Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
1 Heat exchanger
Shell and tube heat exchanger is designed by trial and error calculations
(Edwards, J.E., 2008). The main steps of design are summarized as
follow:
Step #1 Define the hot (low pressure steam 138°C, 340 kPa, numeral 4.5)
and cold fluid (wastewater)
Step#2 Select the fluids for tube and the shell side
The routing of the shell side and tube side fluids has considerable effects
on the heat exchanger design. The fluid with more tendencies to foul is
selected for the tube side (wastewater) and for the shell the steam.
1
Step #6 Calculate the mass of steam required with the equation 2.2.14
Step #7 Select the tube material, decide the tube diameter (di), its wall
thickness and tube length (L).
Typical values for do are 19 – 40 mm. The most efficient condition for heat
transfer is to have the maximum number of tubes in the shell to increase
turbulence. The tube thickness should be enough to withstand the internal
pressure along with the adequate corrosion allowance. The tube length of
2 - 10 m is preferably used. Longer tube reduces shell diameter at the
expense of higher shell pressure drop. Finned tubes are also used when
fluid with low heat transfer coefficient flows in the shell side.
Step #8 Calculate the number of tubes (nt) required to provide the heat
transfer area (A).
A
nt = (6.1.2.1.1)
π∙d0 ∙L
np
4∙ṁ∙( n )
t
v= 2 (6.1.2.1.2)
π∙di ∙ρl
np
𝑣∗𝜌𝑙 ∗𝑑𝑖 4∙ṁ∙( n )
t
Re = = (6.1.2.1.3)
𝜇𝑙 π∙di ∙μl
Where,
Step #11 Decide the type of shell and tube exchanger (fixed tube sheet,
U-tube etc.). Select the tube pitch (PT) and calculate the tube clearance
(C).
In the removable tube bundle, the tube bundle may be removed for ease
of cleaning and replacement.
The lower distance between the axes of two adjacent tubes is the Pitch
(PT). The pitch configuration can be triangular or square. Triangular pattern
provides a more robust tube sheet construction. Square pattern simplifies
cleaning and has a lower shell side pressure drop. The recommended
Pitch value is PT=1,25*do. However, in case of high shell pressure drop it
could be increased. The shortest distance between two adjacent holes is
the clearance (C) (figure 22).
𝐶 = 𝑃𝑇 − 𝑑𝑜 (6.1.2.1.4)
3
Figure 1 Triangular and square Pitch and clearance
Step #12 Select the type of baffle (segmental, doughnut etc.), its size (i.e.
percentage cut, 25% baffles are widely used). Calculate the tube bundle
diameter (Db). Determine inside shell diameter (Ds) that can accommodate
the calculated number of tubes (nt), spacing (B) usually chosen to be
within 0,2*Ds to Ds.
The tube bundle diameter (Db) is calculated with the parameters shown in
table 11 and the following equation:
𝑛 1/𝑛𝑙
𝐷𝑏 = 𝑑𝑜 ∗ (𝐾𝑡 ) (6.1.2.1.5)
𝑏
The inside shell diameter (Ds) is calculated with the equation bellow:
𝐷𝑠 = 𝐷𝑏 + 𝐶 (6.1.2.1.6)
Step #13 Calculate the shell side cross flow area (𝑎𝑠 )
𝐶∗𝐵∗𝐷𝑆
𝑎𝑠 = (6.1.2.1.7)
𝑃𝑇
4
Step #14 Calculate the gas velocity (𝐺𝑆 )
𝑚̇𝑠𝑡𝑒𝑎𝑚
𝐺𝑆 = (6.1.2.1.8)
𝑎𝑠
Step #15 Calculate the equivalent diameter for the shell side, square pitch:
𝜋
4(𝑃𝑇2 − 𝑑02 )
4
𝐷𝑒 = (6.1.2.1.9)
𝜋𝑑𝑜
Or the equivalent diameter for the shell side for triangular pitch:
𝜋
4(0,43∗𝑃𝑇2 − 8 𝑑02 )
𝐷𝑒 = 𝜋 (6.1.2.1.10)
𝑑
2 𝑜
And finally the Reynolds number in terms of equivalent diameter for the
shell side
𝐷𝑒 ∗𝐺𝑠
𝑅𝑒 = (6.1.2.1.11)
𝜇𝑔
Step #16 Determine the tube side film heat transfer coefficient (hi) using
the suitable form of equation in laminar and turbulent flow regimes.
Estimate the shell-side film heat transfer coefficient (ho). There are many
models used to calculate these parameters according to the flow in
laminar or sensible regime and the change in phase or Sensible Heat
Transfer. The Kern Method is described below:
1/3
𝑘𝑔 𝐷𝑒 ∗𝐺𝑠 𝐶𝑝𝑔 ∗𝜇𝑔
ℎ𝑜 = 𝑗𝐻 ∗ ∗( )( ) (6.1.2.1.12)
𝐷𝑒 𝜇𝑔 𝑘𝑔
5
Figure 2 Shell side heat transfer factor (jH) for several segmental baffles
(Sinnott, R. K., 2005)
Figure 3 Tube side heat transfer factor (jH) (Sinnott, R. K., 2005)
6
The heat transfer factor (jH) is defined using the figure 24 and 25 for shell
and tube side according to the Reynolds number.
Step #17 Select the outside tube (shell side) resistance due to fouling in
the steam flow (Ro) and inside tube (tube side) resistance due to fouling in
the wastewater (Ri) from literature or take the value from the plant.
Step #18 Calculate overall heat transfer coefficient (Ucal) with equation
2.2.3.13.
𝑈𝑐𝑎𝑙 −𝑈𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑢𝑚
Step #19 If 0 < < 30% then go the next step#20. Otherwise
𝑈𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑢𝑚
go to step #5, calculate heat transfer area (A) required using Ucal, and
repeat the calculations.
If the calculated shell side heat transfer coefficient (ho) is too low, assume
closer baffle spacing (B) close to 0.2*Ds and recalculate shell side heat
transfer coefficient. However, this is subject to allowable pressure drop
across the heat exchanger.
𝐴−𝐴𝑟𝑒𝑞𝑢𝑖𝑟𝑒𝑑
% 𝑜𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑑𝑒𝑠𝑖𝑔𝑛 = ∗ 100 (6.1.2.1.14)
𝐴𝑟𝑒𝑞𝑢𝑖𝑟𝑒𝑑
Step #21 Calculate the tube-side pressure drop (PT): pressure drop in the
straight section of the tube (frictional loss) (Pt)
Step #22 Calculate shell side pressure drop (PS): pressure drop for flow
across the tube bundle (frictional loss) (Ps)
7
Shell side frictional pressure drop
𝐿
𝑓𝑎∗𝑮𝟐𝒔 ∗𝑫𝒔 ∗( +1)
𝐵
∆𝑃𝑠 = (6.1.2.1.16)
𝟐∗𝝆𝒈 ∗ 𝑫𝒆
The Fanning Friction Factor (fa) is obtained using the Moody diagram
(figure 26) for the equivalent Reynolds number in tube and shell, assuming
smooth relative roughness (McCabe, W., Smith, J. and Harriott, P., (2004).
Figure 4 Moody diagram used to determine the fanning friction factor (fa)
The table 13 shows the parameters assumed for the shell and tube heat
exchanger design. The physic-chemical properties of the streams are
assumed to do not vary significantly in the range of the operational
temperature. Additionally the variation of the parameters with the total
solid content and ions dissolved is not considered for this initial design.
8
APPENDIX 1
List of symbols
10
MW Molecular weight
n Growth order struvite crystallization (-)
Ni Rotational speed of the stirrer (s-1)
nim Number of impellers ph adjustment tank (-)
nl Parameter used for the tube bundle diameter calculation (Db) (-)
np Number of passes shell and tube side heat exchanger (-)
Np Power number for calculation of Power required by the stirred ph
adjustment tank (-)
nt Number of tubes heat exchanger (-)
Ṗ Concentrated liquid volume flow (m3/h)
P Operational pressure (kPa)
Pm Power required by the stirred ph adjustment tank (kW)
Ps−sample Solubility product of the wastewater (-)
Ps−equilibrium Solubility product in equilibrium under the same conditions
(pH, conductivity and temperature) of the wastewater (-)
PT Pitch number of the heat exchanger tubes (m)
Q̇ Heat exchanger duty required (kW)
R Parameter used in the calculation of Logarithmic mean temperature
difference (∆TLM ) (-)
Re Reynolds number shell and tube side (-)
𝑅𝑖 Tube side resistance due to fouling in the wastewater flow
(s*m²*K/kJ)
𝑅𝑂 Shell side resistance due to fouling in the steam flow (s*m²*K/kJ)
S Parameter used in the calculation of Logarithmic mean temperature
difference (∆TLM ) (-)
Sim Spacing impeller of the stirred ph adjustment tank (m)
SSR Supersaturation ratio (-)
Sr Supersaturation (-)
𝑇𝑐𝑖 Inlet temperature cold fluid (°C)
𝑇𝑐𝑜 Outlet temperature cold fluid (°C)
t clog Time required for the struvite to clog the pipe (min)
tR Residence time (h)
𝑇𝑡 Thickness heat exchanger tube (m)
11
Tu Upstream liquid temperature (°C)
Td Liquid saturation temperature corresponding to the downstream
pressure (°C)
𝑢 Upstream or previous to the flash process
𝑈𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑢𝑚 Overall heat transfer coefficient assumed for the design of heat
exchanger (kJ/s*m²*K)
Ucal Overall heat transfer coefficient calculated (kJ/s*m²*K)
Umf Minimum fluidized velocity (m/s)
v̇ Volume flow wastewater (m3/h)
VT Volume ph adjustment tank (m3)
wim Width impeller of the stirred ph adjustment tank (m)
X Weight ratio of vaporized / remaining liquid (-)
𝑧 Ionic charge of ion (-)
𝜌 Density (kg/m3)
ρg Density steam (heating medium) (kg/m3)
ρl Density liquid wastewater (kg/m3)
ρp Density solid particle (kg/m3)
µ Viscosity (Pas)
µg Viscosity steam (heating medium) (Pas)
µl Viscosity liquid wastewater (Pas)
γ Activity coefficient of ion (-)
ε Fluidized bed voidage (-)
εSB Static bed voidage (-)
ΔHv Heat of evaporation steam (kJ/kg)
∆TLM Logarithmic mean temperature difference (ºC)
∆𝑇𝑏 Boiling-point elevation (°C)
∆P Pressure drop (kPa)
12
References
4. Ulbricht, M., Schneider J., Stasiak, M., and Sengupta, A.. (2013).
Ammonia recovery from industrial wastewater by
transmembranechemisoprtion. Chemie Ingenieur technik 85, N°
8, 1259-1262.
6. Edwards, J.E. (2008). Design and rating shell and tube heat
exchangers. P & I Design Ltd, Teesside, UK
13
LIST OF TABLES
14
LIST OF FIGURES
16