Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Kassandra Simeon
ABSTRACT
This action research study was conducted in Mentor, OH at Lake Elementary School
in the Mentor Public School District. This study used a third-grade class (n=22) divided into
an experimental (n=11) and control group (n=11). This study investigated if using
strategies were first taught to the entire class. Google Slides were created for each
comprehension strategy and used with the experimental group. Qualitative data was
gathered using the Renaissance STAR Reading benchmark assessment to determine if the
extra practice using technology showed a significant increase in scores. The fall and spring
benchmark scores were compared. Overall, there was an increase in scores but statistically
they were not significant enough to show that using Google Slides to practice and reflect on
INTRODUCTION
readers who not only can read well, but more importantly enjoy reading. Independent
reading is one part of the balanced literacy framework that many elementary schools are
turning to. According to Brown & Fisher (2006), balanced literacy has four main
framework that is focused around building strong readers and through a wide array of
reading tasks.
Independent reading is a time where students read books of their choosing on their
own. “Independent reading challenges teachers to give up the control of what students read
and how students assess what they read” (Brown & Fisher, 2006, p. 39). By having a choice
of what they read, students can practice reading different kinds of texts and expand their
reading diets (Kasten & Wilfong, 2007). Having choice in what in what they read helps
students to stay interested in what they are reading and builds their confidence as readers.
“Independent reading allows students to expand their world, background knowledge, and
Reading is a main foundation and can motivate, inform, inspire, and has the ability
to change lives (Lele, 2017). “The primary goal of a reading program is to inculcate love for
books in the minds of young readers” (Lele, 2017, p. 14). By having time in the school day
dedicated to independent reading, teachers are providing their students a time to foster
reader.
READING STRATEGY USE DURING INDEPENDENT READING 4
“Once the students fall in love with the books, the next goal of a school is to equip
students with the strategies to make reading easier” (Lele, 2017, p. 14). Using reading
“Explicitly, the reading strategies that proficient readers use when trying to make sense of
the text, help deepen the understanding and create independent readers” (Lele, 2017, p.
14). Teachers in elementary school teach students reading strategies to use during reading.
Students take the strategies they learn and apply them on their own. Students are to use
these reading strategies during independent reading time to help them comprehend what
they are reading and understand what the text is telling them. According to Bishop, Reyes,
& Pflaum (2006), “What sets strategic readers apart from those readers who read but get
little information from the text is the understanding that they must read smarter and not
harder” (p. 69). Reading strategies make reading easier when they are used because
students are better able to decode the text, understand what it is saying, and ultimately
Research Question
strategies taught to help them read through books that are at their independent reading
level. One issue with independent reading time is students are not always using the reading
strategies that are taught. Some students don’t fully understand the strategy so they don’t
use it. Some students understand the strategy but think it doesn’t apply to the book they
are reading. Some students just forget to use reading strategies altogether. Teachers are
struggling to get students to use reading strategies in their independent reading, especially
struggling readers who need to use the strategies the most. This is a huge issue because
READING STRATEGY USE DURING INDEPENDENT READING 5
research shows what benefits using reading strategies has on reading fluency and
comprehension. “It is a simple fact that if the children don’t understand what they read,
The purpose of this study is to get students to better understand the reading
strategies taught and then apply the reading strategies during independent reading time.
This study will integrate technology in a way that ensures understanding of each strategy,
gets students to practice each reading strategy during independent reading, and then
reflect on how they used that reading strategy to help them become a better reader. The
LITERATURE REVIEW
Reading strategies have been used in elementary to help students read grade level texts
and comprehend what they are reading. Elementary students are challenged daily in their
reading and are often faced with reading complex texts. Incorporating reading strategies is
a way that teachers teach students how to decode words, read accurately, and ultimately
comprehend what they are reading. In elementary school, students start out by learning to
read. Around third grade however, students switch from learning to read to reading to lean.
continual basis” (Marcell, DeCleene, & Juettner, 2010). Teaching students reading strategies
helps them to make this transition easier and get the most out of reading.
READING STRATEGY USE DURING INDEPENDENT READING 6
Independent reading time is a time where students can practice these learned
strategies with books of their choice. Studies have been done to show the importance of
teaching reading strategies at the elementary level. Other studies have been conducted to
show the importance of independent reading time and giving students a choice in what
they read. Together, reading strategies and independent reading time give students the
opportunity to practice what they have learned, apply it their reading and ultimately
Several studies have been conducted to show the impact that reading strategies
have on elementary students and their reading. Daily 5 and the CAFÉ is a reading
framework in which students make independent choices while the teacher leads small
groups or reading conferences with students (Boushey & Moser, 2012). This framework is
used by many teachers in order to make their reading time more student centered, teach
students independence, and let students have the ability to make choices about their
learning. Duty (2016) conducted a qualitative study regarding the Daily 5 and CAFÉ
framework. In this study, Duty (2016) explored the impact of this particular reading
framework with fourth grade struggling students’ reading comprehension, attitudes, and
engagement while reading. This study looked closely at six fourth grade students that were
picked by maximum variation sampling. These six students showed low test scores in the
area of reading comprehension. An equal number of boys and girls were selected. Over the
course of a ten-week period, the researcher met with students individually. The researcher
used interviews, reading response journals, and Draw-a-Reader illustrations to collect data.
reading when participating in the Daily 5 and CAFÉ framework (Duty, 2016, p. 87).
Students in this study ended up making one years growth. This study shows the
importance of a sound reading framework and how teaching reading strategies can have a
strategies are used as the student becomes a better reader. Kragler, Martin, and Schreier
(2015) conducted a study about how students use reading strategies and how the reading
strategies they use change over time. The purpose of this study was to investigate the use
and change of reading strategies used by elementary school students over time from first
grade to third grade (Kragler et al., 2015, p. 448). Stratified sampling was used to select
thirty students in first grade. By the end of third grade, due to students moving or lack of
attendance, sixteen students remained in the study. Throughout this study, the researchers
conducted interviews, running records, anecdotal notes, and retellings to examine reading
comprehension. “The results of this study indicate young children are using a variety of
strategies while they read. However, the results also show the critical need for a systematic
rich discussions about the texts being read” (Kragler et al., 2015, p. 468). Reading strategy
Another study was done by Droop, Elsacker, Voeten, and Verhoeven (2016) in order
to examine the effects of a program that offered strategic reading instruction (SRI) on
reading abilities of third and fourth graders over a two year period. There is no doubt that
grades. According to Droop et al. (2016), there have been many studies conducted on
strategy instruction but none over an extended period of time. This study was conducted
over a period of two years (third and fourth grade) in a natural classroom setting in the
experimental or control group. In the first year, third grade teachers in the experimental
group received training on the SRI program and implemented it in their classrooms and in
the second year, fourth grade teachers received the same training. The control group
design was used to examine the effects of the SRI program on the experimental group.
“Measurements occurred at three moments in time: the pretest at the beginning of third
grade (September 2009), the intermediate posttest at the end of third grade (June 2010)
and the final posttest at the end of fourth grade (June 2011)” (Droop et al., 2016, p. 80).
Overall, the results of this study showed positive effects on students and their knowledge of
reading strategies. At the end of the study, students in the experimental group had greater
growth in their knowledge of reading strategies than the control group. “Gaining an
knowledge of these strategies” (Droop et al., 2016, p. 98). This study shows that
implementing a sound reading program like SRI can have positive effects on student
knowledge of reading strategies which ultimately helps them comprehend what they are
Independent Reading
READING STRATEGY USE DURING INDEPENDENT READING 9
student’s day. Independent reading time is a time where students build their reading
stamina, are exposed to text at their level, practice reading strategies, and foster the love of
reading. Giving students a choice in what they read is crucial to fostering the love of
reading. “When a child chooses a book and reads it with ease, it promotes fluency, self-
expression and works towards better comprehension” (Lele, 2017, p. 14). The most
important thing teachers can do is encourage students to read independently and foster the
love of reading.
Kasten and Wilfong (2007) conducted a study based from past observations and
experiences with independent reading. They wondered, “What makes students hate
reading? What makes students like reading? How are students feeling about themselves as
independent readers?” (Kasten & Wilfong, 2007, p. 1). In this study, the researchers
conducted two surveys with 1,006 students from two Ohio school districts from third grade
all the way up to twelfth grade. “Students were asked questions about their attitudes
towards independent reading, what they believe helped them want to read, what
discouraged them from reading, and their habits as readers” (Kasten & Wilfong, 2007, p. 1).
The results showed that certain reading activities in school encouraged them and made
them want to read. Sustained silent reading, artistic projects, book talks, and journaling all
are activities that help them want to read. The results also showed that students look at
their peers, teachers, and mothers as role models and for ideas on what to read. Building
positive attitudes for independent reading at the elementary level can influence how
students feel about independent reading later in middle and in high school.
READING STRATEGY USE DURING INDEPENDENT READING 10
learn reading strategies, it also is a time for middle and high schoolers to continue to build
their love of reading. Dickerson (2015) conducted a study in her own high school
classroom dealing with independent reading. She noticed that many of her students did not
enjoy reading, whether it was done independently outside of class or inside of class.
Because of this problem, she decided to do a study within her own classroom over a two-
year period that incorporated more independent reading and more choice into her reading
classroom. She used purposeful sampling throughout the two years to select students from
her classes on multiple reading levels. She collected data during “Reading Zone,” which was
ten minutes of independent reading time at the start of her class. She collected data
through reading trackers, reading notebooks, a genre tracker in her classroom, reading
surveys, and through conversations. The results of this study showed increase in student
reading levels, students reading a wider variety of books, better engagement by calling it
Reading Zone instead of Sustained Silent Reading time (SSR), and overall higher quality
reading being done by the students. Dickerson (2015) states, “What I’ve learned from the
past two years of my Reading Zone experiment is that everyone is reader; out of the
roughly two hundred students I’ve tried Reading Zone with, all of them have willingly
engaged in it” (par. 34). Dickerson (2015) also expresses, “But students need to be guided
toward texts that resonate with them and be given the freedom and trust to explore these
texts” (par. 34). This study shows how important a structured independent reading time
can be in a classroom. It also shows the importance of student choice and how powerful a
Summary
READING STRATEGY USE DURING INDEPENDENT READING 11
Based on these studies, teaching reading strategies and independent reading have a
positive impact on elementary students. Reading strategies are used across multiple grade
levels and have a huge impact on reading comprehension when reading. By teaching
reading strategies, teachers help students to break down the text they are reading in order
those in upper elementary where reading shifts from learning to read to reading to learn.
Practicing these reading strategies during independent reading time can increase student
independence with reading as well as give them an opportunity to experiment with these
strategies on their own. During independent reading time, students choose from a wide
variety of books and choose what they want to read (Brown & Fisher, 2006). By giving
students a choice on what they read, teachers are facilitating independent choice and will
see better engagement in their readers. Better engagement means higher quality
PROJECT FILES
The CAFÉ Reading strategies have four different reading strategy groups;
Vocabulary strategies. For this research project, the Comprehension strategies were the
strategies that were focused on. The other groups of strategies were still taught in small
reading groups, but the comprehension strategies were taught to all students in a whole
group setting.
For this research project, Google Slides were created for students to interact with.
The project files for this research project include a set of slides for students to reflect on all
of the CAFÉ reading comprehension strategies. Each set of slides include a title slide that
READING STRATEGY USE DURING INDEPENDENT READING 12
tells students the comprehension strategy that the set is focused on (Figure 1). The title
slide also includes what letter of CAFÉ the strategy falls under. The colorful cards on each
slide correspond to the CAFÉ anchor chart that is displayed in the classroom.
All comprehension strategies are first taught using whole group instruction to the
entire class. The next slide in all of the sets is a slide telling about the comprehension
strategy (Figure 2). This slide reminds students what the reading strategy is all about and
gives some pointers on how to correctly use the strategy independently. In all of the sets,
this slide is followed by a slide the tells students the following slides are reflection slides
(Figure 3). This slide is the same in all sets, so it is familiar to the students.
The next slides in the Google Slides sets are slides where students reflect
independently while using the strategy in their own reading (Figure 4). These slides are for
students to practice using the comprehension strategy that was taught. By providing
opportunities to practice using the strategy and reflecting on how it helps them as a reader,
The last slide in every set provides students an opportunity to reflect about
themselves as a reader (Figure 5). It asks students to reflect on how the strategy helped
them as a reader, what they liked about using the strategy, and what they didn’t like about
the strategy.
READING STRATEGY USE DURING INDEPENDENT READING 13
Figure 1: Example of a title slide that students see when interacting with the Google Slides file.
Figure 2. Example of a slide that tells students about the reading comprehension strategy.
Figure 3. An example of the slide students see to know it is time for reflection.
READING STRATEGY USE DURING INDEPENDENT READING 14
Figure 4. An example of a slide that provides students with an opportunity to practice the
reading comprehension strategy.
Figure 5. An example of the last slide in every set where students reflect on how the strategy
helped them as a reader.
METHODOLOGY
Research Design
Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Approaches, this research design is a strong research
design because it controls several threats to the internal validity of the study. “The pretest-
controls for rival hypotheses that would threaten the internal validity of the experiment”
(Johnson & Christensen, 2017, p. 338). Participants will first take the STAR Reading
Assessment by Renaissance Learning. The STAR Reading Assessment will be used as the
READING STRATEGY USE DURING INDEPENDENT READING 15
pretest and the posttest in this research study design. Half of the participants will be in the
experimental group and the other half will be in the control group. Participants in the
experimental group will have the opportunity to reflect on each reading strategy learned
through the use of technology, and the control group will not.
Participants
Twenty-two third grade students from one class will participate in this study.
Convenience sampling is used because the researcher is using her own class for this study.
Within this sampling of students, random sampling will be used to sort students into the
experimental and control group. By using random sampling, the target population will be
Instrumentation
The independent variable in this study is the technology used to have students
review and practice each reading strategy. Each reading strategy taught has a Google Slides
interactive presentation that accompanies it. Students in the experimental group will work
through the Google Slides interactive presentation through the use of Google Classroom.
These Google Slides will have spots where students type into text boxes, reflect on the
reading strategy, and tell how they practiced using it in their independent reading.
The pretest and posttest will be administered using the STAR Reading Assessment
by Renaissance Learning. This is a reading assessment used to measure the reading level of
each student and used to measure reading growth over time. This assessment is a
customized reading test taken on the computer that gives students a series of multiple
choice reading questions based on how they are answering. For example, if a student is
answering questions correctly, they will continue to get more advanced questions in order
READING STRATEGY USE DURING INDEPENDENT READING 16
to find their reading level. If a student is answering questions incorrectly, the test adjusts
and gives them less advanced questions in order to fins their reading level. By
administering the STAR Reading Assessment as a pretest and posttest in this study, the
researcher will be able to accurately measure the growth between both the experimental
Procedures
Data will be collected at various points in this study. First, data will be collected for
the pretest. Students will be randomly selected for two subgroups using a randomly
assigned students ID number ranging from 1 through 22. Once the experimental and the
control groups are established, students in the experimental group will begin interacting
with the Google Slides presentations after each reading strategy is taught in the classroom.
Each reading strategy will have a different Google Slides presentation for students to
interact with. Students in the control group will not interact with the Google Slides and will
continue learning each reading strategy in whole group instruction only. At the end of the
experiment, the posttest will be administered and the scores from the pretest and posttest
will be compared.
RESULTS
Pretest Results
To start this experiment, the STAR assessment was given within the first month of
school to collect baseline data on the students. According to the STAR reading assessment,
the following are the benchmarks throughout the year; Fall, 323; Winter, 360; Spring, 393.
By earning the benchmark score, this means the students scored at or above the 40th
READING STRATEGY USE DURING INDEPENDENT READING 17
percentile rank compared to other students their age. Their fall scaled score on this
The STAR Screening report breaks down each student score into the following color
categories listed chronologically from high scoring to low scoring: Green stands for
At/Above Benchmark (at or above 40th percentile rank); Blue stand for On Watch (below
40th percentile rank); Yellow for Intervention (below 25 percentile rank); and Red stands
The benchmark score for fall administration of the assessment was a scaled score of
323. According to the fall STAR screening report, 12 participants (55% of population)
scored in the At/Above Benchmark category; 1 student (5% of population) scored in the On
Watch category; 4 students (18% of population) scored in the Intervention category; and 5
students (23% of population) scored in the Urgent Intervention category (Figure 6, Figure
7).
In order to get true random groups, students were assigned a student ID # ranging
from 1 through 22. These numbers were randomly drawn one by one in order to determine
which subgroup they were assigned to; the experimental group or the control group
(Figure 8). The experimental group started with an average scaled score of 309.7 with the
lowest score being 74 and the greatest being 632. The control group started with an
average scaled score of 311.5 with the lowest score being 92 and the greatest being 517.
Both averages were below the 323 benchmark score for fall. The following chart shows the
pretest scores within both subgroups as well as what color category those score fell into
Figure 8. Experimental and Control Group Fall Scaled scores paired with the category color.
The posttest was taken in early spring under the same conditions that the pretest
was administered in (Figure 9). The experimental group ended with an average scaled
score of 396.4 with the lowest score being 132 and the greatest being 679 (Figure 10). The
control group ended with an average scaled score of 372.7 with the lowest score being 198
and the greatest being 566 (Figure 11). The average score for the experimental group
(396.4) was slightly above the spring benchmark score of 393 and students on average
increased 86.6 points from their fall score. The average score for the control group (372.7)
was below the spring benchmark score and students on average increased 61.1 points from
their fall score. The following charts show the posttest scores within both subgroups, what
color category those score fell into according to the STAR report, and the increase in scores
Figure 9. Experimental and Control Group Spring Scaled scores paired with the category
color.
Figure 10. Chart showing the Experimental Groups’ pretest and post test scores along with the
amount of points increased.
READING STRATEGY USE DURING INDEPENDENT READING 21
Figure 11. Chart showing the Control Groups’ pretest and post test scores along with the
amount of points increased.
Statistical Analysis
To analyze the results of the impact of using technology to practice and reflect on
reading strategies, statistical analysis was used. In this study, the independent variable was
the CAFÉ Strategy online unit which was used for students to reflect on the reading
strategies being taught. This unit was only given to those students in the experimental
group. The dependent variable was the STAR reading assessment that was given to all
students.
practice, experimental groups scores (n=11, M=372.27, Sample Group 1) were predicted to
increase more than the control group (n=11, M=396.36, Sample Group 2). To statistically
analyze the posttest scores, a t-test of independent samples was used and tested at the .05
alpha level. Based on the results of the spring posttest, the p value (0.6795) is greater than
READING STRATEGY USE DURING INDEPENDENT READING 22
the .05 alpha level which shows the sample data is not significantly different. This means
that we fail to reject the null. Using technology to review reading strategies did not
tailed.
Summary of Results
Overall, the experimental group’s scores did increase and showed a higher average
than the posttest scores of the control group but did not show significant difference when
analyzed statistically.
CONCLUSIONS
One possible reason the data did not show significant difference may be the
population size. This study was done within one third grade classroom using only 22
students. This is quite a small population size to analyze. The results may have been
different if the population size was greater. If this research experiment was to be done
again, using a larger population size, such as multiple grade levels with more participants,
Although statistically speaking the results did not show a significant increase, the
classroom teacher did see a difference in some of the students who participated in the
experimental group. The classroom teacher regularly conferences with students about
their reading. While conferencing with the students in the experimental group, these
students were better able to talk about how they used the reading comprehension
strategies in their independent reading than students who were in the control group. This
may be because the students in the experimental group had extra opportunities to practice
READING STRATEGY USE DURING INDEPENDENT READING 23
using the strategies through the use of the Google Slides than students who were in the
control group.
REFERENCES
Bishop, P. A., Reyes, C. & Pflaum, S. (2006). Read smarter, not harder: Global reading
Boushey, G. & Moser, J. (2012). Big ideas behind Daily 5 and CAFÉ. Reading Teacher, 66(3),
Brown, J. & Fisher, P. (2006). Balanced literacy: One middle school’s experience. Principal
No. 22211194)
spring-2015/reimagining-reading-creating-classroom-culture-embraces-indepe
Droop, M., Elsacker, W., Voeten, M., & Verhoeven, L. (2016). Long-term effects of strategic
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19345747.2015.1065528
Duty, S. L. (2016). The impact of Daily 5 and CAFÉ literacy framework on reading
Johnson, R. B., & Christensen, L. (2017). Educational research: Quantitative, qualitative, and
Kragler, S., Martin, L. & Schreier, V. (2015). Investigating young children’s use of reading
10.1080/02702711.2014.884031
Lele, S. (2017). Making independent reading work. California English, 22(3), 14-16.
Marcell, B., DeCleene, J. & Juettner, M.R. (2010). Caution! Hard hat area! Comprehension
10.1598/RT.63.8.8