Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Introduction
Growth modification of the hyperdivergent phenotype should be early and preventative
Favorable growth includes:
Increase in posterior facial height/anterior facial height ratio
Average or greater “true” forward mandibular rotation
Enhanced condylar growth and in the anterior direction
(most orthodontic therapy does the opposite of these)
Control of the vertical is critically important (High-pull headgear, extraction, bite-block, chin-cup)
Maxillary transverse constriction also common in the hyperdivergent phenotype
However, expansion can displace the maxilla and mandible inferiorly – increasing anterior facial
height (minimized by bonded expander)
Study Treatment:
1. Lip Seal Exercises –strengthen orbicularis oris and reduce mentalis strain
2. Lower Crozat/Lip Bumper – lower arch expansion. Initial 2-3 mm activation, additional 1
mm reactivation every 8 weeks
3. Bonded Palatal Expander (BPE) – upper arch expansion. 1 mm per month for ~6 months
4. High-pull Chincup – at least 14 hrs per day with 45º up and back pull relative to occlusal
plane.
Compared to the control group, the treatment group had significant changes of:
SNB increased with treatment and decreased in the control group
Gonial angle decreased and Articular angle increased
OB/OJ improved
The mandibular measures, except mandibular molar, displayed anterior displacement
Gonion was displaced 0.6 mm more inferiorly with treatment (more posterior facial height
increases)
Relative intrusion of upper molar, vertical control of lower molar and increased eruption
of lower incisor increased overbite
1.2 mm more vertical condylar growth than control
True mandibular forward rotation was almost 3x greater (1.6º vs 0.6º)
Discussion
The treatment regimen led to increased condylar growth, altered direction of condylar
growth, increased true forward mandibular rotation, increased posterior facial height, and
decreased anterior facial height for openbite patients. It also controlled molar eruption,
increased overbite and decreased overjet.
Therefore, this regimen seems effective for treating vertical skeletal dysplasia.
Their results showed no increased vertical displacement of ANS or PNS and no increase
in MPA unlike other modes of expansion
Increasing condylar growth helped improve the posterior facial height and anterior
displacement of the mandible
Other studies have shown instability of intrusion after 4 months, so more work is needed
to investigate this regimen’s stability
The improvements in OB/OJ was attributed to the posterior control and intrusion of molars
combined with increased soft tissue and facial muscular force
ABO Question
Which of the following is NOT a treatment goal for the Class II Hyperdivergent patient?
A. Increase in posterior facial height/anterior facial height ratio
B. Increase in the gonial angle
C. Forward mandibular rotation
D. Increase condylar growth in the anterior direction
B