Print
(e.g., employer-provided educational assistance) are also required.17 Furthermore, tax-free dis-
tributions from both a Coverdell ESA and a 529 plan can be taken in the same year. However,
if the total distributions exceed the beneficiary’s qualified higher education expenses for the
year (after reduction by amounts used in claiming the Hope credit or lifetime learning credit),
the beneficiary is required to allocate the expenses between the distributions to determine the
amount includible in income (as explained on p. 26).18
17
Code Section 529(c)(3)(B)(v).
18
Code Section 529(c)(3)(B)(vi).
19
Code Section 529(c)(3)(B).
20
Code Section 529(c)(3)(B)(iii).
21
Code Section 529(c)(3)(B)(v).
22
Code Section 529(c)(3)(B)(ii).
Contents Search Print
30
Code Section 529(e)(2).
31
Code Section 529(c)(3)(C).
32
Code Section 529(c)(5)(B).
33
Notice 2001-81, 2001-2 C.B. 617.
34
Code Section 529(c)(3)(C).
Contents Search Print
he opened to a different 529 plan account for the child without telling the child’s parents,
any distribution or rollover from the account opened by the parents within the 12-month
period will be subject to taxation.
✔ PLANNING POINTERS
To ensure that a Hope credit or lifetime learning credit is not claimed for any amount paid with
a 529 plan distribution, the amount of qualified expenses taken into account in determining the
tax treatment of a distribution is reduced by any amount of expense that was taken into account
in determining the education credits claimed by the taxpayer or any other person.35
EXAMPLE: Andrew enrolls as a freshman at Northern University in 2004 and pays
$3,000 in fees and other qualified expenses. He withdraws $1,000 from a 529 plan ac-
count and his parents pay the remaining $2,000. Andrew’s parents can use the $2,000
they pay to claim a $1,500 Hope credit (the credit is equal to 100 percent of the first
$1,000 of tuition and 50 percent of the next $1,000). After subtracting the $2,000 used
to determine the Hope credit from the total expenses, $1,000 in expenses remain. Thus,
Andrew can exclude the full amount of the $1,000 distribution from income.
If a portion of the 529-plan distribution is not used to pay qualified higher education expenses,
and part of the distribution is therefore taxable, the tax can be avoided in some instances by
electing not to claim the Hope credit or lifetime learning credit.36
EXAMPLE: Nicholas enrolls as a freshman at Southern University in 2004 and pays
$2,500 in fees and other qualified expenses. His parents pay $2,000 of these costs. Nich-
olas withdraws $1,000 from a 529 plan account, but uses only $500 of that amount for to
pay for qualified higher education expenses. If Nicholas’ parents use the $2,000 they pay
to claim a Hope credit, only $500 in qualified expenses remains. Thus, since Nicholas
withdrew more than this amount from his account, the excess ($500) is not considered to
have been withdrawn to pay qualified expenses and a portion of the distribution is taxed.
However, if Nicholas’ parents elect not to claim the Hope credit, then the entire $2,500
of education expenses can be used to exclude the 529 plan distribution. In that case, the
entire $1,000 distribution would be excluded since it is less than $2,500.
However, in almost all situations, the full Hope credit or lifetime learning credit should be
claimed, even if it results in a portion of a benefit or distribution from a qualified tuition program
being included in income, since the credit provides a benefit of at least 50 percent of the ex-
penses, while the tax on distributions cannot be more than the top tax rate (35 percent for 2004)
and applies only to the taxable portion of the distribution.
The exclusion from income for distributions from 529 plans is also coordinated with other tax
benefits, as follows:
35
Code Section 529(c)(3)(B)(v); Notice 97-60, 1997-2 C.B. 310.
36
See Code Section 25A(e).
Contents Search Print
(1) The amount of education expenses taken into account in determining the amount that
can be excluded as a 529 plan distribution and as a Coverdell ESA distribution must
be allocated between the distributions to determine the amount includible in income
if the total distributions exceed the beneficiary’s qualified higher education expenses
for the year;37
(2) The amount of education expenses taken into account in determining the amount
that can be excluded is reduced by any amounts paid with tax-free income, such as
qualified scholarships, educational assistance allowances, or other amounts excluded
from income, other than gifts, bequests, and devises;38
(3) The amount of expenses taken into account in determining the amount of interest on
U.S. Savings Bonds that is excluded from income because it is used to pay for higher
education is reduced by any amount taken into account in determining the exclusion
for distributions from 529 plans (see Exclusion for Bond Interest Income, p. 67);39
(4) The amount of expenses considered incurred for higher education for purposes of
determining the amount of a loan for which the student loan interest deduction is
available is reduced by the amount excluded from gross income by reason of these
expenses (see Student Loan Interest Deduction, p. 91);40
(5) The amount of qualified higher education expenses for which the deduction for these
expenses is allowed is reduced by the amount of expenses taken into account in de-
termining the exclusion from income for distributions for a 529 plan (see Deduction
for Qualified Higher Education Expenses, p. 53). However, the amount taken into
account does not include that portion of the distribution that represents a return of
any contributions to the plan.41
EXAMPLE: A taxpayer receives a distribution of $100 from a 529 plan that is used for
tuition. $90 represents contributions to the account, and $10 represents earnings under
the plan. Qualified expenses would be reduced only by that $10. Thus, the taxpayer
would be entitled to claim the deduction with respect to the $90 representing a return of
contributions. In contrast, if the distribution were from a Coverdell ESA, the $90 would
not be eligible for the deduction.
37
Code Section 529(b)(3)(B)(vi).
38
Code Section 529(b)(3)(B)(v). See also Code Section 25A(g)(2).
39
Code Section 135(d)(2)(B).
40
Code Section 221(e)(2)(A).
41
Code Section 222(c)(2)(B).
42
Code Section 529(c)(2)(A)(i).
43
Code Section 2503(b); Rev. Proc. 2003-85, 2003-2 C.B. 1184. See Kleinrock’s Analysis and Explanation, Section
759.5(a), for a detailed review of the annual gift tax exclusion.
Contents Search Print
plan are not eligible for the unlimited exclusion for qualified transfers of amounts paid on behalf
of an individual for educational expenses.44
PRACTICE TIP: Tuition paid directly to an educational institution on behalf of a stu-
dent is exempt from gift tax through the unlimited exclusion for qualified transfers.45 The
exclusion is permitted for tuition expenses of full-time or part-time students, but is not
available for amounts paid for books, supplies, dormitory fees, board, or other similar
expenses that do not constitute direct tuition costs.46
OBSERVATION: The portion of a contribution excludable from the gift tax is also ex-
cludable for purposes of the generation-skipping transfer tax.47
If the amount of contributions exceeds the annual exclusion amount, the donor can elect to take
the aggregate amount into account ratably over a five-year period beginning with the calendar
year of the contributions. The election is available for joint gifts by spouses. The election is
limited to contributions not in excess of five times the annual exclusion amount available in the
calendar year of the contributions (i.e., $55,000 in 2004). Any excess is treated as a taxable gift
in the calendar year of the contribution.48
COMPLIANCE TIP: The election is made by checking the box on line B at the top of
Schedule A of Form 709, Federal Gift Tax Return, for the year of the contribution. In
addition, an election statement must be attached to the Form 709. The statement must
include the total amount contributed per individual beneficiary, the amount for which the
election is being made, and the name of the individual for whom the contribution was
made.49 See Planning and Practice — Sample Election Statement to Treat Contributions
to a 529 Plan as Made Over a Five-Year Period, p. 130.
If the annual exclusion amount is increased to account for inflation after the first year of the five-
year period, the donor can make an additional contribution in any one or more of the remaining
years. The additional contribution cannot exceed the difference between the exclusion amount as
increased and the original exclusion amount for the year or years in which the original contribu-
tion was made.50
EXAMPLE: In 2004, Fred makes a contribution of $75,000 to a 529 plan for the ben-
efit of his son. Fred elects to account for the gift ratably over a five-year period. Fred is
treated as making a taxable gift of $20,000 and an excludable gift of $11,000 in each year
from 2004 through 2008. In 2005, when, hypothetically, the annual exclusion amount is
increased to $12,000, Fred makes an additional contribution for the benefit of his
44
Code Section 529(c)(2)(A)(ii). See Kleinrock’s Analysis and Explanation, Section 759.5(b), for a detailed re-
view of the gift tax exclusion for educational expenses.
45
Code Section 2503(e).
46
Reg. Section 25.2503-6(b)(2). Se e also TAM 199941013, where a grandparent’s payment of $180,000 to a private
school that her grandchildren were attending to cover specified tuition costs qualified for the Code Section 2503(e)
exclusion.
47
Prop. Reg. Section 1.529-5(b)(1).
48
Code Section 529(c)(2)(B); Prop. Reg. Section 1.529-5(b)(2).
49
Prop. Reg. Section 1.529-5(b)(2)(iii).
50
Prop. Reg. Section 1.529-5(b)(2)(iv).
Contents Search Print
grandson in the amount of $5,000. Fred is treated as making an excludable gift of $1,000
and a taxable gift of $4,000 in that year.
There are no gift tax consequences to rollovers and beneficiary changes if the old and new ben-
eficiaries are members of the same generation. However, if the new beneficiary is one generation
lower, the transfer is treated as a taxable gift by the old beneficiary. When the new beneficiary is
two or more generation lower, generation-skipping rules apply.51
EXAMPLE: In 2004, Jim makes a contribution to a 529 plan on behalf of Holly, his
daughter. In 2007, Jim directs that a distribution from the account established for Holly
be made to an account for the benefit of Holly’s son Ed. The rollover distribution is
treated as a taxable gift by Holly to Ed, because Ed is a generation below Holly.
For estate tax purposes, the gross estate of a decedent generally does not include the value of any
interest in a 529 plan attributable to contributions made by the decedent on behalf of any des-
ignated beneficiary. However, if a taxpayer’s contributions exceed the annual exclusion amount
and he elects to take the aggregate amount into account ratably over a five-year period, that por-
tion of the contribution allocable to calendar years beginning after the taxpayer’s death is includ-
ible in his gross estate if he dies before the close of the five-year period. The gross estate of a
designated beneficiary of a 529 plan account includes the value of any interest in the account.52
Additional Tax
An additional 10 percent tax is imposed on the amount of a distribution from a 529 plan that is
includible in gross income. The additional tax is the same tax, computed in the same way, as the
additional tax that applies to such distributions from Coverdell ESAs. Thus, the amount of the
penalty is equal to 10 percent of the amount that is included in income when a taxpayer receives
a payment or a distribution (or is provided a benefit) under a 529 plan. However, the tax does not
apply if the payment or distribution is made to a beneficiary or a beneficiary’s estate on or after
the beneficiary’s death; is attributable to the beneficiary’s being disabled; is made on account of
a scholarship, allowance, or payment received by the account holder to the extent the amount of
the payment or distribution does not exceed the amount of the scholarship, allowance, or pay-
ment; or is made on account of the attendance of the designated beneficiary at the United States
Military, Naval, Air Force, Coast Guard, or Merchant Marine Academies, to the extent that the
amount of the distribution does not exceed the costs of advanced education attributable to the
attendance. It also does not apply if the amount is included in income because the taxpayer elects
to claim a Hope credit or lifetime learning credit instead of the exclusion for distributions from
a 529 plan.53 See Planning Pointers, p. 26.
OBSERVATION: Conforming the 529 plan penalty to the Coverdell ESA provisions
makes it easier for taxpayers to allocate expenses between the various education tax in-
51
Code Section 529(c)(5)(B); Prop. Reg. Section 1.529-5(b)(3).
52
Code Section 529(c)(4); Prop Reg. Section 1.529-5(d).
53
Code Sections 529(c)(6), 530(d)(4).
Contents Search Print
centives. For example, a taxpayer who receives distributions from a Coverdell ESA and
a 529 plan in the same year must allocate qualified expenses to determine the amount
excludable from income. A taxpayer also may need to know the amount excludable from
income due to a distribution from a 529 plan in order to determine the amount of ex-
penses eligible for the tuition deduction (see Deduction for Qualified Higher Education
Expenses, p. 53).
Because the exclusion for earnings does not apply to distributions from 529 plans sponsored by
educational institutions made in any taxable year beginning before January 1, 2004, the addi-
tional tax will not apply to any distribution made in such a year that is includible in gross income
despite being used to pay the designated beneficiary’s qualified higher education expenses.54 For
example, the earnings portion of a distribution from a 529 plan sponsored by an educational
institution that is made in taxable year beginning before January 1, 2004, and that is used for the
designated beneficiary’s qualified higher education expenses will not be subject to the additional
tax, even though the earnings are includible in gross income.
Plan Sponsors
A state (or an agency or instrumentality of a state) or one or more eligible educational institu-
tions can establish and maintain a 529 plan.55 For state-sponsored plans, the state (or its agency
or instrumentality) must be actively involved on an ongoing basis in the administration of the
plan, including supervising all decisions relating to the investment of assets contributed to the
plan.56
OBSERVATION: Factors that are relevant in determining whether a state (or agency
or instrumentality of the state) is actively involved in the administration of a 529 plan
include, but are not limited to, whether it (1) provides services or benefits (such as tax,
student aid, or other financial benefits) to account owners or designated beneficiaries that
are not provided to persons who are not account owners or designated beneficiaries; (2)
establishes detailed operating rules for administering the plan; (3) authorizes its officials
to play a substantial role in the operation of the plan, including selecting, supervising,
monitoring, auditing, and terminating any private contractors that provide services under
the plan; (4) holds the private contractors that provide services under the plan to the same
standards and requirements that apply when private contractors handle funds that belong
to the state or provide services to the state; (5) provides funding for the plan; and (6) acts
as trustee or holds plan assets directly or for the benefit of the account owners or desig-
nated beneficiaries. If the state exercises the same authority over the funds invested in
the plan as it does over the investments in or pool of funds of a state employees’ defined
benefit pension plan, then the state will be considered actively involved on an ongoing
basis in the administration of the plan.
54
Code Section 529(c)(6).
55
Code Section 529(b)(1).
56
Prop. Reg. Section 1.529-2(b)(2)(ii).
Contents Search Print
Eligible educational institutions can only establish prepaid tuition plans.57 An “eligible educa-
tional institution” is any college, university, vocational school, or other post-secondary educa-
tional institution that is described in section 481 of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C.
1088) and, therefore, eligible to participate in the student aid programs administered by the
Department of Education. This definition includes virtually all accredited public, nonprofit, and
proprietary post-secondary institutions (including many foreign institutions).58
The assets of a 529 plan established by one or more educational institutions must be held in a
trust created or organized in the United States for the exclusive benefit of designated beneficia-
ries. The trustee must be a bank or other person who demonstrates that it will administer the trust
in accordance with applicable requirements, and the assets of the trust may not be commingled
with other property except in a common trust fund or common investment fund. In addition,
a plan maintained by an educational institution will not be treated as a 529 plan unless it has
received a ruling or determination from the IRS that the program satisfies applicable require-
ments.59
Cash Contributions
To be treated as a 529 plan, a program must provide that purchases or contributions may only be
made in cash, and not in property.60 Payments by check, money order, credit card, or a similar
method satisfy this requirement.61 Payments made in the form of payroll deductions and auto-
matic deductions from a bank account are considered cash payments.62
OBSERVATION: Because of the cash contributions requirement, investments in
UGMA/UTMA accounts must be liquidated before they can be rolled over into a 529
plan.
Separate Accounting
A 529 plan must provide a separate accounting for each designated beneficiary.63 Separate ac-
counting requires that contributions for the benefit of a designated beneficiary and any earnings
attributable to them must be allocated to the appropriate account.64
In the case of a rollover contribution (such as a transfer from a Coverdell ESA, a transfer of
proceeds from U.S. Savings Bonds, or a transfer from another qualified tuition program), the
recipient plan must determine the basis and earnings part of the amount contributed.65 Final
regulations will clarify that, when accepting a contribution, a 529 plan must ask whether the
contribution is a rollover contribution from a Coverdell ESA, a qualified U.S. Savings Bond,
57
Code Section 529(b)(1)(A)(i).
58
Code Section 529(e)(5); Notice 97-60, 1997-2 C.B. 310.
59
Code Section 529(b)(1) (flush language).
60
Code Section 529(b)(2).
61
Prop. Reg. Section 1.529-2(d).
62
PLR 9825035.
63
Code Section 529(b)(3).
64
Prop. Reg. Section 1.529-2(f).
65
Prop. Reg. Section 1.529-3(a)(2).
Contents Search Print
or another 529 plan. If it is, the recipient plan must determine the earnings portion of the con-
tribution and add that amount to the earnings recorded in the account to which the roll-over
contribution is made. Until the recipient plan receives appropriate documentation showing the
earnings portion of the contribution, it must treat the entire amount of the contribution as earn-
ings.66
COMPLIANCE TIP: Appropriate documentation for purposes of showing the earn-
ings portion of the contribution means: (1) in the case of a rollover contribution from
a Coverdell ESA, an account statement issued by the financial institution that acted as
trustee or custodian of the account that shows basis and earnings in the account, (2) in
the case of a rollover contribution from the redemption of qualified U.S. Savings Bonds,
an account statement or Form 1099-INT, Interest Income, issued by the financial institu-
tion that redeemed the bonds showing interest from the redemption of the bonds; and
(3) in the case of a rollover contribution from another 529 plan, a statement issued by
the distributing plan that shows the earnings portion of the distribution (the statement
must be provided within 30 days after the distribution, or by January 10 of the next year,
whichever is earlier).67
If a 529 plan does not ordinarily provide each account owner an annual account statement show-
ing the total account balance, the investment in the account, earnings, and distributions from
the account, it must give this information to the account owner or designated beneficiary upon
request. In the case of a prepaid tuition plan, the total account balance may be shown as credits
or units of benefits instead of fair market value.68
OBSERVATION: Most state-sponsored plans provide quarterly statements reflecting
the activity in the account, including the current account balance. Access to account
information is often available by telephone or on-line as well.
No Investment Direction
A 529 plan cannot allow any contributor or designated beneficiary to direct the investment of
any contribution to the plan or the investment of any earnings attributable to contributions.69
A plan does not violate this requirement if a contributor is permitted to select among different
and exclusively designed investment strategies at the time the initial contribution establishing
the account is made.70
OBSERVATION: The IRS expects that final regulations, when issued, will provide that
a change in investment strategy will be permitted once per calendar year and upon a
change in the account’s designated beneficiary. The final regulations are also expected
to provide that (1) 529 plan participants must be allowed to select only from among
exclusively designed, broad-based investment strategies, and (2) procedures must be es-
66
Notice 2001-81, 2001-2 C.B. 617.
67
Notice 2001-81, 2001-2 C.B. 617.
68
Prop. Reg. Section 1.529-2(f).
69
Code Section 529(b)(4).
70
Prop. Reg. Section 1.529-2(g).
Contents Search Print
71
See Notice 2001-55, 2001-2 C.B. 299.
72
Code Section 529(b)(5).
73
Prop. Reg. Section 1.529-2(h).
74
Code Section 529(b)(6).
75
PLR 9812037.
76
PLR 200024055
77
PLR 200030030.
78
Prop. Reg. Section 1.529-2(i)(2).
79
PLR 200134032.
Contents Search Print
1
Code Section 25A.
2
Code Section 25A(e).
3
Code Section 26(a). See also Kleinrock’s Analysis and Explanation, Section 52.1, for a discussion of the non-re-
fundable personal tax credits.
4
Code Section 25A(g)(4).
Contents Search Print
PRACTICE TIP: Since the time of payment, not the date an academic semester begins,
determines when a Hope or lifetime learning credit can be claimed, it may be worth
delaying an end-of-the-year tuition payment for an academic semester beginning in the
following year if the later year is the more beneficial year to claim the credit (e.g., if the
credit will be phased out in the earlier year) and the educational institution allows pay-
ment to be deferred.
If the payment is made with the proceeds of a loan, it is creditable in the tax year the loan pro-
ceeds are used to make the payment (rather than in the year the loan is repaid). If the loan pro-
ceeds are disbursed directly to the eligible institution, they are treated as paid when the proceeds
are actually credited to the student’s account. If the taxpayer does not know the date the proceeds
are credited to the student’s account, the tuition is treated as paid on the last date for payment
prescribed by the educational institution.5
COMPLIANCE TIP: No credit is allowed for the qualified expenses of an eligible
student unless the taxpayer includes the name and taxpayer identification number of the
student on his tax return for the taxable year.6
If a taxpayer pays for qualified expenses through a third party installment plan, the time of pay-
ment by the taxpayer depends on the terms of the installment payment agreement. If the third
party installment agent is the agent for the taxpayer, the taxpayer pays the qualified expenses at
the time the third party agent pays the educational institution. If the third party installment agent
is the agent for the educational institution, the taxpayer pays the qualified expenses at the time
the taxpayer pays the third party agent.7
The expenses paid during a taxable year with respect to any student for whom a Hope credit is
claimed may not be taken into account in computing the amount of that credit with respect to any
other student or the lifetime learning credit. Thus, a taxpayer may not claim both a Hope credit
and a lifetime learning credit with respect to the same student in the same taxable year. However,
a taxpayer who claims the Hope credit for the expenses of one eligible student may still claim the
lifetime learning credit for payment of another student’s qualified expenses.8
EXAMPLE: In 2004, Alice pays $2,000 in qualified tuition and related expenses for her
dependent daughter Diane to attend City College during 2004. In that same year, Alice
also pays $500 in qualified tuition to attend a computer course during 2003 to improve
her own job skills. Assuming all other relevant requirements are met, Alice may claim
a Hope credit for the $2,000 of qualified tuition and related expenses attributable to Di-
ane and a lifetime learning credit for the $500 of qualified tuition expenses incurred to
improve her job skills. If, however, she had paid $3,000 for Diane’s tuition, Alice would
not add the $1,000 of excess expenses that she incurred for Diane’s tuition to her $500 of
qualified tuition and related expenses in computing the amount of the lifetime learning
credit.
5
Reg. Section 1.25A-5(e)(3).
6
Code Section 25A(g)(1).
7
Reg. Section 1.25A-5(e)(4).
8
Code Section 25A(c)(2)(A); Reg. Section 1.25A-1(b).3
Contents Search Print
In addition, no credit is permitted for any education expense for which a deduction is allowed
under any other provision of the income tax laws.9 This includes expenses qualifying for the
Code Section 222 deduction for higher education expenses (see Deduction for Qualified Higher
Education Expenses, p. 53) or deductible as ordinary and necessary business expenses (see
Business Deductions for Educational Expenses, p. 59). Thus, taxpayers may have to determine
whether a deduction or an education tax credit provides greater tax benefits.
EXAMPLE: Jim, who expects to be in the 28 percent tax bracket, incurs $3,000 of tu-
ition expenses in 2004 for courses he takes at a local college to acquire new job skills. If
Jim claims the lifetime learning credit he will reduce his 2004 tax liability by $600 (20%
× $3,000). However, if he takes the deduction for qualified higher education expenses,
he will reduce his 2004 tax liability by $840 (28% × $3,000).
On the other hand, a taxpayer may claim a Hope or lifetime learning credit for a tax year and
exclude from gross income amounts distributed from a Coverdell ESA or a 529 plan on behalf
of the same student as long as the distribution is not used for the same educational expenses for
which a credit was claimed.10 See Coverdell Education Savings Accounts, p. 5; Qualified Tuition
Programs (529 Plans), p. 19).
PRACTICE TIP: Taxpayers must be careful to incur sufficient education expense to
both exhaust the available education credits and the entire amount of any withdrawals
from a Coverdell ESA or a 529 plan. If not, a portion of the Coverdell ESA or 529 plan
withdrawal for the year will be treated as taxable income.
✔ PLANNING POINTERS
To maximize the benefits of the education tax incentives with respect to a single student, a
taxpayer should normally claim the Hope credit for the first two years of that student’s higher
education since this credit is only available for the first two years of post-secondary education.
In the following years, the lifetime learning credit should be used. However, if the Hope credit
cannot be fully utilized in the first year of college, use of the lifetime learning credit for that year
may result in an overall tax savings.
EXAMPLE: Carol starts college in September 2004. Her qualified tuition and related
expenses are such that she can only claim a $500 Hope credit for her freshman year.
For each of the next three years, her qualified tuition and related expenses are $2,500. If
Carol claims the Hope credit in 2004 and 2005, and the lifetime learning credit in 2006
and 2007, her credits over the four year period will amount to $3,000 ($500 + $1,500 +
$500 + $500).11 If she claims the lifetime learning credit in 2004 and 2007, and the Hope
credit in 2005 and 2006,12 her overall education credits over the same four year period
will equal $3,600 ($100 + $1,500 + $1,500 + $500).
9
Code Section 25A(g)(5).
10
Code Sections 529(c)(3)(B)(v), 530(d)(2)(C).
11
For purposes of this example, future inflation adjustments to the maximum Hope scholarship credit amount are
disregarded.
12
In the example, Carol can claim the Hope scholarship credit in 2006 because she will not have completed her
second year of college before January 1, 2006. See Reg. Section 1.25A-3(d)(1)(iii).
Contents Search Print
13
Code Section 25A(b)(1).
14
Code Section 25A(h)(1). See Rev. Proc. 2003-85, 2003-2 C.B. 1184.
15
Code Section 25A(b)(2)(A).
16
Code Section 25A(b)(2)(C).
17
Reg. Section 1.25A-3(d)(1)(iii).
18
Code Section 25A(b)(2)(D).
Contents Search Print
An individual must be at least a half-time student (carrying at least half the normal full-time
work load for the course of study the student is pursuing) for at least one academic period of the
year to be an eligible student for purposes of the Hope credit.19
PRACTICE TIP: Part-time students who are not eligible students for purposes of the
Hope credit are eligible students for purposes of the lifetime learning credit.
COMPLIANCE TIP: Educational institutions are required to indicate whether the half-
time student requirement is met on Form 1098-T, Tuition Payments Statement.20
To be an eligible student, the individual must also meet the requirements of Section 484(a)(1)
of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. Section 1091(a)(1)), as in effect on August 5,
1997.21 Among other things, the Higher Education Act requires that a student be enrolled or
accepted for enrollment in a degree, certificate, or other program leading to a recognized educa-
tional credential at an eligible institution of higher learning and not be enrolled in an elementary
or secondary school.
OBSERVATION: Because this provision excludes a student enrolled in a secondary
school from the definition of an eligible student, it appears that the credit is not available
for the expenses of a high school student taking courses at a college or university.22
19
Code Section 25A(b)(2)(B).
20
Reg. Section 1.6050S-1(b)(2).
21
Code Section 25A(b)(3)(A).
22
See Reg. Section 1.25A-3(d)(2), Example 5.
23
Code Section 25A(c)(1).
24
Code Section 25A(c)(1).
Contents Search Print
Expenses paid with respect to a student for whom the Hope credit is claimed are not
eligible for the lifetime learning credit.25
EXAMPLE: In 2004, Arnold paid $6,000 of qualified tuition and related expenses for
his dependent son Bill and $2,000 for his dependent daughter Cindy to attend eligible
educational institutions. Cindy has already completed the first two years of post-sec-
ondary education. Thus, she is ineligible for the Hope credit, but Arnold may claim the
lifetime learning credit for her. Arnold may claim the maximum $1,500 Hope credit with
respect to Bill, but in computing the amount of the lifetime learning credit, he may not
include any of the $6,000 he paid for Bill. Arnold may only include the $2,000 of quali-
fied tuition and related expenses he paid for Cindy.
There is no limit on the number of years the lifetime learning credit may be claimed for an in-
dividual.26 A taxpayer who continues to pay qualified expenses for herself or a dependent may
continue to claim the credit for the relevant amount of the expenses.
The lifetime learning credit is available for qualified expenses relating to any course of instruc-
tion at an eligible educational institution to acquire or improve job skills.27 A student may take
as little as one course, as opposed to the requirement of the Hope credit that an individual be at
least a half-time student.
PRACTICE TIP: The allowance of the credit for courses taken to acquire job skills is
in sharp contrast to the Code Section 162 business expenses deduction, which is allowed
only for educational expenses incurred where required for a current position, not those
incurred to qualify the taxpayer for a new position (see Business Deductions for Educa-
tional Expenses, p. 59). However, when both the deduction and the credit are available,
the taxpayer should consider which is more advantageous. The choice is easy for em-
ployees who do not itemize, since they receive no benefit from the deduction. Similarly,
for those that do not have miscellaneous itemized deductions that exceed 2 percent of
adjusted gross income, the credit also provides the greater benefit.
The lifetime learning credit is not, however, available for all educational expenses. The expenses
still must be incurred in education related to acquiring or improving job skills so that a taxpayer
who is in school only for personal, non-business related purposes cannot claim the credit.
EXAMPLE: Christy, a professional photographer, enrolls in an advanced photography
course at a local community college. Although the course is not part of a degree program,
Christy enrolls in the course to improve her job skills. The course fee paid by Christy is
a qualified tuition and related expense for purposes of the lifetime learning credit.
EXAMPLE: Brad, a doctor, plans to travel abroad on a “photo-safari” for his next vaca-
tion. In preparation for the trip, Brad enrolls in a non-credit photography class at a local
25
Code Section 25A(c)(2)(A).
26
Reg. Section 1.25A-4(b).
27
Code Section 25A(c)(2)(B).
Contents Search Print
community college. Because Brad is not taking the photography course as part of a de-
gree program or to acquire or improve his job skills, amounts paid for the course are not
qualified tuition and related expenses for purposes of the lifetime learning credit.
Phaseouts
The Hope and lifetime learning credits are both phased out ratably for taxpayers with a modi-
fied adjusted gross income (AGI) exceeding $40,000 ($80,000 for a joint return). The credits
are fully phased out for taxpayers with a modified AGI of $50,000 or more ($100,000 for a joint
return).28 These amounts are adjusted for inflation.29 For the 2004 tax year, the beginning phase-
out amount is $42,000 ($85,000 for a joint return), and the credit is fully phased out at $52,000
($105,000 for joint returns).30
Modified AGI is calculated by increasing adjusted gross income by any amount excluded from
gross income under Code Sections 911, 931, or 933 (foreign earned income; income from
sources within Guam, American Samoa, or the Northern Mariana Islands; and income from
sources within Puerto Rico).31
The limitation operates by reducing the credit allowable (but not below zero) by the amount that
bears the same ratio to the credit as the excess (if any) of the taxpayer’s modified AGI for the tax
year over the phase-out amount bears to $10,000 ($20,000 for joint returns).32 Thus, a full credit
is potentially available in 2004 for taxpayers whose modified AGI is $42,000 or less ($85,000 for
joint returns); a partial credit is available for taxpayers whose modified AGI is between $42,000
and $52,000 ($85,000 and $105,000 for joint returns); and no credit may be taken by taxpayers
whose modified AGI is more than $52,000 ($105,000 for joint returns).
EXAMPLE: In 2004, Bob, a single taxpayer, pays the $9,000 tuition for his daughter
Charlotte’s third year of college. Bob is entitled to a dependency deduction with respect
to her. His adjusted gross income is $45,000; he has no exclusions of foreign or posses-
sions income. Under the lifetime learning credit, Bob is entitled to a maximum credit of
$2,000 (20 percent times $10,000).
STEP 1:
Taxpayer’s Limitation
Modified AGI Minus Amount Equals Numerator
$45,000 – $42,000 = 3,000
28
Code Section 25A(d)(2).
29
Code Section 25A(h)(2).
30
Rev. Proc. 2003-85, 2002-3 C.B. 1184.
31
Code Section 25A(d)(3).
32
Code Section 25A(d)(2).
Contents Search Print
STEP 2:
Statutory Applicable
Numerator Divided By Amount Equals Percentage
3,000 ÷ $10,000 = 30%
STEP 3:
Maximum
Applicable Available Credit
Percentage Times Credit Equals Limitation
30% × $2,000 = $600
STEP 4:
Maximum Credit
Available Credit Amount
Credit Minus Limitation Equals Available
$2,000 – $600 = $1,400
Thus, in this example, Bob’s maximum available tentative credit is $1,400. It is tenta-
tive only in the sense that he could be denied the credit this year if the sum of his other
credits plus this credit exceeded the tax liability on his return. There are no carryover
provisions.
Qualified Expenses
The Hope and lifetime learning credits may be claimed only for qualified tuition and related ex-
penses (“qualified expenses”). Qualified expenses consist of tuition and fees required for the en-
rollment or attendance of the taxpayer, the taxpayer’s spouse, or any dependent of the taxpayer,
at an eligible educational institution for courses of instruction at the institution.33 A taxpayer
cannot claim a credit for paying the tuition and expenses of persons other than the taxpayer,
the taxpayer’s spouse, or a dependent of the taxpayer, even if those expenses would otherwise
qualify for the credits.
The test for determining whether any fee is a qualified expense (including fees for books, sup-
plies, and equipment used in a course of study) is whether the fee must be paid to the eligible
educational institution as a condition of the student’s enrollment or attendance at the institu-
tion.34 Thus, even if a course requires the use of supplies or equipment (e.g., a computer), its cost
33
Code Section 25A(f)(1)(A).
34
Reg. Section 1.25A-2(d)(2).
Contents Search Print
is not a qualified expense unless it is required as a condition of the student’s enrollment, not just
a condition of participation in the class.
EXAMPLE: State University offers a degree program in dentistry. In addition to tuition,
all students enrolled in the program are required to pay a fee to State University for the
rental of dental equipment. Because the equipment rental fee must be paid to State Uni-
versity for enrollment and attendance, the tuition and the equipment rental fee are quali-
fied tuition and related expenses.
EXAMPLE: All students who attend City College are required to pay a separate student
activity fee in addition to their tuition. The student activity fee is used solely to fund
on-campus organizations and activities run by students, such as the student newspaper
and the student government (no portion of the fee covers personal expenses). Although
labeled as a student activity fee, the fee is required for enrollment or attendance at City
College. Therefore, the fee is a qualified tuition and related expense.
Qualified expenses do not include student activity fees, athletic fees, insurance expenses, medi-
cal expenses, or other expenses unrelated to an individual’s academic course of instruction such
as room and board, transportation, or personal, living, or family expenses, even if such fees are
required as a condition of enrollment. Student health fees are regarded as medical expenses and
therefore are not qualified expenses.35 In addition, qualified expenses do not include expenses
with respect to any course or education involving sports, games, or hobbies, unless such course
or other education is part of the individual’s degree program.36
If a student is required to pay a comprehensive fee or a bundled fee to an eligible educational
institution that includes charges for tuition, fees, and personal expenses, the portion of the com-
prehensive or bundled fee that is allocable to personal expenses is not a qualified tuition and
related expense. An allocation between the qualified and non-qualified portion must be made by
the educational institution using a reasonable method.37
EXAMPLE: Eastern College requires all students to live on campus. It charges a single
comprehensive fee to cover tuition, required fees not allocable to personal expenses, and
room and board. Based on Eastern College’s reasonable allocation, 60 percent of the
comprehensive fee is allocable to tuition and other required fees not allocable to personal
expenses, and the remaining 40 percent of the comprehensive fee is allocable to charges
for room and board. Therefore, only 60 percent of Eastern College’s comprehensive fee
is a qualified tuition and related expense.
The amount of qualified expenses is reduced by any tax-free educational assistance received,
including any tax-free scholarship, certain veterans’ or member of the armed forces’ educa-
tional assistance under Title 38 of the U.S. Code, or any other payment (except a gift, bequest,
35
Reg. Section 1.25A-2(d)(3).
36
Code Section 25A(f)(1)(B), (C).
37
Reg. Section 1.25A-2(d)(4).
Contents Search Print
devise, or inheritance) excludable from gross income and used for educational expenses (e.g.,
employer-provided educational assistance).38
A scholarship is treated as allocated to qualified expenses and thus as a qualified scholarship that
reduces qualified expenses, unless the student includes the scholarship in income or the terms of
the scholarship require that it be applied to non-qualified expenses.39
EXAMPLE: City College charges Cindy $3,000 for tuition and $5,000 for room and
board. City College awards a $2,000 scholarship to Cindy and applies it against her
$8,000 total bill. The terms of the scholarship permit it to be used to pay any of a stu-
dent’s costs of attendance at City College, including tuition, room, and board. Cindy
pays the $6,000 balance of her bill from City College with a combination of savings and
amounts she earns from a summer job. City College does not require Cindy to pay any
additional fees beyond the $3,000 in tuition in order to enroll in classes. Cindy does not
report any portion of the scholarship as income on her tax return because it is excludable
as a qualified scholarship (see Scholarships and Fellowships, p. 79, for a discussion of
excludable scholarships). However, it is allocable first to Cindy’s qualified tuition and
related expenses. For purposes of calculating the education credit, Cindy is treated as
having paid only $1,000 ($3,000 tuition – $2,000 scholarship) in qualified tuition and
related expenses to City College.
Any reduction in tuition provided by an eligible educational institution to its employees or
spouses or dependents of employees does not reduce qualified expenses and may be included
in determining the amount of an allowable credit only if the amount of the tuition reduction is
included in the employee’s gross income.40
The amount of qualified expenses is also reduced by any refund of previously paid qualified
expenses by the educational institution.41 Any refund of loan proceeds used to pay qualified ex-
penses back to the lender on behalf of the borrower is treated as a refund of qualified expenses.42
Qualified expenses are not reduced, however, to the extent that they are not refunded if the stu-
dent withdraws.
COMPLIANCE TIP: If the refund or tax-free assistance is received in the same year
in which the expenses are paid or in the following year before the taxpayer files his tax
return for that year, the taxpayer reduces the amount of qualified expenses by the as-
sistance or refund and computes the credit using the reduced amount.43 If the refund or
tax-free assistance is received in a later year, the rules on recapture apply.44 See Credit
Recapture, p. 50.
EXAMPLE: In January 2004, Andrew, a full-time freshman at State University, pays
$2,000 for qualified tuition and related expenses for a 16-hour work load for the 2004
Spring semester. Prior to beginning classes, Andrew withdraws from six course hours.
38
Code Section 25A(g)(2).
39
Reg. Section 1.25A-5(c).
40
Reg. Section 1.25A-5(b)(2).
41
Reg. Section 1.25A-5(f)(1).
42
Reg. Section 1.25A-5(f)(4).
43
Reg. Section 1.25A-5(f)(2).
44
Reg. Section 1.25A-5(f)(3).
Contents Search Print
On February 15, 2004, Andrew receives an $800 refund from State University. In Sep-
tember 2004, Andrew pays State University $1,000 to enroll half-time for the 2004 Fall
semester. Prior to beginning classes, Andrew withdraws from a two-hour course and re-
ceives a $200 refund in October 2004. Andrew computes the amount of qualified tuition
and related expenses he may claim for 2004 by:
(1) Adding all qualified expenses paid during the taxable year ($2,000 + 1,000
= $3,000);
(2) Adding all refunds of qualified tuition and related expenses received during
the taxable year ($800 + $200 = $1,000); and, then
(3) Subtracting (2) from (1) ($3,000 – $1,000 = $2,000). Therefore, Andrew’s
qualified tuition and related expenses for 2004 are $2,000.
✔ PLANNING POINTERS
A scholarship or fellowship grant is excludable from gross income to the extent that it is used for
qualified tuition and related expenses.45 Therefore, to the extent it is not used for qualified tuition
and related expenses, a scholarship or fellowship grant is taxable income and will not be used to
reduce the amount of qualified expenses for purposes of the Hope and lifetime learning credits.
As a result, if a student’s tuition, room, board, etc., exceed the scholarship amount, taxpayers can
take the position that the scholarship funds (or a at least a portion of them) were used for items
that do not fall within the definition of “qualified tuition and related expenses” (if the scholar-
ship can be used for such costs). This will prevent or lessen the reduction of other expenses that
are available for purposes of claiming the credits (there are no tracing rules).
EXAMPLE: State University charges Robin $3,000 for tuition and $5,000 for room and
board. Robin receives a $4,000 scholarship to be used to pay any of her costs of atten-
dance at State University, including tuition, room, and board. Robin reports the scholar-
ship funds as taxable income on her tax return, claiming that the $4,000 was used to pay
for room and board (using Line 7 of Form 1040, U.S. Individual Income Tax Return,
with the notation “SCH” on the dotted line preceding the entry).
CAUTION: A scholarship that is restricted by its terms to paying qualified expenses
is excludible from income and therefore reduces the amount of qualifying expenses for
purposes of the Hope Scholarship and lifetime learning credits, regardless of whether the
student includes the amount in income.
45
Code Section 117(b).
46
Code Section 25A(b)(1), (c)(1).
Contents Search Print
in Section 481 of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1088), as in effect on August
5, 1997, and that is eligible to participate in a program under Title IV of the Higher Education
Act.47 This includes virtually all accredited public, nonprofit, and proprietary post-secondary
institutions (including many foreign institutions).48
OBSERVATION: As noted above, there is an exception to the rule that the academic
period must begin in the same year that the payment is made. Under that exception,
prepayment of qualified expenses for an academic period that begins during the first
three months following the taxable year can be counted as expenses for that year.49 See
Generally, p. 35.
An academic period means a quarter, semester, trimester, or other period of study (such as a
summer school session) as reasonably determined by an eligible educational institution. In the
case of an institution that uses credit hours or clock hours instead of academic terms, each pay-
ment period may be treated as an academic period.50
47
Code Section 25A(f)(2).
48
Notice 97-60, 1997-2 C.B. 310.
49
Code Section 25A(g)(4).
50
Reg. Section 1.25A-2(c).
51
Code Section 25A(g)(3).
52
Reg. Section 1.25A-1(f)(1).
53
Reg. Section 1.25A-1(f)(2).
Contents Search Print
OBSERVATION: If a parent chooses not to claim a deduction for a dependent for whom
the deduction is allowable, the dependent may not claim a personal exemption on his
income tax return.54 If a student is not claimed by his parents as a dependent, the student,
assuming all other relevant eligibility requirements are met, is entitled to claim a Hope
Scholarship credit on his own return.55
✔ PLANNING POINTERS
If the parents’ Hope or lifetime learning credit is reduced or eliminated because of the AGI
phaseout (see Phaseouts, p. 41) and/or their personal exemption deductions are phased out,56 the
parents should consider electing not to claim the child as a dependent if the child has income.
In that case, even though the parents cannot take advantage of the credits or deduction, the child
becomes eligible to claim either the Hope or lifetime learning credit for herself – thereby avoid-
ing loss of the credits entirely.57
An unmarried college student may report up to $29,050 of taxable income in 2004 at the 15
percent bracket (the first $7,150 is taxed at the 10 percent rate). If the student provides over half
of her support for the year, she can claim a $3,100 personal exemption and a $4,850 standard de-
duction in 2004. Accordingly, the $1,500 Hope credit will eliminate the tax liability of a student
who has $12,383 of ordinary taxable income (10% of $7,150 + 15% of $5,233), or $30,000 of
capital gain income if the 5 percent rate applies. Taking into account the $4,850 standard deduc-
tion and the $3,100 personal exemption, she can have $20,333 of ordinary income or $37,950 of
capital gain income before incurring any tax.
EXAMPLE: Ralph, who provides more than half of his own support, has $22,000 of
ordinary income in 2004. Ralph is also a freshman in college and pays $10,000 in tuition
and fees. Ralph’s 2004 tax liability is $250, computed as follows:
Income $22,000
Less:
Standard Deduction $4,850
Personal Exemption $3,100 ($7,950)
Taxable Income $14,050
Tax on $7,150 at 10% rate $715
Tax on $6,900 at 15% rate $1035
Tax Before Hope Credit $1,750
Hope Credit ($1,500)
Tax Liability $250
54
Code Section 151(d)(2).
55
CCM 200236001.
56
See Kleinrock’s Analysis and Explanation, Section 3.2, for a discussion of the personal exemption deduction
phase-out ranges.
57
Under Code Section 151(d)(2), the child would not be able to claim a personal exemption if she is still eligible to
be claimed as a dependent on her parent’s return as a student.
Contents Search Print
If half of Ralph’s income had been derived from the sale of securities held in a trust
established by his parents since 2002 (i.e., for more than one year) 11,000 of Ralph’s
$14,050 of taxable income would be taxed at the 5 percent capital gains rate and the re-
maining $3,050 at the ordinary income rate of 10 percent, for a pre-credit tax of $855. In
2004 and 2005, the $855 would be offset by the Hope credit. In 2006 and 2007, it would
be offset by the lifetime learning credit.
Similarly, the $2,000 lifetime learning credit will eliminate the tax liability of a student who has
$15,717 of ordinary taxable income (10% of $7,150 + 15% of $8,567), or $40,000 of capital
gain income if the 5 percent rate applies. Taking into account the $4,850 standard deduction and
the $3,100 personal exemption, she can have $23,667 of ordinary income or $47,950 of capital
gain income before incurring any tax in 2004.
OBSERVATION: If a student has a mix of ordinary income and capital gain income, the
$4,850 standard deduction and the $3,100 personal exemption are applied against ordi-
nary income before they reduce capital gain income.58 Accordingly, if ordinary income
does not exceed $7,950, the remainder will only be subject to the applicable capital gain
rate.
Third-Party Payments
If a third party (someone other than the taxpayer, the taxpayer’s spouse, or a dependent) makes a
payment directly to an eligible educational institution to pay for a student’s qualified tuition and
related expenses, the student is treated as receiving the payment from the third party and, in turn,
paying the qualified tuition and related expenses to the institution.59
58
Code Section 1(h)
59
Reg. Section 1.25A-5(b)(1). See also PLR 199917036 (distributions from a settlement trust for educational ex-
penses that are included in student’s gross income may be used to compute credits even if they are paid directly to
an educational institution).
Contents Search Print
EXAMPLE: Grace makes a direct payment to an eligible educational institution for her
grandson’s qualified tuition and related expenses. Grace does not claim her grandson as
a dependent. For purposes of claiming a Hope or lifetime learning credit, the grandson is
treated as receiving the money from Grace and, in turn, paying his qualified tuition and
related expenses.
If a student is claimed as a dependent on another person’s return, the expenses are deemed to be
paid by the person claiming the dependency deduction.60 See Claiming a Credit for a Depen-
dent, p. 46.
EXAMPLE: Under a court-approved divorce decree, Fred is required to pay Kevin’s
college tuition. Fred makes a direct payment to City College for Kevin’s 2004 tuition.
Kevin is treated as receiving the money from Fred and, in turn, paying his qualified
tuition and related expenses. Fred’s former wife, Sue, properly claims Kevin as a depen-
dent on her 2004 federal income tax return. Sue may claim an education credit for the
qualified tuition and related expenses paid directly to City College by Fred. Similarly, if
Sue were still married, but either legally separated or simply living apart from Fred for
more than six months so as to be treated as not married pursuant to Code Section 7703,
she could claim an education credit for the qualified tuition and related expenses paid
directly to City College by Fred.
PRACTICE TIP: If the parties in the above example agree that Fred, the non-custodial
parent, has the right to claim the dependency exemption, then Fred can claim an educa-
tion credit for Kevin’s education tuition. To do so, Sue would attach Form 8332, Release
of Claim to Exemption for Child of Divorced or Separated Parents, to her return. Alter-
natively, the divorce decree could state that Sue’s custody ends when Kevin reaches 18
years of age. Thus, once Kevin turns 18, the normal rules of support would apply and the
parent paying the tuition would be entitled to the education credits.
PRACTICE TIP: It may be to a parent’s benefit not to claim a student as a dependent if
the parent cannot claim the education credit because of the credit phase-out rules and the
student pays (or is treated as paying) the expense and has sufficient tax liability to claim
the credit. See Planning Pointers, p. 47.
60
Reg. Section 1.25A-5(a).
61
Code Section 25A(g)(6).
Contents Search Print
ried. An individual also is not considered married if she lived apart from her spouse for
the last six months of the taxable year, maintained a household that was the principal
place of abode for more than half the year of a child with respect to whom the individual
is entitled to a personal exemption deduction, and furnished over one-half the cost of
maintaining the household.62
Non-Resident Aliens
The Hope and lifetime learning credits are generally limited to United States citizens and resi-
dent aliens. A non-resident alien can claim the credits only if he is considered a resident alien
due to an election under Code Section 6013(g) or 6013(h).63 Those provisions allow a non-resi-
dent alien married to a United States citizen or resident alien to elect to be treated as a resident
for income tax purposes.64 A limited number of tax treaties also allow individuals to elect to be
treated as a resident and thus eligible to claim the credits.
If the student is a non-resident alien, a taxpayer may not claim an education credit with respect
to his qualified tuition and related expenses unless he is a dependent.65 Thus, among other re-
quirements, a non-resident alien student must be a resident of a country contiguous to the United
States in order to claim the Hope or lifetime learning credit.66
COMPLIANCE TIP: Payments to educational institutions by or for non-resident aliens
need not be reported by the institution. However, non-resident aliens who are eligible for
the Hope or lifetime learning credits can request reporting.67 See Reporting, p. 52.
Credit Recapture
The amount of qualified expenses for which the Hope and lifetime learning credits are allowed
is reduced by any tax-free assistance or refunds of expenses the student receives. If the refund or
tax-free assistance is received in the same year in which the expenses are paid, or in the follow-
ing year before the tax return for the year in which the expenses are paid is filed, the qualified
expenses are reduced by the refund or tax-free assistance (see Qualified Expenses, p. 42). If a
refund is received later, the benefit of the credit is recaptured. Tax-free assistance received in a
later year for expenses paid earlier is treated as a refund for this purpose.68
When a refund is received in a later year and recapture occurs, the tax for the subsequent taxable
year is increased by the recapture amount. The recapture amount is the difference between the
credit claimed in the prior taxable year and the redetermined credit. The redetermined credit is
computed by reducing the amount of the qualified tuition and related expenses for which a credit
was claimed in the prior taxable year by the amount of the refund of the qualified tuition and
related expenses (redetermined qualified expenses) and computing the credit using the redeter-
62
See Kleinrock’s Analysis and Explanation, Sections 2.2 and 4.5, for discussions of joint returns and filing status.
63
Code Section 25A(g)(7).
64
See Kleinrock’s Analysis and Explanation, Section 164.6, for a discussion of alien individuals who elect to be
treated as U.S. residents.
65
See Code Section 152 for the definition of a dependent.
66
Reg. Section 1.25A-1(h). See also Code Section 152(b)(3).
67
Reg. Section 1.6050S-1(a)(2)(i).
68
Reg. Section 1.25A-5(f).
Contents Search Print
mined qualified expenses and the relevant facts and circumstance of the prior taxable year, such
as modified adjusted gross income.69
EXAMPLE: In December 2003, Tom, a senior at City College, pays $2,000 for quali-
fied tuition and related expenses for a 16-hour work load for the 2004 Spring semester,
which begins on January 20, 2004. On January 13, 2004, Tom files his 2003 income tax
return and claims a $400 lifetime learning credit for the $2,000 qualified expenses paid
in 2003. On January 15, 2004, Tom withdraws from a four-hour course and receives a
$500 refund. Tom has a $100 increase in 2004 taxes, as determined by:
(1) Calculating the redetermined qualified expenses ($2,000 – $500 = $1,500);
(2) Calculating the redetermined credit for the redetermined qualified expenses
($1,500 × 20% = $300); and
(3) Subtracting the redetermined credit from the credit claimed in 2002 ($400
– $300 = $100).
OBSERVATION: A refund will only affect the amount of a Hope or lifetime learning
credit if the total qualified tuition and related expenses after the reduction for the refund
are below the maximum amount eligible for the credit (i.e., $2,000 for the Hope credit
and $10,000 for the lifetime learning credit).
The computation is the same if excludable educational assistance is received for the qualified
tuition and related expenses paid during a prior taxable year.70
EXAMPLE: In September 2003, Jerry, a student at State University, pays $1,200 in
qualified tuition and related expenses to attend evening classes during the 2003 Fall
semester. Jerry is an employee of X Corp. On January 15, 2004, Jerry files his 2003
federal income tax return and claims a lifetime learning credit of $240 ($1,200 × 20%).
In February 2004, X Corp. reimburses Jerry under a Code Section 127(b) educational
assistance program for the $1,200 of qualified tuition and related expenses paid by Jerry
in 2003. Thus, the $240 education credit claimed by Jerry for 2003 is subject to recap-
ture. Because Jerry paid no net qualified tuition and related expenses in 2003, the rede-
termined credit for 2003 is zero. Jerry must increase the amount of his 2004 taxes by the
recapture amount, which is $240 (the education credit claimed for 2003 ($240) minus
the redetermined credit for 2003 ($0)). Because the $1,200 reimbursement is taken into
account in calculating the $240 recapture amount for 2004, the reimbursement does not
reduce the amount of any qualified tuition and related expenses that Jerry paid in 2004.
COMPLIANCE TIP: The amount of the recapture is reported on the tax return of the
person who claimed the credit as an “additional tax” for the year the refund or tax-free
assistance was received. It is labeled “ECR.”
69
Reg. Section 1.25A-5(f)(3).
70
Reg. Section 1.25A-5(f)(5).
Contents Search Print
Reporting
Educational institutions that enroll any students for an academic period are required to file a
Form 1098-T, Tuition Payments Statement, for each individual for whom payments or grants
were received or reimbursements or refunds were paid, and to provide a copy to that individ-
ual.71 The form must include the name, address, and social security number for students who
are enrolled or have been enrolled in the institution during the calendar year, or to whom pay-
ments were made or received, along with the aggregate amount of the payments or grants and
the amounts of any adjustments, refunds, or reimbursements.72 Institutions may elect to report
either the aggregate amount of payments received or the aggregate amount billed, for qualified
expenses. The aggregate amount of scholarships and grants received for each individual’s costs
must be included.
COMPLIANCE TIP: Institutions that are required to file 250 or more Forms 1098-T,
Tuition Payments Statement, must file on magnetic media.73 The copy required to be pro-
vided to each individual may, with the individual’s consent, be provided electronically.74
Reporting is not required with respect to any individual who is a non-resident alien, although
non-resident aliens can request that amounts be reported.75 Institutions also are not required
to report with respect to courses for which no academic credit is offered, even if the student
is enrolled in a degree program.76 Reporting is not required as well for formal billing arrange-
ments, whereby the institution bills a company or governmental entity directly for the qualified
expenses of employees of the company or entity and does not maintain a separate account with
respect to any individual student.77
71
Code Section 6050S.
72
Code Section 6050S(b)(2), as amended by Pub. L. 107-131, Section 101.
73
Reg. Section 301.6011-2(b)(1).
74
Reg. Section 1.6050S-2(a).
75
Reg. Section 1.6050S-1(a)(2)(i).
76
Reg. Section 1.6050S-1(a)(2)(ii).
77
Reg. Section 1.6050S-1(a)(2)(iv).
Contents Search Print
1
Code Section 222.
2
Code Section 62(a)(18).
3
Code Section 222(e).
4
Code Section 222(d)(4).
5
See Reg. Section 1.162-5(a).
6
Code Section 222(c)(3).
7
Code Section 151. See Kleinrock’s Analysis and Explanation, Sections 3.4 and 3.5, for discussions of exemptions
for dependents.
Contents Search Print
The deduction for higher education expenses also cannot be claimed by any taxpayer who is a
non-resident alien for any part of the tax year, other than a spouse of a U.S. citizen or resident
who elects to be treated as a resident alien.8
OBSERVATION: The IRS is authorized to require recordkeeping and reporting in con-
nection with this deduction.9 It seems likely that reporting requirements similar to those
imposed in connection with the Hope and lifetime learning credits and the deduction
for student loan interest will be imposed. See Hope Scholarship and Lifetime Learning
Credits – Reporting, p. 52.
Qualified Expenses
Qualified tuition and related expenses are defined for purposes of the deduction for higher edu-
cation expenses in the same manner they are for the Hope scholarship credit.10 See Hope Schol-
arship and Lifetime Learning Credits – Qualified Expenses, p. 42. Thus, qualified expenses
consist of tuition and fees required for the enrollment or attendance of the taxpayer, the taxpay-
er’s spouse, or any dependent of the taxpayer, at an eligible educational institution for courses
of instruction at the institution.11 A taxpayer cannot claim a deduction for paying the tuition and
expenses of other persons even if those expenses would otherwise qualify for the deduction. The
cost of books, supplies, and equipment also qualify as education expenses if they are required
and are paid to the eligible education institution.12
COMPLIANCE TIP: No deduction will be allowed to a taxpayer with respect to the
qualified expenses of an individual unless the taxpayer includes the individual’s name
and taxpayer identification number on the taxpayer’s tax return for the year for which he
is claiming the deduction.13
Qualified expenses do not include expenses with respect to any course or education involving
sports, games, or hobbies, unless such course or other education is part of the individual’s degree
program.14 In addition, qualified expenses do not include student activity fees, athletic fees, in-
surance expenses, or other expenses unrelated to an individual’s academic course of instruction
such as room and board, transportation, or personal, living, or family expenses.15
If a student is required to pay a comprehensive or bundled fee to an eligible educational institu-
tion that includes charges for tuition, fees, and personal expenses, the portion of the comprehen-
sive or bundled fee that is allocable to personal expenses is not a qualified tuition and related
expense. An allocation between the qualified and non-qualified portion must be made by the
educational institution using a reasonable method.16
8
Code Section 222(d)(5). See Kleinrock’s Analysis and Explanation, Section 164.6, for a discussion of alien indi-
viduals who elect to be treated as U.S. residents.
9
Code Section 222(d)(6).
10
Code Section 222(d)(1).
11
See Code Section 25A(f)(1)(A).
12
See Reg. Section 1.25A-2(d)(2).
13
Code Section 222(d)(2).
14
See Code Section 25A(f)(1)(B).
15
See Code Section 25A(f)(1)(C).
16
See Reg. Section 1.25A-2(d)(4).
Contents Search Print
The amount of qualified expenses for purposes of the deduction is also reduced in the same
manner as such expenses are reduced for purposes of the Hope credit and lifetime learning
credit.17 Thus, they are reduced by any tax-free educational assistance received, including any
tax-free scholarship, certain educational assistance for veterans or members of the armed forces
provided under Title 38 of the U.S. Code, or any other payment (except a gift, bequest, devise, or
inheritance) used for education expenses that is excludable from gross income.18 The amount of
qualified expenses used for purposes of the deduction is also reduced by the amount of qualified
expenses that are taken into account for purposes of the exclusions for:
(1) Interest income from U.S. savings bonds used to pay higher education tuition and
fees (see Exclusion for Bond Interest Income, p. 67);
(2) Distributions from a 529 plan (see Qualified Tuition Programs (529 Plans) – Income
Tax Treatment of Distributions and Rollovers, p. 23); and
(3) Distributions from Coverdell ESAs (see Coverdell Education Savings Accounts,
p. 5).
However, the reduction for amounts taken into account in determining an exclusion for distribu-
tions from a 529 plan applies only to the amount of the distribution that is attributable to earn-
ings, and not to the return of contributions.19
EXAMPLE: A taxpayer receives a distribution of $100 from a 529 plan that is used for
tuition. $90 represents contributions to the account, and $10 represents earnings under
the program. Qualified expenses would be reduced only by that $10. Thus, the taxpayer
would be entitled to claim the deduction with respect to the $90 representing a return of
contributions. In contrast, if the distribution were from a Coverdell ESA, the $90 would
not be eligible for the deduction.
Deduction Limits
For taxable years beginning in 2004 and 2005, taxpayers with adjusted gross income that does
not exceed $65,000 ($130,000 in the case of married taxpayers filing joint returns) are entitled to
a maximum deduction of $4,000, and taxpayers with adjusted gross income that is greater than
$65,000 but does not exceed $80,000 (greater than $130,000 but does not exceed $160,000 in
the case of married taxpayers filing joint returns) are entitled to a maximum deduction of $2,000.
Taxpayers with adjusted gross income above these thresholds are not entitled to a deduction.20
For taxable years beginning in 2003, taxpayers with adjusted gross income that does not exceed
$65,000 ($130,000 in the case of married couples filing joint returns) are entitled to a maximum
deduction of $3,000 per year. Taxpayers with adjusted gross income above these thresholds are
not entitled to a deduction.21
17
Code Section 222(d)(1).
18
See Code Section 25A(g)(2).
19
Code Section 222(c)(2)(B).
20
Code Section 222(b)(2)(B).
21
Code Section 222(b)(2)(A).
Contents Search Print
OBSERVATION: Unlike most deductions that are limited, there are no phase-out ranges
for the qualified higher education expense deduction limits applicable to taxable years
beginning in 2003.
PRACTICE TIP: A taxpayer who has qualified tuition and related expenses in excess of
the deduction limitation amount can still claim the expenses as a miscellaneous itemized
deduction subject to the 2% AGI limitation if they qualify as work-related education ex-
penses required by the taxpayer’s employer in order for the taxpayer to retain his current
position.22 See Business Deductions for Educational Expenses, p. 59.
For this purpose, adjusted gross income is determined without taking into account the exclusion
for foreign earned income and housing cost amounts; the exclusion for income from sources
within Guam, American Samoa, or the Northern Mariana Islands; or the exclusion for income
from sources within Puerto Rico. On the other hand, for purposes of the deduction, adjusted
gross income is determined after applying the rules relating to:
(1) Taxation of certain social security benefits;
(2) Exclusion of income from U.S. savings bonds used to pay higher education tuition
and fees (see Exclusion for Bond Interest Income, p. 67);
(3) Exclusion of amounts paid or expenses incurred by the employer for qualified adop-
tion expenses;
(4) Deduction for amounts contributed to individual retirement accounts (IRAs);
(5) Deduction for interest on education loans (see Student Loan Interest Deduction, p.
91); and
(6) Limit on passive activity losses and credits.23
OBSERVATION: Calculating modified AGI without taking into account the listed
deductions and exclusions, increases the taxpayer’s modified AGI and, therefore, the
chances of having the deduction for qualified higher education expenses phased-out. On
the other hand, allowing modified AGI to be computed after the application of certain
other deductions and exclusions decreases both the taxpayer’s modified AGI and the
chances of having the qualified higher education expense deduction limited.
In addition, no deduction will be allowed for any expense for which the taxpayer is allowed a
deduction under any other provision.24 Finally, a taxpayer cannot claim the deduction if he or
any other person claims a Hope or lifetime learning credit in the same taxable year with respect
to the same student.25
22
See Reg. Section 1.162-5(a).
23
Code Section 222(b)(2)(C).
24
Code Section 222(c)(1).
25
Code Section 222(c)(2)(A).
Contents Search Print
✔ PLANNING POINTERS
Determining whether to take the deduction or one of the education credits when both are avail-
able requires consideration of the amount of the expenses incurred and the taxpayer’s marginal
tax rate. It generally is more advantageous to claim the Hope scholarship credit, if available,
rather than the deduction, because $4,000 in expenses results in the full $1,500 credit, which
is more valuable than the maximum $4,000 deduction for all taxpayers. In contrast, since the
lifetime learning credit is only available for 20 percent of expenses, up to $10,000, the deduc-
tion is more valuable for any taxpayer with $4,000 or less in expenses who has a marginal tax
rate of more than 20 percent, but the credit may be more valuable for taxpayers who incur larger
amounts of expenses.
Assuming that a taxpayer has at least $10,000 in qualifying expenses in 2004, taking a credit
generally results in more tax savings when the taxpayer’s AGI is low, while the deduction be-
comes more advantageous as AGI increases. For example, the 2004 tax savings for a married
couple filing a joint return are as follows if they paid $10,000 in qualifying expenses, have one
child, and do not itemize (i.e., they claim three personal exemptions of $3,100 each and the
$9,700 standard deduction):
Savings From:
AGI Lifetime
(Joint Filers) Hope Credit* Learning Credit* Deduction
$0 – $33,300 $1,500 $2,000 $400
$33,301 – $77,100 $1,500 $2,000 $600
$77,101 – $85,000 $1,500 $2,000 $1000
$85,001 – $95,000 $1,500 – $750 $2,000 – $1,000 $1000
$95,001 – $105,000 $750 – $0 $1,000 – $0 $1000
$105,001 – $130,000 $0 $0 $1000
$130,001 and over $0 $0 $0
*Credits are phased out ratably for married taxpayers filing a joint return with AGI from $85,000 to $105,000
Timing of Deduction
The deduction generally is allowed for a tax year only to the extent the expenses are in connec-
tion with enrollment at an institution of higher education during the tax year. However, a limited
amount of prepayment is allowed – expenses in connection with an academic term that begins
during that tax year or during the first three months of the next taxable year are allowed.26
EXAMPLE: State University requires tuition to be paid by December 15 for a semester
beginning in February of the following year. A taxpayer who pays the tuition by the due
date can claim the deduction for this payment, even though the expenses are for enroll-
ment in the following year, because the semester starts in the first three months of that
year.
26
Code Section 222(d)(3).
Contents Search Print
✔ PLANNING POINTERS
Since the timing of the deduction is determined by the timing of the payment, not the education
for which the payment is made, it may be worth deferring any tuition payments due near the
end of the year until the following year, if the educational institution permits it. This could be
particularly advantageous in the case of payments on behalf of individuals who are not expected
to incur additional educational expenses in the following year, such as students graduating in
June of the following year.
Planning when to pay qualified tuition is also important if the taxpayer’s modified AGI is close to
$80,000 ($160,000 in the case of married couples filing joint returns) since the entire deduction
is lost if the taxpayer’s modified AGI is even $1 over the applicable limitation amount. There-
fore, if the taxpayer expects an increase in his modified AGI that will put him over the deduction
limit, he should consider prepaying tuition if possible. On the other hand, if the taxpayer expects
a decrease in his modified AGI that will put him under the deduction limit, he should consider
deferring tuition payments until the following year if possible.
Contents Search Print
1
See Code Section 162; Reg. Section 1.162-5. See Kleinrock’s Analysis and Explanation, Ch. 25, for a detailed
discussion of the deduction for business expenses.
2
Code Sections 262, 263; Reg. Section 1.162-5(b)(1).
3
Reg. Section 1.162-5.
4
Rev. Rul. 76-62, 1976-1 C.B. 12.
5
Rev. Rul. 78-93, 1978-1 C.B. 38.
6
Rev. Rul. 67-421, 1967-2 C.B. 84.
7
Boser v. Commissioner, 77 T.C. 1124 (1981).
8
Voigt v. Commissioner, 74 T.C. 82 (1980).
9
See Kleinrock’s Analysis and Explanation, Section 29.5, for a discussion of accountable and non-accountable
reimbursement plans.
Contents Search Print
✔ PLANNING POINTERS
Education gained during a temporary absence from work is deductible if it maintains or im-
proves skills needed in the employee’s present employment. If a taxpayer stops working for a
year or less in order to obtain additional such an education and then returns to the same work,
the taxpayer’s absence is considered temporary.
EXAMPLE: John quits his biology research job to become a full-time biology gradu-
ate student for one year. If John returns to work in biology research after completing the
courses, the education is related to his present work even if he does not go back to work
with the same employer.
10
Rev. Rul. 60-97, 1960-1 C.B. 69, obsoleted by Rev. Rul. 72-619, 1972-2 C.B. 650. But see Watson v. Commis-
sioner, 31 T.C. 1014 (1959) (customariness is not absolutely necessary).
11
Reg. Section 1.162-5(c).
12
Reg. Section 1.162-5(b)(3).
13
Winterheld v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2003-175.
Contents Search Print
If a taxpayer stops work for more than a year, his absence is considered indefinite. Education
during an indefinite absence is considered non-deductible education to qualify for a new trade
or business, even if it maintains or improves skills needed in the work from which the taxpayer
is absent.
14
Reg. Section 1.162-5(c)(2). See, e.g., Kinch v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1971-117 (taxpayer could not deduct
expenses relating to obtaining a bachelor’s degree that he claimed was a condition for his retention in the Air
Force since there was no official Air Force requirement of a degree in order to receive or retain a commission).
15
See, e.g., Sud v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1965-102 (teaching assistant could not deduct expenses for graduate
studies where the was not an express requirement that he proceed with his graduate studies).
16
Reg. Section 1.162-5(c)(2).
17
Zhang v. Commissioner, T.C. Summary 2003-58.
Contents Search Print
18
Reg. Section 1.162-5(b)(3).
19
See O’Donnell v. Commissioner, 62 T.C. 781 (1974), aff’d, 519 F.2d 1406 (7th Cir. 1975).
20
Meeks v. Commissioner, 208 F.3d 221 (9th Cir. Feb. 22, 2000).
21
See Diaz v. Commissioner, 70 T.C. 1067 (1978), aff’d without published opinion, 607 F.2d 995 (2d Cir. 1979).
22
See, e.g., Wiertzema v. United States, 747 F. Supp. 1363 (D.N.D. 1989) (farmer allowed to deduct educational
expenses associated with a certified welding program, even though the education would qualify the farmer for
employment in a new occupation as a welder, because the farmer intended to continue farming indefinitely); PLR
8324068 (business representative and financial secretary allowed to deduct expenses associated with a non-accred-
ited law school program because completion of the program would not make the taxpayers eligible to take any state
bar examination).
23
Reg. Section 1.162-5(b)(3).
Contents Search Print
24
Reg. Section 1.162-5(b)(2)(i).
25
Reg. Section 1.162-5(b)(2)(ii).
Contents Search Print
32
See Code Section 265(a)(1). See also Manocchio v. Commissioner, 78 T.C. 989 (1982); Rev. Rul. 83-3, 1983-1
C.B. 72, modified by Rev. Rul. 87-32, 1987-1 C.B. 131, and Rev. Rul. 85-96, 1985-2 C.B. 87.
33
IRS Publication 508, Tax Benefits for Work-Related Education.
Contents Search Print
EXAMPLE: Woody is taking a correspondence course that costs $8,000. However, only
$3,200 of the course’s tuition qualifies for a business expense deduction. Woody receives
a tax-exempt scholarship for $6,000. As a result, Woody can only deduct $800 of the
tuition as a business expense because he had to subtract $2,400 from the portion of the
total tuition that qualified for the deduction.
$3,200
$6,000 × = $2,400
$8,000
34
See Code Section 67(a). See Kleinrock’s Analysis and Explanation, Ch. 45, for a detailed discussion of miscel-
laneous itemized deductions subject to the 2 percent AGI floor.
35
See Code Section 62(a)(2)(B), (C). See Kleinrock’s Analysis and Explanation, Sections 27.3 and 45.4, for discus-
sions of when compensation received by a public official is fee based and when a performing artist is eligible for
the above-the-line deduction, respectively.
Contents Search Print
1
Code Section 135(a), (c)(2)(A).
2
Code Section 135(c)(1). Bonds obtained as part of a tax-free rollover of matured Series E bonds do not qualify for
the exclusion. H.R. Conf. Rep. No. 104, 100th Cong., 2d Sess. 142 (1988).
3
Code Section 135(d)(3).
Contents Search Print
✔ PLANNING POINTERS
Parents might want to put U.S. Savings Bonds in the child’s name so that the child may elect to
include the bond interest in income on a yearly basis rather than at the time of redemption.4 The
child may then use his annual standard deduction to eliminate or reduce the tax that would have
to be paid. See Sample Election to Recognize Current Income on Non-Interest Bearing Discount
Bonds Under Code Section 454, p. 131. Unfortunately, the bond interest exclusion is lost alto-
gether if the bonds are put in a child’s name.
If a parent keeps U.S. Savings Bonds in his own name, but still elects to accrue the interest rat-
ably as it is earned, he may want to revoke the election if he plans to redeem the bonds in the
same year that he pays for his child’s higher education expenses because he must use the cash
method for reporting the interest income. Revoking the election will allow him to claim the tax
benefit for bonds that are purchased subsequent to the revocation.
The revocation is tantamount to a change in accounting method, which ordinarily requires the
filing of Form 3115, Application for Change Accounting Method. However, the IRS has pro-
vided an expeditious procedure to secure automatic consent for the change. Under the automatic
consent procedures, the taxpayer files a revocation statement (in lieu of Form 3115) with the
return for the tax year in which the revocation is desired. The statement must be identified at
the top as follows: “Change in Method of Accounting under Section 6.01 of the Appendix of
Rev. Proc. 2002-9.” The statement must also set forth (1) the Series E, EE, or I U.S. Savings
Bonds for which this change in accounting method is requested; (2) an agreement to report all
interest on any bonds acquired during or after the year of change when the interest is realized
upon disposition, redemption, or final maturity, whichever is earliest; and (3) an agreement to
report all interest on the bonds acquired before the year of change when the interest is realized
upon disposition, redemption, or final maturity, whichever is earliest, with the exception of any
interest income previously reported in prior taxable years.5 See Sample Statement for Automatic
Consent of Accounting Method Change upon Redemption of Savings Bonds, p. 132. No user fee
is required.
The revocation has no effect on the interest income previously recognized. It is only effective
for any unrecognized interest on all Series E, EE, or I bonds held at the beginning of the year in
which the election is made and with regard to all Series EE and I bonds acquired thereafter.
4
See Code Section 454.
5
Rev. Proc. 2002-9, Appendix, Section 6.01, 2002-1 C.B. 327.
Contents Search Print
interest only applies when a person 24 years of age or older purchase the bonds, interest eligible
for the exclusion will be paid on bonds owned by the parents in most cases. Where the parents
own the bonds, the interest paid upon redemption will be assessed the at a 22 to 47 percent rate
for purposes of determining the parents’ contribution towards the student’s EFC in the following
year. If the bonds are owned by the student, the paid interest will be assessed at a 50 percent rate
for purposes of determining the student’s contribution from income in the following year.
Qualified Expenses
Qualified higher education expenses are tuition and fees required for the enrollment or atten-
dance of the taxpayer, the taxpayer’s spouse, or the taxpayer’s dependent at an eligible educa-
tional institution. Contributions to 529 plans and Coverdell ESAs are also considered qualified
higher education expenses for purposes of the bond interest exclusion.6 See Qualified Tuition
Programs (529 Plans), p. 19; Coverdell Education Savings Accounts, p. 5.
OBSERVATION: An “eligible educational institution” is any college, university, voca-
tional school, or other post-secondary educational institution that is described in section
481 of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1088) and, therefore, eligible to
participate in the student aid programs administered by the Department of Education.
This definition includes virtually all accredited public, nonprofit, and proprietary post-
secondary institutions (including many foreign institutions).7
Room and board are not included in the definition of qualified higher education expenses. Nei-
ther are expenses for any course involving sports, games, or hobbies unless they are part of a
degree program.8
In addition, for purposes of the bond interest exclusion, qualified higher education expenses are
reduced by the amount of any:
(1) Scholarship excluded from gross income (see Scholarships and Fellowships, p. 73);
(2) Educational assistance payment to a veteran or member of the armed forces;
(3) Expense taken into account in determining a Hope scholarship or lifetime learning
credit (see Hope Scholarship and Lifetime Learning Credits, p. 35);
(4) Expense taken into account in determining the exclusion for distributions from a
Coverdell ESA or 529 plan (see Coverdell Education Savings Accounts, p. 5; Quali-
fied Tuition Programs (529 Plans), p. 19);
(5) Payment, waiver, or reimbursement of expenses under a 529 plan; and/or
(6) Other exempt payment (other than a gift, bequest, devise, or inheritance) for educa-
tional expenses or attributable to attendance at an eligible education institution.9
6
Code Section 135(c)(2)(A), (C).
7
Code Section 135(c)(3). See also Code Section 529(e)(5); Notice 97-60, 1997-2 C.B. 310.
8
Code Section 135(c)(2)(B).
9
Code Section 135(d)(1), (2).
Contents Search Print
The reductions are taken into account before application of the limit based on qualified higher
education expenses (see below).
✔ PLANNING POINTERS
A taxpayer who has bonds with a redemption value in excess of one year’s qualified higher edu-
cation expenses should spread the redemption over more than one year. This will also reduce the
effect of the AGI phaseout. See AGI Phaseout, p. 71.
EXAMPLE 1: In 1997, Tom purchased, for $15,000, Series EE bonds having a face
amount of $30,000, which were due to mature in 2004 (eight years). In 2004, Tom’s
daughter entered college and Tom incurred $18,000 of qualified higher education ex-
penses. If Tom redeems all of the bonds for $30,000 in 2004, his exclusion will be
$9,000, determined as follows:
$18,000
× $15,000 = $9,000
$30,000
10
Code Section 135(b)(1)(B).
Contents Search Print
EXAMPLE 2: The facts are the same as in Example 1, except that instead of redeeming
all the bonds in 2004, Tom redeems $18,000 worth of bonds in 2004 and the remain-
ing bonds in 2005 for $13,000 (the $1,000 increase in value from 2004 is additional
accrued interest). In 2004, the entire $9,000 of interest income is excluded because the
redemption proceeds of $18,000 equal qualified higher education expenses. In 2005,
Tom will have $7,000 of interest income from the $13,000 redemption, but if his daugh-
ter continues in school and incurs qualified expenses of $13,000 or more, the $7,000 of
income will also be excluded. If Tom’s daughter does not continue in school, however,
this amount will be taxed, but this result is no worse than that from redeeming all of the
bonds in 2004.
AGI Phaseout
The exclusion provided for bonds redeemed for qualified higher education expenses is phased
out for upper-income taxpayers. The phaseout ranges are based on a taxpayer’s modified ad-
justed gross income (AGI) and are annually adjusted for inflation. For 2004, the phase-out be-
gins for single and head of household filers when AGI exceeds $59,850 and is complete when
AGI exceeds $74,850. For joint filers, the 2004 tax year phase-out begins when AGI exceeds
$89,750 and is complete when AGI exceeds $119,750.11 Married taxpayers filing separately do
not qualify for any exclusion.12
For taxpayers falling within the phaseout range, excludable interest is reduced by a fraction,
where the numerator is the excess modified AGI (i.e., the excess of modified AGI over the low
figure of the phaseout range) and the denominator is the number of dollars in the phaseout range
($30,000 for joint returns and $15,000 for single taxpayers).13
EXAMPLE 3: In 1997, Tom purchased, for $15,000, Series EE bonds having a face
amount of $30,000, which were due to mature in 2004 (eight years). In 2004, Tom’s
daughter entered college and Tom incurred $18,000 of qualified higher education ex-
penses. To pay for his daughter’s education expenses, Tom redeems $18,000 worth of
bonds in 2004 and the remaining bonds in 2005 for $13,000 (the $1,000 increase in value
from 2004 is additional accrued interest). Tom has a modified AGI of $98,750 in 2004
(joint return). Although Tom would otherwise be entitled to exclude all $9,000 of the
bond interest income received in 2004 (see Example 2, above), the phaseout reduces the
exclusion by $2,700 (to $6,300).
$98,750 – $89,750
× $9,000 = $2,700
$30,000
11
Code Section 135(b)(2); Rev. Proc. 2003-85, 2003-2 C.B. 1184.
12
Code Section 135(d)(3).
13
Code Section 135(b)(2)(A). The $15,000 and $30,000 amounts are not indexed for inflation. Code Section
135(b)(2)(B).
Contents Search Print
EXAMPLE 4: In 1997, Tom purchased, for $15,000, Series EE bonds having a face
amount of $30,000, which were due to mature in 2004 (eight years). In 2004, Tom’s
daughter entered college and Tom incurred $18,000 of qualified higher education ex-
penses. To pay for his daughter’s education expenses, Tom redeems all of the bonds in
2004. Tom now has a modified AGI of $104,750 ($98,750 + $6,000 of additional income
from non-excludable portion of bond interest). Although Tom would otherwise be en-
titled to exclude $9,000 of the bond interest income received in 2004 (see Example 1,
above), the phaseout reduces the exclusion by $4,500 (to $4,500).
$104,750 – $89,750
× $9,000 = $4,500
$30,000
For purposes of calculating the bond interest exclusion’s AGI phaseout, a taxpayer’s modified
AGI is determined after the partial inclusion of social security and Tier I Railroad Retirement
benefits, the deduction for contributions to IRAs, and the limitations of passive activity losses
and credits are taken into account, and includes:
(1) Bond interest excluded from gross income;
(2) Adoption assistance excluded from gross income;
(3) Interest on education loans deducted;
(4) Tuition and related expenses deducted;
(5) Foreign earned income excluded from gross income; and
(6) Income from sources within Guam, American Samoa, the Northern Mariana Islands,
and Puerto Rico excluded from gross income.14
14
Code Section 135(c)(4).
Contents Search Print
1
Code Section 117(a), (b)(1).
2
Code Section 117(c).
3
Prop. Reg. Section 1.117-6(c)(3).
4
Code Section 117(b)(2).
5
Prop. Reg. Section 1.117-6(c)(2).
Contents Search Print
EXAMPLE: In 2004, Stephen receives a scholarship from City College for the 2004-
2005 academic year. A computer is a suggested item for a writing course that Stephen
will take, but students in the course are not required to obtain a computer. Stephen may
not treat the cost of a computer as a related expense in determining the amount excluded
from income as a qualified scholarship.
If the amount to be excluded cannot be determined when the scholarship or fellowship is re-
ceived because expenditures have not yet been incurred, any amount that is not used for qualified
tuition and related expenses within the academic period to which the scholarship or fellowship
applies must be included in the gross income of the recipient for the taxable year in which the
academic period ends.6
OBSERVATION: The terms of a scholarship or fellowship need not expressly require
that the amounts received be used for tuition and related expenses. However, to the ex-
tent that the terms specify that any portion of the scholarship or fellowship cannot be
used for tuition and related expenses or designate any portion for purposes other than
tuition and related expenses (such as for room and board or for a meal allowance), such
amounts are not amounts received as a qualified scholarship.7
A “candidate for a degree” is a student at a primary or secondary school or an undergraduate
or graduate student at a college or university who is pursuing studies or conducting research to
meet the requirements for an academic or professional degree. The term also includes (1) full-
time or part-time students at an educational organization that provides a program for full credit
toward a bachelor’s or higher degree, or (2) offers a program of training to prepare students for
gainful employment in a recognized occupation, is authorized under federal or state law to pro-
vide such a program, and is accredited by a nationally recognized accreditation agency.8
An “educational organization” is any organization that has as its primary function the presenta-
tion of formal instruction, normally maintains a regular faculty and curriculum, and normally
has a regularly enrolled body of pupils or students in attendance at the place where its educa-
tional activities are regularly carried on.9
EXAMPLE: In 2004, Donna receives a $500 scholarship to take a course from Corre-
spondence College. Donna receives and returns all lessons through the mail. No students
physically attend Correspondence College. Donna is not attending an educational orga-
nization and, thus, the $500 scholarship must be included in her gross income.
6
Prop. Reg. Section 1.117-6(b)(2).
7
Prop. Reg. Section 1.117-6(c)(1).
8
Prop. Reg. Section 1.117-6(c)(4). But see, e.g., Streiff v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1999-84 (doctor training for
board certification was not a degree candidate).
9
Code Sections 117(a), 170(b)(1)(A)(ii); Prop. Reg. Section 1.117-6(c)(5).
Contents Search Print
aid. In addition, tax-exempt scholarships and fellowships are taken into account for purposes of
determining a student’s financial aid eligibility by reducing the student’s “cost of attendance”
by the amount of any scholarship or other aid he receives. Thus, when a student receives a com-
pletely tax-exempt scholarship, his financial aid eligibility is decreased because his educational
costs are lowered. See Financial Aid – Financial Need, p. 99, for a discussion of a student’s cost
of attendance and expected family contribution.
General Rules
The exclusion for scholarships and fellowship is generally not available for any amounts re-
ceived as payment for teaching, conducting research, or providing other services as a condition
to receiving the award, regardless of whether all candidates for the particular degree are required
to perform such services.10
EXAMPLE: Cory is awarded a fellowship for the 2004-2005 academic year to pursue a
research project, the nature of which is determined by the grantor, Southern University.
Cory must submit a paper to Southern University that describes the research results. The
paper does not fulfill any course requirements. Under the terms of the fellowship, South-
ern University may publish Cory’s results or otherwise use the results of Cory’s research.
Cory is treated as performing services for Southern University. Thus, Cory’s fellowship
represents payment for services and must be included in Cory’s gross income.
Under an exception to this rule, amounts received under the National Health Service Corps
Scholarship Program or the Armed Forces Health Professions Scholarship and Financial Assis-
tance program are eligible for tax-free treatment as qualified scholarships without regard to any
service obligation.11 Furthermore, scholarships and fellowships conditioned on the performance
of a public service do not violate the compensation for services limitation.12
COMPLIANCE TIP: Any scholarship or fellowship amount representing payment for
services is considered wages for withholding and information reporting purposes. The
amount may also represent wages for Federal Insurance Contributions Act (FICA) and
Federal Unemployment Tax Act (FUTA) purposes, depending on the nature of the ser-
vices performed.13 On the other hand, scholarships and fellowships are not subject to
self-employment taxes.14
10
Code Section 117(c); Prop. Reg. Section 1.117-6(d)(1).
11
Code Section 117(c)(2). Recipients of National Health Service Corps Scholarships must agree to provide medical
services for a certain length of time in a geographic area identified as having a shortage of health care professionals.
Similarly, recipients of Armed Forces Health Profession Scholarshops and Financial Assistance must agree to serve
a certain number of years in the military at an armed forces medical facility.
12
See PLR 9645021; PLR 9526020.
13
Prop. Reg. Section 1.117-6(d)(4). See Kleinrock’s Analysis and Explanation, Ch. 111, for a discussion of income
tax withholding; Ch. 113, for Wage and Tax Statements (Form W-2); Section 618.2, for reporting payments of $600
or more in the course of a trade or business; Ch. 102, for FICA taxes; and Ch. 114, for FUTA taxes.
14
See Spiegelman v. Commissioner, 102 T.C. 394 (1994); Rev. Rul. 60-378, 1960-2 C.B. 38.
Contents Search Print
A scholarship or fellowship represents payment for services when the recipient is required to
perform services in return for the granting of the scholarship or fellowship. A requirement that
the recipient pursue studies, research, or other activities primarily for the benefit of the grantor is
treated as a requirement to perform services, but a requirement that a recipient furnish periodic
reports to the grantor for the purpose of keeping the grantor informed as to the general progress
of an individual is not. A scholarship or fellowship conditioned upon either past, present, or fu-
ture teaching, research, or other services by the recipient represents payment for services.15
EXAMPLE: Burt receives a $10,000 scholarship from X Corp. for the 2004-2005 aca-
demic year. As a condition of receiving the scholarship, Burt agrees to work for X Corp.
after graduation. Burt has no previous relationship with X Corp. Since the $10,000
scholarship represents payment for future services, it must be included in Burt’s gross
income.
OBSERVATION: The IRS has ruled that stipends paid to fellows under research and
training programs modeled after the National Institutes of Health National Research
Service Awards program can be excluded from income (and are not wages subject to
employment taxes), because the focus of the programs is research training, the activities
of the fellows during their training do not materially benefit the institution, and fellows
are not required to perform services in the future.16 Because the training stipends do
not represent payment for services, the amounts received by the individuals also are not
subject to self-employment tax.
If only a portion of a scholarship or fellowship represents payment for services, the grantor
must determine the amount allocated to payment for services. Factors to be taken into account
in making this allocation include, but are not limited to, the amount of compensation paid by
the grantor for similar services performed by full-time or part-time employees or by students
with comparable qualifications who do not receive a scholarship or fellowship, and the amount
paid by educational organizations other than the grantor of the scholarship for similar services
performed either by students or other employees.17
EXAMPLE: Cindy receives a $6,000 scholarship from Northern University for the
2004-2005 academic year. As a condition of receiving the scholarship, Cindy performs
services as a researcher for Northern University. Researchers who are not scholarship
recipients receive $2,000 for similar services. Therefore, Northern University allocates
$2,000 of the scholarship amount to compensation for services performed by Cindy,
which must be included in Cindy’s gross income as wages. However, if Cindy establishes
expenditures of $4,000 for qualified tuition and related expenses, $4,000 of the scholar-
ship is excludable from her gross income as a qualified scholarship.
If a recipient includes in gross income the amount allocated by the grantor to payment for ser-
vices (and this amount represents reasonable compensation for those services) any additional
scholarship received from the same grantor that is a qualified scholarship is excludable from
gross income.
15
Prop. Reg. Section 1.117-6(d)(2).
16
PLR 200010033.
17
Prop. Reg. Section 1.117-6(d)(3).
Contents Search Print
18
Rev. Rul. 77-263, 1977-2 C.B. 47.
19
Rev. Proc. 2004-3, 2004-1 I.R.B. 114, Section 3.01(11).
20
Rev. Proc. 76-47, 1976-2 C.B. 670. Although the guidelines by their terms apply only to scholarships awarded
by private foundations, the IRS has indicated that they serve to illustrate the type of analysis involved in determin-
ing whether grants awarded under any employer-related program fall outside the pattern of employment. TAM
200049007.
Contents Search Print
ship regardless of the reason for the termination of employment; and, if a scholarship
is awarded for one academic year and the recipient must reapply for a subsequent
year, the recipient may not be considered ineligible for a further scholarship simply
because that individual or the individual’s parent is no longer employed by the em-
ployer.
(6) The courses of study for which scholarships are available must not be limited to
those that would be of particular benefit to the employer (or other party providing the
scholarship).
(7) The terms of the scholarship and the courses of study for which scholarships are
available must meet all other requirements for the exclusion and must be consistent
with a disinterested purpose of enabling the recipients to obtain an education in their
individual capacities solely for their personal benefit and must not include any com-
mitments, understandings or obligations suggesting that the studies are undertaken
by the recipients for the benefit of the employer (or third party) or have as their ob-
jective the accomplishment of any purpose of the employer other than enabling the
recipients to obtain an education in their individual capacities and solely for their
personal benefit.
Under the percentage tests, the number of scholarships awarded under the program to children
of employees must not exceed 25 percent of the children who (1) were eligible for such scholar-
ships, (2) were applicants for the scholarships, and (3) were considered by the selection com-
mittee making such scholarships, or 10 percent of the number of employees’ children who can
be shown to be eligible for scholarships (whether or not they submitted an application) in that
year.
For purposes of determining how many employees’ children are eligible for a scholarship or
loan under the 10 percent test, an employer (or third party) may include as eligible only those
children:
(1) who submit a statement in writing (or on whose behalf a statement is submitted by
his/her authorized representative), or
(2) for whom information is maintained sufficient to demonstrate, other than by statisti-
cal or sampling techniques, that (i) they meet the foundation’s eligibility require-
ments; and (ii) they are enrolled in or have completed a course of study preparing
them for admission to an educational institution at the level for which the scholar-
ships or loans are available, have applied or intend to apply to such an institution,
and expect, if accepted, to attend such an educational institution in the immediately
succeeding academic year; or (iii) they currently attend an educational institution for
which the scholarships or loans are available but are not in the final year for which
an award may be made.21
21
Rev. Proc. 85-51, 1985-2 C.B. 717.
Contents Search Print
If, in applying any of the percentage tests, an organization determines that the maximum number
of allowable scholarships is a mixed number with a fraction of 1/2 or greater, the organization
may round upward the number of allowable scholarships to the nearest whole number, if in that
year, the maximum number of allowable scholarships, as determined under the percentage tests,
is at least four without the benefit of rounding up.22
If a taxpayer meets all of the conditions but is unable to show that it meets one of the percent-
age tests, the program’s scholarships can still be excludable from income if all the relevant facts
and circumstances show that the purpose of the scholarship is to educate scholarship recipients
rather than provide extra compensation. However, the facts and circumstances are considered in
the context of the probability that a scholarship will be available to any eligible applicant.23
Record-Keeping Requirements
To qualify for the exclusion, the recipient of a scholarship or fellowship must maintain records
that establish amounts used for qualified tuition and related expenses as well as the total amount
of qualified tuition and related expenses. Adequate records include copies of relevant bills, re-
ceipts, cancelled checks, or other documentation, or records that clearly reflect the use of the
scholarship. These records must be provided to the IRS on request. The recipient must also
submit, upon request, documentation that establishes receipt, the notification date, and the con-
ditions and requirements of the particular scholarship or fellowship. Scholarship or fellowship
amounts are excludable without the need to trace particular dollars to particular expenditures for
qualified tuition and related expenses.24
COMPLIANCE TIP: Taxpayers should include the taxable amount of scholarships or
fellowships on their income tax returns as “wages, salaries, tips, etc.,” and enter “SCH”
and any taxable amount not reported on a Form W-2, Wage and Tax Statement, on the
dotted line preceding the entry.
22
Rev. Proc. 94-78, 1994-2 C.B. 833.
23
Rev. Proc. 76-47, 1976-2 C.B. 670.
24
Prop. Reg. Section 1.117-6(e).
Contents Search Print
1
Code Section 117(d).
2
Code Sections 3121(a)(20), 3306(b)(16), 3401(a)(19).
3
Code Section 117(d)(3).
4
Code Section 117(c).
5
PLR 200029051.
6
Code Section 117(d)(2). See also Code Section 170(b)(1)(A)(ii).
7
See PLR 200029051.
Contents Search Print
Non-Discrimination Requirement
A qualified tuition reduction is excludable from the gross income of a highly compensated em-
ployee only if the tuition reduction is made available on substantially the same terms to each
8
Code Section 117(d)(2)(B). See also Code Section 132(h)(1).
9
PLR 9431017. See also the Defense of Marriage Act, Pub. L. 104-199, which provides, among other things, that
the word “spouse” refers only to a person of the opposite sex who is a husband or a wife for federal tax purposes.
10
Code Section 117(d)(2).
11
H. Conf. Rep. 1104, 100th Cong., 2d Sess. 78 (1988).
12
Code Section 117(d)(5).
13
Code Section 127(c)(6); Rev. Rul. 86-69, 1986-1 C.B. 78.
14
Code Section 117(d)(2).
15
PLR 20029051.
Contents Search Print
member of a group of employees that has been defined under a reasonable classification, set up
by the employer, that does not discriminate in favor of officers, owners, or highly compensated
employees.16
OBSERVATION: A tuition reduction program may provide benefits that are not quali-
fied tuition reductions and are not eligible for the exclusion without jeopardizing the
exclusion for benefits that do qualify. Whether the exclusion is available is determined
on an individual-by-individual basis, rather than on the basis of the entire program. Thus,
for example, a program may provide benefits both for individuals who are eligible for the
exclusion and those who are not.17
For purposes of the exclusion, an employee is a highly compensated employee if he (1) was
a 5 percent owner at any time during the current or preceding year; or (2) had compensation
from the employer for the preceding year in excess of $80,000, adjusted for inflation ($90,000
for 2004).18 However, the employer can elect to limit employees treated as highly compensated
employees under (2) to those who are in the group consisting of the top 20 percent of employees
when ranked on the basis of compensation paid during the year (the top-paid group).19 A former
employee counts as a highly compensated employee if he qualified as a highly compensated
employee when he separated from service or at any time after attaining age 55.20
An employee is a 5 percent owner for a year if, at any time during the year, she owns more than
5 percent of the corporation’s outstanding stock or stock possessing more than 5 percent of the
total combined voting power of all stock of the corporation, in the case of an employer that is a
corporation; or more than 5 percent of the capital or profits interest of the employer, in the case
of a non-corporate employer. Constructive ownership rules apply in making this determina-
tion.21
The employees considered in identifying highly compensated employees include common law
employees and self-employed individuals. However, an employer can elect to exclude the fol-
lowing employees both in identifying highly compensated employees and in identifying the
top-paid group:
(1) Employees who have not completed six months of service;
(2) Employees who normally work less than 17 1/2 hours per week;
(3) Employees who normally work not more than six months during any year;
(4) Employees who have not attained age 21; and
(5) Except as provided in regulations governing Code Section 414, collectively bargained
employees.
16
Code Section 117(d)(3).
17
PLR 200029051.
18
Code Sections 117(d)(3), 414(q). For the 2004 inflation adjusted amount, see Notice 2003-73, 2003-2 C.B.
1017.
19
See Code Section 414(q)(1).
20
See Code Section 414(q)(6).
21
See Code Section 414(q)(2).
Contents Search Print
Employers can also elect to exclude employees based on shorter periods of service,
smaller numbers of hours or months worked, or lower age.22
1
Code Section 127(a).
2
Code Section 162(a); Reg. Section 1.162-10.
3
Code Section 127(b); Reg. Section 1.127-2(a). Note, however, that an employer may request that the IRS deter-
mine whether a plan is a qualified program.
4
Code Section 127(b)(4).
5
Code Section 127(b)(2), (3).
6
Code Section 127(c)(2); Reg. Section 1.127-2(h)(1). Self-employed is defined by reference to Code Section
401(c)(1). A plan does not fail to qualify as a qualified educational assistance program merely because eligible
participants include former employees, regardless of the reason for termination of employment. Rev. Rul. 96-41,
1996-2 C.B. 8.
7
See Code Section 401(c)(1)(B).
8
Reg. Section 1.127-2(d).
Contents Search Print
Maximum Exclusion
The maximum amount of assistance that an employee may exclude from his gross income dur-
ing any calendar year under the educational assistance program rules is $5,250.11 The excluded
amount is exempt from both income and employment taxes.12
COMPLIANCE TIP: Education assistance payments that are excluded from an em-
ployee’s income are generally included in Box 14 (Other) of the employee’s Form W-2,
Wage and Tax Statement. Payments that do not qualify or that exceed the $5,250 limita-
tion are included as wages on the employee’s Form W-2.
PRACTICE TIP: Assistance that is not excludable under the education assistance pro-
gram rules (i.e., that is in excess of $5,250 or is not a qualifying expense) is nevertheless
excludable if it qualifies as a working condition fringe benefit.13
Where an employee works for more than one employer, the $5,250 limitation applies to the ag-
gregate amount of educational assistance benefits received from all employers.14 However, the
employer is not required to withhold income tax or pay or withhold employment taxes if it is
reasonable to assume that an amount is excludable.15
9
Code Section 127(c)(3).
10
Code Section 127(c)(6), (7). See Kleinrock’s Analysis and Explanation, Ch. 26, for a discussion of deductions for
investment expenses.
11
Code Section 127(a)(2).
12
Code Section 3121(a)(18); Code Section 3306(b)(13); and Code Section 3401(a)(18).
13
See Code Section 132(j)(8). See Kleinrock’s Analysis and Explanation, Section 23.4, for a discussion of working
condition fringe benefits.
14
H.R. Rep. 1049, 98th Cong., 2d Sess. 6 (1984).
15
See Reg. Sections 31.3121(a)(18)-1, 31.3306(b)(13)-1, 31.3401(a)(18)-1.
Contents Search Print
To determine the amount of educational assistance received, an employee must take into account
the fair market value of all educational assistance paid or provided directly by an employer, as
well as all the reimbursements received from employers for educational assistance. Any amount
expended for education that is (or would be) deductible by the employee as an employee busi-
ness expense is not subject to the $5,250 limitation on educational assistance benefits and is not
counted in determining whether other educational benefits received during the year exceed the
$5,250 limitation.16
An employee cannot avoid exceeding the $5,250 limit in the present tax year by electing to
forgo reimbursements of educational assistance expenses until a subsequent year, because an
employee is considered to be in constructive receipt of the reimbursement in the year he incurred
the expense. An employer must also report to an employee who separated from the employer’s
service during the taxable year the value of educational assistance benefits received by the em-
ployee during the year.17
Educational Assistance
For purposes of the exclusion, educational assistance means the payment by an employer of ex-
penses incurred by or on behalf of an employee for education. These expenses include, but are
not limited to, tuition, fees and similar payments, books, supplies, and equipment. Educational
assistance also includes the employer’s provision of education directly to an employee (including
books, supplies, and equipment).18 The term “education” generally means any form of instruc-
tion or training that improves or develops an individual’s capability, whether or not job related or
part of a degree program. Education paid for or provided under a qualified program may be fur-
nished directly by the employer, either alone or in conjunction with other employers, or through
a third party such as an educational institution.19 Payments for graduate level courses beginning
after December 31, 2001, are also included in the definition of educational assistance.20
Expenses specifically excluded from the definition of educational assistance include tools or
supplies (other than textbooks) that the employee may retain after completion of a course of
instruction, and meals, lodging, or transportation. In addition, educational assistance does not
include payments for, or provision of, benefits related to any education involving sports, games,
or hobbies unless the instruction or course involves the business of the employer or is required
as part of a degree program.21
OBSERVATION: The phrase “sports, games, or hobbies” does not include education
that instructs employees on how to maintain and improve their health, so long as the edu-
cation does not involve the use of athletic facilities or equipment and is not recreational
in nature.22
16
H.R. Rep. 1049, 98th Cong., 2d Sess. 6 (1984).
17
H.R. Rep. 1049, 98th Cong., 2d Sess. 6-7 (1984).
18
Code Section 127(c)(1).
19
Reg. Section 1.127-2(c)(4).
20
See Pub. L. 107-16, Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2001, Section 411(b).
21
Code Section 127(c)(1); Reg. Section 1.127-2(c)(3).
22
Reg. Section 1.127-2(c)(3)(iii).
Contents Search Print
Non-Discrimination Requirements
A qualified educational assistance program must benefit employees who qualify under a clas-
sification set up by the employer and found by the IRS not to be discriminatory in favor of em-
ployees who are highly compensated employees (within the meaning of Code Section 414(q))
or in favor of their spouses or dependents who are themselves employees. For these purposes,
employees who are covered by a collective bargaining agreement may be disregarded provided
there is evidence that educational assistance benefits were the subject of good faith collective
bargaining.24
OBSERVATION: For purposes of the exclusion, an employee is a highly compensated
employee if he (1) was a 5 percent owner at any time during the current or preceding
year; or (2) had compensation from the employer for the preceding year in excess of
$80,000, adjusted for inflation (for 2004, the amount is $90,000).25 However, the em-
ployer can elect to limit employees treated as highly compensated employees under (2)
to those who are in the group consisting of the top 20 percent of employees when ranked
on the basis of compensation paid during the year (the top-paid group).26 A former em-
ployee counts as a highly compensated employee if he qualified as a highly compensated
employee when he separated from service or at any time after attaining age 55.27
The classification of employees to be considered benefited consists of employees who are actu-
ally eligible for educational assistance under the program, taking into account the eligibility
requirements set forth in the written plan, the eligibility requirements reflected in the types of
educational assistance available under the program, and any other conditions that may affect the
availability of benefits under the program. Thus, for example, if an employer’s plan provides that
all employees are eligible for educational assistance, yet limits that assistance to courses of study
leading to post-graduate degrees in fields relating to the employer’s business, then only those
employees able to pursue such a course of study are considered actually eligible for educational
assistance under the program. Whether any classification of employees discriminates in favor of
highly compensated employees is generally be determined by applying the same standards as are
applied to qualified pension, profit-sharing, and stock bonus plans.28
An educational assistance program is not considered discriminatory merely because it (1) is
utilized to a greater degree by one class of employees or (2) because reimbursement under
the program is dependent on successfully completing a course, attaining a particular grade, or
23
Reg. Section 1.127-2(i).
24
Code Section 127(b)(2); Reg. Section 1.127-2(e)(1).
25
Code Sections 127(B)(2), 414(q). For the 2004 inflation-adjusted amount, see Notice 2003-73, 2003-2 C.B.
1017.
26
See Code Section 414(q)(1).
27
See Code Section 414(q)(6).
28
Reg. Section 1.127-2(e)(1). See Kleinrock’s Analysis and Explanation, Section 122.10, for a discussion of the
non-discrimination requirements for qualified plans.
Contents Search Print
satisfying a reasonable condition subsequent (such as remaining an employee for a year after
completion of the course).29
In addition, an educational assistance program is not a qualified program for any program year
in which more than 5 percent of the amounts paid or incurred by the employer for educational
assistance benefits during the year are provided to the employer’s limitation class. For this pur-
pose, the program year must be specified in the written plan as either the calendar year or the
taxable year of the employer.30 In the case of a corporate employer, the limitation class consists
of those employees (and their spouses and dependents) who, on any day of the program year,
own more than 5 percent of the total number of shares of the outstanding stock of the employer.31
In the case of a non-corporate employer, the limitation class consists of those employees (and
their spouses and dependents) who, on any day of the program year, own more than 5 percent of
the capital or profits interest in the employer.32
Reporting Requirements
An employer that maintains an educational assistance program for its employees must file any
annual report that includes the following information:
(1) The number of employees it has;
(2) The number of its employees that are eligible to participate in the plan;
(3) The number of employees that do participate;
(4) The total cost of the plan for the year; and
(5) Its name, address, and taxpayer identification number, and the type of business in
which it is engaged.33
COMPLIANCE TIP: This report is filed on Form 5500, Annual Return Report of Em-
ployee Benefit Plan, which is filed with the Employee Benefits Security Administration.
The Code also requires an employer to report the number of highly compensated employees it
has, the number of highly compensated employees who are eligible to participant in its plan, and
the number of highly compensated employees that do in fact participate in plan.34 However, the
IRS has suspended this requirement until it provides further guidance.35
29
Code Section 127(c)(5); Reg. Section 1.127-2(e)(2).
30
Code Section 127(b)(3); Reg. Section 1.127-2(f).
31
Reg. Section 1.127-2(f)(2). For these purposes, the term shareholder includes an individual who is a shareholder
as determined by the attribution rules under Code Section 1563(d) and Code Section 1563(e), without regard to
Code Section 1563(e)(3)(C). Reg. Section 1.127-2(h)(4).
32
Reg. Section 1.127-2(f)(2). The regulations prescribed under Code Section 414(c) are applicable in determining
an individual’s interest in the capital or profits of an unincorporated trade or business.
33
Code Section 6039D.
34
Code Section 6039D.
35
Notice 90-24, 1990-1 C.B. 335.
Contents Search Print
For purposes of the deduction, modified AGI is determined without taking into account the
deduction for qualified tuition and related expenses (see Deduction for Qualified Higher Educa-
tion Expenses, p. 53); the exclusion for foreign earned income and housing cost amounts; the
exclusion for income from sources within Guam, American Samoa, or the Northern Mariana
Islands; or the exclusion for income from sources within Puerto Rico. However, for purposes of
the deduction, modified AGI is determined after applying the rules relating to the:
(1) Taxation of certain social security benefits;
(2) Exclusion of income from U.S. savings bonds used to pay higher education tuition
and fees (see Exclusion for Bond Interest Income, p. 67);
(3) Exclusion of amounts paid or expenses incurred by the employer for qualified adop-
tion expenses;
(4) Deduction for amounts contributed to individual retirement accounts (IRAs); and
(5) Limit on passive activity losses and credits.4
1
Code Section 221.
2
Code Section 221(b)(2), (f).
3
Rev. Proc. 2003-85, 2003-2 C.B. 1184.
4
Code Section 221(b)(2)(C).
Contents Search Print
OBSERVATION: Calculating modified AGI without taking into account the listed
deductions and exclusions, increases the taxpayer’s modified AGI and, therefore, the
chances of having the student loan interest deduction phased-out. On the other hand,
allowing modified AGI to be computed after the application of certain other deductions
and exclusions decreases both the taxpayer’s modified AGI and the chances of having the
student loan interest deduction limited.
If a taxpayer is married at the close of the taxable year, the deduction is allowed only if the tax-
payer and his spouse file a joint return for the taxable year.5 In addition, no deduction is allowed
to an individual for the taxable year if a dependency exemption with respect to the individual is
allowed to another taxpayer.6
EXAMPLE: Bonnie, a student, pays $750 of interest on qualified education loans dur-
ing 2004. Only Bonnie is legally obligated to make the payments. Bonnie’s parents claim
her as a dependent and take a dependency deduction for Bonnie in computing their 2004
federal income tax. Neither Bonnie nor her parents may deduct the $750 of interest paid
in 2004.
PRACTICE TIP: If Bonnie’s parents are not allowed to claim Bonnie as a dependent,
then Bonnie is entitled to the interest deduction.7 In any event, she will be able to claim
the interest deduction in later years when she no longer qualifies as a dependent on her
parents’ return.
Furthermore, no student loan interest deduction is allowed for any amount that is also deductible
under another provision of the Code.8 For example, if the student loan interest paid is actually
interest on a home equity loan and is deductible as an itemized deduction on Schedule A of
Form 1040, U.S. Individual Income Tax Return, the interest does not qualify for the student loan
interest deduction.
Loan origination fees, other than those paid for property or services provided by the lender, and
capitalized interest on qualified education loans are also deductible. Capitalized interest means
any accrued and unpaid interest on a qualified education loan that is capitalized by the lender
(in accordance with the terms of the loan) and added to the loan’s outstanding principal balance.
Loan origination fees and capitalized interest are deemed to be paid by the taxpayer when the
loan’s principal is repaid. Accordingly, a taxpayer can deduct the portion of a stated principal
payment that is treated as the payment of any loan origination fees or capitalized interest on the
loan. For this purpose, a payment (regardless of its label) is treated first as a payment of inter-
est to the extent that interest has accrued and remains unpaid as of the date the payment is due,
second as a payment of any loan origination fees or capitalized interest (until such amounts have
been reduced to zero), and third as a payment of principal.9
5
Code Section 221(e)(2). Marital status is determined under Code Section 7703. See Kleinrock’s Analysis and
Explanation, Section 2.2, for a discussion of marital status.
6
Code Section 221(c).
7
See Reg. Section 1.221-1(b)(2).
8
Code Section 221(e)(1).
9
Reg. Section 1.221-1(f).
Contents Search Print
Qualified Loans
Only interest paid on a “qualified loan” can be deducted under Code Section 221. For purposes
of the deduction, a qualified education loan is any indebtedness incurred by the taxpayer solely
to pay for the qualified higher education expenses of the taxpayer, the taxpayer’s spouse, or any
dependent of the taxpayer.11 See Qualified Expenses, p. 95, for a discussion of the expenses that
can be paid for with a qualified loan. Thus, the deduction may be claimed only by a taxpayer
who is legally obligated to pay interest on the indebtedness.12 If a third party who is not legally
obligated to make a payment of interest on the loan makes a payment on behalf of the taxpayer
who is legally obligated to make the payment, the taxpayer is treated as receiving the payment
from the third party and, in turn, paying the interest, and, thus, is entitled to the deduction.13
For a loan to qualify as an education loan, the qualified higher education expenses must be in-
curred within a reasonable period of time before or after the indebtedness is incurred.14 What
constitutes a reasonable period of time is determined based on all the relevant facts and circum-
stances. Expenses are treated as paid or incurred within a reasonable period of time before or
after the taxpayer incurs the indebtedness if either the expenses are paid with the proceeds of
education loans that are part of a federal postsecondary education loan program or the expenses
relate to a particular academic period and the loan proceeds used to pay the expenses are dis-
bursed within a period that begins 90 days prior to the start of that academic period and ends 90
days after the end of that academic period.15
10
Notice 2004-63, 2004-41 I.R.B. 597.
11
Code Section 221(d)(1).
12
Reg. Section 1.221-1(b)(1).
13
Reg. Section 1.221-1(b)(4).
14
Reg. Section 1.221-1(e)(3)(i)(C).
15
Reg. Section 1.221-1(e)(3)(ii).
Contents Search Print
EXAMPLE: Henry signs a promissory note for a loan on August 15, 2004, to pay for
qualified higher education expenses for the Fall 2004 and Spring 2005 semesters. On
August 20, 2004, loan proceeds are disbursed by the lender to Henry’s college and cred-
ited to his account to pay qualified higher education expenses for the Fall 2004 semester,
which begins on August 26, 2004. On January 25, 2005, additional loan proceeds are
disbursed by the lender to Harry’s college and credited to Harry’s account to pay quali-
fied higher education expenses for the Spring 2005 semester, which began on January
20, 2005. Henry’s qualified higher education expenses for the two semesters are paid
within a reasonable period of time, as the first loan disbursement was made within 90
days prior to the start of the Fall 2004 semester and the second loan disbursement was
made during the Spring 2005 semester.
A qualified education loan includes indebtedness used to refinance indebtedness that qualifies as
a qualified education loan.16 Furthermore, a loan does not have to be issued or guaranteed under
a federal post-secondary education loan program to be a qualified education loan.17
A qualified education loan does not include any indebtedness owed to a person who is related to
the taxpayer.18 A loan made under any qualified employer plan or under any contract purchased
under a qualified employer plan also is not a qualified education loan.19 In addition, revolving
lines of credit (e.g., credit card debt) generally are not qualified education loans, unless the bor-
rower uses the line of credit solely to pay qualified higher education expenses.20 Finally, because
the debt must be incurred solely to pay qualified higher education expenses, mixed-use loans are
not qualified education loans. If any of the proceeds are used for expenses that are not qualified
as higher education expenses, none of the interest is deductible as interest paid on a qualified
education loan.21
EXAMPLE: John signs a promissory note for a loan secured by John’s personal resi-
dence. Part of the loan proceeds will be used to pay for certain improvements to John’s
residence and part of the loan proceeds will be used to pay qualified higher education
expenses of John’s spouse. Because the loan is not incurred by John solely to pay quali-
fied higher education expenses, the loan is not a qualified education loan.
✔ PLANNING POINTERS
The rule that the taxpayer must be legally obligated to pay interest on the indebtedness to be
entitled to claim the deduction requires that she be primarily responsible for payment of the loan.
Therefore, the student – rather than the parent – should take out the loan. Many student loans
carry a subsidized interest rate. Furthermore, the adjusted gross income limitations on claiming
16
Code Section 221(d)(1).
17
Reg. Section 1.221-1(e)(3)(iv).
18
Code Section 221(d)(1). Whether a person is related to the taxpayer is determined pursuant to Code Sections
267(b) and 707(b). See Kleinrock’s Analysis and Explanation, Sections 404.7 and 506.5, for a discussion of the
Code Section 707(b) rules relating to transactions between a partner and a partnership and the related persons listed
in Code Section 267(b), respectively.
19
Reg. Section 1.221-1(e)(3)(iii).
20
See Preamble to REG-116826-97, 64 Fed. Reg. 3257 (Jan. 21, 1999).
21
Reg. Section 1.221-1(e)(4), Example 6.
Contents Search Print
the deduction precludes many parents from taking a deduction in any event. Parents who want to
claim the interest deduction may be better advised to take out a home equity loan that will enable
them to claim an itemized interest deduction.
Qualified Expenses
Only interest on loans used solely to pay for qualified higher education expenses is deductible.
For purposes of the deduction, qualified higher education expenses is equal to the student’s “cost
of attendance” at an eligible educational institution. Thus, the deduction is generally available
for interest on loans used to pay for tuition, fees, room and board, books, supplies, transporta-
tion, and miscellaneous personal expenses of a student attending on at least a half-time basis.
However, in determining a student’s qualified higher education costs, the student’s cost of at-
tendance is reduced by any:
(1) Scholarship excludable from gross income;
(2) Veterans’ or member of the armed forces’ educational assistance allowance;
(3) Employer-provided educational assistance excluded from gross income;
(4) Interest from U.S. Savings Bonds excluded from gross income;
(5) Distribution from a Coverdell ESA excluded from gross income;
(6) Distribution from a 529 plan excluded from gross income; or
(7) Other educational assistance excludable from gross income (other than a gift, be-
quest, devise, or inheritance).22
The expenses must also be paid or incurred within a reasonable period before or after the indebt-
edness is incurred, and must be attributable to a period when the student is at least a half-time
student.23
OBSERVATION: It is not clear whether interest on loans used in part to pay for a per-
sonal computer are deductible. Current Code Section 221(d)(2) states that “the term
‘qualified higher education expense’ means the cost of attendance (as defined in section
472 of the Higher Education Act of 1965, 20 U.S.C. 1087ll, as in effect on the day be-
fore the date of the enactment of this Act) . . .” This provision, however, was originally
enacted in 1997 by Pub. L. 105-34 as Code Section 221(e)(2), but in 2001 EGTRRA “re-
designated” Code Section 221(e)(2) as Code Section 221(d)(2). If the reference to “this
Act” in current Code Section 221(d)(2) refers to EGTRRA, then loans used in part to pay
for a personal computer would appear to be deductible because the definition of cost of
attendance in 20 U.S.C. 1087ll was amended in 1998 to include “a reasonable allowance
for the documented rental or purchase of a personal computer” (see Pub. L. 105-244,
Sec. 471(1)). However, if the reference to “this Act” in current Code Section 221(d)(2)
refers to the act originally enacting the provision (i.e., Pub. L. 105-34), then loans used
in part to pay for a personal computer probably are not deductible because the 20 U.S.C.
1087ll definition of cost of attendance in effect on the day before the enactment of Pub.
L. 105-34 was silent with regard to personal computers.
22
Code Section 221(d)(2); Reg. Section 1.221-1(e)(2)(ii).
23
Code Section 221(d)(1).
Contents Search Print
For purposes of the deduction, an “eligible educational institution” is any college, university, vo-
cational school, or other post-secondary educational institution that is described in Section 481
of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1088) and, therefore, eligible to participate in
the student aid programs administered by the Department of Education. This definition includes
virtually all accredited public, nonprofit, and proprietary post-secondary institutions (including
many foreign institutions). In addition, institutions conducting internship or residency programs
leading to a degree or certificate awarded by an institution of higher education, a hospital, or
a health care facility offering post-graduate training are considered to be eligible educational
institutions.24 The deductibility of interest on a qualified education loan is not affected by the
institution’s subsequent change of status. Thus, interest on a qualified education loan may con-
tinue to be deducted even if the education institution ceases to be a qualified institution after the
end of the academic period for which the loan was incurred.25
Reporting
Any person in a trade or business or any governmental agency that receives $600 or more in
qualified education loan interest from a borrower during a calendar year must provide an infor-
mation report on such interest to the IRS and the borrower, using Form 1098-E, Student Loan
Interest Statement. In general, Form 1098-E must include the name, address, and taxpayer infor-
mation number of the borrower and the aggregate amount of interest received for the year.26 A
written statement must be provided to the payor of the interest that includes the name, address,
and phone number of the contact person making the report and the amount of interest reported.27
With the payor’s consent, the statement may be provided electronically.28
CAUTION: For qualified education loans made before September 1, 2004, a lender is
not required to report payments of loan origination fees and capitalized interest (or to
include these amounts in determining whether the $600 threshold is exceeded).29 Instead,
the lender must include in its statement furnished to the payor the information that the
payor may be able to deduct additional amounts, such as certain loan origination fees
and capitalized interest, that are not reported on the statement.30 Under the regulations,
a lender is required to report those items for loans made on or after that date.31 However,
the IRS has stated that it will not assert penalties on a lender for failure to report pay-
ments attributable to loan origination fees and capitalized interest received in calendar
year 2004 on a qualified education loan made on or after September 1, 2004, as long
as the lender reports the amount of interest received in 2004, other than the loan origi-
nation fees and capitalized interest, and furnishes a statement to the borrower that the
reported amount does not include payments attributable to either loan origination fees or
capitalized interest and that the borrower may be able to deduct amounts in addition to
24
Code Section 221(d)(2). See also Notice 97-60, 1997-2 C.B. 310.
25
Reg. Section 1.221-1(e)(4), Example 5.
26
Reg. Section 1.6050S-3(a), (c)(2).
27
Code Section 6050S(d).
28
Reg. Section 1.6050S-2(a).
29
Reg. Section 1.6050S-3(e)(1).
30
Reg. Section 1.6050S-3(d)(1)(iii)(B).
31
Reg. Section 1.6050S-3(e)(1).
Contents Search Print
the amount reported. A borrower who receives an information statement indicating that
it does not include payments of loan origination fees may use any reasonable method to
allocate the loan origination fees over the term of the loan for purposes of the deduc-
tion.32
If a loan is not subsidized, guaranteed, financed, or is not otherwise treated as a student loan
under a program of the federal, state, or local government or an eligible educational institution,
the lender must request a certification from the borrower that the loan will be used solely to pay
for qualified higher education expenses. The lender may use Form W-9S, Request for Student’s
or Borrower’s Social Security Number and Certification, to obtain the certification. A lender
may establish an electronic system for borrowers to submit Forms W-9S electronically, develop
a separate form to obtain the certification, or incorporate the certification into other forms cus-
tomarily used by the lender, such as loan applications, provided the certification is clearly set
forth. If the certification is not received, the loan is not a qualified education loan.33
PRACTICE TIP: Taxpayers that are eligible for the education loan interest deduction
who take out a home equity loan should certify the loan as an education loan under the
procedures described above. If the interest paid in any year exceeds the taxpayers al-
lowable education loan deduction, the balance can still be deducted on Schedule A of
Form 1040, U.S. Individual Income Tax Return, as an itemized home equity loan interest
deduction.
32
Notice 2004-63, 2004-41 I.R.B. 597.
33
Reg. Section 1.6050S-3(e)(2).
Contents Search Print
Financial Aid
According to the U.S. Department of Education (Department), over $67 billion in federal finan-
cial aid will be awarded to millions of students and families for the 2004-2005 school year. Most
federal aid is need based and consists of grants, work-study programs, and loans.
The process of obtaining financial aid starts when the student submits a completed Free Applica-
tion for Federal Student Aid (FAFSA) to the Department. Students can apply for the 2004-2005
school year after January 1, 2004, and must reapply for financial aid every year.
After the student’s FAFSA is processed, he will be sent a Student Aid Report (SAR). The SAR
outlines the information provided on the FAFSA and reports the student’s Expected Family Con-
tribution (EFC), which is used in determining the student’s eligibility for federal student aid. See
Expected Family Contribution, p. 101. The results will also be sent to the schools listed on the
FAFSA (i.e., the schools that the student is considering attending).
Once a college has the necessary information from the SAR, it determines the student’s financial
need and packages the student’s aid. Colleges arrive at different estimates of EFC depending
on which assets they choose to count. Furthermore, the components of the package depend on
a variety of factors, such as the college’s resources and the student’s merit. For example, they
might offer a top candidate all grants (which do not have to be repaid), while a package for a less
favored candidate might be made up mostly of loans.
Financial Need
Unlike scholarship programs that may award funds based on academic merit or based on the
student’s field of study, financial aid awards are generally based on the family’s need for as-
sistance. A student must have financial need to receive all federal financial aid funds except for
unsubsidized Stafford and PLUS loans under the Direct Loan and Federal Family Education
Loan (FFEL) programs. See Stafford Loans, p. 107, and PLUS Loans, p. 109.
A dependent student’s financial need is defined as the difference between her “cost of atten-
dance” (COA) at a particular educational institution and her “expected family contribution”
(EFC).1 If the EFC is less than the cost of attendance (i.e., if the student’s family cannot be ex-
pected to contribute the full costs faced), the student has financial need.
Cost of Attendance
The COA is an estimate of a student’s education expenses for the period of enrollment. The total
federal financial aid a student can receive cannot exceed the student’s cost. Generally, a depen-
dent student’s COA is the sum of:
(1) The tuition and fees normally assessed for a student carrying the same academic
workload. This includes costs of rental or purchase of equipment, materials, or sup-
plies required of all students in the same course of study;
1
20 U.S.C. Section 1087kk.
Contents Search Print
3
20 U.S.C. Section 1087oo.
Contents Search Print
(5) Employment Expense Allowance. This allowance recognizes the extra expenses for
families with two working parents and one-parent families, such as housekeeping
services, transportation, clothing and upkeep, and meals away from home. Where
there are two working parents, the allowance is 35 percent of the father’s income
earned from work or the mother’s income earned from work, whichever is smaller,
but may not exceed $3,000 (for the 2003-2004 award year). For one-parent families,
the allowance is 35 percent of the parent’s income earned from work, also not to ex-
ceed $3,000 (for the 2003-2004 award year). If a student’s parents are married and
only one parent reports an income earned from work, the allowance is zero.
PRACTICE TIP: Parents can reduce the income that is included in the EFC calculation
by postponing bonuses until after financial aid base year, temporarily reducing their sal-
ary if they own a business, or selling stock that has decreased in value to incur a capital
loss. Parents should avoid selling appreciated stock between the student’s senior year
in high school and junior year in college. Otherwise, the capital gains incurred will be
included in the parents’ income for financial aid base years and, therefore, reduce the
student’s ability to obtain financial aid.
To determine the parents’ contribution from assets, the parents’ “net worth” and “discretionary
net worth” must first be calculated. The parents’ net worth is determined by adding the assets
reported on the FAFSA (if net worth is $1,000,000 or more, then $999,999 is entered on the
FAFSA). The net worth of a business or a farm is adjusted to protect a portion of their net worth.
See Business/Farm Net Worth Adjustment for 2004-2005 Award Year, p. 133. The parents’ discre-
tionary net worth is calculated by subtracting the education savings and asset protection allow-
ance from their net worth. See Education Savings and Asset Protection Allowance for 2004-2005
Award Year, p. 134. The discretionary net worth (which can be less than zero) is multiplied by
the conversion rate of 12 percent to obtain the parents’ contribution from assets (cannot be less
than zero), which represents the portion of the value of the parents’ assets that are considered to
be available to pay for the student’s post-secondary education.
OBSERVATION: “Assets” include, among other things, cash, savings accounts, check-
ing accounts, real estate (but not the primary residence), trust funds, money market
funds, mutual funds, certificates of deposit, stock and stock options, bonds, other se-
curities, Coverdell ESAs, 529 savings plans (but not prepaid tuition plans), installment
and land sale contracts (including mortgages held), and commodities. In addition to the
primary residence and prepaid tuition plans, “assets” does not include the value of life
insurance and retirement plans (pension funds, annuities, IRAs, Keogh plans, etc.).
The parent’s available income and contribution from assets are then added to determine the
parents’ adjusted available income (AAI). The parents’ AAI can be a negative number. The total
parents’ contribution from AAI (i.e., the total amount parents are expected to contribute toward
all their family’s post-secondary education costs) is 22 to 47 percent of their AAI. See Parents’
Contribution From AAI for 2004-2005 Award Year, p. 135.
OBSERVATION: Given the 12 percent conversion rate used to obtain the parents’ con-
tribution from assets and the 22 to 47 percent rate used to calculate the parents’ total con-
tribution from AAI, the parents’ assets are assessed at a maximum rate of 5.64 percent.
For example, if a student’s parents have $100,000 in assets above any education savings
Contents Search Print
and asset protection allowance, no more than $5,640 of those assets can be included in
the parents’ total contribution from AAI (($100,000 × 12%) × 47% = $5,640).
The parent’s contribution for the individual student is calculated by dividing the total parents’
contribution from AAI by the number of children in college during the award year.
PRACTICE TIP: Since certain expensive consumer items are not included as assets
for purposes of determining the parents’ contribution, parents who are considering the
purchase of automobiles, boats, furniture, and other “big ticket” items should consider
making these purchases before the financial aid base year. This will reduce the parents’
liquid assets for purposes of calculating the student’s EFC.
Student’s Contribution from Income. To determine the student’s contribution from income, the
student’s available income (AI) is first calculated by subtracting certain allowances from the
student’s total income. The student’s AI is then assessed at a rate of 50 percent to obtain the
student’s contribution from income. If the student’s contribution from income is less than zero,
it is set to zero.
PRACTICE TIP: Since the student’s income is assessed at a higher rate (50%) than his
parents’ income (22% to 47%), the student’s income should be spent first (preferably all
in the first year of college) to avoid having more income assessed at the higher rate in
subsequent years.
As with the parents’ income information, the student’s total income is calculated using informa-
tion from the student’s FAFSA. The student’s total income is generally the sum of the student’s
taxable and untaxed income. If the student files a tax return, his AGI is the amount of taxable
income used in the calculation. If the student does not a file a return, the student’s reported in-
come earned from work is used. Total income may be a negative number.
OBSERVATION: The student’s available income is reduced by the amount of any Hope
scholarship or lifetime learning credit claimed on his return (see Hope Scholarship and
Lifetime Learning Credits, p. 39) and does not include child support paid because of
divorce or separation; taxable earnings from federal work-study or other need-based
work programs; or student grant, scholarship, fellowship, and assistantship aid (includ-
ing AmeriCorps awards) included in his gross income.
The allowances are calculated by adding the following:
(1) U.S. Income Tax Paid. Non-taxfilers don’t receive this allowance. If this is a negative
amount, it is set to zero.
(2) State and Other Tax Allowance. This allowance is a percentage of the student’s total
income and approximates the average amount paid in state and other taxes. The per-
centage varies according to the state and the parents’ total income. If the allowance
is a negative amount, it is set to zero. See State and Other Taxes Allowance (Student
Only) for 2004-2005 Award Year, p. 136.
(3) Social Security Tax Allowance. The student’s Social Security taxes are calculated
separately by applying the appropriate tax rates to the student’s income earned from
work in 2002. See Social Security Tax Allowance for 2004-2005 Award Year, p. 133.
The total allowance for Social Security taxes is never less than zero.
Contents Search Print
(4) Income Protection Allowance. The income protection allowance for a dependent
student for the 2003-2004 award year is $2,380.
(5) Parent’s Negative AAI. To recognize that a student’s income may be needed to help
support the family, the EFC calculation allows a parent’s negative adjusted available
income (AAI) to reduce a dependent student’s contribution from income. Because
the student’s contribution from income cannot be negative, this will not affect the
student’s contribution from assets.
Student’s Contribution from Assets. The student’s assets are treated the same way as the parents’
assets with three differences – there is no adjustment to the net worth of a business or farm, there
is no education savings and asset protection allowance, and net worth is assessed at the rate of
35%.
PRACTICE TIP: Since the student’s assets are assessed at a higher rate (35%) than his
parents’ assets (maximum rate of 5.64%), the student’s assets should be used first (pref-
erably all in the first year of college) to avoid having more assets assessed at the higher
rate in subsequent years.
The student’s net worth is calculated by adding assets reported on the FAFSA (negative amounts
are converted to zero for this calculation). Then, the student’s net worth is multiplied by the con-
version rate of 35 percent to obtain the student’s contribution from assets, which represents the
portion of the value of student’s assets that may be considered to be available to help pay for the
student’s post-secondary education.
PRACTICE TIP: If a student is planning to buy a car or other expensive item with his
own money, he should consider purchasing the item before the financial aid base year. It
will reduce the student’s liquid assets for purposes of determining his EFC.
✔ PLANNING POINTERS
In addition to the standard EFC formula, special calculations of the EFC are permitted in certain
circumstances.4 The first special calculation, known as the “simplified formula,” is basically the
same as the regular formula, except that asset information is not considered in the calculation.
A dependent student qualifies for the simplified calculation if (1) neither the student nor his par-
ents were required to file a Form 1040, U.S. Individual Income Tax Return, and (2) the parents’
AGI or income earned from work was less than $50,000.
Under the second special calculation, known as an “automatic zero EFC,” a dependent student
is automatically assign a zero EFC if (1) neither the parents nor the student was required to
file a Form 1040, and (2) the parents’ combined AGI or combined income earned from work is
$13,000 or less.
PRACTICE TIP: A family member who was not required to file a Form 1040 may have
filed one solely to claim a Hope or lifetime learning credit. This, however, does not dis-
qualify the applicant for purposes of the simplified formula or the automatic zero EFC.
4
20 U.S.C. Section 1087ss.
Contents Search Print
For purposes of determining the student’s EFC, either the parents’ or the student’s income is
reduced by the amount allowed by as a Hope scholarship credit or lifetime learning credit. See
Hope Scholarship and Lifetime Learning Credits, p. 35. Normally, the parents will claim an
education credit (if available), but the parents can elect not to claim a student as a dependent so
that the student can claim an education credit. This can increase the student’s ability to obtain fi-
nancial aid by decreasing the student’s expected family contribution. For example, if the parent’s
AAI for the 2003-2004 award year is $20,000 with a $1,500 Hope credit, allowing the student
to take the credit would increase the parent’s contribution by $510 ($4,926 – $4,416). This is
because the parent’s contribution is increased by 22 to 47 percent of the credit when the credit is
allocated to the student. However, since the student’s contribution from income is decreased by
50 percent of the allowable credit, permitting the student to take the $1,500 Hope credit would
lower the student’s contribution by $750 ($1,500 × 50%). Thus, the overall effect of allowing the
student to take the Hope credit is a $240 decrease in EFC ($750 – $510).
If U.S. Savings Bonds are used to pay for education expenses in order to claim the exclusion for
bond interest income, the effect on financial aid depends on who owns the bonds. See Exclusion
for Bond Interest Income, p. 67. If parents own the bonds, the bonds are assessed at the parent’s
asset rate. However, if the student owns bonds, they are assessed at the student’s asset rate. Since
the exclusion for bond interest only applies when a person 24 years of age or older purchases
the bonds, interest eligible for the exclusion will be paid on bonds owned by the parents in most
cases. Where the parents own the bonds, the interest paid upon redemption will be assessed the
at the 22 to 47 percent rate for purposes of determining the parents’ contribution in the follow-
ing year. If the bonds are owned by the student, the paid interest will be assessed the at the 50
percent rate for purposes of determining the student’s contribution from income in the following
year.
The amount of any scholarship or fellowship that is included in a student’s AGI is subtracted
from his income for purposes of calculating the student’s contribution from income. See Schol-
arships and Fellowships, p. 73. This will, of course, increase his eligibility for financial aid.
However, the student’s COA is reduced by the amount of any scholarship provided by an entity
other than the school. See Cost of Attendance, p. 99.
Any payment from a qualified tuition reduction program that is excluded from an employee’s in-
come increases the parent’s contribution from income if the payment is used for the educational
expenses of the employee’s dependent child. See Qualified Tuition Reduction Programs, p. 81.
Thus, the child’s EFC is increased by an amount equal to 22 to 47 percent of the payment.
financial aid package to exceed her financial need, then a college cannot award additional
need based federal aid.
Pell Grants are given only to undergraduate students or students enrolled in a post-baccalaure-
ate teacher certification or licensure program. Students incarcerated in a federal or state penal
institution are not eligible for Pell Grants.
Work-Study Programs
Work-study programs are available to both undergraduate and graduate students. The are often
tied to community service and pay the minimum wage or more, depending on the type and skill
required for the work. Work-study awards are also limited to the student’s financial need. Work-
study jobs can be on-campus or off-campus jobs. Students working on campus usually work for
their school, while students working off campus usually work for a private non-profit organiza-
tion or a public agency. For students attending a proprietary school, there may be further restric-
tions on the jobs that can be assigned. In addition, the number of hours a student can work is
limited under federal work-study programs.
Perkins Loans
Perkins Loans are low-interest (5 percent) loans available to both undergraduate and graduate
students with financial need. Students can borrow up to $4,000 for each year of undergraduate
study (with the total amount of such outstanding debt not to exceed $20,000) and $6,000 for
each year of graduate or professional study (with the sum of undergraduate and graduate debt
totaling no more than $40,000).
Students have nine months after they graduate, leave school, or drop below half-time status be-
fore they must begin repayment (graduates on active duty with the military have longer than nine
months). Students are allowed up to 10 years to repay a Perkins Loan; however, Perkins Loans
can be deferred or cancelled under certain circumstances.
Stafford Loans
Stafford Loans may be made either through the Direct Loan Program or through the FFEL Pro-
gram. Generally, schools participate in the Direct Loan Program or the FFEL Program, but not
both. Direct and FFEL Stafford Loans have identical eligibility requirement and loan limits. The
major difference between the two programs is the source of the loan funds. Under the Direct
Loan Program, the U.S. government loans students the funds. Under the FFEL Program, loans
are made by a private lender (a bank, credit union, etc.). Loan repayment options also differ
somewhat. The interest rate on Stafford Loans is variable and could change each year, but it will
never exceed 8.25 percent.5
5
As of July 1, 2002, the interest rate for Stafford loans is 4.06 percent (3.46 percent for students who are in
school, within the six-month grace period, or in deferment).
Contents Search Print
Direct and FFEL Stafford Loans are either subsidized or unsubsidized. A subsidized loan is
awarded on the basis of financial need. Students receiving subsidized loans are not charged in-
terest before they begin repayment or during authorized periods of deferment. An unsubsidized
loan is not awarded on the basis of need and students are charged interest from the time the loan
is disbursed until it is paid in full.
A dependent undergraduate student can borrow annually up to:
* $2,625 if she is a first-year student enrolled in a program of study that is at least a full
academic year;
* $3,500 if she has completed her first year of study and the remainder of her program is
at least a full academic year; and
* $5,500 if she has completed two years of study and the remainder of her program is at
least a full academic year.
An independent undergraduate student or a dependent student whose parents are unable to get a
PLUS Loan (see Plus Loans, p. 109), can borrow annually up to:
* $6,625 if she is a first-year student enrolled in a program of study that is at least a full
academic year (only $2,625 of this amount may be in subsidized loans);
* $7,500 if she has completed her first year of study and the remainder of her program
is at least a full academic year (only $3,500 of this amount may be in subsidized loans);
and
* $10,500 if she has completed two years of study and the remainder of her program is at
least a full academic year (only $5,500 of this amount may be in subsidized loans).
Generally, graduate students can borrow up to $18,500 each academic year (only $8,500 of this
amount may be in subsidized Stafford Loans).
The total debt a student can have outstanding from all Stafford Loans combined is:
* $23,000 as a dependent undergraduate student;
* $46,000 as an independent undergraduate student (only $23,000 of this amount may
be in subsidized loans); and
* $138,500 as a graduate or professional student (only $65,500 of this amount may be
in subsidized loans).
A student has six months after he graduates, leaves school, or drops below half-time status be-
fore he must begin repayment of a Stafford Loan. During the grace period on a subsidized loan,
a student does not have to pay any principal, and no interest will be charged. During the grace
period on an unsubsidized loan, a student does not have to pay any principal, but interest will be
charged. Stafford Loans can also be deferred or discharged under certain circumstances.
Contents Search Print
6
As of July 1, 2002, the interest rate for PLUS loans is 4.86 percent
7
Code Section 221.
Contents Search Print
Finally, the parents need to determine the number of years they have to save for the college costs
they intend to pay. Parents often fall into one of two categories: (1) those with a new-born child
who want to start saving immediately, and (2) those with a child just entering high school who
suddenly realize that there is not much time left to save. Although a child generally starts college
when she is 18 years old, the parents must remember that they have an additional four years to
save for the total costs of a traditional four-year college (i.e., they can continue to save for the
last year while the child is attending college). Obviously, the parents who start saving for their
child’s educational expenses shortly after the child is born are in a better position because they
can maximize the benefits of compounding and realize a greater overall return on their invest-
ment.
Examples
Bob and Mary want to save enough money to pay for all of their son Jack’s college-related ex-
penses (i.e., tuition, fees, books, room and board, transportation costs, and personal expenses) at
a top-flight private college. Currently, this would cost $35,000 for one academic year.
Since Bob and Mary have a combined adjusted gross income of $250,000 (which is expected to
grow in subsequent years), they realize that Jack probably will not qualify for financial aid and
that they will not be able to claim the Hope scholarship credit, lifetime learning credit, or tuition
deduction when Jack is in college. Furthermore, Bob and Mary are not counting on Jack receiv-
ing a scholarship. So that Jack can concentrate on his studies in high school and college, they
also do not want Jack to have to work to save money for his own higher education expenses.
If Bob and Mary choose to make annual contributions to the 529-plan account, their investment
portfolio would be as follows:
If Bob and Mary choose to make annual contributions to the 529-plan account, their investment
portfolio would be as follows:
Assuming an average annual return on investments of 7.5 percent, Bob and Mary’s investment
portfolio would be as follows if they planned to send Jack to a college costing $15,000 in today’s
dollars:
Year College Fund Annual School Ending
Balance Payment Payments Balance
1 0 3,646 0 3,646
2 3,919 3,646 0 7,565
3 8,132 3,646 0 11,778
4 12,661 3,646 0 16,307
5 17,530 3,646 0 21,176
6 22,764 3,646 0 26,410
7 28,391 3,646 0 32,036
8 34,439 3,646 0 38,085
9 40,941 3,646 0 44,587
10 47,931 3,646 0 51,577
11 55,445 3,646 0 59,091
12 63,523 3,646 0 67,168
13 72,206 3,646 0 75,852
14 81,541 3,646 0 85,186
15 91,575 3,646 0 95,221
16 102,363 3,646 0 106,008
17 113,959 3,646 0 117,605
18 126,425 3,646 0 130,071
19 139,826 3,646 39,322 104,150
20 111,961 3,646 41,485 74,122
21 79,681 3,646 43,766 39,561
22 42,528 3,646 46,174 0
Contents Search Print
Assuming an average annual return on investments of 7.5 percent, Bob and Mary’s investment
portfolio would be as follows if they planned to send Jack to a college costing $25,000 in today’s
dollars:
Assuming the same average annual rate increase for college costs over the next eight years, if
Bob and Mary start saving for Jack’s college costs when Jack begins high school, they will need
to save $80,732 to pay for all of Jack’s college costs at a four-year college with annual costs of
$15,000 in today’s dollars; or $134,554 for a four-year college with annual costs of $25,000 in
today’s dollars. Although the total amount of money needed is less than that required if Bob
and Mary started saving when Jack is born, the required annual contributions are considerable
higher (see below). This is because the value of compounding is largely lost and, therefore, the
return on investments is reduced.
Contents Search Print
Assuming an average annual return on investments of 4.5 percent, Bob and Mary’s investment
portfolio would be as follows if they planned to send Jack to a college costing $15,000 in today’s
dollars:
Assuming an average annual return on investments of 4.5 percent, Bob and Mary’s investment
portfolio would be as follows if they planned to send Jack to a college costing $25,000 in today’s
dollars:
College Fund Annual School Ending
Year Balance Payment Payments Balance
1 0 15,297 0 15,297
2 15,986 15,297 0 31,283
3 32,690 15,297 0 47,988
4 50,147 15,297 0 65,444
5 68,389 15,297 30,982 52,704
6 55,076 15,297 32,689 37,683
7 39,379 15,297 34,491 20,186
8 21,094 15,297 36,391 0
Contents Search Print
Years 1 and 2: The grants awarded to Connie by State University do not have to be repaid. In
addition, they are not included in Connie’s taxable income.
Contents Search Print
The maximum amount that can be borrowed under a Stafford Loan in the first two years of col-
lege are $2,625 and $3,500, respectively. The federal government pays the interest on the loan
(not to exceed 8.25%) both during the time that Connie is in college and during any authorized
deferment period. See Stafford Loans, p. 107. Like the grants, there are no immediate tax con-
sequences stemming from Connie’s use of the Stafford Loans.
Since more of Connie’s educational expenses can be paid with Stafford Loan funds in years 3
and 4 (see below), Jack and Gloria withdraw all of the Coverdell ESA funds in years 1 and 2
– $1,200 in each year. In addition, $5,000 is withdrawn from the 529-plan account established
by Connie’s grandmother in each of the first two years. Connie is not liable for income tax on the
combined $6,200 in distributions from the Coverdell ESA and the 529 plan since the distribu-
tions are used to pay for qualified expenses and do not exceed those expenses when combined.1
See Coverdell Education Savings Accounts – Distributions, p. 12; Qualified Tuition Programs
(529 Plans) – Income Tax Treatment of Distributions and Rollovers, p. 23. In addition, since the
Coverdell ESA and 529 plan distributions can be used to pay for room and board, the distribu-
tions should be allocated to those expenses first.
OBSERVATION: Although Connie is not subject to income tax on the Coverdell ESA
and 529 plan distributions, the earnings portion of the distributions are chargeable to
Connie’s income in the following year for purposes of determining her eligibility to
receive financial aid. In determining Connie’s “expected family contribution” (EFC) in
those subsequent years, the distributions will be assessed at a 50 percent rate and will
reduce her ability to receive aid in that year. However, based on the facts in this example,
it will have little or no adverse consequences. Furthermore, since the 529-plan account
is owned by Connie’s grandmother, the account itself is not counted in any year when
determining Connie’s EFC. See Financial Aid – Expected Family Contribution, p. 101.
The interest paid on the bank loans each year qualifies for an above-the-line interest deduction
on Jack and Gloria’s income tax return since the loan is used to pay for qualified education
expenses. The interest will be well below the $2,500 maximum that can be deducted in any
one year. In addition, since Jack and Gloria’s AGI is below $100,000, the deduction will not be
reduced by the phaseout provisions. Since the student loan interest deduction can be taken with
respect to loans used to pay for room and board (while many of the other tax incentives cannot),
the loan amounts should be applied towards Connie’s room and board first – along with the dis-
tributions from the Coverdell ESA and the 529 plan.
Jack and Gloria can also claim either the Hope scholarship credit, the lifetime learning credit,
or the above-the-line tuition deduction for a portion of the amount they pay for Connie’s col-
lege expenses (i.e., the bank loan and out-of-pocket amounts). See Hope Scholarship and Life-
time Learning Credits, p. 35; Deduction for Qualified Higher Education Expenses, p. 53. Even
though Jack and Gloria pay between $8,500 and $10,175 per year for Connie’s education costs,
only $7,000 of this amount can be used to calculate the education credits and tuition deduction,
since each of these tax benefits can be applied only to Connie’s tuition and related expenses
($10,000 per year), reduced by the amount of Connie’s grant ($3,000). Thus, after comparing the
tax benefits of each option, Jack and Gloria should claim the Hope credit in both 2004 and 2005.
Although they are eligible for a full $4,000 tuition deduction in 2004 and 2005, the deduction
1
This, of course, means that Connie avoids the additional 10 percent tax levied on any portion of a Coverdell
ESA or 529 plan distribution that is taxable.
Contents Search Print
will not reduce their tax liability as much as the Hope credit. Assuming that they fall in the 25
percent tax bracket for those years, a $4,000 deduction will decrease their total tax liability by
only $1,000 ($4,000 × 25%). As for the lifetime learning credit, considering the $2,000 maxi-
mum allowable credit ($10,000 × 20%), application of the phaseout rules, and the reduction in
qualified expenses due to the grant,2 use of the lifetime learning credit in 2004 would reduce
Jack and Gloria’s tax liability by only $1,050 (see below).
2004 Hope Scholarship Credit Amount
$90,000 – $85,000 = $5,000
$5,000 × $20,000 = 25%
25% × $1,500 = $375
$1,500 – $375 = $1,125
Years 3 and 4: Again, the grants awarded to Connie do not have to be repaid and they are not
included in Connie’s taxable income.
The maximum amount that can be borrowed under a Stafford Loan in the third and fourth years
of college is $5,500 (in each year). Again, there are no immediate tax consequences stemming
from Connie’s use of these loans.
The $5,000 distributions from the 529-plan account in Connie’s third and fourth years of college
are not taxable because the distributions are used to pay for, and do not exceed, Connie’s quali-
fied expenses.
All the interest paid by Jack and Gloria on the bank loans continue to qualify for the student loan
interest deduction since the loan is used to pay for qualified education expenses, the interest will
be below the $2,500 maximum, and their AGI is below the phaseout range for joint filers.
The Hope credit is not available in Connie’s last two years of college, nor is the above-the-line
deduction for tuition and related expenses3 for the amount they pay for Connie’s college ex-
penses. Jack and Gloria should claim the lifetime learning credit in 2006 and 2007. Claiming the
lifetime learning credit in those years would lower Jack and Gloria’s total tax liability by $1,050
(assuming no inflation adjustment for the phase-out ranges).
Post-Graduation: After Connie graduates, she can claim an above-the-line deduction for the
interest that will become due on the Stafford Loans since the loans were taken out in her name.
In addition, Jack and Gloria can continue to claim the same deduction for interest that they pay
on the bank loan.
2
Since only $7,000 in qualified expenses is available for purposes of claiming the lifetime learning credit, Jack
and Gloria’s maximum credit amount for 2004 is $1,400 ($7,000 × 20%).
3
The tuition deduction is available only through 2005 unless it is extended. Code Section 222(e).
Contents Search Print
MAXIMUM
ANNUAL
ITEM AMOUNT PHASEOUTS
Books,
Supplies, and ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔
Equipment*
Room &
Board ** ✔ ✔ ✔
Elementary &
Secondary Schools ✔
Graduate Schools
✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔*** ✔
Non-Degree Courses
✔
Special Needs
Expenses ✔ ✔
* Fees for books, supplies, or equipment (including computers) used in a course of study are covered only if they
must be paid to an eligible educational institution for the enrollment or attendance of the student.
** Student must attend eligible institution on at least a half-time basis.
*** Cost of attendance at institutions conducting internship or residency programs leading to a degree or certificate
awarded by an institution of higher education, a hospital, or a health care facility offering post-graduate training
are also covered.
Contents Search Print
Name:
Address:
Taxpayer ID Number:
Pursuant to Code Section 529(c)(2)(B) and Prop. Reg. Section 1.529-5(b)(2), the do-
nor elects to treat the gift of $ paid to the qualified tuition program of the State of
as five equal gifts extending over the period from to
.
The contribution to the qualified state tuition program is for the benefit of
, whose social security number is - - and
who is my .
[relationship]
Name:
Address:
Taxpayer ID Number:
Election for:
[year]
Taxpayer agrees to have the election apply to all market discount bonds that are acquired on or
after the first day of the current tax year. He is using the ratable accrual [or constant interest rate]
to compute the annual market discount amount.
Taxpayer also agrees to report the cumulative increase in the redemption price of such bonds
from the acquisition date of such bonds in the return for the current year.
Name:
Address:
Taxpayer ID Number:
The undersigned taxpayer requests permission to report all interest on the Series E, EE, or I U.S.
savings bonds described below under the cash method of accounting. The taxpayer also agrees
to report interest on all such obligations acquired in the year of change and all such obligations
acquired in subsequent tax years when the interest is realized upon disposition, redemption, or
final maturity, whichever is earliest.
As to such obligations on which interest has heretofore been reported on the accrual basis, the
taxpayer agrees to report the remaining interest income when the interest is realized upon dispo-
sition, redemption, or final maturity, whichever is earliest.
The Series E, EE, or I U.S. savings bonds for which the change of accounting from the accrual
method to the cash method is requested include:
___________________________________________________________
[List Bonds]
___________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________
Number in College
––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––
Family size: 1 2 3 4 5
–––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––
2 13,700 11,350
3 17,060 14,730 12,380
4 21,070 18,720 16,390 14,050
5 24,860 22,510 20,180 17,840 15,510
6 29,070 26,730 24,400 22,060 19,730
–––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––
For each additional family member add $3,280.
For each additional college student subtract $2,330.
* Calculate separately the Social Security Tax of the father, mother, and student.
Contents Search Print
New York 8% 7%
Other 3% 2%
Contents Search Print
District of Columbia 6%
Other 2%
Contents Search Print
Georgia Student Finance Authority – Cont’d Iowa College Student Aid Commission
(770) 724-9000; (800) 776-6878 Fourth Floor
FAX: (770) 724-9225 200 10th Street
E-Mail: info@mail.gsfc.state.ga.us Des Moines, IA 50309
URL: http://www.gsfc.org/Main/main.cfm
(515) 281-3501; (800) 383-4222
FAX: (515) 242-3388
Hawaii State Post-Secondary Education E-Mail: icsac@max.state.ia.us
Commission URL: http://www.state.ia.us/collegeaid/
Room 209
2444 Dole Street
Honolulu, HI 96822-2302 Kansas Board of Regents
Curtis State Office Building
(808) 956-8213 Suite 520
FAX: (808) 956-5156 1000 SW Jackson Street
E-Mail: hern@hawaii.edu Topeka, KS 66602-1368
URL: http://www.hern.hawaii.edu/hern/
(785) 296-3421
FAX: (785) 296-0983
Idaho State Board of Education URL: http://www.kansasregents.org/
P.O. Box 83720
Boise, ID 83720-0027
Kentucky Higher Education
(208) 334-2270 Assistance Authority
FAX: (208) 334-2632 1050 U.S. Highway 127 South
E-Mail: board@osbe.state.id.us Frankfort, KY 40601-4323
URL: http://www.sde.state.id.us/osbe/board.htm
(502) 696-7200; (800) 928-8926
FAX: (502) 696-7496
Illinois Student Assistance Commission E-Mail: webmaster@kheaa.com
1755 Lake Cook Road URL: http://www.kheaa.com/
Deerfield, IL 60015-5209
(617) 994-6950
FAX: (617) 727-6397 Missouri Department of Higher Education
E-Mail: bhe@bhe.mass.edu 3515 Amazonas Drive
URL: http://www.mass.edu/ Jefferson City, MO 65109-5717
– OR –
North Carolina State Education
Assistance Authority Oregon University System
P.O. Box 13663 P.O. Box 3175
Research Triangle Park, NC 27709-3663 Eugene, OR 97403-0175
(307) 777-7763
FAX: (307) 777-6567
E-Mail: sbutler@commission.wcc.edu
Wisconsin Higher Educational Aids Board URL: http://commission.wcc.edu/
Room 902
131 West Wilson Street
Madison, WI 53707-7885
Contents Search Print