INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE OCMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM

Name of Employee ELLEN MAE P. VERANO Name of Rater IRINE C.MAHINAY, MEEM
Position Teacher I Position HT-III / TIC
Review Period June 2014 - March 2015 Date of Review March 30, 2015
Bureau/Center/Service/Division Secondary Education/Davao del Sur

WEIGHT PER PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL

MFO KRAs OBJECTIVES TIME FRAME RATING SCORE
KRA (Quality Time, Efficiency, Timeliness) RESULTS

Teaching - 1. Prepared lesson plan / June to March 40% *Lesson Plans / Log Plans were prepared 3 x 0.12 0.36
Learning logs of the learning daily.
Process competencies including *Each part had a full description of the LP /
appropriate, adequate DLL of what to do with an example.
and updated *Appropriate instructional mateirals /
instructional materials teaching aids were prepared.
within the rating *Competencies of the learning guides
period (12%) were adopted in the daily logs / lesson
plans.
*Attained 100% of the desired learning
competencies based on the budget of
work.
(5) - When all indicators were met.
(4) - When 4 indicators were met.
(3) - When 3 indicators were met.
(2) - When 2 indicators were met.
(1) - When only 1 indicator was met.
 WEIGHT PER PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL
MFO KRAs OBJECTIVES TIME FRAME RATING SCORE
KRA (Quality Time, Efficiency, Timeliness) RESULTS
2. Faciltated learning June to March *Objectives and instructional materials 4 x 0.20 0.8
in the school through were aligned.
functional lesson * Varied techniques and strategies suited
plans, daily logs and to different kinds of learners were being
innovative teaching utilized.
strategies . (20%) *Technology resources in planning,
designing, and delivery of the lesson
was utilized.
* Situations that encourage learners to use
higher order thinking skills were created.
* Routines and procedures was establshed
to maximize use of time and instructional
materials.
*Appropriate intervention activities for
learners at risk were provided.
*Fairness in dealing with learners was
evident.
(5) - 100% of the indicators were rated
Proficient / Highly Proficient
(4) - 85%-99% of the indicators were
rated Proficient/ Highly Proficient
(3) - 70% - 84% of the indicators were
rated Proficient/ Highly Proficient
(2) - 69% - 51% of the indicators were
rated Proficient/ Highly Proficient
(1) - 50% and below of the indicators
were rated Proficient / Highly
Proficient .
 WEIGHT PER PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL
MFO KRAs OBJECTIVES TIME FRAME RATING SCORE
KRA (Quality Time, Efficiency, Timeliness) RESULTS
3. Monitored *Attendance of all pupils was systematically 5 x 0.08 0.4
attendance, diversity monitored.
appreciation, safe, *Attendance of 75% identified PARDOs
positive and motivating were monitored.
environment, overall *Behavior problems was handled quickly
physical atmosphere, with due respect to children's rights
cleanliness and *Gender sensitive opportunities for learning
orderliness of were provided.
classrooms including *safety, orderliness and cleanliness of
proper waste disposal classroom, toilers and proper waste
daily. (8%) disposal were maintained.
(5) - When all indicators were met.
(4) - When 4 indicators were met.
(3) - When 3 indicators were met.
(2) - When 2 indicators were met.
(1) - When only 1 indicator was met. 1.56

Pupils / 1. Monitored, evaluated
Students and maintained
Outcomes pupil's/students'
progress within the
rating period. (10%)
June to March 30% *Formative, summative tests congruent to 4 x 0.10 0.4
the lesson were being used.
*Appropriate reinforcement/feedback to
learners' behavior was provided.
*Opportunity for learners to demonstrate
their learning was provided.
*Non-traditional authentic assessment
techniques was used when needed.
*Assignment as reinforcement or
enrichment of the lesson was given.

WEIGHT PER PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL

MFO KRAs OBJECTIVES TIME FRAME RATING SCORE
KRA RESULTS
 WEIGHT PER ACTUAL
MFO KRAs OBJECTIVES TIME FRAME RATING SCORE
KRA (Quality Time, Efficiency, Timeliness) RESULTS
(5) - When all indicators were met.
(4) - When 4 indicators were met.
(3) - When 3 indicators were met.
(2) - When 2 indicators were met.
(1) - When only 1 indicator was met.

2. Conducted * (5) - Remediatin / Enrichment Program is 2 x 0.03 0.06

remediation/ offered to 130% and above of students
enrichment programs who need it.
to 75% of the pupils / * (4) - Remediation / Enrichment Program
student needing it. (3%) is offered to 115 - 129% who need it.
* (3) - Remediation / Enrichment Program
is offered to 100 - 114% who need it.
* (2) - Remediation / Enrichment Program
is offered to 51 - 99% who need it.
* (1) - Remediation /Enrichment Program is
offered to 50% and below who need it.

3. Attained the required 3 0.45

General Scholastic x 0.15
Average (GSA) / Mean
Percentage Score (MPS)
and Reading Proficiency
Level for every grade /
year level for every
learning area (15%)
*75% of the pupils * 5 - 30% and aboveover the targeted 3
attained a GSA of number of pupils / students
85%-89% * 4 - 15-29% over the targeted number of
(Proficient Level) pupils / students

WEIGHT PER PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL

MFO KRAs OBJECTIVES TIME FRAME RATING SCORE
KRA (Quality Time, Efficiency, Timeliness) RESULTS
 * 3 - 100% of the targeted number of
pupils / students
* 2 - 51 - 99% of the targeted number of
pupils / students
* 1 - 50% and below of the targeted number
of pupis / students

*75% of the Grade * 5 - 30% and aboveover the targeted

3 pupils achieved number of pupils / students
81.76 MPS in NAT 3 * 4 - 15-29% over the targeted number of
pupils / students
* 3 - 100% of the targeted number of
pupils / students
* 2 - 51 - 99% of the targeted number of
pupils / students
* 1 - 50% and below of the targeted number
of pupis / students

* 75% of the * 5 - 30% and above over the targeted

Grade 6 pupils number of pupils / students
achieved 83.38% * 4 - 15-29% over the targeted number of
MPS in NAT 6 pupils / students
* 3 - 100% of the targeted number of
pupils / students
* 2 - 51 - 99% of the targeted number of
pupils / students
* 1 - 50% and below of the targeted number
of pupis / students

WEIGHT PER PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL

MFO KRAs OBJECTIVES TIME FRAME RATING SCORE
KRA (Quality Time, Efficiency, Timeliness) RESULTS
* 75% of the Year 4 * 5 - 30% and above over the targeted 3
 students achieved number of pupils / students
75% MPS in NAT 4 * 4 - 15-29% over the targeted number of
pupils / students
* 3 - 100% of the targeted number of
pupils / students
* 2 - 51 - 99% of the targeted number of
pupils / students
* 1 - 50% and below of the targeted number
of pupis / students

* 75% of the pupils * 5 - 30% and above over the targeted

achieved number of pupils / students
instructional level * 4 - 15-29% over the targeted number of
of reading pupils / students
proficiency (MT for * 3 - 100% of the targeted number of
Grades 1 & 2; pupils / students
English and Filipino * 2 - 51 - 99% of the targeted number of
for Grades 3) pupils / students
* 1 - 50% and below of the targeted number
of pupis / students

* 75% of the pupils / * 5 - 30% and above over the targeted 3

students achieved number of pupils / students
Independent * 4 - 15-29% over the targeted number of
Level of reading pupils / students
proficiency both * 3 - 100% of the targeted number of
in English and pupils / students
Filipino (For Grades * 2 - 51 - 99% of the targeted number of
4 - 6; Y1 - Y4) pupils / students

WEIGHT PER PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL

MFO KRAs OBJECTIVES TIME FRAME RATING SCORE
KRA (Quality Time, Efficiency, Timeliness) RESULTS
* 1 - 50% and below of the targeted number
of pupis / students
 4. Participated in to * Participation to Academic and 3 x 0.02 0.06
curricular / school Co-Curricular Competitions
activities within the a. National Level - 5
rating period. (2%) b. Regional Level - 4
c. Provincial Level - 3
d. District Level - 2
e. School Level - 1 0.97

Communi- 1. Supported June to March 15% * (5) - 60% and above of the targeted pupils 3 x 0.02 0.06
ty registration / and teachers supported registration /
Involve- participated in non- attended to BSP / GSP / RCYC activities.
ment government activities * (4) - 50% - 59% of the targeted pupils
like BSP,GSP& RCYC and teachers supported registration /
(50%) of the total attended to BSP / GSP / RCYC activities.
number of pupils in a * (3) - 40% - 49% of the targeted pupils
class) (2%) and teachers supported registration /
attended to BSP / GSP / RCYC activities.
* (2) - 30% - 39% of the targeted pupils
and teachers supported registration /
attended to BSP / GSP / RCYC activities.
* (1) - Below 30% of the targeted pupils
and teachers supported registration /
attended to BSP / GSP / RCYC activities.

WEIGHT PER PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL

MFO KRAs OBJECTIVES TIME FRAME RATING SCORE
KRA (Quality Time, Efficiency, Timeliness) RESULTS
2. Conducted periodic *Homeroom PTA meetings to report 5 x 0.05 0.25
PTA meetings / learners' progress conducted at least once:
conference to report a. a month -5
 learner's b. in two months -4
progress. (5%) c. in three months -3
d. in four months -2
e. In five months or more -1

3. Coducted home * (5) 30% and above over the targeted 5 x 0.05 0.25
visits to 75% of parents number of pupils that need academic
and pupils needing monitoring / identified PARDO's were
academic monitoring / visited.
identified PARDOs * (4) - 15-29% over the targeted number of
within the rating period. pupis that need academic monitoring /
(5%) identified PARDO's were visited
*(3) - 100-114% of the targeted number of
pupils that need academic monitoring /
identified PARDO's were visited
* (2) - 51-99% of the targeted number of
pupils that need academic monitoring /
identified PARDO's were visited
* (1) - 50% and below of the targeted number
of pupils that need academic monitoring /
identified PARDO's were visited

4. Undertaken / * (5) - 100% project accomplishment 2 x 0.03 0.06

initiated classroom within the target date with full
projects / events / documentation report.
activities/ with * (4) - 85%-99% project accomplishment
external funding or within the target date with full
sponsorships within documentation report.

WEIGHT PER PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL

MFO KRAs OBJECTIVES TIME FRAME RATING SCORE
KRA (Quality Time, Efficiency, Timeliness) RESULTS
the target date. * (3) - 70%-84% project accomplishment
(Funding requirement: within the target date with full
Php 3,000 and up) (3%) documentation report.
* (2) - 69%-51% project accomplishment
 within the target date with full
documentation report.
* (1) - 50% and below project
accomplishment within the target date
with full documentation report. 0.62

Profes- 1. Conducted problem June to March 15% Conducted problem/classroom-based 1 x 0.02 0.02
sional / classroom -based action research was undertaken using the
Growth Action Research at following steps:
and Deve- least one in a school a. preparation of design
lopment year. (2%) b. conducting the research
c. managing data
d. analyzing data
e. disseminating data
f. utilizing the results

* (5) - All indicators were met without any

revision and submitted ahead of schedule
* (4) - All indicators were met with minor
revision and submitted ahead of schedule
* (3) - All indicators were met with minor
revision and submitted on schedule
* (2) - All indicators were met with major
revision and submitted behind schedule
* (1) - No indicators were met due to the
absence of the action research.

WEIGHT PER PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL

MFO KRAs OBJECTIVES TIME FRAME RATING SCORE
KRA (Quality Time, Efficiency, Timeliness) RESULTS
2. Submitted oneself * (5) - 30% and above over the targeted 5 x 0.04 0.2
for Instructional number of instructional supervision
Supervision at least conducted.
5 times in a school * (4) - 15-29% over the targeted number of
year. (4%) instructional supervision conducted
 * (3) - 100% of thetargeted number of
instructional supervision conducted
* (2) -51%-99% of the targeted number of
instructional supervision conducted
* (1) - 50% and below of the targeted number
of instructional supervision conducted.

3. Participatedin to 75% * (5) - 30% and above participation over the 4 x 0.02 0.08
INSET / training / targeted number of INSET / trainings /
seminars / workshops seminars / workshop
called for. (2%) * (4) - 15-29% participation over the
targeted number of INSET / trainings /
seminars / workshop
* (3) - 100-114% participation over the
targeted number of INSET / trainings /
seminars / workshop
* (2) - 51-99% particioation of the
targeted number of INSET / trainings /
seminars / workshop
* (1) - 50% and below participation over the
targeted number of INSET / trainings /
seminars / workshop

WEIGHT PER PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL

MFO KRAs OBJECTIVES TIME FRAME RATING SCORE
KRA (Quality Time, Efficiency, Timeliness) RESULTS
4.Received academic *Academic and Co-curricular awards 2 x 0.02 0.04
and co-curricular received
awards. (2%) a. National Level - 5
b. Regional Level - 4
c. Division Level - 3
d. District Level - 2
 e. School Level - 1

5. Produced and * (5) - Produced publication / creative 1 x 0.01 0.01

publshed creative work published in National Circulation /
work / publication for DepEd Post / CSC Newsletters / LRMDS and
LRMDS / school paper / similar publications.
division publicatin and * (4) - Produced publication / creative work
similar publication published in regional publications
within the school * (3) - Produced publication / creative work
year. (1%) published in division publication
* (2) -Produced publication / creative work
published in school papers.
* (1) - Unpublished work produced

6. Punctuality / 4x 0.16
Attendance / Wearing of 0.04
Uniform (4%)
*Conformed with the * (5) - incurred less than 4 times tardiness / 4
official time of undertime of the total number of official
attendance from days
Monday to Friday * (4) - incurred 4 - 6 times tardiness /
*Normal Working undertime of the total number of official
Hours: (per class days
program)

WEIGHT PER PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL

MFO KRAs OBJECTIVES TIME FRAME RATING SCORE
KRA (Quality Time, Efficiency, Timeliness) RESULTS
*Any officer or * (3) - incurred 7 -10 times tardiness /
employee who is undertime of the total number of official
absent in the days
morning is * (2) - incurred 11-15 times tardiness /
considered to be undertime of the total number of official
tardy and is subject days
to provision on * (1) - incurred more than 15 times
 Habitual Tardiness tardiness / undertime of the
*Any officer or total number of official days
employee who is
absent in the
afternoon is
considered to have
incurred undertime,
subject to the
provisions on
Undertime

* Conformed with * (5) - incurre o un-authorized absence 4

the official number within the expected numbe of official days
of daily attendance * (4) - incurred 0.5 un-athorized absence
within the expected numbe of official days
* (3) - incurred 1 un-athorized absences
within the expected numbe of official days
* (2) - incurred 1.5 un-athorized absences
within the expected numbe of official days
* (1) - incurred 2 or more un-authorized
absences within the expected number of
official days.

WEIGHT PER PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL

MFO KRAs OBJECTIVES TIME FRAME RATING SCORE
KRA (Quality Time, Efficiency, Timeliness) RESULTS
*Participation in the * (5) - incurred not more than 4 days 4
Flag Raising / absences of the total number of flag raising
Lowering Ceremony / lowering ceremonies in a year
* (4) - incurred 5-8 days absences of the
total number of flag raising / lowering
ceremonies in a year
* (3) - incurred 9 - 12 daysabsences of the
total number of flag raising / lowering
 ceremonies in a year
* (2) - incurred 13-16 days absences of the
total number of flag raising / lowering
ceremonies in a year
* (1) - incurred more than 16 days absences of
the total number of flag raising / lowering
ceremonies in a year

Complied with the * (5) - incurred less than 4 times 5

prescribed uniform non-compliance to the wearing of the
from Monday - Thursday. prescribed uniform
(refer to DepEd Order) * (4) - incurred 4-6times non-compliance
to the wearing of the prescribed unform
* (3) - incurred 7-10 times
non-compliance to the wearing of the
prescribed uniform
* (2) - incurred 11-15 times
non-compliance to the wearing of the
prescribed uniform
* (1) - incurred more than 15 times
non-compliance to the wearing of the
prescribed uniform

WEIGHT PER PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL

MFO KRAs OBJECTIVES TIME FRAME RATING SCORE
KRA (Quality Time, Efficiency, Timeliness) RESULTS
* (2) - incurred 11-15 times
non-compliance to the wearing of the
prescribed uniform
* (1) - incurred more than 15 times
non-compliance to the wearing of the
prescribed uniform 0.43
OVERALL
RATING
FOR
3.66 VS
 3.66 VS
ACCOM-
PLISH-
MENTS

ELLEN MAE P. VERANO IRINE C. MAHINAY, MEEM

Ratee HT-III / TIC
INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE OCMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM

Name of Employee MA. KRISTYL RAIN G. SAGOT Name of Rater GENCIANO M. CAMBALON
Position TEACHER I Position MT-I/SIC
Review Period JUNE 2016- APRIL 2017 Date of Review ###
Bureau/Center/Service/Division SECONDARY/ DAVAO OCCIDENTAL

WEIGHT PER PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL

MFO KRAs OBJECTIVES TIME FRAME RATING SCORE
KRA (Quality Time, Efficiency, Timeliness) RESULTS

Teaching - 1. Prepared lesson plan / June to March 40% *Lesson Plans / Log Plans were prepared 2 1.2
Learning logs of the learning daily.
Process competencies including *Each part had a full description of the LP /
appropriate, adequate DLL of what to do with an example.
and updated *Appropriate instructional mateirals /
instructional materials teaching aids were prepared.
within the rating *Competencies of the learning guides
period (12%) were adopted in the daily logs / lesson
plans.
*Attained 100% of the desired learning
competencies based on the budget of
work.
(5) - When all indicators were met.
(4) - When 4 indicators were met.
(3) - When 3 indicators were met.
(2) - When 2 indicators were met.
(1) - When only 1 indicator was met.
 WEIGHT PER PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL
MFO KRAs OBJECTIVES TIME FRAME RATING SCORE
KRA (Quality Time, Efficiency, Timeliness) RESULTS
2. Faciltated learning June to March *Objectives and instructional materials 2
in the school through were aligned.
functional lesson * Varied techniques and strategies suited
plans, daily logs and to different kinds of learners were being
innovative teaching utilized.
strategies . (20%) *Technology resources in planning,
designing, and delivery of the lesson
was utilized.
* Situations that encourage learners to use
higher order thinking skills were created.
* Routines and procedures was establshed
to maximize use of time and instructional
materials.
*Appropriate intervention activities for
learners at risk were provided.
*Fairness in dealing with learners was
evident.
(5) - 100% of the indicators were rated
Proficient / Highly Proficient
(4) - 85%-99% of the indicators were
rated Proficient/ Highly Proficient
(3) - 70% - 84% of the indicators were
rated Proficient/ Highly Proficient
(2) - 69% - 51% of the indicators were
rated Proficient/ Highly Proficient
(1) - 50% and below of the indicators
were rated Proficient / Highly
Proficient .

WEIGHT PER PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL

MFO KRAs OBJECTIVES TIME FRAME RATING SCORE
KRA (Quality Time, Efficiency, Timeliness) RESULTS
3. Monitored *Attendance of all pupils was systematically 4
attendance, diversity monitored.
appreciation, safe, *Attendance of 75% identified PARDOs
 positive and motivating were monitored.
environment, overall *Behavior problems was handled quickly
physical atmosphere, with due respect to children's rights
cleanliness and *Gender sensitive opportunities for learning
orderliness of were provided.
classrooms including *safety, orderliness and cleanliness of
proper waste disposal classroom, toilers and proper waste
daily. (8%) disposal were maintained.
(5) - When all indicators were met.
(4) - When 4 indicators were met.
(3) - When 3 indicators were met.
(2) - When 2 indicators were met.
(1) - When only 1 indicator was met.
3 0.3 0.81
Pupils / 1. Monitored, evaluated June to March 30% *Formative, summative tests congruent to
Students and maintained the lesson were being used.
Outcomes pupil's/students' *Appropriate reinforcement/feedback to
progress within the learners' behavior was provided.
rating period. (10%) *Opportunity for learners to demonstrate
their learning was provided.
*Non-traditional authentic assessment
techniques was used when needed.
*Assignment as reinforcement or
enrichment of the lesson was given.

MFO KRAs OBJECTIVES
2. Conducted
remediation/
enrichment programs
to 75% of the pupils /
student needing it. (3%)
3. Attained the required
General Scholastic
Average (GSA) / Mean
Percentage Score (MPS)
and Reading Proficiency
Level for every grade /
year level for every
learning area (15%)
*75% of the pupils
attained a GSA of
85%-89%
(Proficient Level)
MFO KRAs OBJECTIVES
WEIGHT PER PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL
TIME FRAME RATING SCORE
KRA (Quality Time, Efficiency, Timeliness) RESULTS
(5) - When all indicators were met.
(4) - When 4 indicators were met.
(3) - When 3 indicators were met.
(2) - When 2 indicators were met.
(1) - When only 1 indicator was met.
3 0.09
* (5) - Remediatin / Enrichment Program is
offered to 130% and above of students
who need it.
* (4) - Remediation / Enrichment Program
is offered to 115 - 129% who need it.
* (3) - Remediation / Enrichment Program
is offered to 100 - 114% who need it.
* (2) - Remediation / Enrichment Program
is offered to 51 - 99% who need it.
* (1) - Remediation /Enrichment Program is
offered to 50% and below who need it.
0.38
* 5 - 30% and aboveover the targeted
number of pupils / students
* 4 - 15-29% over the targeted number of
pupils / students
WEIGHT PER PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL
TIME FRAME RATING SCORE
KRA (Quality Time, Efficiency, Timeliness) RESULTS
* 3 - 100% of the targeted number of
pupils / students
* 2 - 51 - 99% of the targeted number of
 pupils / students
* 1 - 50% and below of the targeted number
of pupis / students

*75% of the Grade * 5 - 30% and aboveover the targeted

3 pupils achieved number of pupils / students
81.76 MPS in NAT 3 * 4 - 15-29% over the targeted number of
pupils / students
* 3 - 100% of the targeted number of
pupils / students
* 2 - 51 - 99% of the targeted number of
pupils / students
* 1 - 50% and below of the targeted number
of pupis / students

* 75% of the * 5 - 30% and above over the targeted

Grade 6 pupils number of pupils / students
achieved 83.38% * 4 - 15-29% over the targeted number of
MPS in NAT 6 pupils / students
* 3 - 100% of the targeted number of
pupils / students
* 2 - 51 - 99% of the targeted number of
pupils / students
* 1 - 50% and below of the targeted number
of pupis / students
 WEIGHT PER PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL
MFO KRAs OBJECTIVES TIME FRAME RATING SCORE
KRA (Quality Time, Efficiency, Timeliness) RESULTS
* 75% of the Year 4 * 5 - 30% and above over the targeted
students achieved number of pupils / students
75% MPS in NAT 4 * 4 - 15-29% over the targeted number of
pupils / students
* 3 - 100% of the targeted number of
pupils / students
* 2 - 51 - 99% of the targeted number of
pupils / students
* 1 - 50% and below of the targeted number
of pupis / students

* 75% of the pupils * 5 - 30% and above over the targeted

achieved number of pupils / students
instructional level * 4 - 15-29% over the targeted number of
of reading pupils / students
proficiency (MT for * 3 - 100% of the targeted number of
Grades 1 & 2; pupils / students
English and Filipino * 2 - 51 - 99% of the targeted number of
for Grades 3) pupils / students
* 1 - 50% and below of the targeted number
of pupis / students
3
* 75% of the pupils / * 5 - 30% and above over the targeted
students achieved number of pupils / students
Independent * 4 - 15-29% over the targeted number of
Level of reading pupils / students
proficiency both * 3 - 100% of the targeted number of
in English and pupils / students
Filipino (For Grades * 2 - 51 - 99% of the targeted number of
4 - 6; Y1 - Y4) pupils / students

WEIGHT PER PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL

MFO KRAs OBJECTIVES TIME FRAME RATING SCORE
KRA (Quality Time, Efficiency, Timeliness) RESULTS
* 1 - 50% and below of the targeted number
of pupis / students
2 0.04
 4. Participated in to * Participation to Academic and
curricular / school Co-Curricular Competitions
activities within the a. National Level - 5
rating period. (2%) b. Regional Level - 4
c. Provincial Level - 3
d. District Level - 2
e. School Level - 1
2 0.04 0.89
Communi- 1. Supported June to March 15% * (5) - 60% and above of the targeted pupils
ty registration / and teachers supported registration /
Involve- participated in non- attended to BSP / GSP / RCYC activities.
ment government activities * (4) - 50% - 59% of the targeted pupils
like BSP,GSP& RCYC and teachers supported registration /
(50%) of the total attended to BSP / GSP / RCYC activities.
number of pupils in a * (3) - 40% - 49% of the targeted pupils
class) (2%) and teachers supported registration /
attended to BSP / GSP / RCYC activities.
* (2) - 30% - 39% of the targeted pupils
and teachers supported registration /
attended to BSP / GSP / RCYC activities.
* (1) - Below 30% of the targeted pupils
and teachers supported registration /
attended to BSP / GSP / RCYC activities.
 WEIGHT PER PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL
MFO KRAs OBJECTIVES TIME FRAME RATING SCORE
KRA (Quality Time, Efficiency, Timeliness) RESULTS
2. Conducted periodic *Homeroom PTA meetings to report 3 0.15
PTA meetings / learners' progress conducted at least once:
conference to report a. a month -5
learner's b. in two months -4
progress. (5%) c. in three months -3
d. in four months -2
e. In five months or more -1
2 0.1
3. Coducted home * (5) 30% and above over the targeted
visits to 75% of parents number of pupils that need academic
and pupils needing monitoring / identified PARDO's were
academic monitoring / visited.
identified PARDOs * (4) - 15-29% over the targeted number of
within the rating period. pupis that need academic monitoring /
(5%) identified PARDO's were visited
*(3) - 100-114% of the targeted number of
pupils that need academic monitoring /
identified PARDO's were visited
* (2) - 51-99% of the targeted number of
pupils that need academic monitoring /
identified PARDO's were visited
* (1) - 50% and below of the targeted number
of pupils that need academic monitoring /
identified PARDO's were visited
2 0.06
4. Undertaken / * (5) - 100% project accomplishment
initiated classroom within the target date with full
projects / events / documentation report.
activities/ with * (4) - 85%-99% project accomplishment
external funding or within the target date with full
sponsorships within documentation report.

WEIGHT PER PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL

MFO KRAs OBJECTIVES TIME FRAME RATING SCORE
KRA (Quality Time, Efficiency, Timeliness) RESULTS
the target date. * (3) - 70%-84% project accomplishment
(Funding requirement: within the target date with full
Php 3,000 and up) (3%) documentation report.
 * (2) - 69%-51% project accomplishment
within the target date with full
documentation report.
* (1) - 50% and below project
accomplishment within the target date
with full documentation report.
1 0.02 0.39
Profes- 1. Conducted problem June to March 15% Conducted problem/classroom-based
sional / classroom -based action research was undertaken using the
Growth Action Research at following steps:
and Deve- least one in a school a. preparation of design
lopment year. (2%) b. conducting the research
c. managing data
d. analyzing data
e. disseminating data
f. utilizing the results

* (5) - All indicators were met without any

revision and submitted ahead of schedule
* (4) - All indicators were met with minor
revision and submitted ahead of schedule
* (3) - All indicators were met with minor
revision and submitted on schedule
* (2) - All indicators were met with major
revision and submitted behind schedule
* (1) - No indicators were met due to the
absence of the action research.
 WEIGHT PER PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL
MFO KRAs OBJECTIVES TIME FRAME RATING SCORE
KRA (Quality Time, Efficiency, Timeliness) RESULTS
2. Submitted oneself * (5) - 30% and above over the targeted 4 0.16
for Instructional number of instructional supervision
Supervision at least conducted.
5 times in a school * (4) - 15-29% over the targeted number of
year. (4%) instructional supervision conducted
* (3) - 100% of thetargeted number of
instructional supervision conducted
* (2) -51%-99% of the targeted number of
instructional supervision conducted
* (1) - 50% and below of the targeted number
of instructional supervision conducted.

3. Participatedin to 75% * (5) - 30% and above participation over the 2 0.04
INSET / training / targeted number of INSET / trainings /
seminars / workshops seminars / workshop
called for. (2%) * (4) - 15-29% participation over the
targeted number of INSET / trainings /
seminars / workshop
* (3) - 100-114% participation over the
targeted number of INSET / trainings /
seminars / workshop
* (2) - 51-99% particioation of the
targeted number of INSET / trainings /
seminars / workshop
* (1) - 50% and below participation over the
targeted number of INSET / trainings /
seminars / workshop
 WEIGHT PER PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL
MFO KRAs OBJECTIVES TIME FRAME RATING SCORE
KRA (Quality Time, Efficiency, Timeliness) RESULTS
4.Received academic *Academic and Co-curricular awards 2 0.04
and co-curricular received
awards. (2%) a. National Level - 5
b. Regional Level - 4
c. Division Level - 3
d. District Level - 2
e. School Level - 1
1 0.01
5. Produced and * (5) - Produced publication / creative
publshed creative work published in National Circulation /
work / publication for DepEd Post / CSC Newsletters / LRMDS and
LRMDS / school paper / similar publications.
division publicatin and * (4) - Produced publication / creative work
similar publication published in regional publications
within the school * (3) - Produced publication / creative work
year. (1%) published in division publication
* (2) -Produced publication / creative work
published in school papers.
* (1) - Unpublished work produced

6. Punctuality / 3 0.12
Attendance / Wearing of
Uniform (4%)
*Conformed with the * (5) - incurred less than 4 times tardiness / 3
official time of undertime of the total number of official
attendance from days
Monday to Friday * (4) - incurred 4 - 6 times tardiness /
*Normal Working undertime of the total number of official
Hours: (per class days
program)
 WEIGHT PER PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL
MFO KRAs OBJECTIVES TIME FRAME RATING SCORE
KRA (Quality Time, Efficiency, Timeliness) RESULTS
*Any officer or * (3) - incurred 7 -10 times tardiness /
employee who is undertime of the total number of official
absent in the days
morning is * (2) - incurred 11-15 times tardiness /
considered to be undertime of the total number of official
tardy and is subject days
to provision on * (1) - incurred more than 15 times
Habitual Tardiness tardiness / undertime of the
*Any officer or total number of official days
employee who is
absent in the
afternoon is
considered to have
incurred undertime,
subject to the
provisions on
Undertime

* Conformed with * (5) - incurre o un-authorized absence

the official number within the expected numbe of official days
of daily attendance * (4) - incurred 0.5 un-athorized absence
within the expected numbe of official days
* (3) - incurred 1 un-athorized absences
within the expected numbe of official days
* (2) - incurred 1.5 un-athorized absences
within the expected numbe of official days
* (1) - incurred 2 or more un-authorized
absences within the expected number of
official days.
 WEIGHT PER PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL
MFO KRAs OBJECTIVES TIME FRAME RATING SCORE
KRA (Quality Time, Efficiency, Timeliness) RESULTS
*Participation in the * (5) - incurred not more than 4 days 4
Flag Raising / absences of the total number of flag raising
Lowering Ceremony / lowering ceremonies in a year
* (4) - incurred 5-8 days absences of the
total number of flag raising / lowering
ceremonies in a year
* (3) - incurred 9 - 12 daysabsences of the
total number of flag raising / lowering
ceremonies in a year
* (2) - incurred 13-16 days absences of the
total number of flag raising / lowering
ceremonies in a year
* (1) - incurred more than 16 days absences of
the total number of flag raising / lowering
ceremonies in a year
5
Complied with the * (5) - incurred less than 4 times
prescribed uniform non-compliance to the wearing of the
from Monday - Thursday. prescribed uniform
(refer to DepEd Order) * (4) - incurred 4-6times non-compliance
to the wearing of the prescribed unform
* (3) - incurred 7-10 times
non-compliance to the wearing of the
prescribed uniform
* (2) - incurred 11-15 times
non-compliance to the wearing of the
prescribed uniform
* (1) - incurred more than 15 times
non-compliance to the wearing of the
prescribed uniform

WEIGHT PER PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL

MFO KRAs OBJECTIVES TIME FRAME RATING SCORE
KRA (Quality Time, Efficiency, Timeliness) RESULTS
* (2) - incurred 11-15 times
non-compliance to the wearing of the
prescribed uniform
* (1) - incurred more than 15 times
non-compliance to the wearing of the
prescribed uniform
OVERALL
RATING
FOR
3.29 S
ACCOM-
PLISH-
MENTS

MA. KRISTYL RAIN G. SAGOT GENCIANO M. CAMBALON

Ratee MT-I/SIC
INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE OCMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM

Name of Employee FLORENCIA VILLASAN ORTIZANO Name of Rater IRINE C.MAHINAY, MEEM
Position Teacher I Position HT-III / TIC
Review Period June 2014 - March 2015 Date of Review March 30, 2015
Bureau/Center/Service/Division Secondary Education/Davao del Sur

WEIGHT PER PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL

MFO KRAs OBJECTIVES TIME FRAME RATING SCORE
KRA (Quality Time, Efficiency, Timeliness) RESULTS

Teaching - 1. Prepared lesson plan / June to March 40% *Lesson Plans / Log Plans were prepared 3 x 0.12 0.36
Learning logs of the learning daily.
Process competencies including *Each part had a full description of the LP /
appropriate, adequate DLL of what to do with an example.
and updated *Appropriate instructional mateirals /
instructional materials teaching aids were prepared.
within the rating *Competencies of the learning guides
period (12%) were adopted in the daily logs / lesson
plans.
*Attained 100% of the desired learning
competencies based on the budget of
work.
(5) - When all indicators were met.
(4) - When 4 indicators were met.
(3) - When 3 indicators were met.
(2) - When 2 indicators were met.
(1) - When only 1 indicator was met.
 WEIGHT PER PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL
MFO KRAs OBJECTIVES TIME FRAME RATING SCORE
KRA (Quality Time, Efficiency, Timeliness) RESULTS
2. Faciltated learning June to March *Objectives and instructional materials 4 x 0.20 0.8
in the school through were aligned.
functional lesson * Varied techniques and strategies suited
plans, daily logs and to different kinds of learners were being
innovative teaching utilized.
strategies . (20%) *Technology resources in planning,
designing, and delivery of the lesson
was utilized.
* Situations that encourage learners to use
higher order thinking skills were created.
* Routines and procedures was establshed
to maximize use of time and instructional
materials.
*Appropriate intervention activities for
learners at risk were provided.
*Fairness in dealing with learners was
evident.
(5) - 100% of the indicators were rated
Proficient / Highly Proficient
(4) - 85%-99% of the indicators were
rated Proficient/ Highly Proficient
(3) - 70% - 84% of the indicators were
rated Proficient/ Highly Proficient
(2) - 69% - 51% of the indicators were
rated Proficient/ Highly Proficient
(1) - 50% and below of the indicators
were rated Proficient / Highly
Proficient .
 WEIGHT PER PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL
MFO KRAs OBJECTIVES TIME FRAME RATING SCORE
KRA (Quality Time, Efficiency, Timeliness) RESULTS
3. Monitored *Attendance of all pupils was systematically 5 x 0.08 0.4
attendance, diversity monitored.
appreciation, safe, *Attendance of 75% identified PARDOs
positive and motivating were monitored.
environment, overall *Behavior problems was handled quickly
physical atmosphere, with due respect to children's rights
cleanliness and *Gender sensitive opportunities for learning
orderliness of were provided.
classrooms including *safety, orderliness and cleanliness of
proper waste disposal classroom, toilers and proper waste
daily. (8%) disposal were maintained.
(5) - When all indicators were met.
(4) - When 4 indicators were met.
(3) - When 3 indicators were met.
(2) - When 2 indicators were met.
(1) - When only 1 indicator was met. 1.56

Pupils / 1. Monitored, evaluated
Students and maintained
Outcomes pupil's/students'
progress within the
rating period. (10%)
June to March 30% *Formative, summative tests congruent to 4 x 0.10 0.4
the lesson were being used.
*Appropriate reinforcement/feedback to
learners' behavior was provided.
*Opportunity for learners to demonstrate
their learning was provided.
*Non-traditional authentic assessment
techniques was used when needed.
*Assignment as reinforcement or
enrichment of the lesson was given.

WEIGHT PER PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL

MFO KRAs OBJECTIVES TIME FRAME RATING SCORE
KRA RESULTS
 WEIGHT PER ACTUAL
MFO KRAs OBJECTIVES TIME FRAME RATING SCORE
KRA (Quality Time, Efficiency, Timeliness) RESULTS
(5) - When all indicators were met.
(4) - When 4 indicators were met.
(3) - When 3 indicators were met.
(2) - When 2 indicators were met.
(1) - When only 1 indicator was met.

2. Conducted * (5) - Remediatin / Enrichment Program is 2 x 0.03 0.06

remediation/ offered to 130% and above of students
enrichment programs who need it.
to 75% of the pupils / * (4) - Remediation / Enrichment Program
student needing it. (3%) is offered to 115 - 129% who need it.
* (3) - Remediation / Enrichment Program
is offered to 100 - 114% who need it.
* (2) - Remediation / Enrichment Program
is offered to 51 - 99% who need it.
* (1) - Remediation /Enrichment Program is
offered to 50% and below who need it.

3. Attained the required 3 0.45

General Scholastic x 0.15
Average (GSA) / Mean
Percentage Score (MPS)
and Reading Proficiency
Level for every grade /
year level for every
learning area (15%)
*75% of the pupils * 5 - 30% and aboveover the targeted 3
attained a GSA of number of pupils / students
85%-89% * 4 - 15-29% over the targeted number of
(Proficient Level) pupils / students

WEIGHT PER PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL

MFO KRAs OBJECTIVES TIME FRAME RATING SCORE
KRA (Quality Time, Efficiency, Timeliness) RESULTS
 * 3 - 100% of the targeted number of
pupils / students
* 2 - 51 - 99% of the targeted number of
pupils / students
* 1 - 50% and below of the targeted number
of pupis / students

*75% of the Grade * 5 - 30% and aboveover the targeted

3 pupils achieved number of pupils / students
81.76 MPS in NAT 3 * 4 - 15-29% over the targeted number of
pupils / students
* 3 - 100% of the targeted number of
pupils / students
* 2 - 51 - 99% of the targeted number of
pupils / students
* 1 - 50% and below of the targeted number
of pupis / students

* 75% of the * 5 - 30% and above over the targeted

Grade 6 pupils number of pupils / students
achieved 83.38% * 4 - 15-29% over the targeted number of
MPS in NAT 6 pupils / students
* 3 - 100% of the targeted number of
pupils / students
* 2 - 51 - 99% of the targeted number of
pupils / students
* 1 - 50% and below of the targeted number
of pupis / students

WEIGHT PER PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL

MFO KRAs OBJECTIVES TIME FRAME RATING SCORE
KRA (Quality Time, Efficiency, Timeliness) RESULTS
* 75% of the Year 4 * 5 - 30% and above over the targeted 3
 students achieved number of pupils / students
75% MPS in NAT 4 * 4 - 15-29% over the targeted number of
pupils / students
* 3 - 100% of the targeted number of
pupils / students
* 2 - 51 - 99% of the targeted number of
pupils / students
* 1 - 50% and below of the targeted number
of pupis / students

* 75% of the pupils * 5 - 30% and above over the targeted

achieved number of pupils / students
instructional level * 4 - 15-29% over the targeted number of
of reading pupils / students
proficiency (MT for * 3 - 100% of the targeted number of
Grades 1 & 2; pupils / students
English and Filipino * 2 - 51 - 99% of the targeted number of
for Grades 3) pupils / students
* 1 - 50% and below of the targeted number
of pupis / students

* 75% of the pupils / * 5 - 30% and above over the targeted 3

students achieved number of pupils / students
Independent * 4 - 15-29% over the targeted number of
Level of reading pupils / students
proficiency both * 3 - 100% of the targeted number of
in English and pupils / students
Filipino (For Grades * 2 - 51 - 99% of the targeted number of
4 - 6; Y1 - Y4) pupils / students

WEIGHT PER PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL

MFO KRAs OBJECTIVES TIME FRAME RATING SCORE
KRA (Quality Time, Efficiency, Timeliness) RESULTS
* 1 - 50% and below of the targeted number
of pupis / students
 4. Participated in to * Participation to Academic and 1 x 0.02 0.02
curricular / school Co-Curricular Competitions
activities within the a. National Level - 5
rating period. (2%) b. Regional Level - 4
c. Provincial Level - 3
d. District Level - 2
e. School Level - 1 0.93

Communi- 1. Supported June to March 15% * (5) - 60% and above of the targeted pupils 3 x 0.02 0.06
ty registration / and teachers supported registration /
Involve- participated in non- attended to BSP / GSP / RCYC activities.
ment government activities * (4) - 50% - 59% of the targeted pupils
like BSP,GSP& RCYC and teachers supported registration /
(50%) of the total attended to BSP / GSP / RCYC activities.
number of pupils in a * (3) - 40% - 49% of the targeted pupils
class) (2%) and teachers supported registration /
attended to BSP / GSP / RCYC activities.
* (2) - 30% - 39% of the targeted pupils
and teachers supported registration /
attended to BSP / GSP / RCYC activities.
* (1) - Below 30% of the targeted pupils
and teachers supported registration /
attended to BSP / GSP / RCYC activities.

WEIGHT PER PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL

MFO KRAs OBJECTIVES TIME FRAME RATING SCORE
KRA (Quality Time, Efficiency, Timeliness) RESULTS
2. Conducted periodic *Homeroom PTA meetings to report 5 x 0.05 0.25
PTA meetings / learners' progress conducted at least once:
conference to report a. a month -5
 learner's b. in two months -4
progress. (5%) c. in three months -3
d. in four months -2
e. In five months or more -1

3. Coducted home * (5) 30% and above over the targeted 5 x 0.05 0.25
visits to 75% of parents number of pupils that need academic
and pupils needing monitoring / identified PARDO's were
academic monitoring / visited.
identified PARDOs * (4) - 15-29% over the targeted number of
within the rating period. pupis that need academic monitoring /
(5%) identified PARDO's were visited
*(3) - 100-114% of the targeted number of
pupils that need academic monitoring /
identified PARDO's were visited
* (2) - 51-99% of the targeted number of
pupils that need academic monitoring /
identified PARDO's were visited
* (1) - 50% and below of the targeted number
of pupils that need academic monitoring /
identified PARDO's were visited

4. Undertaken / * (5) - 100% project accomplishment 2 x 0.03 0.06

initiated classroom within the target date with full
projects / events / documentation report.
activities/ with * (4) - 85%-99% project accomplishment
external funding or within the target date with full
sponsorships within documentation report.

WEIGHT PER PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL

MFO KRAs OBJECTIVES TIME FRAME RATING SCORE
KRA (Quality Time, Efficiency, Timeliness) RESULTS
the target date. * (3) - 70%-84% project accomplishment
(Funding requirement: within the target date with full
Php 3,000 and up) (3%) documentation report.
* (2) - 69%-51% project accomplishment
 within the target date with full
documentation report.
* (1) - 50% and below project
accomplishment within the target date
with full documentation report. 0.62

Profes- 1. Conducted problem June to March 15% Conducted problem/classroom-based 1 x 0.02 0.02
sional / classroom -based action research was undertaken using the
Growth Action Research at following steps:
and Deve- least one in a school a. preparation of design
lopment year. (2%) b. conducting the research
c. managing data
d. analyzing data
e. disseminating data
f. utilizing the results

* (5) - All indicators were met without any

revision and submitted ahead of schedule
* (4) - All indicators were met with minor
revision and submitted ahead of schedule
* (3) - All indicators were met with minor
revision and submitted on schedule
* (2) - All indicators were met with major
revision and submitted behind schedule
* (1) - No indicators were met due to the
absence of the action research.

WEIGHT PER PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL

MFO KRAs OBJECTIVES TIME FRAME RATING SCORE
KRA (Quality Time, Efficiency, Timeliness) RESULTS
2. Submitted oneself * (5) - 30% and above over the targeted 5 x 0.04 0.2
for Instructional number of instructional supervision
Supervision at least conducted.
5 times in a school * (4) - 15-29% over the targeted number of
year. (4%) instructional supervision conducted
 * (3) - 100% of thetargeted number of
instructional supervision conducted
* (2) -51%-99% of the targeted number of
instructional supervision conducted
* (1) - 50% and below of the targeted number
of instructional supervision conducted.

3. Participatedin to 75% * (5) - 30% and above participation over the 4 x 0.02 0.08
INSET / training / targeted number of INSET / trainings /
seminars / workshops seminars / workshop
called for. (2%) * (4) - 15-29% participation over the
targeted number of INSET / trainings /
seminars / workshop
* (3) - 100-114% participation over the
targeted number of INSET / trainings /
seminars / workshop
* (2) - 51-99% particioation of the
targeted number of INSET / trainings /
seminars / workshop
* (1) - 50% and below participation over the
targeted number of INSET / trainings /
seminars / workshop

WEIGHT PER PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL

MFO KRAs OBJECTIVES TIME FRAME RATING SCORE
KRA (Quality Time, Efficiency, Timeliness) RESULTS
4.Received academic *Academic and Co-curricular awards 1 x 0.02 0.02
and co-curricular received
awards. (2%) a. National Level - 5
b. Regional Level - 4
c. Division Level - 3
d. District Level - 2
 e. School Level - 1

5. Produced and * (5) - Produced publication / creative 1 x 0.01 0.01

publshed creative work published in National Circulation /
work / publication for DepEd Post / CSC Newsletters / LRMDS and
LRMDS / school paper / similar publications.
division publicatin and * (4) - Produced publication / creative work
similar publication published in regional publications
within the school * (3) - Produced publication / creative work
year. (1%) published in division publication
* (2) -Produced publication / creative work
published in school papers.
* (1) - Unpublished work produced

6. Punctuality / 4x 0.16
Attendance / Wearing of 0.04
Uniform (4%)
*Conformed with the * (5) - incurred less than 4 times tardiness / 4
official time of undertime of the total number of official
attendance from days
Monday to Friday * (4) - incurred 4 - 6 times tardiness /
*Normal Working undertime of the total number of official
Hours: (per class days
program)

WEIGHT PER PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL

MFO KRAs OBJECTIVES TIME FRAME RATING SCORE
KRA (Quality Time, Efficiency, Timeliness) RESULTS
*Any officer or * (3) - incurred 7 -10 times tardiness /
employee who is undertime of the total number of official
absent in the days
morning is * (2) - incurred 11-15 times tardiness /
considered to be undertime of the total number of official
tardy and is subject days
to provision on * (1) - incurred more than 15 times
 Habitual Tardiness tardiness / undertime of the
*Any officer or total number of official days
employee who is
absent in the
afternoon is
considered to have
incurred undertime,
subject to the
provisions on
Undertime

* Conformed with * (5) - incurre o un-authorized absence 4

the official number within the expected numbe of official days
of daily attendance * (4) - incurred 0.5 un-athorized absence
within the expected numbe of official days
* (3) - incurred 1 un-athorized absences
within the expected numbe of official days
* (2) - incurred 1.5 un-athorized absences
within the expected numbe of official days
* (1) - incurred 2 or more un-authorized
absences within the expected number of
official days.

WEIGHT PER PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL

MFO KRAs OBJECTIVES TIME FRAME RATING SCORE
KRA (Quality Time, Efficiency, Timeliness) RESULTS
*Participation in the * (5) - incurred not more than 4 days 4
Flag Raising / absences of the total number of flag raising
Lowering Ceremony / lowering ceremonies in a year
* (4) - incurred 5-8 days absences of the
total number of flag raising / lowering
ceremonies in a year
* (3) - incurred 9 - 12 daysabsences of the
total number of flag raising / lowering
 ceremonies in a year
* (2) - incurred 13-16 days absences of the
total number of flag raising / lowering
ceremonies in a year
* (1) - incurred more than 16 days absences of
the total number of flag raising / lowering
ceremonies in a year

Complied with the * (5) - incurred less than 4 times 4

prescribed uniform non-compliance to the wearing of the
from Monday - Thursday. prescribed uniform
(refer to DepEd Order) * (4) - incurred 4-6times non-compliance
to the wearing of the prescribed unform
* (3) - incurred 7-10 times
non-compliance to the wearing of the
prescribed uniform
* (2) - incurred 11-15 times
non-compliance to the wearing of the
prescribed uniform
* (1) - incurred more than 15 times
non-compliance to the wearing of the
prescribed uniform

WEIGHT PER PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL

MFO KRAs OBJECTIVES TIME FRAME RATING SCORE
KRA (Quality Time, Efficiency, Timeliness) RESULTS
* (2) - incurred 11-15 times
non-compliance to the wearing of the
prescribed uniform
* (1) - incurred more than 15 times
non-compliance to the wearing of the
prescribed uniform 0.43
OVERALL
RATING
FOR
3.6 VS
 3.6 VS
ACCOM-
PLISH-
MENTS

FLORENCIA VILLASAN ORTIZANO IRINE C. MAHINAY, MEEM

Ratee HT-III / TIC
INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE OCMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM

Name of Employee RODOLFO EMMANUEL T. MASANDANG, JR. Name of Rater IRINE C.MAHINAY, MEEM
Position Teacher I Position HT-III / TIC
Review Period June 2014 - March 2015 Date of Review March 30, 2015
Bureau/Center/Service/Division Secondary Education/Davao del Sur

WEIGHT PER PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL

MFO KRAs OBJECTIVES TIME FRAME RATING SCORE
KRA (Quality Time, Efficiency, Timeliness) RESULTS

Teaching - 1. Prepared lesson plan / June to March 40% *Lesson Plans / Log Plans were prepared 5 x 0.12 0.6
Learning logs of the learning daily.
Process competencies including *Each part had a full description of the LP /
appropriate, adequate DLL of what to do with an example.
and updated *Appropriate instructional mateirals /
instructional materials teaching aids were prepared.
within the rating *Competencies of the learning guides
period (12%) were adopted in the daily logs / lesson
plans.
*Attained 100% of the desired learning
competencies based on the budget of
work.
(5) - When all indicators were met.
(4) - When 4 indicators were met.
(3) - When 3 indicators were met.
(2) - When 2 indicators were met.
(1) - When only 1 indicator was met.
 WEIGHT PER PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL
MFO KRAs OBJECTIVES TIME FRAME RATING SCORE
KRA (Quality Time, Efficiency, Timeliness) RESULTS
2. Faciltated learning June to March *Objectives and instructional materials 5 x 0.20 0.1
in the school through were aligned.
functional lesson * Varied techniques and strategies suited
plans, daily logs and to different kinds of learners were being
innovative teaching utilized.
strategies . (20%) *Technology resources in planning,
designing, and delivery of the lesson
was utilized.
* Situations that encourage learners to use
higher order thinking skills were created.
* Routines and procedures was establshed
to maximize use of time and instructional
materials.
*Appropriate intervention activities for
learners at risk were provided.
*Fairness in dealing with learners was
evident.
(5) - 100% of the indicators were rated
Proficient / Highly Proficient
(4) - 85%-99% of the indicators were
rated Proficient/ Highly Proficient
(3) - 70% - 84% of the indicators were
rated Proficient/ Highly Proficient
(2) - 69% - 51% of the indicators were
rated Proficient/ Highly Proficient
(1) - 50% and below of the indicators
were rated Proficient / Highly
Proficient .
 WEIGHT PER PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL
MFO KRAs OBJECTIVES TIME FRAME RATING SCORE
KRA (Quality Time, Efficiency, Timeliness) RESULTS
3. Monitored *Attendance of all pupils was systematically 5 x 0.08 0.4
attendance, diversity monitored.
appreciation, safe, *Attendance of 75% identified PARDOs
positive and motivating were monitored.
environment, overall *Behavior problems was handled quickly
physical atmosphere, with due respect to children's rights
cleanliness and *Gender sensitive opportunities for learning
orderliness of were provided.
classrooms including *safety, orderliness and cleanliness of
proper waste disposal classroom, toilers and proper waste
daily. (8%) disposal were maintained.
(5) - When all indicators were met.
(4) - When 4 indicators were met.
(3) - When 3 indicators were met.
(2) - When 2 indicators were met.
(1) - When only 1 indicator was met. 2

Pupils / 1. Monitored, evaluated
Students and maintained
Outcomes pupil's/students'
progress within the
rating period. (10%)
June to March 30% *Formative, summative tests congruent to 4 x 0.10 0.4
the lesson were being used.
*Appropriate reinforcement/feedback to
learners' behavior was provided.
*Opportunity for learners to demonstrate
their learning was provided.
*Non-traditional authentic assessment
techniques was used when needed.
*Assignment as reinforcement or
enrichment of the lesson was given.

WEIGHT PER PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL

MFO KRAs OBJECTIVES TIME FRAME RATING SCORE
KRA RESULTS
 WEIGHT PER ACTUAL
MFO KRAs OBJECTIVES TIME FRAME RATING SCORE
KRA (Quality Time, Efficiency, Timeliness) RESULTS
(5) - When all indicators were met.
(4) - When 4 indicators were met.
(3) - When 3 indicators were met.
(2) - When 2 indicators were met.
(1) - When only 1 indicator was met.

2. Conducted * (5) - Remediatin / Enrichment Program is 4 x 0.03 0.12

remediation/ offered to 130% and above of students
enrichment programs who need it.
to 75% of the pupils / * (4) - Remediation / Enrichment Program
student needing it. (3%) is offered to 115 - 129% who need it.
* (3) - Remediation / Enrichment Program
is offered to 100 - 114% who need it.
* (2) - Remediation / Enrichment Program
is offered to 51 - 99% who need it.
* (1) - Remediation /Enrichment Program is
offered to 50% and below who need it.

3. Attained the required 3 0.45

General Scholastic x 0.15
Average (GSA) / Mean
Percentage Score (MPS)
and Reading Proficiency
Level for every grade /
year level for every
learning area (15%)
*75% of the pupils * 5 - 30% and aboveover the targeted 3
attained a GSA of number of pupils / students
85%-89% * 4 - 15-29% over the targeted number of
(Proficient Level) pupils / students

WEIGHT PER PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL

MFO KRAs OBJECTIVES TIME FRAME RATING SCORE
KRA (Quality Time, Efficiency, Timeliness) RESULTS
 * 3 - 100% of the targeted number of
pupils / students
* 2 - 51 - 99% of the targeted number of
pupils / students
* 1 - 50% and below of the targeted number
of pupis / students

*75% of the Grade * 5 - 30% and aboveover the targeted

3 pupils achieved number of pupils / students
81.76 MPS in NAT 3 * 4 - 15-29% over the targeted number of
pupils / students
* 3 - 100% of the targeted number of
pupils / students
* 2 - 51 - 99% of the targeted number of
pupils / students
* 1 - 50% and below of the targeted number
of pupis / students

* 75% of the * 5 - 30% and above over the targeted

Grade 6 pupils number of pupils / students
achieved 83.38% * 4 - 15-29% over the targeted number of
MPS in NAT 6 pupils / students
* 3 - 100% of the targeted number of
pupils / students
* 2 - 51 - 99% of the targeted number of
pupils / students
* 1 - 50% and below of the targeted number
of pupis / students

WEIGHT PER PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL

MFO KRAs OBJECTIVES TIME FRAME RATING SCORE
KRA (Quality Time, Efficiency, Timeliness) RESULTS
* 75% of the Year 4 * 5 - 30% and above over the targeted 3
 students achieved number of pupils / students
75% MPS in NAT 4 * 4 - 15-29% over the targeted number of
pupils / students
* 3 - 100% of the targeted number of
pupils / students
* 2 - 51 - 99% of the targeted number of
pupils / students
* 1 - 50% and below of the targeted number
of pupis / students

* 75% of the pupils * 5 - 30% and above over the targeted

achieved number of pupils / students
instructional level * 4 - 15-29% over the targeted number of
of reading pupils / students
proficiency (MT for * 3 - 100% of the targeted number of
Grades 1 & 2; pupils / students
English and Filipino * 2 - 51 - 99% of the targeted number of
for Grades 3) pupils / students
* 1 - 50% and below of the targeted number
of pupis / students

* 75% of the pupils / * 5 - 30% and above over the targeted 3

students achieved number of pupils / students
Independent * 4 - 15-29% over the targeted number of
Level of reading pupils / students
proficiency both * 3 - 100% of the targeted number of
in English and pupils / students
Filipino (For Grades * 2 - 51 - 99% of the targeted number of
4 - 6; Y1 - Y4) pupils / students

WEIGHT PER PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL

MFO KRAs OBJECTIVES TIME FRAME RATING SCORE
KRA (Quality Time, Efficiency, Timeliness) RESULTS
* 1 - 50% and below of the targeted number
of pupis / students
 4. Participated in to * Participation to Academic and 1 x 0.02 0.02
curricular / school Co-Curricular Competitions
activities within the a. National Level - 5
rating period. (2%) b. Regional Level - 4
c. Provincial Level - 3
d. District Level - 2
e. School Level - 1 0.99

Communi- 1. Supported June to March 15% * (5) - 60% and above of the targeted pupils 3 x 0.02 0.06
ty registration / and teachers supported registration /
Involve- participated in non- attended to BSP / GSP / RCYC activities.
ment government activities * (4) - 50% - 59% of the targeted pupils
like BSP,GSP& RCYC and teachers supported registration /
(50%) of the total attended to BSP / GSP / RCYC activities.
number of pupils in a * (3) - 40% - 49% of the targeted pupils
class) (2%) and teachers supported registration /
attended to BSP / GSP / RCYC activities.
* (2) - 30% - 39% of the targeted pupils
and teachers supported registration /
attended to BSP / GSP / RCYC activities.
* (1) - Below 30% of the targeted pupils
and teachers supported registration /
attended to BSP / GSP / RCYC activities.

WEIGHT PER PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL

MFO KRAs OBJECTIVES TIME FRAME RATING SCORE
KRA (Quality Time, Efficiency, Timeliness) RESULTS
2. Conducted periodic *Homeroom PTA meetings to report 3 x 0.05 0.15
PTA meetings / learners' progress conducted at least once:
conference to report a. a month -5
 learner's b. in two months -4
progress. (5%) c. in three months -3
d. in four months -2
e. In five months or more -1

3. Coducted home * (5) 30% and above over the targeted 3 x 0.05 0.15
visits to 75% of parents number of pupils that need academic
and pupils needing monitoring / identified PARDO's were
academic monitoring / visited.
identified PARDOs * (4) - 15-29% over the targeted number of
within the rating period. pupis that need academic monitoring /
(5%) identified PARDO's were visited
*(3) - 100-114% of the targeted number of
pupils that need academic monitoring /
identified PARDO's were visited
* (2) - 51-99% of the targeted number of
pupils that need academic monitoring /
identified PARDO's were visited
* (1) - 50% and below of the targeted number
of pupils that need academic monitoring /
identified PARDO's were visited

4. Undertaken / * (5) - 100% project accomplishment 4 x 0.03 0.12

initiated classroom within the target date with full
projects / events / documentation report.
activities/ with * (4) - 85%-99% project accomplishment
external funding or within the target date with full
sponsorships within documentation report.

WEIGHT PER PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL

MFO KRAs OBJECTIVES TIME FRAME RATING SCORE
KRA (Quality Time, Efficiency, Timeliness) RESULTS
the target date. * (3) - 70%-84% project accomplishment
(Funding requirement: within the target date with full
Php 3,000 and up) (3%) documentation report.
* (2) - 69%-51% project accomplishment
 within the target date with full
documentation report.
* (1) - 50% and below project
accomplishment within the target date
with full documentation report. 0.48

Profes- 1. Conducted problem June to March 15% Conducted problem/classroom-based 1 x 0.02 0.02
sional / classroom -based action research was undertaken using the
Growth Action Research at following steps:
and Deve- least one in a school a. preparation of design
lopment year. (2%) b. conducting the research
c. managing data
d. analyzing data
e. disseminating data
f. utilizing the results

* (5) - All indicators were met without any

revision and submitted ahead of schedule
* (4) - All indicators were met with minor
revision and submitted ahead of schedule
* (3) - All indicators were met with minor
revision and submitted on schedule
* (2) - All indicators were met with major
revision and submitted behind schedule
* (1) - No indicators were met due to the
absence of the action research.

WEIGHT PER PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL

MFO KRAs OBJECTIVES TIME FRAME RATING SCORE
KRA (Quality Time, Efficiency, Timeliness) RESULTS
2. Submitted oneself * (5) - 30% and above over the targeted 5 x 0.04 0.2
for Instructional number of instructional supervision
Supervision at least conducted.
5 times in a school * (4) - 15-29% over the targeted number of
year. (4%) instructional supervision conducted
 * (3) - 100% of thetargeted number of
instructional supervision conducted
* (2) -51%-99% of the targeted number of
instructional supervision conducted
* (1) - 50% and below of the targeted number
of instructional supervision conducted.

3. Participatedin to 75% * (5) - 30% and above participation over the 4 x 0.02 0.08
INSET / training / targeted number of INSET / trainings /
seminars / workshops seminars / workshop
called for. (2%) * (4) - 15-29% participation over the
targeted number of INSET / trainings /
seminars / workshop
* (3) - 100-114% participation over the
targeted number of INSET / trainings /
seminars / workshop
* (2) - 51-99% particioation of the
targeted number of INSET / trainings /
seminars / workshop
* (1) - 50% and below participation over the
targeted number of INSET / trainings /
seminars / workshop

WEIGHT PER PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL

MFO KRAs OBJECTIVES TIME FRAME RATING SCORE
KRA (Quality Time, Efficiency, Timeliness) RESULTS
4.Received academic *Academic and Co-curricular awards 1 x 0.02 0.02
and co-curricular received
awards. (2%) a. National Level - 5
b. Regional Level - 4
c. Division Level - 3
d. District Level - 2
 e. School Level - 1

5. Produced and * (5) - Produced publication / creative 1 x 0.01 0.01

publshed creative work published in National Circulation /
work / publication for DepEd Post / CSC Newsletters / LRMDS and
LRMDS / school paper / similar publications.
division publicatin and * (4) - Produced publication / creative work
similar publication published in regional publications
within the school * (3) - Produced publication / creative work
year. (1%) published in division publication
* (2) -Produced publication / creative work
published in school papers.
* (1) - Unpublished work produced

6. Punctuality / 4x 0.16
Attendance / Wearing of 0.04
Uniform (4%)
*Conformed with the * (5) - incurred less than 4 times tardiness / 4
official time of undertime of the total number of official
attendance from days
Monday to Friday * (4) - incurred 4 - 6 times tardiness /
*Normal Working undertime of the total number of official
Hours: (per class days
program)

WEIGHT PER PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL

MFO KRAs OBJECTIVES TIME FRAME RATING SCORE
KRA (Quality Time, Efficiency, Timeliness) RESULTS
*Any officer or * (3) - incurred 7 -10 times tardiness /
employee who is undertime of the total number of official
absent in the days
morning is * (2) - incurred 11-15 times tardiness /
considered to be undertime of the total number of official
tardy and is subject days
to provision on * (1) - incurred more than 15 times
 Habitual Tardiness tardiness / undertime of the
*Any officer or total number of official days
employee who is
absent in the
afternoon is
considered to have
incurred undertime,
subject to the
provisions on
Undertime

* Conformed with * (5) - incurre o un-authorized absence 4

the official number within the expected numbe of official days
of daily attendance * (4) - incurred 0.5 un-athorized absence
within the expected numbe of official days
* (3) - incurred 1 un-athorized absences
within the expected numbe of official days
* (2) - incurred 1.5 un-athorized absences
within the expected numbe of official days
* (1) - incurred 2 or more un-authorized
absences within the expected number of
official days.

WEIGHT PER PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL

MFO KRAs OBJECTIVES TIME FRAME RATING SCORE
KRA (Quality Time, Efficiency, Timeliness) RESULTS
*Participation in the * (5) - incurred not more than 4 days 4
Flag Raising / absences of the total number of flag raising
Lowering Ceremony / lowering ceremonies in a year
* (4) - incurred 5-8 days absences of the
total number of flag raising / lowering
ceremonies in a year
* (3) - incurred 9 - 12 daysabsences of the
total number of flag raising / lowering
 ceremonies in a year
* (2) - incurred 13-16 days absences of the
total number of flag raising / lowering
ceremonies in a year
* (1) - incurred more than 16 days absences of
the total number of flag raising / lowering
ceremonies in a year

Complied with the * (5) - incurred less than 4 times 4

prescribed uniform non-compliance to the wearing of the
from Monday - Thursday. prescribed uniform
(refer to DepEd Order) * (4) - incurred 4-6times non-compliance
to the wearing of the prescribed unform
* (3) - incurred 7-10 times
non-compliance to the wearing of the
prescribed uniform
* (2) - incurred 11-15 times
non-compliance to the wearing of the
prescribed uniform
* (1) - incurred more than 15 times
non-compliance to the wearing of the
prescribed uniform

WEIGHT PER PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL

MFO KRAs OBJECTIVES TIME FRAME RATING SCORE
KRA (Quality Time, Efficiency, Timeliness) RESULTS
* (2) - incurred 11-15 times
non-compliance to the wearing of the
prescribed uniform
* (1) - incurred more than 15 times
non-compliance to the wearing of the
prescribed uniform 0.43
OVERALL
RATING
FOR
3.96 VS
 3.96 VS
ACCOM-
PLISH-
MENTS

RODOLFO EMMANUEL T. MASANDANG, JR. IRINE C. MAHINAY, MEEM

Ratee HT-III / TIC
INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE OCMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM

Name of Employee EHDEN PEARL C. MALBINO Name of Rater IRINE C.MAHINAY, MEEM
Position Teacher I Position HT-III / TIC
Review Period June 2014 - March 2015 Date of Review March 30, 2015
Bureau/Center/Service/Division Secondary Education/Davao del Sur

WEIGHT PER PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL

MFO KRAs OBJECTIVES TIME FRAME RATING SCORE
KRA (Quality Time, Efficiency, Timeliness) RESULTS

Teaching - 1. Prepared lesson plan / June to March 40% *Lesson Plans / Log Plans were prepared 3 x 0.12 0.36
Learning logs of the learning daily.
Process competencies including *Each part had a full description of the LP /
appropriate, adequate DLL of what to do with an example.
and updated *Appropriate instructional mateirals /
instructional materials teaching aids were prepared.
within the rating *Competencies of the learning guides
period (12%) were adopted in the daily logs / lesson
plans.
*Attained 100% of the desired learning
competencies based on the budget of
work.
(5) - When all indicators were met.
(4) - When 4 indicators were met.
(3) - When 3 indicators were met.
(2) - When 2 indicators were met.
(1) - When only 1 indicator was met.
 WEIGHT PER PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL
MFO KRAs OBJECTIVES TIME FRAME RATING SCORE
KRA (Quality Time, Efficiency, Timeliness) RESULTS
2. Faciltated learning June to March *Objectives and instructional materials 4 x 0.20 0.8
in the school through were aligned.
functional lesson * Varied techniques and strategies suited
plans, daily logs and to different kinds of learners were being
innovative teaching utilized.
strategies . (20%) *Technology resources in planning,
designing, and delivery of the lesson
was utilized.
* Situations that encourage learners to use
higher order thinking skills were created.
* Routines and procedures was establshed
to maximize use of time and instructional
materials.
*Appropriate intervention activities for
learners at risk were provided.
*Fairness in dealing with learners was
evident.
(5) - 100% of the indicators were rated
Proficient / Highly Proficient
(4) - 85%-99% of the indicators were
rated Proficient/ Highly Proficient
(3) - 70% - 84% of the indicators were
rated Proficient/ Highly Proficient
(2) - 69% - 51% of the indicators were
rated Proficient/ Highly Proficient
(1) - 50% and below of the indicators
were rated Proficient / Highly
Proficient .

WEIGHT PER PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL

MFO KRAs OBJECTIVES TIME FRAME RATING SCORE
KRA RESULTS
 WEIGHT PER ACTUAL
MFO KRAs OBJECTIVES TIME FRAME RATING SCORE
KRA (Quality Time, Efficiency, Timeliness) RESULTS
3. Monitored *Attendance of all pupils was systematically 5 x 0.08 0.4
attendance, diversity monitored.
appreciation, safe, *Attendance of 75% identified PARDOs
positive and motivating were monitored.
environment, overall *Behavior problems was handled quickly
physical atmosphere, with due respect to children's rights
cleanliness and *Gender sensitive opportunities for learning
orderliness of were provided.
classrooms including *safety, orderliness and cleanliness of
proper waste disposal classroom, toilers and proper waste
daily. (8%) disposal were maintained.
(5) - When all indicators were met.
(4) - When 4 indicators were met.
(3) - When 3 indicators were met.
(2) - When 2 indicators were met.
(1) - When only 1 indicator was met. 1.56

Pupils / 1. Monitored, evaluated
Students and maintained
Outcomes pupil's/students'
progress within the
rating period. (10%)
June to March 30% *Formative, summative tests congruent to 4 x 0.10 0.4
the lesson were being used.
*Appropriate reinforcement/feedback to
learners' behavior was provided.
*Opportunity for learners to demonstrate
their learning was provided.
*Non-traditional authentic assessment
techniques was used when needed.
*Assignment as reinforcement or
enrichment of the lesson was given.

WEIGHT PER PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL

MFO KRAs OBJECTIVES TIME FRAME RATING SCORE
KRA (Quality Time, Efficiency, Timeliness) RESULTS
 (5) - When all indicators were met.
(4) - When 4 indicators were met.
(3) - When 3 indicators were met.
(2) - When 2 indicators were met.
(1) - When only 1 indicator was met.

2. Conducted * (5) - Remediatin / Enrichment Program is 2 x 0.03 0.06

remediation/ offered to 130% and above of students
enrichment programs who need it.
to 75% of the pupils / * (4) - Remediation / Enrichment Program
student needing it. (3%) is offered to 115 - 129% who need it.
* (3) - Remediation / Enrichment Program
is offered to 100 - 114% who need it.
* (2) - Remediation / Enrichment Program
is offered to 51 - 99% who need it.
* (1) - Remediation /Enrichment Program is
offered to 50% and below who need it.

3. Attained the required 3 0.45

General Scholastic x 0.15
Average (GSA) / Mean
Percentage Score (MPS)
and Reading Proficiency
Level for every grade /
year level for every
learning area (15%)
*75% of the pupils * 5 - 30% and aboveover the targeted 3
attained a GSA of number of pupils / students
85%-89% * 4 - 15-29% over the targeted number of
(Proficient Level) pupils / students

WEIGHT PER PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL

MFO KRAs OBJECTIVES TIME FRAME RATING SCORE
KRA (Quality Time, Efficiency, Timeliness) RESULTS
* 3 - 100% of the targeted number of
 pupils / students
* 2 - 51 - 99% of the targeted number of
pupils / students
* 1 - 50% and below of the targeted number
of pupis / students

*75% of the Grade * 5 - 30% and aboveover the targeted

3 pupils achieved number of pupils / students
81.76 MPS in NAT 3 * 4 - 15-29% over the targeted number of
pupils / students
* 3 - 100% of the targeted number of
pupils / students
* 2 - 51 - 99% of the targeted number of
pupils / students
* 1 - 50% and below of the targeted number
of pupis / students

* 75% of the * 5 - 30% and above over the targeted

Grade 6 pupils number of pupils / students
achieved 83.38% * 4 - 15-29% over the targeted number of
MPS in NAT 6 pupils / students
* 3 - 100% of the targeted number of
pupils / students
* 2 - 51 - 99% of the targeted number of
pupils / students
* 1 - 50% and below of the targeted number
of pupis / students

WEIGHT PER PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL

MFO KRAs OBJECTIVES TIME FRAME RATING SCORE
KRA (Quality Time, Efficiency, Timeliness) RESULTS
* 75% of the Year 4 * 5 - 30% and above over the targeted 3
students achieved number of pupils / students
 75% MPS in NAT 4 * 4 - 15-29% over the targeted number of
pupils / students
* 3 - 100% of the targeted number of
pupils / students
* 2 - 51 - 99% of the targeted number of
pupils / students
* 1 - 50% and below of the targeted number
of pupis / students

* 75% of the pupils * 5 - 30% and above over the targeted

achieved number of pupils / students
instructional level * 4 - 15-29% over the targeted number of
of reading pupils / students
proficiency (MT for * 3 - 100% of the targeted number of
Grades 1 & 2; pupils / students
English and Filipino * 2 - 51 - 99% of the targeted number of
for Grades 3) pupils / students
* 1 - 50% and below of the targeted number
of pupis / students

* 75% of the pupils / * 5 - 30% and above over the targeted 3

students achieved number of pupils / students
Independent * 4 - 15-29% over the targeted number of
Level of reading pupils / students
proficiency both * 3 - 100% of the targeted number of
in English and pupils / students
Filipino (For Grades * 2 - 51 - 99% of the targeted number of
4 - 6; Y1 - Y4) pupils / students

WEIGHT PER PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL

MFO KRAs OBJECTIVES TIME FRAME RATING SCORE
KRA (Quality Time, Efficiency, Timeliness) RESULTS
* 1 - 50% and below of the targeted number
of pupis / students
 4. Participated in to * Participation to Academic and 1 x 0.02 0.02
curricular / school Co-Curricular Competitions
activities within the a. National Level - 5
rating period. (2%) b. Regional Level - 4
c. Provincial Level - 3
d. District Level - 2
e. School Level - 1 0.93

Communi- 1. Supported June to March 15% * (5) - 60% and above of the targeted pupils 5 x 0.02 0.1
ty registration / and teachers supported registration /
Involve- participated in non- attended to BSP / GSP / RCYC activities.
ment government activities * (4) - 50% - 59% of the targeted pupils
like BSP,GSP& RCYC and teachers supported registration /
(50%) of the total attended to BSP / GSP / RCYC activities.
number of pupils in a * (3) - 40% - 49% of the targeted pupils
class) (2%) and teachers supported registration /
attended to BSP / GSP / RCYC activities.
* (2) - 30% - 39% of the targeted pupils
and teachers supported registration /
attended to BSP / GSP / RCYC activities.
* (1) - Below 30% of the targeted pupils
and teachers supported registration /
attended to BSP / GSP / RCYC activities.

WEIGHT PER PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL

MFO KRAs OBJECTIVES TIME FRAME RATING SCORE
KRA (Quality Time, Efficiency, Timeliness) RESULTS
2. Conducted periodic *Homeroom PTA meetings to report 5 x 0.05 0.25
PTA meetings / learners' progress conducted at least once:
conference to report a. a month -5
learner's b. in two months -4
 progress. (5%) c. in three months -3
d. in four months -2
e. In five months or more -1

3. Coducted home * (5) 30% and above over the targeted 5 x 0.05 0.25
visits to 75% of parents number of pupils that need academic
and pupils needing monitoring / identified PARDO's were
academic monitoring / visited.
identified PARDOs * (4) - 15-29% over the targeted number of
within the rating period. pupis that need academic monitoring /
(5%) identified PARDO's were visited
*(3) - 100-114% of the targeted number of
pupils that need academic monitoring /
identified PARDO's were visited
* (2) - 51-99% of the targeted number of
pupils that need academic monitoring /
identified PARDO's were visited
* (1) - 50% and below of the targeted number
of pupils that need academic monitoring /
identified PARDO's were visited

4. Undertaken / * (5) - 100% project accomplishment 4 x 0.03 0.12

initiated classroom within the target date with full
projects / events / documentation report.
activities/ with * (4) - 85%-99% project accomplishment
external funding or within the target date with full
sponsorships within documentation report.

WEIGHT PER PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL

MFO KRAs OBJECTIVES TIME FRAME RATING SCORE
KRA (Quality Time, Efficiency, Timeliness) RESULTS
the target date. * (3) - 70%-84% project accomplishment
(Funding requirement: within the target date with full
Php 3,000 and up) (3%) documentation report.
* (2) - 69%-51% project accomplishment
within the target date with full
 documentation report.
* (1) - 50% and below project
accomplishment within the target date
with full documentation report. 0.72

Profes- 1. Conducted problem June to March 15% Conducted problem/classroom-based 1 x 0.02 0.02
sional / classroom -based action research was undertaken using the
Growth Action Research at following steps:
and Deve- least one in a school a. preparation of design
lopment year. (2%) b. conducting the research
c. managing data
d. analyzing data
e. disseminating data
f. utilizing the results

* (5) - All indicators were met without any

revision and submitted ahead of schedule
* (4) - All indicators were met with minor
revision and submitted ahead of schedule
* (3) - All indicators were met with minor
revision and submitted on schedule
* (2) - All indicators were met with major
revision and submitted behind schedule
* (1) - No indicators were met due to the
absence of the action research.

WEIGHT PER PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL

MFO KRAs OBJECTIVES TIME FRAME RATING SCORE
KRA (Quality Time, Efficiency, Timeliness) RESULTS
2. Submitted oneself * (5) - 30% and above over the targeted 4 x 0.04 0.16
for Instructional number of instructional supervision
Supervision at least conducted.
5 times in a school * (4) - 15-29% over the targeted number of
year. (4%) instructional supervision conducted
* (3) - 100% of thetargeted number of
 instructional supervision conducted
* (2) -51%-99% of the targeted number of
instructional supervision conducted
* (1) - 50% and below of the targeted number
of instructional supervision conducted.

3. Participatedin to 75% * (5) - 30% and above participation over the 4 x 0.02 0.08
INSET / training / targeted number of INSET / trainings /
seminars / workshops seminars / workshop
called for. (2%) * (4) - 15-29% participation over the
targeted number of INSET / trainings /
seminars / workshop
* (3) - 100-114% participation over the
targeted number of INSET / trainings /
seminars / workshop
* (2) - 51-99% particioation of the
targeted number of INSET / trainings /
seminars / workshop
* (1) - 50% and below participation over the
targeted number of INSET / trainings /
seminars / workshop

WEIGHT PER PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL

MFO KRAs OBJECTIVES TIME FRAME RATING SCORE
KRA (Quality Time, Efficiency, Timeliness) RESULTS
4.Received academic *Academic and Co-curricular awards 1 x 0.02 0.02
and co-curricular received
awards. (2%) a. National Level - 5
b. Regional Level - 4
c. Division Level - 3
d. District Level - 2
e. School Level - 1
 5. Produced and * (5) - Produced publication / creative 1 x 0.01 0.01
publshed creative work published in National Circulation /
work / publication for DepEd Post / CSC Newsletters / LRMDS and
LRMDS / school paper / similar publications.
division publicatin and * (4) - Produced publication / creative work
similar publication published in regional publications
within the school * (3) - Produced publication / creative work
year. (1%) published in division publication
* (2) -Produced publication / creative work
published in school papers.
* (1) - Unpublished work produced

6. Punctuality / 4x 0.16
Attendance / Wearing of 0.04
Uniform (4%)
*Conformed with the * (5) - incurred less than 4 times tardiness / 4
official time of undertime of the total number of official
attendance from days
Monday to Friday * (4) - incurred 4 - 6 times tardiness /
*Normal Working undertime of the total number of official
Hours: (per class days
program)

WEIGHT PER PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL

MFO KRAs OBJECTIVES TIME FRAME RATING SCORE
KRA (Quality Time, Efficiency, Timeliness) RESULTS
*Any officer or * (3) - incurred 7 -10 times tardiness /
employee who is undertime of the total number of official
absent in the days
morning is * (2) - incurred 11-15 times tardiness /
considered to be undertime of the total number of official
tardy and is subject days
to provision on * (1) - incurred more than 15 times
Habitual Tardiness tardiness / undertime of the
 *Any officer or total number of official days
employee who is
absent in the
afternoon is
considered to have
incurred undertime,
subject to the
provisions on
Undertime

* Conformed with * (5) - incurre o un-authorized absence 4

the official number within the expected numbe of official days
of daily attendance * (4) - incurred 0.5 un-athorized absence
within the expected numbe of official days
* (3) - incurred 1 un-athorized absences
within the expected numbe of official days
* (2) - incurred 1.5 un-athorized absences
within the expected numbe of official days
* (1) - incurred 2 or more un-authorized
absences within the expected number of
official days.

WEIGHT PER PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL

MFO KRAs OBJECTIVES TIME FRAME RATING SCORE
KRA (Quality Time, Efficiency, Timeliness) RESULTS
*Participation in the * (5) - incurred not more than 4 days 4
Flag Raising / absences of the total number of flag raising
Lowering Ceremony / lowering ceremonies in a year
* (4) - incurred 5-8 days absences of the
total number of flag raising / lowering
ceremonies in a year
* (3) - incurred 9 - 12 daysabsences of the
total number of flag raising / lowering
ceremonies in a year
 * (2) - incurred 13-16 days absences of the
total number of flag raising / lowering
ceremonies in a year
* (1) - incurred more than 16 days absences of
the total number of flag raising / lowering
ceremonies in a year

Complied with the * (5) - incurred less than 4 times 4

prescribed uniform non-compliance to the wearing of the
from Monday - Thursday. prescribed uniform
(refer to DepEd Order) * (4) - incurred 4-6times non-compliance
to the wearing of the prescribed unform
* (3) - incurred 7-10 times
non-compliance to the wearing of the
prescribed uniform
* (2) - incurred 11-15 times
non-compliance to the wearing of the
prescribed uniform
* (1) - incurred more than 15 times
non-compliance to the wearing of the
prescribed uniform

WEIGHT PER PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL

MFO KRAs OBJECTIVES TIME FRAME RATING SCORE
KRA (Quality Time, Efficiency, Timeliness) RESULTS
* (2) - incurred 11-15 times
non-compliance to the wearing of the
prescribed uniform
* (1) - incurred more than 15 times
non-compliance to the wearing of the
prescribed uniform 0.43
OVERALL
RATING
FOR
3.66 VS
ACCOM-
 3.66 VS

PLISH-
MENTS

EHDEN PEARL C. MALBINO IRINE C. MAHINAY, MEEM

Ratee HT-III / TIC
INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE OCMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM

Name of Employee JONAS CAWOG LUMAYAS Name of Rater IRINE C.MAHINAY, MEEM
Position Teacher I Position HT-III / TIC
Review Period June 2014 - March 2015 Date of Review March 30, 2015
Bureau/Center/Service/Division Secondary Education/Davao del Sur

WEIGHT PER PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL

MFO KRAs OBJECTIVES TIME FRAME RATING SCORE
KRA (Quality Time, Efficiency, Timeliness) RESULTS

Teaching - 1. Prepared lesson plan / June to March 40% *Lesson Plans / Log Plans were prepared 4 x 0.12 0.48
Learning logs of the learning daily.
Process competencies including *Each part had a full description of the LP /
appropriate, adequate DLL of what to do with an example.
and updated *Appropriate instructional mateirals /
instructional materials teaching aids were prepared.
within the rating *Competencies of the learning guides
period (12%) were adopted in the daily logs / lesson
plans.
*Attained 100% of the desired learning
competencies based on the budget of
work.
(5) - When all indicators were met.
(4) - When 4 indicators were met.
(3) - When 3 indicators were met.
(2) - When 2 indicators were met.
(1) - When only 1 indicator was met.
 WEIGHT PER PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL
MFO KRAs OBJECTIVES TIME FRAME RATING SCORE
KRA (Quality Time, Efficiency, Timeliness) RESULTS
2. Faciltated learning June to March *Objectives and instructional materials 4 x 0.20 0.8
in the school through were aligned.
functional lesson * Varied techniques and strategies suited
plans, daily logs and to different kinds of learners were being
innovative teaching utilized.
strategies . (20%) *Technology resources in planning,
designing, and delivery of the lesson
was utilized.
* Situations that encourage learners to use
higher order thinking skills were created.
* Routines and procedures was establshed
to maximize use of time and instructional
materials.
*Appropriate intervention activities for
learners at risk were provided.
*Fairness in dealing with learners was
evident.
(5) - 100% of the indicators were rated
Proficient / Highly Proficient
(4) - 85%-99% of the indicators were
rated Proficient/ Highly Proficient
(3) - 70% - 84% of the indicators were
rated Proficient/ Highly Proficient
(2) - 69% - 51% of the indicators were
rated Proficient/ Highly Proficient
(1) - 50% and below of the indicators
were rated Proficient / Highly
Proficient .

WEIGHT PER PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL

MFO KRAs OBJECTIVES TIME FRAME RATING SCORE
KRA RESULTS
 WEIGHT PER ACTUAL
MFO KRAs OBJECTIVES TIME FRAME RATING SCORE
KRA (Quality Time, Efficiency, Timeliness) RESULTS
3. Monitored *Attendance of all pupils was systematically 5 x 0.08 0.4
attendance, diversity monitored.
appreciation, safe, *Attendance of 75% identified PARDOs
positive and motivating were monitored.
environment, overall *Behavior problems was handled quickly
physical atmosphere, with due respect to children's rights
cleanliness and *Gender sensitive opportunities for learning
orderliness of were provided.
classrooms including *safety, orderliness and cleanliness of
proper waste disposal classroom, toilers and proper waste
daily. (8%) disposal were maintained.
(5) - When all indicators were met.
(4) - When 4 indicators were met.
(3) - When 3 indicators were met.
(2) - When 2 indicators were met.
(1) - When only 1 indicator was met. 1.68

Pupils / 1. Monitored, evaluated
Students and maintained
Outcomes pupil's/students'
progress within the
rating period. (10%)
June to March 30% *Formative, summative tests congruent to 5 x 0.10 0.5
the lesson were being used.
*Appropriate reinforcement/feedback to
learners' behavior was provided.
*Opportunity for learners to demonstrate
their learning was provided.
*Non-traditional authentic assessment
techniques was used when needed.
*Assignment as reinforcement or
enrichment of the lesson was given.

WEIGHT PER PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL

MFO KRAs OBJECTIVES TIME FRAME RATING SCORE
KRA (Quality Time, Efficiency, Timeliness) RESULTS
 (5) - When all indicators were met.
(4) - When 4 indicators were met.
(3) - When 3 indicators were met.
(2) - When 2 indicators were met.
(1) - When only 1 indicator was met.

2. Conducted * (5) - Remediatin / Enrichment Program is 3 x 0.03 0.09

remediation/ offered to 130% and above of students
enrichment programs who need it.
to 75% of the pupils / * (4) - Remediation / Enrichment Program
student needing it. (3%) is offered to 115 - 129% who need it.
* (3) - Remediation / Enrichment Program
is offered to 100 - 114% who need it.
* (2) - Remediation / Enrichment Program
is offered to 51 - 99% who need it.
* (1) - Remediation /Enrichment Program is
offered to 50% and below who need it.

3. Attained the required 3.33333 0.5

General Scholastic x 0.15
Average (GSA) / Mean
Percentage Score (MPS)
and Reading Proficiency
Level for every grade /
year level for every
learning area (15%)
*75% of the pupils * 5 - 30% and aboveover the targeted 4
attained a GSA of number of pupils / students
85%-89% * 4 - 15-29% over the targeted number of
(Proficient Level) pupils / students

WEIGHT PER PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL

MFO KRAs OBJECTIVES TIME FRAME RATING SCORE
KRA (Quality Time, Efficiency, Timeliness) RESULTS
* 3 - 100% of the targeted number of
 pupils / students
* 2 - 51 - 99% of the targeted number of
pupils / students
* 1 - 50% and below of the targeted number
of pupis / students

*75% of the Grade * 5 - 30% and aboveover the targeted

3 pupils achieved number of pupils / students
81.76 MPS in NAT 3 * 4 - 15-29% over the targeted number of
pupils / students
* 3 - 100% of the targeted number of
pupils / students
* 2 - 51 - 99% of the targeted number of
pupils / students
* 1 - 50% and below of the targeted number
of pupis / students

* 75% of the * 5 - 30% and above over the targeted

Grade 6 pupils number of pupils / students
achieved 83.38% * 4 - 15-29% over the targeted number of
MPS in NAT 6 pupils / students
* 3 - 100% of the targeted number of
pupils / students
* 2 - 51 - 99% of the targeted number of
pupils / students
* 1 - 50% and below of the targeted number
of pupis / students

WEIGHT PER PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL

MFO KRAs OBJECTIVES TIME FRAME RATING SCORE
KRA (Quality Time, Efficiency, Timeliness) RESULTS
* 75% of the Year 4 * 5 - 30% and above over the targeted 3
students achieved number of pupils / students
 75% MPS in NAT 4 * 4 - 15-29% over the targeted number of
pupils / students
* 3 - 100% of the targeted number of
pupils / students
* 2 - 51 - 99% of the targeted number of
pupils / students
* 1 - 50% and below of the targeted number
of pupis / students

* 75% of the pupils * 5 - 30% and above over the targeted

achieved number of pupils / students
instructional level * 4 - 15-29% over the targeted number of
of reading pupils / students
proficiency (MT for * 3 - 100% of the targeted number of
Grades 1 & 2; pupils / students
English and Filipino * 2 - 51 - 99% of the targeted number of
for Grades 3) pupils / students
* 1 - 50% and below of the targeted number
of pupis / students

* 75% of the pupils / * 5 - 30% and above over the targeted 3

students achieved number of pupils / students
Independent * 4 - 15-29% over the targeted number of
Level of reading pupils / students
proficiency both * 3 - 100% of the targeted number of
in English and pupils / students
Filipino (For Grades * 2 - 51 - 99% of the targeted number of
4 - 6; Y1 - Y4) pupils / students

WEIGHT PER PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL

MFO KRAs OBJECTIVES TIME FRAME RATING SCORE
KRA (Quality Time, Efficiency, Timeliness) RESULTS
* 1 - 50% and below of the targeted number
of pupis / students
 4. Participated in to * Participation to Academic and 3 x 0.02 0.06
curricular / school Co-Curricular Competitions
activities within the a. National Level - 5
rating period. (2%) b. Regional Level - 4
c. Provincial Level - 3
d. District Level - 2
e. School Level - 1 1.15

Communi- 1. Supported June to March 15% * (5) - 60% and above of the targeted pupils 2 x 0.02 0.04
ty registration / and teachers supported registration /
Involve- participated in non- attended to BSP / GSP / RCYC activities.
ment government activities * (4) - 50% - 59% of the targeted pupils
like BSP,GSP& RCYC and teachers supported registration /
(50%) of the total attended to BSP / GSP / RCYC activities.
number of pupils in a * (3) - 40% - 49% of the targeted pupils
class) (2%) and teachers supported registration /
attended to BSP / GSP / RCYC activities.
* (2) - 30% - 39% of the targeted pupils
and teachers supported registration /
attended to BSP / GSP / RCYC activities.
* (1) - Below 30% of the targeted pupils
and teachers supported registration /
attended to BSP / GSP / RCYC activities.

WEIGHT PER PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL

MFO KRAs OBJECTIVES TIME FRAME RATING SCORE
KRA (Quality Time, Efficiency, Timeliness) RESULTS
2. Conducted periodic *Homeroom PTA meetings to report 5 x 0.05 0.25
PTA meetings / learners' progress conducted at least once:
conference to report a. a month -5
learner's b. in two months -4
 progress. (5%) c. in three months -3
d. in four months -2
e. In five months or more -1

3. Coducted home * (5) 30% and above over the targeted 5 x 0.05 0.25
visits to 75% of parents number of pupils that need academic
and pupils needing monitoring / identified PARDO's were
academic monitoring / visited.
identified PARDOs * (4) - 15-29% over the targeted number of
within the rating period. pupis that need academic monitoring /
(5%) identified PARDO's were visited
*(3) - 100-114% of the targeted number of
pupils that need academic monitoring /
identified PARDO's were visited
* (2) - 51-99% of the targeted number of
pupils that need academic monitoring /
identified PARDO's were visited
* (1) - 50% and below of the targeted number
of pupils that need academic monitoring /
identified PARDO's were visited

4. Undertaken / * (5) - 100% project accomplishment 3 x 0.03 0.09

initiated classroom within the target date with full
projects / events / documentation report.
activities/ with * (4) - 85%-99% project accomplishment
external funding or within the target date with full
sponsorships within documentation report.

WEIGHT PER PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL

MFO KRAs OBJECTIVES TIME FRAME RATING SCORE
KRA (Quality Time, Efficiency, Timeliness) RESULTS
the target date. * (3) - 70%-84% project accomplishment
(Funding requirement: within the target date with full
Php 3,000 and up) (3%) documentation report.
* (2) - 69%-51% project accomplishment
within the target date with full
 documentation report.
* (1) - 50% and below project
accomplishment within the target date
with full documentation report. 0.63

Profes- 1. Conducted problem June to March 15% Conducted problem/classroom-based 1 x 0.02 0.02
sional / classroom -based action research was undertaken using the
Growth Action Research at following steps:
and Deve- least one in a school a. preparation of design
lopment year. (2%) b. conducting the research
c. managing data
d. analyzing data
e. disseminating data
f. utilizing the results

* (5) - All indicators were met without any

revision and submitted ahead of schedule
* (4) - All indicators were met with minor
revision and submitted ahead of schedule
* (3) - All indicators were met with minor
revision and submitted on schedule
* (2) - All indicators were met with major
revision and submitted behind schedule
* (1) - No indicators were met due to the
absence of the action research.

WEIGHT PER PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL

MFO KRAs OBJECTIVES TIME FRAME RATING SCORE
KRA (Quality Time, Efficiency, Timeliness) RESULTS
2. Submitted oneself * (5) - 30% and above over the targeted 3 x 0.04 0.12
for Instructional number of instructional supervision
Supervision at least conducted.
5 times in a school * (4) - 15-29% over the targeted number of
year. (4%) instructional supervision conducted
* (3) - 100% of thetargeted number of
 instructional supervision conducted
* (2) -51%-99% of the targeted number of
instructional supervision conducted
* (1) - 50% and below of the targeted number
of instructional supervision conducted.

3. Participatedin to 75% * (5) - 30% and above participation over the 4 x 0.02 0.08
INSET / training / targeted number of INSET / trainings /
seminars / workshops seminars / workshop
called for. (2%) * (4) - 15-29% participation over the
targeted number of INSET / trainings /
seminars / workshop
* (3) - 100-114% participation over the
targeted number of INSET / trainings /
seminars / workshop
* (2) - 51-99% particioation of the
targeted number of INSET / trainings /
seminars / workshop
* (1) - 50% and below participation over the
targeted number of INSET / trainings /
seminars / workshop

WEIGHT PER PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL

MFO KRAs OBJECTIVES TIME FRAME RATING SCORE
KRA (Quality Time, Efficiency, Timeliness) RESULTS
4.Received academic *Academic and Co-curricular awards 2 x 0.02 0.04
and co-curricular received
awards. (2%) a. National Level - 5
b. Regional Level - 4
c. Division Level - 3
d. District Level - 2
e. School Level - 1
 5. Produced and * (5) - Produced publication / creative 1 x 0.01 0.01
publshed creative work published in National Circulation /
work / publication for DepEd Post / CSC Newsletters / LRMDS and
LRMDS / school paper / similar publications.
division publicatin and * (4) - Produced publication / creative work
similar publication published in regional publications
within the school * (3) - Produced publication / creative work
year. (1%) published in division publication
* (2) -Produced publication / creative work
published in school papers.
* (1) - Unpublished work produced

6. Punctuality / 4x 0.16
Attendance / Wearing of 0.04
Uniform (4%)
*Conformed with the * (5) - incurred less than 4 times tardiness / 4
official time of undertime of the total number of official
attendance from days
Monday to Friday * (4) - incurred 4 - 6 times tardiness /
*Normal Working undertime of the total number of official
Hours: (per class days
program)

WEIGHT PER PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL

MFO KRAs OBJECTIVES TIME FRAME RATING SCORE
KRA (Quality Time, Efficiency, Timeliness) RESULTS
*Any officer or * (3) - incurred 7 -10 times tardiness /
employee who is undertime of the total number of official
absent in the days
morning is * (2) - incurred 11-15 times tardiness /
considered to be undertime of the total number of official
tardy and is subject days
to provision on * (1) - incurred more than 15 times
Habitual Tardiness tardiness / undertime of the
 *Any officer or total number of official days
employee who is
absent in the
afternoon is
considered to have
incurred undertime,
subject to the
provisions on
Undertime

* Conformed with * (5) - incurre o un-authorized absence 4

the official number within the expected numbe of official days
of daily attendance * (4) - incurred 0.5 un-athorized absence
within the expected numbe of official days
* (3) - incurred 1 un-athorized absences
within the expected numbe of official days
* (2) - incurred 1.5 un-athorized absences
within the expected numbe of official days
* (1) - incurred 2 or more un-authorized
absences within the expected number of
official days.

WEIGHT PER PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL

MFO KRAs OBJECTIVES TIME FRAME RATING SCORE
KRA (Quality Time, Efficiency, Timeliness) RESULTS
*Participation in the * (5) - incurred not more than 4 days 4
Flag Raising / absences of the total number of flag raising
Lowering Ceremony / lowering ceremonies in a year
* (4) - incurred 5-8 days absences of the
total number of flag raising / lowering
ceremonies in a year
* (3) - incurred 9 - 12 daysabsences of the
total number of flag raising / lowering
ceremonies in a year
 * (2) - incurred 13-16 days absences of the
total number of flag raising / lowering
ceremonies in a year
* (1) - incurred more than 16 days absences of
the total number of flag raising / lowering
ceremonies in a year

Complied with the * (5) - incurred less than 4 times 4

prescribed uniform non-compliance to the wearing of the
from Monday - Thursday. prescribed uniform
(refer to DepEd Order) * (4) - incurred 4-6times non-compliance
to the wearing of the prescribed unform
* (3) - incurred 7-10 times
non-compliance to the wearing of the
prescribed uniform
* (2) - incurred 11-15 times
non-compliance to the wearing of the
prescribed uniform
* (1) - incurred more than 15 times
non-compliance to the wearing of the
prescribed uniform

WEIGHT PER PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL

MFO KRAs OBJECTIVES TIME FRAME RATING SCORE
KRA (Quality Time, Efficiency, Timeliness) RESULTS
* (2) - incurred 11-15 times
non-compliance to the wearing of the
prescribed uniform
* (1) - incurred more than 15 times
non-compliance to the wearing of the
prescribed uniform 0.43
OVERALL
RATING
FOR
3.89 VS
ACCOM-
 3.89 VS

PLISH-
MENTS

JONAS CAWOG LUMAYAS IRINE C. MAHINAY, MEEM

Ratee HT-III / TIC
INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE OCMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM

Name of Employee MARITESS LABRA LLAMEG Name of Rater IRINE C.MAHINAY, MEEM
Position Teacher I Position HT-III / TIC
Review Period June 2014 - March 2015 Date of Review March 30, 2015
Bureau/Center/Service/Division Secondary Education/Davao del Sur

WEIGHT PER PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL

MFO KRAs OBJECTIVES TIME FRAME RATING SCORE
KRA (Quality Time, Efficiency, Timeliness) RESULTS

Teaching - 1. Prepared lesson plan / June to March 40% *Lesson Plans / Log Plans were prepared 4 x 0.12 0.48
Learning logs of the learning daily.
Process competencies including *Each part had a full description of the LP /
appropriate, adequate DLL of what to do with an example.
and updated *Appropriate instructional mateirals /
instructional materials teaching aids were prepared.
within the rating *Competencies of the learning guides
period (12%) were adopted in the daily logs / lesson
plans.
*Attained 100% of the desired learning
competencies based on the budget of
work.
(5) - When all indicators were met.
(4) - When 4 indicators were met.
(3) - When 3 indicators were met.
(2) - When 2 indicators were met.
(1) - When only 1 indicator was met.
 WEIGHT PER PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL
MFO KRAs OBJECTIVES TIME FRAME RATING SCORE
KRA (Quality Time, Efficiency, Timeliness) RESULTS
2. Faciltated learning June to March *Objectives and instructional materials 4 x 0.20 0.8
in the school through were aligned.
functional lesson * Varied techniques and strategies suited
plans, daily logs and to different kinds of learners were being
innovative teaching utilized.
strategies . (20%) *Technology resources in planning,
designing, and delivery of the lesson
was utilized.
* Situations that encourage learners to use
higher order thinking skills were created.
* Routines and procedures was establshed
to maximize use of time and instructional
materials.
*Appropriate intervention activities for
learners at risk were provided.
*Fairness in dealing with learners was
evident.
(5) - 100% of the indicators were rated
Proficient / Highly Proficient
(4) - 85%-99% of the indicators were
rated Proficient/ Highly Proficient
(3) - 70% - 84% of the indicators were
rated Proficient/ Highly Proficient
(2) - 69% - 51% of the indicators were
rated Proficient/ Highly Proficient
(1) - 50% and below of the indicators
were rated Proficient / Highly
Proficient .

WEIGHT PER PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL

MFO KRAs OBJECTIVES TIME FRAME RATING SCORE
KRA RESULTS
 WEIGHT PER ACTUAL
MFO KRAs OBJECTIVES TIME FRAME RATING SCORE
KRA (Quality Time, Efficiency, Timeliness) RESULTS
3. Monitored *Attendance of all pupils was systematically 5 x 0.08 0.4
attendance, diversity monitored.
appreciation, safe, *Attendance of 75% identified PARDOs
positive and motivating were monitored.
environment, overall *Behavior problems was handled quickly
physical atmosphere, with due respect to children's rights
cleanliness and *Gender sensitive opportunities for learning
orderliness of were provided.
classrooms including *safety, orderliness and cleanliness of
proper waste disposal classroom, toilers and proper waste
daily. (8%) disposal were maintained.
(5) - When all indicators were met.
(4) - When 4 indicators were met.
(3) - When 3 indicators were met.
(2) - When 2 indicators were met.
(1) - When only 1 indicator was met. 1.68

Pupils / 1. Monitored, evaluated
Students and maintained
Outcomes pupil's/students'
progress within the
rating period. (10%)
June to March 30% *Formative, summative tests congruent to 4 x 0.10 0.4
the lesson were being used.
*Appropriate reinforcement/feedback to
learners' behavior was provided.
*Opportunity for learners to demonstrate
their learning was provided.
*Non-traditional authentic assessment
techniques was used when needed.
*Assignment as reinforcement or
enrichment of the lesson was given.

WEIGHT PER PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL

MFO KRAs OBJECTIVES TIME FRAME RATING SCORE
KRA (Quality Time, Efficiency, Timeliness) RESULTS
 (5) - When all indicators were met.
(4) - When 4 indicators were met.
(3) - When 3 indicators were met.
(2) - When 2 indicators were met.
(1) - When only 1 indicator was met.

2. Conducted * (5) - Remediatin / Enrichment Program is 2 x 0.03 0.06

remediation/ offered to 130% and above of students
enrichment programs who need it.
to 75% of the pupils / * (4) - Remediation / Enrichment Program
student needing it. (3%) is offered to 115 - 129% who need it.
* (3) - Remediation / Enrichment Program
is offered to 100 - 114% who need it.
* (2) - Remediation / Enrichment Program
is offered to 51 - 99% who need it.
* (1) - Remediation /Enrichment Program is
offered to 50% and below who need it.

3. Attained the required 2.66666 0.4

General Scholastic x 0.15
Average (GSA) / Mean
Percentage Score (MPS)
and Reading Proficiency
Level for every grade /
year level for every
learning area (15%)
*75% of the pupils * 5 - 30% and aboveover the targeted 3
attained a GSA of number of pupils / students
85%-89% * 4 - 15-29% over the targeted number of
(Proficient Level) pupils / students

WEIGHT PER PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL

MFO KRAs OBJECTIVES TIME FRAME RATING SCORE
KRA (Quality Time, Efficiency, Timeliness) RESULTS
* 3 - 100% of the targeted number of
 pupils / students
* 2 - 51 - 99% of the targeted number of
pupils / students
* 1 - 50% and below of the targeted number
of pupis / students

*75% of the Grade * 5 - 30% and aboveover the targeted

3 pupils achieved number of pupils / students
81.76 MPS in NAT 3 * 4 - 15-29% over the targeted number of
pupils / students
* 3 - 100% of the targeted number of
pupils / students
* 2 - 51 - 99% of the targeted number of
pupils / students
* 1 - 50% and below of the targeted number
of pupis / students

* 75% of the * 5 - 30% and above over the targeted

Grade 6 pupils number of pupils / students
achieved 83.38% * 4 - 15-29% over the targeted number of
MPS in NAT 6 pupils / students
* 3 - 100% of the targeted number of
pupils / students
* 2 - 51 - 99% of the targeted number of
pupils / students
* 1 - 50% and below of the targeted number
of pupis / students

WEIGHT PER PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL

MFO KRAs OBJECTIVES TIME FRAME RATING SCORE
KRA (Quality Time, Efficiency, Timeliness) RESULTS
* 75% of the Year 4 * 5 - 30% and above over the targeted 3
students achieved number of pupils / students
 75% MPS in NAT 4 * 4 - 15-29% over the targeted number of
pupils / students
* 3 - 100% of the targeted number of
pupils / students
* 2 - 51 - 99% of the targeted number of
pupils / students
* 1 - 50% and below of the targeted number
of pupis / students

* 75% of the pupils * 5 - 30% and above over the targeted

achieved number of pupils / students
instructional level * 4 - 15-29% over the targeted number of
of reading pupils / students
proficiency (MT for * 3 - 100% of the targeted number of
Grades 1 & 2; pupils / students
English and Filipino * 2 - 51 - 99% of the targeted number of
for Grades 3) pupils / students
* 1 - 50% and below of the targeted number
of pupis / students

* 75% of the pupils / * 5 - 30% and above over the targeted 2

students achieved number of pupils / students
Independent * 4 - 15-29% over the targeted number of
Level of reading pupils / students
proficiency both * 3 - 100% of the targeted number of
in English and pupils / students
Filipino (For Grades * 2 - 51 - 99% of the targeted number of
4 - 6; Y1 - Y4) pupils / students

WEIGHT PER PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL

MFO KRAs OBJECTIVES TIME FRAME RATING SCORE
KRA (Quality Time, Efficiency, Timeliness) RESULTS
* 1 - 50% and below of the targeted number
of pupis / students
 4. Participated in to * Participation to Academic and 3 x 0.02 0.06
curricular / school Co-Curricular Competitions
activities within the a. National Level - 5
rating period. (2%) b. Regional Level - 4
c. Provincial Level - 3
d. District Level - 2
e. School Level - 1 0.92

Communi- 1. Supported June to March 15% * (5) - 60% and above of the targeted pupils 3 x 0.02 0.06
ty registration / and teachers supported registration /
Involve- participated in non- attended to BSP / GSP / RCYC activities.
ment government activities * (4) - 50% - 59% of the targeted pupils
like BSP,GSP& RCYC and teachers supported registration /
(50%) of the total attended to BSP / GSP / RCYC activities.
number of pupils in a * (3) - 40% - 49% of the targeted pupils
class) (2%) and teachers supported registration /
attended to BSP / GSP / RCYC activities.
* (2) - 30% - 39% of the targeted pupils
and teachers supported registration /
attended to BSP / GSP / RCYC activities.
* (1) - Below 30% of the targeted pupils
and teachers supported registration /
attended to BSP / GSP / RCYC activities.

WEIGHT PER PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL

MFO KRAs OBJECTIVES TIME FRAME RATING SCORE
KRA (Quality Time, Efficiency, Timeliness) RESULTS
2. Conducted periodic *Homeroom PTA meetings to report 5 x 0.05 0.25
PTA meetings / learners' progress conducted at least once:
conference to report a. a month -5
learner's b. in two months -4
 progress. (5%) c. in three months -3
d. in four months -2
e. In five months or more -1

3. Coducted home * (5) 30% and above over the targeted 4 x 0.05 0.2
visits to 75% of parents number of pupils that need academic
and pupils needing monitoring / identified PARDO's were
academic monitoring / visited.
identified PARDOs * (4) - 15-29% over the targeted number of
within the rating period. pupis that need academic monitoring /
(5%) identified PARDO's were visited
*(3) - 100-114% of the targeted number of
pupils that need academic monitoring /
identified PARDO's were visited
* (2) - 51-99% of the targeted number of
pupils that need academic monitoring /
identified PARDO's were visited
* (1) - 50% and below of the targeted number
of pupils that need academic monitoring /
identified PARDO's were visited

4. Undertaken / * (5) - 100% project accomplishment 2 x 0.03 0.06

initiated classroom within the target date with full
projects / events / documentation report.
activities/ with * (4) - 85%-99% project accomplishment
external funding or within the target date with full
sponsorships within documentation report.

WEIGHT PER PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL

MFO KRAs OBJECTIVES TIME FRAME RATING SCORE
KRA (Quality Time, Efficiency, Timeliness) RESULTS
the target date. * (3) - 70%-84% project accomplishment
(Funding requirement: within the target date with full
Php 3,000 and up) (3%) documentation report.
* (2) - 69%-51% project accomplishment
within the target date with full
 documentation report.
* (1) - 50% and below project
accomplishment within the target date
with full documentation report. 0.57

Profes- 1. Conducted problem June to March 15% Conducted problem/classroom-based 1 x 0.02 0.02
sional / classroom -based action research was undertaken using the
Growth Action Research at following steps:
and Deve- least one in a school a. preparation of design
lopment year. (2%) b. conducting the research
c. managing data
d. analyzing data
e. disseminating data
f. utilizing the results

* (5) - All indicators were met without any

revision and submitted ahead of schedule
* (4) - All indicators were met with minor
revision and submitted ahead of schedule
* (3) - All indicators were met with minor
revision and submitted on schedule
* (2) - All indicators were met with major
revision and submitted behind schedule
* (1) - No indicators were met due to the
absence of the action research.

WEIGHT PER PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL

MFO KRAs OBJECTIVES TIME FRAME RATING SCORE
KRA (Quality Time, Efficiency, Timeliness) RESULTS
2. Submitted oneself * (5) - 30% and above over the targeted 5 x 0.04 0.2
for Instructional number of instructional supervision
Supervision at least conducted.
5 times in a school * (4) - 15-29% over the targeted number of
year. (4%) instructional supervision conducted
* (3) - 100% of thetargeted number of
 instructional supervision conducted
* (2) -51%-99% of the targeted number of
instructional supervision conducted
* (1) - 50% and below of the targeted number
of instructional supervision conducted.

3. Participatedin to 75% * (5) - 30% and above participation over the 4 x 0.02 0.08
INSET / training / targeted number of INSET / trainings /
seminars / workshops seminars / workshop
called for. (2%) * (4) - 15-29% participation over the
targeted number of INSET / trainings /
seminars / workshop
* (3) - 100-114% participation over the
targeted number of INSET / trainings /
seminars / workshop
* (2) - 51-99% particioation of the
targeted number of INSET / trainings /
seminars / workshop
* (1) - 50% and below participation over the
targeted number of INSET / trainings /
seminars / workshop

WEIGHT PER PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL

MFO KRAs OBJECTIVES TIME FRAME RATING SCORE
KRA (Quality Time, Efficiency, Timeliness) RESULTS
4.Received academic *Academic and Co-curricular awards 3 x 0.02 0.06
and co-curricular received
awards. (2%) a. National Level - 5
b. Regional Level - 4
c. Division Level - 3
d. District Level - 2
e. School Level - 1
 5. Produced and * (5) - Produced publication / creative 1 x 0.01 0.01
publshed creative work published in National Circulation /
work / publication for DepEd Post / CSC Newsletters / LRMDS and
LRMDS / school paper / similar publications.
division publicatin and * (4) - Produced publication / creative work
similar publication published in regional publications
within the school * (3) - Produced publication / creative work
year. (1%) published in division publication
* (2) -Produced publication / creative work
published in school papers.
* (1) - Unpublished work produced

6. Punctuality / 3.75 x 0.15

Attendance / Wearing of 0.04
Uniform (4%)
*Conformed with the * (5) - incurred less than 4 times tardiness / 4
official time of undertime of the total number of official
attendance from days
Monday to Friday * (4) - incurred 4 - 6 times tardiness /
*Normal Working undertime of the total number of official
Hours: (per class days
program)

WEIGHT PER PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL

MFO KRAs OBJECTIVES TIME FRAME RATING SCORE
KRA (Quality Time, Efficiency, Timeliness) RESULTS
*Any officer or * (3) - incurred 7 -10 times tardiness /
employee who is undertime of the total number of official
absent in the days
morning is * (2) - incurred 11-15 times tardiness /
considered to be undertime of the total number of official
tardy and is subject days
to provision on * (1) - incurred more than 15 times
Habitual Tardiness tardiness / undertime of the
 *Any officer or total number of official days
employee who is
absent in the
afternoon is
considered to have
incurred undertime,
subject to the
provisions on
Undertime

* Conformed with * (5) - incurre o un-authorized absence 4

the official number within the expected numbe of official days
of daily attendance * (4) - incurred 0.5 un-athorized absence
within the expected numbe of official days
* (3) - incurred 1 un-athorized absences
within the expected numbe of official days
* (2) - incurred 1.5 un-athorized absences
within the expected numbe of official days
* (1) - incurred 2 or more un-authorized
absences within the expected number of
official days.

WEIGHT PER PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL

MFO KRAs OBJECTIVES TIME FRAME RATING SCORE
KRA (Quality Time, Efficiency, Timeliness) RESULTS
*Participation in the * (5) - incurred not more than 4 days 3
Flag Raising / absences of the total number of flag raising
Lowering Ceremony / lowering ceremonies in a year
* (4) - incurred 5-8 days absences of the
total number of flag raising / lowering
ceremonies in a year
* (3) - incurred 9 - 12 daysabsences of the
total number of flag raising / lowering
ceremonies in a year
 * (2) - incurred 13-16 days absences of the
total number of flag raising / lowering
ceremonies in a year
* (1) - incurred more than 16 days absences of
the total number of flag raising / lowering
ceremonies in a year

Complied with the * (5) - incurred less than 4 times 4

prescribed uniform non-compliance to the wearing of the
from Monday - Thursday. prescribed uniform
(refer to DepEd Order) * (4) - incurred 4-6times non-compliance
to the wearing of the prescribed unform
* (3) - incurred 7-10 times
non-compliance to the wearing of the
prescribed uniform
* (2) - incurred 11-15 times
non-compliance to the wearing of the
prescribed uniform
* (1) - incurred more than 15 times
non-compliance to the wearing of the
prescribed uniform

WEIGHT PER PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL

MFO KRAs OBJECTIVES TIME FRAME RATING SCORE
KRA (Quality Time, Efficiency, Timeliness) RESULTS
* (2) - incurred 11-15 times
non-compliance to the wearing of the
prescribed uniform
* (1) - incurred more than 15 times
non-compliance to the wearing of the
prescribed uniform 0.52
OVERALL
RATING
FOR
3.69 VS
ACCOM-
 3.69 VS

PLISH-
MENTS

MARITESS LABRA LLAMEG IRINE C. MAHINAY, MEEM

Ratee HT-III / TIC
INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE OCMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM

Name of Employee RODEL UY AMIHAN Name of Rater IRINE C.MAHINAY, MEEM

Position Teacher I Position HT-III / TIC
Review Period June 2014 - March 2015 Date of Review March 30, 2015
Bureau/Center/Service/Division Secondary Education/Davao del Sur

WEIGHT PER PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL

MFO KRAs OBJECTIVES TIME FRAME RATING SCORE
KRA (Quality Time, Efficiency, Timeliness) RESULTS

Teaching - 1. Prepared lesson plan / June to March 40% *Lesson Plans / Log Plans were prepared 3 x 0.12 0.36
Learning logs of the learning daily.
Process competencies including *Each part had a full description of the LP /
appropriate, adequate DLL of what to do with an example.
and updated *Appropriate instructional mateirals /
instructional materials teaching aids were prepared.
within the rating *Competencies of the learning guides
period (12%) were adopted in the daily logs / lesson
plans.
*Attained 100% of the desired learning
competencies based on the budget of
work.
(5) - When all indicators were met.
(4) - When 4 indicators were met.
(3) - When 3 indicators were met.
(2) - When 2 indicators were met.
(1) - When only 1 indicator was met.
 WEIGHT PER PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL
MFO KRAs OBJECTIVES TIME FRAME RATING SCORE
KRA (Quality Time, Efficiency, Timeliness) RESULTS
2. Faciltated learning June to March *Objectives and instructional materials 4 x 0.20 0.8
in the school through were aligned.
functional lesson * Varied techniques and strategies suited
plans, daily logs and to different kinds of learners were being
innovative teaching utilized.
strategies . (20%) *Technology resources in planning,
designing, and delivery of the lesson
was utilized.
* Situations that encourage learners to use
higher order thinking skills were created.
* Routines and procedures was establshed
to maximize use of time and instructional
materials.
*Appropriate intervention activities for
learners at risk were provided.
*Fairness in dealing with learners was
evident.
(5) - 100% of the indicators were rated
Proficient / Highly Proficient
(4) - 85%-99% of the indicators were
rated Proficient/ Highly Proficient
(3) - 70% - 84% of the indicators were
rated Proficient/ Highly Proficient
(2) - 69% - 51% of the indicators were
rated Proficient/ Highly Proficient
(1) - 50% and below of the indicators
were rated Proficient / Highly
Proficient .

WEIGHT PER PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL

MFO KRAs OBJECTIVES TIME FRAME RATING SCORE
KRA RESULTS
 WEIGHT PER ACTUAL
MFO KRAs OBJECTIVES TIME FRAME RATING SCORE
KRA (Quality Time, Efficiency, Timeliness) RESULTS
3. Monitored *Attendance of all pupils was systematically 5 x 0.08 0.4
attendance, diversity monitored.
appreciation, safe, *Attendance of 75% identified PARDOs
positive and motivating were monitored.
environment, overall *Behavior problems was handled quickly
physical atmosphere, with due respect to children's rights
cleanliness and *Gender sensitive opportunities for learning
orderliness of were provided.
classrooms including *safety, orderliness and cleanliness of
proper waste disposal classroom, toilers and proper waste
daily. (8%) disposal were maintained.
(5) - When all indicators were met.
(4) - When 4 indicators were met.
(3) - When 3 indicators were met.
(2) - When 2 indicators were met.
(1) - When only 1 indicator was met. 1.56

Pupils / 1. Monitored, evaluated
Students and maintained
Outcomes pupil's/students'
progress within the
rating period. (10%)
June to March 30% *Formative, summative tests congruent to 4 x 0.10 0.4
the lesson were being used.
*Appropriate reinforcement/feedback to
learners' behavior was provided.
*Opportunity for learners to demonstrate
their learning was provided.
*Non-traditional authentic assessment
techniques was used when needed.
*Assignment as reinforcement or
enrichment of the lesson was given.

WEIGHT PER PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL

MFO KRAs OBJECTIVES TIME FRAME RATING SCORE
KRA (Quality Time, Efficiency, Timeliness) RESULTS
 (5) - When all indicators were met.
(4) - When 4 indicators were met.
(3) - When 3 indicators were met.
(2) - When 2 indicators were met.
(1) - When only 1 indicator was met.

2. Conducted * (5) - Remediatin / Enrichment Program is 2 x 0.03 0.06

remediation/ offered to 130% and above of students
enrichment programs who need it.
to 75% of the pupils / * (4) - Remediation / Enrichment Program
student needing it. (3%) is offered to 115 - 129% who need it.
* (3) - Remediation / Enrichment Program
is offered to 100 - 114% who need it.
* (2) - Remediation / Enrichment Program
is offered to 51 - 99% who need it.
* (1) - Remediation /Enrichment Program is
offered to 50% and below who need it.

3. Attained the required 3 x 0.15 0.45

General Scholastic
Average (GSA) / Mean
Percentage Score (MPS)
and Reading Proficiency
Level for every grade /
year level for every
learning area (15%)
*75% of the pupils * 5 - 30% and aboveover the targeted 3
attained a GSA of number of pupils / students
85%-89% * 4 - 15-29% over the targeted number of
(Proficient Level) pupils / students

WEIGHT PER PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL

MFO KRAs OBJECTIVES TIME FRAME RATING SCORE
KRA (Quality Time, Efficiency, Timeliness) RESULTS
* 3 - 100% of the targeted number of
 pupils / students
* 2 - 51 - 99% of the targeted number of
pupils / students
* 1 - 50% and below of the targeted number
of pupis / students

*75% of the Grade * 5 - 30% and aboveover the targeted

3 pupils achieved number of pupils / students
81.76 MPS in NAT 3 * 4 - 15-29% over the targeted number of
pupils / students
* 3 - 100% of the targeted number of
pupils / students
* 2 - 51 - 99% of the targeted number of
pupils / students
* 1 - 50% and below of the targeted number
of pupis / students

* 75% of the * 5 - 30% and above over the targeted

Grade 6 pupils number of pupils / students
achieved 83.38% * 4 - 15-29% over the targeted number of
MPS in NAT 6 pupils / students
* 3 - 100% of the targeted number of
pupils / students
* 2 - 51 - 99% of the targeted number of
pupils / students
* 1 - 50% and below of the targeted number
of pupis / students

WEIGHT PER PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL

MFO KRAs OBJECTIVES TIME FRAME RATING SCORE
KRA (Quality Time, Efficiency, Timeliness) RESULTS
* 75% of the Year 4 * 5 - 30% and above over the targeted 3
students achieved number of pupils / students
 75% MPS in NAT 4 * 4 - 15-29% over the targeted number of
pupils / students
* 3 - 100% of the targeted number of
pupils / students
* 2 - 51 - 99% of the targeted number of
pupils / students
* 1 - 50% and below of the targeted number
of pupis / students

* 75% of the pupils * 5 - 30% and above over the targeted

achieved number of pupils / students
instructional level * 4 - 15-29% over the targeted number of
of reading pupils / students
proficiency (MT for * 3 - 100% of the targeted number of
Grades 1 & 2; pupils / students
English and Filipino * 2 - 51 - 99% of the targeted number of
for Grades 3) pupils / students
* 1 - 50% and below of the targeted number
of pupis / students

* 75% of the pupils / * 5 - 30% and above over the targeted 3

students achieved number of pupils / students
Independent * 4 - 15-29% over the targeted number of
Level of reading pupils / students
proficiency both * 3 - 100% of the targeted number of
in English and pupils / students
Filipino (For Grades * 2 - 51 - 99% of the targeted number of
4 - 6; Y1 - Y4) pupils / students

WEIGHT PER PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL

MFO KRAs OBJECTIVES TIME FRAME RATING SCORE
KRA (Quality Time, Efficiency, Timeliness) RESULTS
* 1 - 50% and below of the targeted number
of pupis / students
 4. Participated in to * Participation to Academic and 3 x 0.02 0.06
curricular / school Co-Curricular Competitions
activities within the a. National Level - 5
rating period. (2%) b. Regional Level - 4
c. Provincial Level - 3
d. District Level - 2
e. School Level - 1 0.97

Communi- 1. Supported June to March 15% * (5) - 60% and above of the targeted pupils 3 x 0.02 0.06
ty registration / and teachers supported registration /
Involve- participated in non- attended to BSP / GSP / RCYC activities.
ment government activities * (4) - 50% - 59% of the targeted pupils
like BSP,GSP& RCYC and teachers supported registration /
(50%) of the total attended to BSP / GSP / RCYC activities.
number of pupils in a * (3) - 40% - 49% of the targeted pupils
class) (2%) and teachers supported registration /
attended to BSP / GSP / RCYC activities.
* (2) - 30% - 39% of the targeted pupils
and teachers supported registration /
attended to BSP / GSP / RCYC activities.
* (1) - Below 30% of the targeted pupils
and teachers supported registration /
attended to BSP / GSP / RCYC activities.

WEIGHT PER PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL

MFO KRAs OBJECTIVES TIME FRAME RATING SCORE
KRA (Quality Time, Efficiency, Timeliness) RESULTS
2. Conducted periodic *Homeroom PTA meetings to report 5 x 0.05 0.25
PTA meetings / learners' progress conducted at least once:
conference to report a. a month -5
learner's b. in two months -4
 progress. (5%) c. in three months -3
d. in four months -2
e. In five months or more -1

3. Coducted home * (5) 30% and above over the targeted 5 x 0.05 0.25
visits to 75% of parents number of pupils that need academic
and pupils needing monitoring / identified PARDO's were
academic monitoring / visited.
identified PARDOs * (4) - 15-29% over the targeted number of
within the rating period. pupis that need academic monitoring /
(5%) identified PARDO's were visited
*(3) - 100-114% of the targeted number of
pupils that need academic monitoring /
identified PARDO's were visited
* (2) - 51-99% of the targeted number of
pupils that need academic monitoring /
identified PARDO's were visited
* (1) - 50% and below of the targeted number
of pupils that need academic monitoring /
identified PARDO's were visited

4. Undertaken / * (5) - 100% project accomplishment 5 x 0.03 0.15

initiated classroom within the target date with full
projects / events / documentation report.
activities/ with * (4) - 85%-99% project accomplishment
external funding or within the target date with full
sponsorships within documentation report.

WEIGHT PER PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL

MFO KRAs OBJECTIVES TIME FRAME RATING SCORE
KRA (Quality Time, Efficiency, Timeliness) RESULTS
the target date. * (3) - 70%-84% project accomplishment
(Funding requirement: within the target date with full
Php 3,000 and up) (3%) documentation report.
* (2) - 69%-51% project accomplishment
within the target date with full
 documentation report.
* (1) - 50% and below project
accomplishment within the target date
with full documentation report. 0.71

Profes- 1. Conducted problem June to March 15% Conducted problem/classroom-based 1 x 0.02 0.02
sional / classroom -based action research was undertaken using the
Growth Action Research at following steps:
and Deve- least one in a school a. preparation of design
lopment year. (2%) b. conducting the research
c. managing data
d. analyzing data
e. disseminating data
f. utilizing the results

* (5) - All indicators were met without any

revision and submitted ahead of schedule
* (4) - All indicators were met with minor
revision and submitted ahead of schedule
* (3) - All indicators were met with minor
revision and submitted on schedule
* (2) - All indicators were met with major
revision and submitted behind schedule
* (1) - No indicators were met due to the
absence of the action research.

WEIGHT PER PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL

MFO KRAs OBJECTIVES TIME FRAME RATING SCORE
KRA (Quality Time, Efficiency, Timeliness) RESULTS
2. Submitted oneself * (5) - 30% and above over the targeted 5 x 0.04 0.2
for Instructional number of instructional supervision
Supervision at least conducted.
5 times in a school * (4) - 15-29% over the targeted number of
year. (4%) instructional supervision conducted
* (3) - 100% of thetargeted number of
 instructional supervision conducted
* (2) -51%-99% of the targeted number of
instructional supervision conducted
* (1) - 50% and below of the targeted number
of instructional supervision conducted.

3. Participatedin to 75% * (5) - 30% and above participation over the 4 x 0.02 0.08
INSET / training / targeted number of INSET / trainings /
seminars / workshops seminars / workshop
called for. (2%) * (4) - 15-29% participation over the
targeted number of INSET / trainings /
seminars / workshop
* (3) - 100-114% participation over the
targeted number of INSET / trainings /
seminars / workshop
* (2) - 51-99% particioation of the
targeted number of INSET / trainings /
seminars / workshop
* (1) - 50% and below participation over the
targeted number of INSET / trainings /
seminars / workshop

WEIGHT PER PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL

MFO KRAs OBJECTIVES TIME FRAME RATING SCORE
KRA (Quality Time, Efficiency, Timeliness) RESULTS
4.Received academic *Academic and Co-curricular awards 2 x 0.02 0.04
and co-curricular received
awards. (2%) a. National Level - 5
b. Regional Level - 4
c. Division Level - 3
d. District Level - 2
e. School Level - 1
 5. Produced and * (5) - Produced publication / creative 1 x 0.01 0.01
publshed creative work published in National Circulation /
work / publication for DepEd Post / CSC Newsletters / LRMDS and
LRMDS / school paper / similar publications.
division publicatin and * (4) - Produced publication / creative work
similar publication published in regional publications
within the school * (3) - Produced publication / creative work
year. (1%) published in division publication
* (2) -Produced publication / creative work
published in school papers.
* (1) - Unpublished work produced

6. Punctuality / 4 x 0.04 0.16

Attendance / Wearing of
Uniform (4%)
*Conformed with the * (5) - incurred less than 4 times tardiness /
official time of undertime of the total number of official
attendance from days
Monday to Friday * (4) - incurred 4 - 6 times tardiness /
*Normal Working undertime of the total number of official
Hours: (per class days
program)

WEIGHT PER PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL

MFO KRAs OBJECTIVES TIME FRAME RATING SCORE
KRA (Quality Time, Efficiency, Timeliness) RESULTS
*Any officer or * (3) - incurred 7 -10 times tardiness /
employee who is undertime of the total number of official
absent in the days
morning is * (2) - incurred 11-15 times tardiness /
considered to be undertime of the total number of official
tardy and is subject days
to provision on * (1) - incurred more than 15 times
Habitual Tardiness tardiness / undertime of the
 *Any officer or total number of official days
employee who is
absent in the
afternoon is
considered to have
incurred undertime,
subject to the
provisions on
Undertime

* Conformed with * (5) - incurre o un-authorized absence 4

the official number within the expected numbe of official days
of daily attendance * (4) - incurred 0.5 un-athorized absence
within the expected numbe of official days
* (3) - incurred 1 un-athorized absences
within the expected numbe of official days
* (2) - incurred 1.5 un-athorized absences
within the expected numbe of official days
* (1) - incurred 2 or more un-authorized
absences within the expected number of
official days.

WEIGHT PER PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL

MFO KRAs OBJECTIVES TIME FRAME RATING SCORE
KRA (Quality Time, Efficiency, Timeliness) RESULTS
*Participation in the * (5) - incurred not more than 4 days 4
Flag Raising / absences of the total number of flag raising
Lowering Ceremony / lowering ceremonies in a year
* (4) - incurred 5-8 days absences of the
total number of flag raising / lowering
ceremonies in a year
* (3) - incurred 9 - 12 daysabsences of the
total number of flag raising / lowering
ceremonies in a year
 * (2) - incurred 13-16 days absences of the
total number of flag raising / lowering
ceremonies in a year
* (1) - incurred more than 16 days absences of
the total number of flag raising / lowering
ceremonies in a year

Complied with the * (5) - incurred less than 4 times 4

prescribed uniform non-compliance to the wearing of the
from Monday - Thursday. prescribed uniform
(refer to DepEd Order) * (4) - incurred 4-6times non-compliance
to the wearing of the prescribed unform
* (3) - incurred 7-10 times
non-compliance to the wearing of the
prescribed uniform
* (2) - incurred 11-15 times
non-compliance to the wearing of the
prescribed uniform
* (1) - incurred more than 15 times
non-compliance to the wearing of the
prescribed uniform

WEIGHT PER PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL

MFO KRAs OBJECTIVES TIME FRAME RATING SCORE
KRA (Quality Time, Efficiency, Timeliness) RESULTS
* (2) - incurred 11-15 times
non-compliance to the wearing of the
prescribed uniform
* (1) - incurred more than 15 times
non-compliance to the wearing of the
prescribed uniform 0.51
OVERALL
RATING
FOR
3.75 VS
ACCOM-
 3.75 VS

PLISH-
MENTS

RODEL UY AMIHAN IRINE C. MAHINAY, MEEM

Ratee HT-III / TIC