Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
A Photometric Method
H. LEWIS KAHLER
W. H. & L. D. Betz, Philadelphia, Penna.
This method measures the molybdenum than the pyrocatechol type and therefore gives higher silica
blue color developed by reducing the yellow equivalence. This 1%-orkshowed conclusively that the Dien-
silicomolybdate complex with sodium sul- ert-Kandenbulke test could not be used for accurate work in
x-aters having tannins present.
fite at suitable pH. It requires only 4 min- Isaacs (4) reported that reduction of the silicomolybdate
utes for a test, a 10-ml. sample, and gives complex by sodium sulfite to molybdenum blue of composi-
an accuracy on par with gravimetric analy- tion Mo808.H20( 8 ) in low acidity is not accompanied by color
sis. Phosphate, alkalinity, tannins, iron, from phosphomolybdates. Bertrand (1) criticized the
method, but Foulger (3) showed that phosphate, free from
and other ions present in natural and
silica, gives no color with the reagent a t the acidity recom-
boiler waters in addition to color, tempera- mended by Isaacs. The latter procedure was not found suit-
ture, and color progression, offer no practical able for rapid photometric work, as it employs acetic acid a t
interference. The work was completed relatively high pH, which gives color progression too great
with a Klett-Summerson photoelectric for accurate work.
I n the present study, the use of hydrochloric acid for de-
photometer, but the method can be em-
velopment of the silicomolybdate complex a t p H 2.4 to 2.7,
ployed with any similar instrument. followed by reduction by sodium sulfite, was found to be very
satisfactory, giving adequate silica sensitivity and no prac-
tical interference from phosphate and tannins. The effect of
Literature Cited (8) Munro, Proc. Trans. Nova Scotian Inst. Sci., 16, 9 (1928).
(9) Schwartz, IND. ENG.CHEM.,Anal. Ed., 6, 364 (1934).
(1) Bertrand, Bull. SOC. chim. biol., 6, 157 (1924). (10) Snell, "Colorimetric Methods of Analysis", New York, D. Van
(2) Dienert and Wandenbulke, Compt. rend., 176, 1478 (1923). Nostrand Co., 1936-37.
(3) Foulger, J . Am. Chem. SOC.,49,431 (1927). (11) Summerson, J . Biol. Chem., 130, 149 (1939).
(4) Isaacs, Bull. SOC. chim. biol., 6, 157 (1924). (12) Thayer, IND.ENQ.CHEM.,Anal. Ed., 2, 276 (1930).
(5) Jolles and Neurath, Z.angew. Chem., 11, 315 (1898).
(6) Mellon, IND. ENQ.CHEM.,l n a l . Ed., 11, 80 (1939). PRESENTED before t h e Division of Water, Sewage, and Sanitation Chemistry
(7) Muller, Ibid., 11, 1 (1939), a t t h e 100th Meeting of the American Chemical Society, Detroit, Mich
28 0 490 0.001
a t 120 C. to constant mass and stored over calcium chloride. 79
f
0.488 =t 0.001
Portions of these samples were recrystallized from water belon-
65" and then subjected to dehydration to ascertain the impor- kav. = 0.490 * 0,001
tance of recrystallization. The time required for dehydration de-
pends, of course, upon the frequency of stirring the solution
formed upon heating the hydrated salt and later upon the fre- TABLE
11. ANALYSESO F I O D I K E SOLTsTIONs B Y SODIUM
quency and degree of subdivision. Individual samples of the THIOSULFa4TE
thiosulfate (0.2 to 0.4 gram) were titrated with 40 to 50 ml. of Normality by Normality Calcd. Deviation
standard iodine solutions using calibrated volumetric apparatus; Sample NazSz03 from 1%Content 70
the iodine purification, solution preparation, and titrations were 1 0,05825 0.05828 0.05
carried out after the method of Kamner ( 3 ) . c. P. resublimed io-. 1 recrystallized 0.04045 0.04046 0.03
dine was sublimed from a 1 to 5 potassium iodide mixture and this 2 0.05825 0.05839 0.24
product was sublimed again, dried, and stored over calcium chlo- 2 recrystallized 0.04045 0.04046 0.00
ride. All iodine solutions contained 4 per cent of potassium 3 0. 06825 0.05832 0.12
iodide. Freshly prepared solutions of soluble starch (0.5 per cent) 3 recrystallized 0.05s25 0,05825 0.00
were used and correction blanks determined. 4 0.05s25 0.05822 0.05
4 recrystallized 0.05590a 0,05592 0.04
0.058ljb 0,05825 0.00
From Table 11, i t may be seen that the concentrations of 0.04255' 0.04257 0.05
iodine solutions determined against weighed portions of these Sample a t 120' for 18 days, b 28 days, C 79 days.
anhydrous samples and the values calculated from the masses