Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at .
http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp
.
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of
content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms
of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
American Oriental Society is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Journal of
the American Oriental Society.
http://www.jstor.org
818 Journal of the American Oriental Society, 89.4 (1969)
students of Urdu are beneficiaries of the decision to pre- whereas in the Mediterranean world figures of speech
pare this second printing. The book will meet the need belonged to the field of rhetorics. Speaking about
Dr. Narang describes. The selections are representative Aristotle, the author points out the fact "dass seine
of the literature and the clear and graceful script em- Rhetorik mehr Figuren enthalt als die Poetik." Finally,
ployed will facilitate skill in reading and encourage the title indicates a limitation in time: Bhamaha and
interest in advanced literary studies in Urdu. Mammata have been taken as the exponents of the
ERNEST BENDER beginning and the acme, respectively, in the evolution
UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA of Indian figures of speech; the corresponding "repre-
sentative rhetoricians" include the period from Aristotle
An Urdu Newspaper Reader. By MUHAMMAD ABD-AL- to Quintilian.
RAHMAN BARKER, SHAFIQUR RAHMAN AND HASAN Part I is mainly historical. For the history of Indian
JAHANGIR HAMDANI. Pp. xii + 404. Montreal: poetics the author draws heavily upon Kane. However,
McGILL UNIVERSITY PRESS. 1968. $4.75. (Paper- he disagrees with Kane on the relative priority of
bound) Bhdmaha and Dandin. Even after Jenner's discussion
he
This, the second of four sets of Urdu teaching ma- the problem might not be definitively solved, but
the Institute of Islamic Studies at does give some good arguments in favor of Bhamaha; his
terials planned by
is that both must have used a common source,
McGill University and supported by a contract with the conclusion
of Education, Department of namely: MedhAvin. In connection with the Dhvanyaloka
United States Office
the author distinguishes between an anonymous KEri-
Health, Education and Welfare, is an excellent mis-
kakara and his commentator Anandavardhana; he shows
cellany of West Pakistani newspaper prose, written in a
that the dhvani theory is more closely connected with
graceful hand, attractive to the eye and easy to compre-
the development of the Alaiqakdrikas'figures of speech
hend. A prerequisite for its use is a mastering of "A
than is generally recognized. Part I also deals with the
Course in Urdu," published in 1967. (See JAOS 88.2
history of Greek and Roman rhetorics, and with the
(1968) 373)
history of Indian figures of speech as compared with
Those who have been lamenting the lack need say no
those of Greece and Rome.
more. Dr. Barker and his associates have responded
Part II opens with a systematic classification of
splendidly with the preparation of this book and the
figures of speech; as far as possible they have been re-
prescription, in detail, of the course of study (A "Key
accom- duced to formulas which facilitate comparison between
to An Urdu Newspaper," bound separately,
East and West. Nearly 170 pages are devoted to a de-
panies the Reader.). In the course of a conversation,
was voiced regarding the need
tailed survey of all Indian figures of speech, with their
when students' concern
definitions and examples; the survey clearly indicates
to acquire linguistic skill in the course of fulfilling the
and the pressure the development from one author to the other. A similar
requisites of their separate disciplines
but shorter paragraph is reserved to Quintilian's figures
of time, one of my colleagues said, "The answer is "will".
in com- of speech.
If the student is seriously interested acquiring
All in all a very useful reference book, thanks also to
petence in a language he can. All he needs is the "will"." indexes. Only three minor remarks: first, the author
the
Dr. Barker, et. al., have furnished the way. takes too much for granted, when he decides
ERNEST BENDER
probably
UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA
not to translate Quintilian, "weil er ein miihelos ver-
standliches Latein schreibt"; second, although the
Sanskritist understands Jenner's concern to simplify
Die poetischen Figuren der Inder von Bhdmaha bis Mam-
Figuren transliteration, he cannot consider his attempt a real
mata. Ihre Eigenart im Verhdltnis zu den
success when it leads to such confusing results as
reprasentativer antiker Rhetoriker. By GERO JENNER.
Band 5.) "paksinah"; finally, the classicist's eye is caught by a
(Schriften des Europa-Kollegs Hamburg, few slips of the pen such as b&votas.
Pp. 317. Hamburg: LUDWIG APPEL VERLAG, 1968. LuDo ROCHER
The title of this volume very adequately summarizes UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA
its contents. The author is mainly concerned with the
Indian figures of speech; unlike his predecessors, who Dasarfzpaka-paddhati by Kuravi Rama. Edited with
were more interested in the basic characteristics of Introduction and Notes by T. VENKATACHARYA.
Indian poetry than in figures of speech, Jenner deliber- Pp. 69. Madras: V. SAMBAMURTY, 1968.
ately starts from the latter and deals with the former
This is the first edition of the Dasarfzpakapaddhati, a
only to the extent that they are helpful for a better
understanding of his primary subject. Next, the volume short treatise on dramaturgy (110 stanzas), with the
compares the nature of Indian figures of speech with help of a single manuscript in Telugu characters. The
that of their Greek and Roman counterparts. The major introduction (pp. 5-15) establishes the author's date:
difference-and even this appears in the title-is that not earlier than the latter part of the 17th century. It
in India figures of speech were inherent to poetics, also shows that this is not a commentary on the
Brief Reviews of Books 819
Dasarfipa(ka), but an independent work. The edition is study of all such correspondences will be given in the-
followed by two appendices. Appendix 1: "A difficult "Critical Notes" that will appear in Part II. A third
illustrative verse in the Dasaruipavaloka,"offers an in- Part is announced, but no information is given as to its.
terpretation for an obscure Prakrit stanza quoted by proposed contents.
Dharmika under 4.34; the interpretation is based upon ROSANE ROCHER
Bhattanrsirlaha's Laghuffka. Appendix II deals with NATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH (BELGIUM)