Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Malinlin
People v. Matusalem
ISSUE: Whether or not the presented evidence is sufficient to prove the paternity
SC: There are particular evidence that must be presented in order to prove paternity
under Art. 132 of the Family Code, but she did not present. A Birth Certificate is not conclusive.
There must be proof that the putative father had a hand in the procc for Acknowledgement
People v Posing
Accused's Defense, police failed to comply with the chain of custody rule, questioning the
competence
SC: It does not require strict compliance as long as the prosecution was able to protect the
integrity of the trans
People v. Gani
EO 2 guilty of violation of
Documentary evidence - PDEA report, coordination letter, joint affidavit, inventory of ceased
money, Toxicology report
Denied, they were victims of extortion, failed to produce money demanded from them
PWEDE BA GRAVESTONE?
PARTIALLY DESTROYED? No. As long as the substance of the contents which are material still
exists, it depends on the use
Allowance
CITIBANK
Creditcard
Original copies of the sales invoice is the best evidence, photocopies are secondary evidence
LOON v POWERMASTER
While it is a quasi judicial body, it is still subject to fairplay, must explain the cause of delay, must
be sufficient that these allegations are true, failed to establish, hence the evidence was
incompetent
Exception, that certified true copies were presented would be more than sufficient
Without the call the evidence is not going to be material to the case
ORTANEZ v CA
Lower court admitted parole eidence which is the existence of the oral agreement
1. Human memory is not better than a written agreement, it cannot be the basis for the
admission
3.Parole evidence would modify/ alter the agreement between them (though was not raised
during the pleading)
4. Intent of parole evidence is to explain, modify but never strike down such agreement, if you
want to just file a direct action
Tehy merely express during the trial, and failed to put in issue the pleading
LAPU-LAPU
ISSUE: WON parole evidence presented by Elias, that the promissory note's agreement that it
will be renewed annually to pay for the loan
SC there is no showing, stipulation that would give the idea on the existence of such agreement
in fact each of the promissory notes have maturity dates
LEOVERAS v VALDEZ
Allot portions of the subject land, later on after the execution of the agreement, Leoveras
secured 2 TCTs one cvering the lot in the agreement, and an additional portion of that was given
not subject to the agreement
Complaint for nullification for the additional square lots obtained by petitioner Leoveras
Leoveras contends that the actual agreement, he who is in actual possession of the WON
allegation of ownership which was not subject of the agreement of the parties can be admissible
in evidence?
SC: NO. The petitioner did not even contend the authenticity of the parties and was only backing
his contention that the affidavit
Such subsequent agreement was spurious because of the discrepancy of the signature of the
ELECTRONIC EVIDENCE
What is electronic evidence? Anything coming from use of IT, peripheries thereof like Hard
Drives, the contents thereof.
Fax and Xerox are not Electronic Evidence, E-Mails are considered electronic evidence
Does not create distinction in the proceedings, maybe Quasi-Judicial bodies have different rules
I want you to go over the minimum requirements for an Electronic Evidence be admitted in court
as well as to the authenticity
Video does not constitute electronic evidence, it is object evidence, but if you passed it through
the internet then it is electronic evidence
Pictures are plain object evidence, you need to present the one who took it
Unlawful Detainer, gave credence with certification issue, after the survey of the land, it
remained alienable and was not given to a particualr person, since he owned the land OCCENA
for 60 years
TORRES v PAGCORP
Illegal dismissal with CSC, PAGCOR sent him dismissal letter regarding the alleged fraud in
connection with the - edited a computer program regarding the slot machine, he increased the
chances of winning in the slot machine
Complaint dismissed, the appeal has already been prescribed, since he failed to file a letter of
reconsideration; though he sent a faximile transmission
ANG
(OVERTURNED)
Text messages should ve proved by the testimony of a person who was a party
Syhunliong v Rivera
P, president of Realty Corp, Rivera is former acctg head manager who resigned
Rivera
============================================================================
It could be in the form of one's perception, be known to another with regard to a particular fact
Varies
PWEDE BANG JURIDICAL PERSON MAG TESTIFY? GR: NO XPN: Through its officers
WHAT ARE THESE QUALIFICATIONS TO BE A WITNESS? Making that emotion apply to you, as
though it was happening to you, did you comprehend what happened? Ignorance, lack of
education is what affects perception
IS THER A LIMINTATION
All that is requred is that a witness must have all qualifications and none of the disqualifications
Mental Incapacity
Pp. v. Malimlim
Rape Case:
Under S29, Mental Incapacity is defined as one who is incapable of intelligently making known
his perception to others
Extended family?
Yes
H was charged with Arson, Maximo moved for the disqualification under Marital Disqualification