0 Bewertungen0% fanden dieses Dokument nützlich (0 Abstimmungen)
149 Ansichten2 Seiten
The rubric scores cluster maps on a scale of 1 to 4 in four categories: content, conventions, organization, and group comparisons. A score of 4 indicates the map is well thought out, accurate, organized, and draws clear contrasts between groups. A score of 3 meets most criteria with only minor errors. A score of 2 supports the solution but may stray occasionally from the focus or have some factual errors. A score of 1 provides inconsistent information with many errors and no organization.
The rubric scores cluster maps on a scale of 1 to 4 in four categories: content, conventions, organization, and group comparisons. A score of 4 indicates the map is well thought out, accurate, organized, and draws clear contrasts between groups. A score of 3 meets most criteria with only minor errors. A score of 2 supports the solution but may stray occasionally from the focus or have some factual errors. A score of 1 provides inconsistent information with many errors and no organization.
The rubric scores cluster maps on a scale of 1 to 4 in four categories: content, conventions, organization, and group comparisons. A score of 4 indicates the map is well thought out, accurate, organized, and draws clear contrasts between groups. A score of 3 meets most criteria with only minor errors. A score of 2 supports the solution but may stray occasionally from the focus or have some factual errors. A score of 1 provides inconsistent information with many errors and no organization.
Content Conventions Organization Group Comparisons
Levels
Is well thought out No spelling, Information is Clear contrasts and
and is to the point. grammatical, or clearly focused in comparisons are punctuation errors an organized in the made. Reflects application cluster. of critical thinking High-level use of Questions are vocabulary and Information is presented to the Has clear goal that 4 word choice constructed in a group is related to the topic logical pattern to Full engagement Information is support the theme. and participation is directly from source made in the group. Is accurate
Is well thought out Few (1 to 3) Information Contrasts and
and supports the spelling, supports the comparisons are solution grammatical, or solution to the made punctuation errors challenge or Has application of Questions are question. critical thinking that Good use of presented to the is apparent vocabulary and The cluster is group. 3 word choice constructed in a Has clear goal that Limited logical matter. is related to the topic engagement and participation is Information is from made in the group the source and other places.
Is accurate
2 Supports the Minimal (3 to 5) Cluster has a focus Contrasts and
solution spelling, but might stray comparisons are grammatical, or from it at times. barely made. Has application of punctuation errors critical thinking that Information Questions have is apparent Low-level use of appears to have a nothing to do with vocabulary and pattern, but the the content Has no clear goal word choice pattern is not Limited Little information is limited consistently carried engagement is out in the project. made in the group Has some factual errors or Information loosely inconsistencies supports the solution.
Provides More than 5 Cluster is No contrasts and
inconsistent spelling, completely comparisons are information for grammatical, or disorganized. made. solution punctuation errors Information does No questions are Has no apparent Poor use of not support the formulated to the application of critical vocabulary and solution to the group. thinking word choice challenge or No participation is question. 1 Has no clear goal attempted. Information has no Information pulled No engagement is apparent pattern. from random attempted in the sources. group.
Has significant factual errors, misconceptions, or misinterpretations