Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Tutorial Note #3
∂f ∂f
according to differentiation theorem, this matrix is given by
different linear transformations (say T and T)) both satisfy the definition of
derivative of 1)
Since each entry is uniquely determined, then the matrix (and the transformation is
uniquely determined, hence there is only one such transformation satisfy the definition.
Furthermore, we may verify a given vector-valued function is differentiable by C
theorem. Recall
Definition: C (or continuously differentiable) function
at 2
Let F: ) ) be defined as
Example 2
Fx, y e
y, ln1 A x ) A y )
Show that the function is differentiable at 1,1 and compute F a and DF a
Solution:
∂f ∂f ∂f) 2x ∂f) 2y
e
y, e
, ,
∂x ∂y ∂x 1 A x A y ∂y 1 A x) A y)
) )
e e ex A ey
and
x 2 2H IxJ K2
DF x, y F 1,1 IyJ F
2 L
, y xA y
3 3 3 3
|T| XY Z 0\
, T |T| |T||| W
|T| XY [ 0
Then for ] 0, consider the case ^ 0, near , , T |T|
Similarly, for the case [ 0, we can get , T , T\|S`a |T|
QR _
QS _S
The limit only exists when |T| |T| g T 0, for T ] 0, 0, T does not exist.
QR
QS
, T does not near 0,0 and hence the function is not P
QR
QS
So
0
j, V 0,0 i k lj |V|
V0
lim lim
S,hb,b 0, V 0 S,hb,b m ) A V )
o ) |pqrsrXts|
lim lim o|pqrsrXts| 0
nb o nb
x 0
c) From b), F 0,0 FQS 0,0, Qh 0,0H 0,0 and DF0,0x, y F 0,0 IyJ I J
QR QR
0
Example 4 (Practice Exercise #6)
XY , V ] 0,0\
Sh v
Show that Y , V uS v whv is not C at 0,0
0 XY , V 0,0
and the function is not differentiable at 0,0
(The function is not C )
Solution:
yz d
v yv \
For a, b ] 0,0, near a, b, fx, y S v whv, a, b | v w{v v
Sh v 34 {z dv {v
3
v wyv v S,h`a,c
0 V )
jY, V Y0,0 i k lj ) o pqrs sin) s
V0 A V)
lim lim lim
S,hb,b 0, V 0 S,hb,b m ) A V ) ~b o
We see the limit does not exist (as limit depends on θ). So f is not differentiable at 0,0
Recall in one variable calculus, when you have a function y gfx where f and g are
differentiable functions, then the derivative of y is given by
dy \
| g fa
f a
dx
`
In general, considering 2 differentiable vector-valued function F and G, what will be the
derivative of Hx G Fx GFx??
Suppose F: R R is differentiable at x a and G: R R is differentiable
Theorem: Chain Rule
Let us first have a simple example to see how the chain rule be applied
as Hx, y, z GFx
e A v, u, 3v , 9uv )
35 35 3v 3v
3 3 3 3
It is easy to get
4 0 2 3 1 8 12 4
I JI JI J
81 0 2 3 1 162 243 81
x
8 12 4 8x 12y A 4z
Finally, DH1,1,1 I J Fy H k l
162 243 81 z 162x 243y A 81z
*Tips: When using chain rule, it will be easier for you to do matrix multiplication than
doing composite function.
Let f, g: R R be differentiable function at a , define hx fxgx, compute
Example 6 (Product Rule)
Y
Solution:
Y,
F a
35
3
3
v 3
6
Y Y
K , … . , L A Y K , … . , L
then H GFx.)
(Note: This exercise shows a good application of chain rule)
4
b) Let f, g: be differentiable at 2 , suppose ga ] 0. Compute IJ a
Appendix:
In the following, we will give a proof to triangle inequality and also a limit theorem
concerning the sequence.
¥ ¦ A ¥
becomes
A T ) A " A A T ) ¦ ) A " A ) A T ) A " A T) A 2©) A " ) T ) A " A T)
After we expend the expression and cancel all the terms, the inequality become
Solution:
m) A " A ) ¦ | | A |) | A " A | |, one may verify it by squaring both side and
(We have used the “useful inequality” in last inequality, namely
compare)
lim ¨ ª 0
¨¬