Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Abstract—This paper investigates the behaviour of Self performance, SCC is different from HPC developed
compacting concrete (SCC) beams under flexural in North America and Europe, which emphasizes on
loading. Self compacting concrete, a new kind of high high strength and durability of concrete. In terms of
performance concrete with excellent deformability is a workability, HPC nearly improves fluidity of
highly-workable concrete which has the ability to fill the concrete to facilitate placing; however it cannot flow
forms without any vibration also has ability to flow freely by itself to pack every corner of moulds and all
and pass through small spaces between reinforcements gaps among reinforcement. In other words, HPC still
and also cohesive enough to be handled without requires vibration and compaction in construction
segregation and bleeding. Totally four mix proportions process.
are arrived with different percentage of fly-ash and The term Self-Compacting Concrete (SCC)
silica fume. The percentage of silica fume varied from 0 refers to a ―new‖ special type of concrete mixture,
to 15%.The total replacement percentage of cement for characterized by high resistance to segregation that
all mixes are 40%. In this paper, studied the fresh can be cast without compaction or vibration. Self
properties (such as Flow ability, Passing ability and
compacting concrete is not affected by the skills of
workers, the shape and amount of reinforcing bars or
Filling ability) and strength properties (such as
the arrangement of a structure. Self-consolidating
Compressive strength, Split tensile strength and
concrete, a latest innovation in concrete technology is
Flexural strength) for different mix proportions. Totally
being regarded as one of the most promising
four beams were casted to study the flexural behaviour
developments in the construction industry due to
of SCC beams with filler materials. The ultimate load
numerous advantages of it over conventional
and deflection are measured under the two point concrete. Self-consolidating concrete, as the name
loading condition. The finite element model is developed indicates, is a type of concrete that does not require
for all beams using ANSYS 14.5. The analytical results external or internal compaction, but it becomes
arrived from ANSYS 14.5 are compared with the levelled and compacted under its self-weight only. It
experimental results. Finally the mix containing 15% is commonly abbreviated as SCC and defined as a
SF produced better result in all stages. concrete which can be placed and compacted into
every corner of a form work, purely by means of its
Key Words: Self Compacting Concrete (SCC), flexural self-weight thus eliminating the need of vibration or
behaviour, filler materials, fresh property, strength other types of compacting effort.
property.
II. LITERATURE REVIEW
I. INTRODUCTION
14136
International Journal of Applied Engineering Research ISSN 0973-4562 Volume 10, Number 19 (2015)
© Research India Publications ::: http://www.ripublication.com
SCC-SF gives the better ductility and energy efficiency of the developed computer program
absorption results than other combination of mixes (ANSYS version 12.0) in predicting the behavior and
such as SCC-FAS, SCC-RHA and SCC-QD. Finally, ultimate load of composite steel-concrete beams.
the experimental result has been proved with analysis
software viz., ANSYS.
III CONCRETE MIX PROPORTIONS
In February 2011, I. Saifullah et al
presented a paper in International Journal of Civil & The investigation was performed on the self-
Environmental Engineering IJCEE-IJENS Vol: 11 compacting concrete with different mix proportions.
No: 01 which focuses on the behavior of reinforced Concrete mixes were designed, prepared and
concrete beam for different pattern of shear summarized in four groups as shown in table 1. Silica
reinforcement to evaluate the effective shear fume was added by 5% of cement content and
reinforcement pattern and also compare the variation increased up to 15%,fly ash was 40% of cement
in behavior of reinforced concrete beam for with and content for CM and reduced up to 25% for the
without shear reinforcement with a simulation. From mixes, Fine aggregate and Coarse aggregate content
observation of analyses results it can be concluded are same for all the mixes, the water–binder ratio was
that all types of web reinforcements are almost same taken as 0.35 for all self- compacting mixes,
effective for static loading condition. super-plasticizer ratio was 2.25% from the cement
content to produce self- compacting concrete.
In November 2012, S. S. Patil, et al
presented a paper in which The deep beam are Table 1 Mix proportions
subjected to two point loading with three different Mix ID Binder content W/B SP
L/D ratios (1.5, 1.6, 1.71) using Non-linear Finite (%) (%) (%)
element method (ANSYS 9.0 software) in order to C FA SF
investigate the stress and strain distribution pattern at CM 60 40 - 0.35 2.25
5SF 60 35 5 0.35 2.25
mid-section of the beam. Flexural stress and strain 10SF 60 30 10 0.35 2.25
variation graphs indicate that the definition of simply 15SF 60 25 15 0.35 2.25
supported deep beam as per IS 456:2000. From the
flexural strain and stress graphs it was observed that C-Cement, FA-Fly Ash, SF-Silica Fume, CM-
as L/D ratio of the beam decreases the neutral axis Control Mix, SP-Super Plasticizer, W/B-Water to
shifted towards soffit of the beam. From the shear Binder Ratio.
stress variation graph it was observed that as
span/depth ratio decreases the shear stress increases. IV EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATION
14137
International Journal of Applied Engineering Research ISSN 0973-4562 Volume 10, Number 19 (2015)
© Research India Publications ::: http://www.ripublication.com
1500
S.NO Mix ID Load (KN) Deflection
500 w w
(mm)
8 mm stirrups
@ 100c/c Hangers:
1 CM 43.2 24.43
20 2 nos 8 mm dia 2 5SF 51.5 25.39
135 3 10SF 54.8 27.27
20
4 15SF 55 23.22
50 1400 100 Main reinforcement
2 nos 10 mm dia
Figure 1 Reinforcement detail of beam the load carrying capacity of the self compacting
concrete beam is increased and the deflection of the
V EXPERIMENTAL TEST RESULT beam gets decreased. . And it is observed, by
replacing cement with silica fume by 5%, 10% and
A. Fresh Properties 15% the deflection value is increased by 3.93%,
11.62% and decreased by 4.95% respectively.
Table 2 Fresh properties
The load deflection curve for all mix proportions are
Mix Slump T50 V- L- U-
shown in figure 2,3,4,5.
ID Flow sec Funn Box Box
Mm el mm mm
sec
CM 655 5.0 11.8 0.85 29
CM
5SF 670 4.9 10.1 0.88 28 y = 1.674x + 13.05
10SF 692 4.8 9.3 0.92 26 R² = 0.721
15SF 710 4.6 8.5 0.97 25
Load KN
B. Strength Properties
Deflection mm
Table 3 Strength properties
Figure 2 Load –Deflection curve for CM
Mix ID Cube compression Split tensile Flexural
(N/mm2)28days (N/mm2) strength
28days (N/mm2)
28days
CM 37.54 2.58 6.33
5SF 40.79 2.93 6.81
10SF 41.02 2.15 6.99
15SF 43.14 2.93 7.3
14138
International Journal of Applied Engineering Research ISSN 0973-4562 Volume 10, Number 19 (2015)
© Research India Publications ::: http://www.ripublication.com
14139
International Journal of Applied Engineering Research ISSN 0973-4562 Volume 10, Number 19 (2015)
© Research India Publications ::: http://www.ripublication.com
D.Modeling
The beam was modelled as volume. The
model was 1500 mm long with a cross section of 100
mm X 170mm. The Finite Element beam model was
shown in Fig.6.
14140
International Journal of Applied Engineering Research ISSN 0973-4562 Volume 10, Number 19 (2015)
© Research India Publications ::: http://www.ripublication.com
REFERENCE
1. Suchithra, S., Malathy, R., ―Computational Analysis of
Bending Properties of Self-Compacting Concrete
Reinforced With Steel Fibers‖, International Journal of
Innovative Research in Science Engineering and
Technology, Vol. 3, Issue 4, April 2014.
2. Saifullah, I., Hossain, M.A., Uddin, S.M.K., Khan,
M.R.A., Amin, M.A., ―Nonlinear Analysis of RC
Beam for Different Shear Reinforcement Patterns by
Finite Element Analysis‖, International Journal of Civil
14141