LOW COST HOUSING

SANJU BHANDARI
1OX11CV032

CIVIL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT

THE OXFORD COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING
 LOW COST HOUSING

INTRODUCTION

• As the population grows, the price in every product increases Including

cement and construction material.
• With the growth in population, the need for residential properties are
marking in all time demand in the construction industry.

• The environmental effect is also to be considered.

• Utilization of the Alternate Materials can put a mark in today’s
construction for Environmental Protection and for Cost Reduction.

CIVIL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT

THE OXFORD COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING
 LOW COST HOUSING

POPULATION AND HOUSING SHORTAGE STATISTICS

CIVIL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT

THE OXFORD COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING
 LOW COST HOUSING

AREAS OF CONCERN

• Severe shortage of houses in developing countries

specially for poor people.
• Severe problem of management of agro industrial waste
in developing countries
• Expensive & scarce building materials and components.
• People may also need affordable housing because a
change in their lives has impacted on their financial
circumstances

CIVIL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT

THE OXFORD COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING
 LOW COST HOUSING

Low Cost or Cost Effective Housing

CIVIL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT

THE OXFORD COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING
 LOW COST HOUSING

FACTORS AFFECTING CHOICE OF

MATERIALS
AND TECHNOLOGIES

CIVIL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT

THE OXFORD COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING
 LOW COST HOUSING

TECHNOLOGY FOR ALTERNATIVE

MATERIALS FOR
LOW COST HOUSING

• ENERGY EFFICIENT
• ENVIRONMENT
FRIENDLY
• EMPLOYMENT
GENERATING

CIVIL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT

THE OXFORD COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING
 LOW COST HOUSING

LOW COST BUILDING MATERIALS

CHARECTERISTICS

STRAW PANEL

CIVIL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT

THE OXFORD COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING
OVERALL MINIMUM COST REDUCTION
=40%
 LOW COST HOUSING

1. DESIGN OF INDIVIDUAL BUILDING

CIVIL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT

THE OXFORD COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING
 LOW COST HOUSING

COMPONENTS OF THE BUILDING

VERTICAL
ELEMENTS
WALLS

HORIZONTAL
ELEMENTS
FLOORS & ROOFS

DOORS AND WINDOWS

STAIRCASE

MOST OF THE COMPONENSTS ARE PRECAST

CIVIL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT

THE OXFORD COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING
 LOW COST HOUSING

TYPE OF STRUCTURE USED

VS

LOAD BEARING STRUCTURE VS FRAME STRUCTURE

 LOAD BEARING STRUCTURE CHEAPER FOR NORMAL LOW RISE
BUILDING AS IT REQUIRES LESSER CONCRETE AND STEEL RODS
 THICK WALL PROVIDES THERMAL INSULATION
 EASIER AND REQUIRES LESS TIME TO CONSTRUCTION
 FLEXIBILITY & STRENGTH ADVANTAGE FOR FRAME STRUCTURE

CIVIL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT

THE OXFORD COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING
 LOW COST HOUSING

HOLLOW CONCRETE BLOCK VS BRICK MASONRY

VS

VS
HOLLOW CONCRETE BLOCK VS BRICK MASONRY
One hollow block = approx. 8 standard bricks
So , cost of one hollow brick is Rs 20 , and cost of one brick is 5
Cost saved in construction 9’’ wall , Rs 20 vs Rs 40
Cost saved in construction of 4’’ wall , Rs 15 vs Rs 20

CIVIL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT

THE OXFORD COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING
2. MATERIALS AND TECHNOLOGY LOW COST HOUSING

HOLLOW CONCRETE BLOCK LOAD BEARING WALL

• CHEAPER THAN STONE AND
BRICK.

• EASY TO HANDLE AND LIGHT IN

WEIGHT.

• BETTER INSULATION DUE TO AIR

SPACE OR VOID.

• CONSUMPTION OF MORTAR IS
LESSER.

• ENVIRONMENTAL FRIENDLY
TECHNOLOGY.

• PLACING OF VERTICAL
REINFORCEMENT IS EASIER

HCB LOAD BEARING WALL IS 45% CHEAPER THAN CONVENTIONAL RCC SYSTEM

CAN BE USED IN FRAME STRUCTURE BUILDING AS WELL

CIVIL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
THE OXFORD COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING
 LOW COST HOUSING

PARTIAL PRECAST SYSTEM PRE CAST BEAM

• PARTIAL PRE CAST SYSTEM

USES COMBINATION OF BOTH
PRE CAST AND CAST IN SITU
PRE CAST SLAB
• USE OF PRE CAST ELEMENT
REDUCES COST

• NO HEAVY LIFTING
EQUIPMENTS REQUIRED.

• NO NEED OF CEMENT PLASTER

1” THICK CAST IN SITU CONCRETE

CIVIL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT

THE OXFORD COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING
 LOW COST HOUSING

ADVANTAGES:

• CEMENT CONSUMPTION 45%

• MS ROD CONSUMPTION 17%
• FORMWORK REQUIRED 73%

PARTIAL PRE CAST SYSTEM IS UPTO 40% CHEAPER THAN

CONVENTIONAL CAST IN SITU RCC FLOOR

CIVIL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT

THE OXFORD COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING
 PRECAST STAIRS VS IN SITU STAIRS

• CONVENTIONAL CAST IN
SITU EXPENSIVE FOR LOW
COST CONSTRUCTIONS

PRE CAST STAIR CASE VS

IN SITU STAIRS CONSTRUCTION

• CHEAPER AND QUICKER TO

CONSTRUCT
• NO FORM WORK REQUIRED
• CAN BE CANTILEVER OR SIMPLY
SUPPORTED
• CANTILEVER SUITABLE FOR LOW
COST CONSTRUCTION BUT SIMPLY
SUPPORTED MORE DURABLE
 LOW COST HOUSING

CONSTRUCTION PROCESS

CIVIL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT

THE OXFORD COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING
 LOW COST HOUSING
Case Study
SOME HOUSING USING LOW COST MATERIALS AND TECHNOLOGY

Demonstration Houses in Demonstration Houses in

DEHRADUN, Uttaranchal NAGPUR, Maharashtra
Unit covered area Unit covered area
194 sq.ft 194 sq.ft
Cost per Unit Cost per Unit
Rs.60,000 Rs.70,000

Technologies used Technologies used

•Solid/Hollow Concrete Blocks •Fly Ash Blocks
•Pre cast Plank & Joist Roof •Filler slab Roof
•RCC Door frame •Ferro Cement and Fly Ash
•Wood substitute Doors Polymer Doors
CIVIL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
THE OXFORD COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING

COMPARISON
Low cost housing
• Almost saves 40% cost
• Environment friendly
• Faster construction
• Local resources are
utilised
• Suitable for small family
LOW COST HOUSING
Conventional practice
• Expensive as compared
• Uses more resources
• Slower as compared
• Suitable for any size
depending upon budget
CIVIL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
THE OXFORD COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING
 LOW COST HOUSING

References

CIVIL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT

THE OXFORD COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING
 LOW COST HOUSING

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

ART WITHOUT ENGINEERING IS DREAMING

I WOULD LIKE TO THANK ENGINEERING WITHOUT ART IS
CALCULATING
DR AMARNATH K ,HOD,
CIVIL DEPARTMENT

Prof. T.. V MALLESHAIAH

AST. PROF SHIVANAND C G

THANK YOU
AND ALL TEACHING AND
NON TEACHING STAFFS

FOR THEIR SUPPORT AND

ENCOURAGEMENT.
CIVIL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
THE OXFORD COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING