Coverage of Quiz No.

6:

(Obligations of the Vendor – General Provisions [Art. 1495-1496] and Delivery of the Thing
Sold [Art. 1497-1544]); (Conditions and Warranties [Art. 1545-1581]); (Obligation of the
Vendee [Art. 1582-1593] and Actions for Breach of Contract of Sale of Goods [Art. 1594-1599])
to include Recto Law: sale of movables on installment (Articles 1484 to 1486, Civil Code) and
Maceda Law: sale of immovable on installment (R.A. No. 6552); (Extinguishment of Sale [Art.
1600-1623]; Assignment of Credits and Other Incorporeal Rights [Art. 1624-1635]

List of Sources for Questions No. I to XX in Quiz No. 6:

I. Power Commercial and Industrial Corporation vs. CA, 274 SCRA 597
II. Reyes vs. De Leon, L-2231, June 16, 1967; Fabian vs. Smith Bell, 36 Phil. 510
III. Alzona vs. Capunitan, 4 SCRA 450; Tañedo, et. al. vs. CA, et. al., G.R. No. 104482, Jan.
22, 1996; 67 SCAD 57; Sps. Nuguid vs. CA, G.R. No. 77423, March 13, 1989; De los
Santos vs. CA, et. al., G.R. No. 111935, September 5, 1997, 86 SCAD 671
IV. Celsa Puncia Anchuelo vs. IAC, Jan. 29, 1987
V. Vda. de Alvarez vs. CA, et. al., G.R. No. 110970, March 16, 1994, 49 SCAD 663
VI. Conejero vs. CA, 123 Phil. 605 (1966); Barcellano vs. Banas, et. al., G.R. No. 165287,
September 14, 2011; Verdad vs. CA, 326 Phil. 601 (1996); Guillen vs. CA, G.R. No.
159755, June 18, 2009, 589 SCRA 399
VII. De la Cruz vs. Marcelino, 84 Phil. 709; Sps. Abalos, et. al., vs. CA, et. al., G.R. No.
99843, June 22, 1993, 42 SCAD 569
VIII. Serfino vs. FEBTC, et. al., G.R. No. 171845, October 10, 2012
IX. Communities Cagayan, Inc. vs. Sps. Nanol, et. al., G.R. No. 176791, November 14, 2012
X. Ulep, Bar Problem; Maceda Law
XI. Ulep, Bar Problem
XII. Ulep, Bar Problem
XIII. Ulep, Bar Problem
XIV. Ulep, Bar Problem
XV. Bareng vs. CA, 107 Phil. 641
XVI. Bandong vs. Austria, 31 Phil. 479; Alojado vs. Lim, 51 Phil. 339; Soriano vs. Abalos, 47
Off. Gaz. 168; Corcega vs. Brosas, CA, Off. Gaz. 3411
XVII. Ocejo Perez & Co. vs. International Bank, 37 Phil. 631 [1918]
XVIII. Katigbak vs. CA, 4 SCRA 243 [1962], citing Hanlon vs. Hausserman
XIX. Ulep, Bar Problem
XX. Bundalian vs. CA, 129 SCRA 645