0 Bewertungen0% fanden dieses Dokument nützlich (0 Abstimmungen)
20 Ansichten2 Seiten
B.Arch. Assignment Objectives critical review of research paper 1. Practice the critical reading 2. Practice writing summaries or taking notes 3. Understand research methodology 4. Ability to understand research conclusions Maximum marks Requirements and Format: One page summary that includes the following subtitles: 13st January 2010 17th February 2009 10%.
B.Arch. Assignment Objectives critical review of research paper 1. Practice the critical reading 2. Practice writing summaries or taking notes 3. Understand research methodology 4. Ability to understand research conclusions Maximum marks Requirements and Format: One page summary that includes the following subtitles: 13st January 2010 17th February 2009 10%.
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Verfügbare Formate
Als DOC, PDF, TXT herunterladen oder online auf Scribd lesen
B.Arch. Assignment Objectives critical review of research paper 1. Practice the critical reading 2. Practice writing summaries or taking notes 3. Understand research methodology 4. Ability to understand research conclusions Maximum marks Requirements and Format: One page summary that includes the following subtitles: 13st January 2010 17th February 2009 10%.
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Verfügbare Formate
Als DOC, PDF, TXT herunterladen oder online auf Scribd lesen
FACULTY OF ARCHITECTURE MANIPAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY MANIPAL UNIVERSITY
Assignment Critical review of research paper
Objectives 1. Practice the critical reading 2. Practice writing summaries or taking notes 3. Understand research methodology 4. Ability to understand research conclusions Assignment introduced and discussed on 13st January 2010 Submission of report 17th February 2009 Maximum marks 10% Requirements & Format: One page summary that includes the following subtitles: 1. Description: Brief description of the research paper including the main conclusion shown in the example. Identify the research type from the given taxonomy. 2. Research Attributes: Describe the research attributes shown in the example. Method of inference. 3. Research Methodology: Describe the research methodology shown in the example Five pages critical review that includes the following subtitles: 1. Problem statement: brief review of the problem statement of the research paper 2. Research design: brief review of the research design of the research paper 3. Conduct of research: brief review of data collection or demonstration with examples 4. Analysis, interpretation and reporting: brief review of the data analysis, interpretation and reporting. You should be ready to make an oral presentation if asked in class. EXAMPLE Summary a research paper is given below as a guideline for an elaborate review. Research paper: Horridge, P., Woodson, E., Khan, S., & Tock, R.W. (1983). Thermal Optical Comparisons of Accepted Interior Window Treatments, ASHRAE Journal. Vol. 25. No. 2. pp. 45-49, Atlanta: ASHRAE. Horridge, Woodson, Khan & Tock (1983) investigated the heat flow Window type(s): Single pane, clear and the visible transmittance through selected categories of single glass and multi layered window treatments (venetian blinds, translucent Window area(s): Not specified rollers, vertical blinds, opaque roller shades, drapery liners, etc.). Shading device(s): Interior: venetian The heat losses were measured using a cold box with painted black blinds, interior connected to a refrigeration unit used to simulate cold, night translucent time conditions. Wind effects were not simulated. The visible light rollers, vertical transmittance was measured using a slide projector and a blinds, opaque photometer. The authors studied the influence of the shading roller shades, device’s design and installation procedure, of using multiple layers, drapery liners of varying the distance to the glass and of using various floor to Climate(s): Cold night time ceiling installations. conditions, no The study showed that, out of 34 cases, 20 individual treatments wind flow, no improved the thermal resistance of the window by 70%. The highest solar radiation R-value was obtained with an aluminium slats venetian blind. (simulated) Multiple layers did not improve the window thermal resistance Orientation(s): Any except when the distance between the layers was reduced to 2.54 cm. Year/period(s): Any The installation procedure did not significantly influence the R- Energy end-use(s): Not included values. Research method(s): Experimental Also, it was shown that 2/3 of the window treatments tested reduced Result(s): Guildelines: the visible light by 60-100% and that the window treatments could thermal* and visual** also significantly increase the thermal resistance of the window. In transmittance of general there was a reverse relationship between visible light shading devices transmittance and thermal resistance. Other: *Using a cold box with painted The study is interesting because it provides R-values for different black interior window coverings. However, some results contradict research results connected to a found by other researchers. They should be examined with caution. refrigeration unit Note also that the light transmittance was measured using a projector **Using slide and that the experimental conditions were relatively far from a real projector and sky situation. photometer
1 Prof (Dr) C. Kabre
VIII Semester B.Arch. ASSIGNMENTS_2010/ARC 414 Research Techniques FACULTY OF ARCHITECTURE MANIPAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY MANIPAL UNIVERSITY