Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Elizabeth Shields
Spielvogel, Section 14
When we think of wood products, we often think of paper or our expensive hardwood
flooring. Odds are, our perception of how much wood we consume is a little skewed. Wood
products can be found in (or aid in the production of) everything from toothpaste to tires to
cosmetics.1 Aside from the loss of trees to produce wood products, many forests are cut away to
meet needs for expanding agricultural land. Worldwide, about 7 million hectares of forests are
destroyed each year, equivalent to about half the size of England, adding up to about 5 billion
trees.2 As shown in the chart below, timber harvesting accounts for about 37% of the forest loss,
agriculture enables another 28%, and 14% is a result of cutting for roads, pipelines, and power
lines. Only 21% of forest depletion is from naturally occurring events, chiefly forest fires.3 It is
estimated at least 50% of the world’s forests have been hacked away since the beginning of
human civilization without being replaced, with the possibility that even larger percentages of
forest have been removed.4 Deforestation is the sum total of these actions, being the conversion
of forest land to any other use, whether it is to take lumber, expand or establish an urban area, or
deforested areas
Shields 2
Cutting down trees, to some extent, is a necessity and an eventuality. There are both
direct and indirect causes of deforestation. Direct causes are more obvious, and include
urbanization, stripping land clear for mining, tree damage from pollution or disease, and tourism
expansion. Indirect causes tend to be more historical or hidden: colonialism, land rights transfers,
economic development, and military operations.5 These indirect causes may only play a small
part in deforestation, but are hard to eliminate. The roots of deforestation come from secondary
causes. The biggest historical kick to deforestation was the Industrial Revolution Era. New
technologies, factories, and expansion created a massive need for wood. On top of the wood to
build new industry, acres of the Americas were deforested in the expansion toward the west.
While this removal was necessary for advancement, trees were cut down across Europe and the
expanding America without being replanted for decades. About 175 million square miles of
forests were cut down by 1850.6 The culture of deforestation, that is, cutting down thousands of
trees for our own development, has continued to expand. Brazil and the Amazon Rainforest have
experienced famously extreme deforestation, but countries such as Russia, Canada, and
Indonesia are losing massive amounts of forest acreage as well, proving deforestation is not only
affecting a specific area or region, but a worldwide problem (see Fig. 2).7 Much of the most well-
known deforestation is a bit more recent, beginning in the 1950s when wood products began to
be taken from the rainforests. In the past 70 years, about a third of the Amazon rainforest has
been cleared, with ever increasing amounts being taken.5 Judging from countless “save the
rainforest”-type campaigns, it seems that in recent years, much of the focus of deforestation has
Deforestation brings with it a heavy set of baggage. Forests absorb many greenhouse
gases and provide habitats for literally uncountable species.9 Large areas of trees are major
regulators of the water cycle and preventers of soil erosion and flooding.10 Aside from
environmental aspects, deforestation brings with it economic and social upheaval. Vice News
predicts that by 2050, approximately the equivalency of the area of India will be deforested
across the globe, worsening all the aforementioned problems.11 It’s hard to imagine what the
world might look like if we continue to stand by while forests are being depleted, but it is
guaranteed not to improve on the current state of global warming and carbon emissions.
Therefore, excessive deforestation must be stopped by restricting location and type of tree being
removed, pushing for sustainable management of forests, and preventing excessive and
unnecessary logging.
Problem
It isn’t hard to look around and find an averagely “eco-friendly” individual who will tell
you to save the trees. Stopping deforestation to save the planet is an unfortunately general
argument. The total effects of deforestation are much deeper than vague statements of probable
global warming.
Shields 4
Firstly, and the most recognizable from our part of the world, are the ecological effects of
deforestation. By rough estimates, approximately 110 billion metric tons of carbon is stored in
the Amazon Rainforest alone.12 Burning large areas of land to clear for agriculture releases much
of the carbon stored in forests as the famous greenhouse gas carbon dioxide. While natural fires
are a normal part of the carbon cycle, purposefully burning large areas of forest adds additional
carbon dioxide to the atmosphere. In fact, it is estimated about 25% of earth’s greenhouse gas
emissions come from deforestation, largely from the burning of forests.13 Trees also majorly
contribute to absorption of gases like CO2.14 Eco-friendly organizations and tacky bumper
stickers around you advertise the power of planting more trees in solving this greenhouse gas
crisis. However, planting more trees is not the solution to climate change. Trees and plants
release carbon dioxide through respiration as well as absorb it during photosynthesis.15 More
trees will not solve the entire climate crisis by absorbing all the atmosphere’s CO2, particularly
as they are releasing quite a bit of CO2 as well. Contrary to this seemingly pro-deforestation
argument, this does not mean we should simply cut away all trees since they release CO2 into the
atmosphere. Ultimately, their benefits outweigh their damages - it only means planting more
trees should not be labeled as the catch-all solution for climate change. With respect to carbon
emissions, in some ways trees help, and in some ways they harm. The key, then, is not in
planting more trees, but avoiding burning them in the first place, as the burning process is the
real fuel of carbon emissions. Despite all this, planting more trees may still be a solution to other
problems caused by deforestation; trees offer a plethora of services aside from absorbing carbon
dioxide.
Deforestation creates a lack of ground surface cover by removing trees and their
surrounding plants. Therefore, sunlight striking the ground is not absorbed by leaves to be used
Shields 5
as energy for photosynthesis, but is instead reflected back into the atmosphere, causing further
heating of local environments and affecting air currents above the region.16 Deforestation also
disrupts soils and water in a given region. The soil degradation reduces soil fertility and
structure, making it difficult to use for agriculture or replanting of forests in future years. Many
forest soils are fairly acidic, so they are not profitable for agriculture without significant and
expensive remediation.17 As trees and roots hold large amounts of water, removal can lead to
major changes in the soil’s water- holding capacity, leading to surface runoff and possible
flooding. This unfiltered surface runoff is often contaminated, which leads to harmful drinking
rainforests) hold numerous animal, bird, and insect species, including many which are
endangered. Most of these species perform necessary functions within the ecosystem, such as
decomposition of dead matter. Upon losing their native habitat, species relocate, often causing
human-animal interactions and problems, such as elephants crashing over cropping systems.
Loss of such biodiversity can eliminate predators of harmful pathogens and pests.19 Without
maintaining the proper balance of flora and fauna, harmful changes to both animals and humans
However, only the lower half of Kuznet’s Curve, the part where lower-developed
countries degrade the environment through measures of deforestation, has been observed.18 Each
year, tropical (usually lower developed) countries lose forest capital equal to about $45 billion
dollars.21 Without replenishing the forests, this implies short term gain with ultimate losses. The
countries will later pay the price of aforementioned compromised soil, water, and animal
systems. In a study of nearly 300 villages in the Amazon rainforest and its environs,
deforestation caused a quick boom followed by a bust leaving villages approximately the same
level or worse than before deforestation.22 Deforestation may bring an immediate rush of jobs
and perhaps bring in new workers, but after some time, those jobs will dry up. Additionally,
about 50% of medicines, not including non-traditional methods of healing, rely on wood
products of rainforests.22 Failure in environmental stewardship could later limit supply of these
life-saving drugs. Regardless, an abrupt halt in large-scale forest reduction or installment of new
limitations and regulations will most likely have a negative effect on strongly resource dependent
communities. Therefore, these developing countries and towns need to diversify their
South America) are often occupied by indigenous peoples. During the process of tree removal,
Shields 7
the traditional livelihoods relying on the forests (through fishing, agriculture, or other means)
would be disrupted by invasion of new roads, equipment, and people.18 People who traditionally
reside in forest regions could be forced to relocate. They may move to areas occupied or used by
other groups, which could cause resource strain.18 Those forced from their area may ultimately
establish entirely new ways of life, leaving behind their people and culture. Additionally,
deforestation often implies migrant workers, traveling from forest to forest to find work. Work
areas will pop up overnight, stay until the resource is depleted, and move on, leaving the
Given environmental, economic, and social costs of deforestation, what can be done
Solution
A complete ban on deforestation is not the answer; wood products are a necessary part of
day-to-day life. With varying climates and economies of countries experiencing heavy
deforestation, the solutions will vary for different locations. Methods to prevent deforestation to
the point of harm can be broken down into three categories: where and what kind of trees can be
cut down, sustainable management of current forests, and ensuring the minimal necessary
To prevent too many trees from being removed in a given area, limits must be imposed
on where and what species of trees that can be removed. An easy defender of forests would be to
institute protected areas (whether National Parks and Forests, or simply restrictions on the
developing countries, will ensure minimal preservation of biodiversity and ecosystems. Limiting
the kind of trees allowed to be harvested and where they can be taken from will reduce the
Shields 8
amount being taken away. Endangered trees and trees in forests used for recreation purposes
should be preserved. With fewer trees on the market, but the same quantity demanded, the price
of lumber will most likely rise. This will encourage companies to search for substitutes of wood
products. Additionally, countries and wood products companies should set aside land specifically
for timber production. Companies will then be in charge of managing their own land and
producing trees to harvest and be incentivized to replant and efficiently and safely manage their
forests. Lands that need to be preserved are buffered from the effects of deforestation and land
Protected areas can’t exist everywhere, so it is better to aim for sustainable management
of forests. The forests should be managed so that when wood products are removed, the
ecosystem, including the biodiversity, soil structure, and water quality, is preserved. There are
agriculture, in which trees and underlying vegetation are, in some combination, cut away and
burnt. Slash-and-burn provides incredibly fertile soil - for several years. The nutrients from the
ash are depleted, forcing the farmers to abandon the land and move elsewhere. Often, the trees
are not replanted, and the land is left abandoned.23 Slash-and burn is most commonly used in
Central and South America, where deforestation is most significant.24 Clear-cutting, the complete
removal of all trees and vegetation on a given area of land, is by far the most destructive method
timber companies.26 In addition to slash-and-burn and clear-cutting, several less drastic removal
methods exist, such as selective logging, which opts to keep some of the vegetation in tact.27
Strip-cutting away of entire forests, even with replanting, needs to end. If the trees are
cut away entirely and then replanted, the ecosystem will take years to bounce back to its original
Shields 9
form, as wildlife will relocate when their habitat is initially removed and trees and groundcover
will take years to grow back. Thus, companies should be required to switch to selective logging,
in which only some trees from an area are removed, leaving the ecosystem intact. Companies
that have already stripped trees should universally be required to replant. However, clear-cutting
and slash and burn should remain to be permitted in areas where trees are diseased. In line with
sustainable management, The Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
determined that in many tropical regions, half of the non-renewable deforestation could be
organizations, forest renewal in these less developed countries is theoretically possible if national
governments would be willing to cooperate and impose regulations on logging companies. The
World Bank’s Forest Carbon Partnership Facility hopes to provide financial incentives to reduce
carbon emissions. For developing countries in Kuznet’s curve, financial incentives will prevent
them from degradation to an irreversible point. Capping carbon emission amounts from forests
specifically as opposed to carbon emissions as a whole could limit techniques such as burning
Lastly, regulations must be imposed for reasons to cut down trees. National and regional
governments would be best suited to fulfil this duty, as they are most capable of observing,
stopping, and punishing violating groups. Slash-and-burn to clear for agriculture is a destructive
technique ultimately leaving the land infertile. Since this land will not be able to be used after
several years, land should only be permitted to be cleared for agriculture if farmers use methods
such as crop rotation and soil remediation to ensure the land can be used for long term purposes.
Banning the use of techniques failing to comply with sustainable deforestation will prevent the
regions from being environmentally compromised. Legal removal of trees also entails solving
Shields 10
illegal logging. National and local governments need to further monitor illegal logging. Illegal
logging is undercutting government regulations and taxes, losing about $10 billion per year and
falsely lowering the price of wood products by about 10%.29 In Peru, about 80% of logging
occurs illegally. To prevent further illegal logging, the world needs expansions of groups such as
Eyes on the Forest, a group of Non-Governmental Organizations monitoring roads and groups
working in forests. Meanwhile, trade agreements to prevent foreign shipping of illegal logging
should be made. Finally, the Forest Stewardship Council is currently labeling wood products that
have met the environmental standard. Companies should be encouraged to only purchase wood
Deforestation impacts our world in a number of ways, from well-known issues of climate
change to lesser-known, but equally impactful problems such as soil structure and water quality.
Aside from environmental issues, social and economic issues become prevalent with increased
deforestation. Given the problems it creates, our world must implement changes in how we are
protecting our forests, methods and amounts of trees permitted to be removed, and how we
regulate permission to remove trees from an area. This is a perfectly fixable problem, as long as
countries and companies cooperate to change the way we look at forests from an infinite
Image Citations
Figure 1: Land Usage of Deforested Areas. Produced by Elizabeth Shields from data collected at:
Rainforest Action Network Blog. “How many trees are cut down every year?” The Understory, 6
March 2016, https://www.ran.org/how_many_trees_are_cut_down_every_year
Works Cited
1. Conners, Terry. “Products Made from Wood.” UK cooperative extension service, July,
2002, https://www.dec.ny.gov/docs/lands_forests_pdf/woodproducts.pdf
2. Bradford, Alina. “Deforestation: Facts, Causes, and Effects.” Live Science, 3 April 2018,
https://www.livescience.com/27692-deforestation.html
3. Rainforest Action Network Blog. “How many trees are cut down every year?” The
Understory, 6 March 2016,
https://www.ran.org/how_many_trees_are_cut_down_every_year
4. Connor, Steve. “Earth has lost more than half its trees since humans first started cutting
them down.” The Independent, 2 Sept. 2015.
https://www.independent.co.uk/environment/earth-has-lost-more-than-half-its-trees-
since-humans-first-started-cutting-them-down-10483189.html
5. Chakravarty, Sumit, Ghosh, S.K., Suresh, C.P., Deyl, A.N., and Shukla, Gopal.
“Deforestation: Causes, Effects and Control Strategies.” Global Perspectives on
Sustainable Forest Management.
https://cdn.intechopen.com/pdfs/36125/InTechDeforestation_causes_effects_and_control
_strategies.pdf
6. Cohen, Sharon. “The History of Deforestation.” Bizfluent, 26 Sept. 2017,
https://bizfluent.com/about-5389808-history-deforestation.html
Shields 12
7. “Countries with greatest tree cover loss.” Global Forest Watch, n.d.
http://www.globalforestwatch.org/countries/overview
8. Rainforest Foundation U.S. Partnering with indigenous communities to save our
rainforests, http://www.rainforestfoundation.org/
9. Reference. “Deforestation” National Geographic, n.d.
https://www.nationalgeographic.com/environment/global-warming/deforestation/
10. “Effects of Deforestation.” Panchamana Alliance, n.d.
https://www.pachamama.org/effects-of-deforestation
11. Verger, Rob. “Here’s How Much of the World’s Forests Could Vanish by 2050.” Vice
News, 26 Aug. 2015, https://news.vice.com/article/heres-how-much-of-the-worlds-
forests-could-vanish-by-2050
12. “Amazon Deforestation.” World Wildlife Fund, n.d.,
http://wwf.panda.org/about_our_earth/deforestation/deforestation_fronts/deforestation_in
_the_amazon/index.cfm
13. Bennett, Lauren. “Deforestation and Climate Change.” 18 April 2017,
http://climate.org/deforestation-and-climate-change/
14. “What is Deforestation?” Conserve Energy Future, n.d., https://www.conserve-energy-
future.com/how-deforestation-affects-climate-change-humans-animals.php
15. Unger, Nadine. “To save the planet, don’t plant trees.” New York Times Opinion, 19
Sept. 2014, https://www.nytimes.com/2014/09/20/opinion/to-save-the-planet-dont-plant-
trees.html
16. Gellert, Andrew. “How Does Deforestation Affect the Weather?” Sciencing, 24 April
2017, https://sciencing.com/deforestation-affect-weather-23869.html
17. Marritz, Leda. “What’s the difference between urban soil and forest soil?” Deeproot, 8
Sept. 2014, http://www.deeproot.com/blog/blog-entries/whats-the-difference-between-
urban-soil-and-forest-soil
18. Chakravarty, Sumit, Ghosh, S.K., Suresh, C.P., Deyl, A.N., and Shukla, Gopal.
“Deforestation: Causes, Effects and Control Strategies.” Global Perspectives on
Sustainable Forest Management.
https://cdn.intechopen.com/pdfs/36125/InTechDeforestation_causes_effects_and_control
_strategies.pdf
Shields 13
19. Giam, Xingli. “Global Biodiversity Loss from Tropical Deforestation.” PNAS. vol 114,
no. 23, June 2017, pp 5575-5577.
20. Cuaresma, Jesus. “Trade-offs between economic growth and deforestation.” International
Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, 16 Jan. 2017,
http://www.iiasa.ac.at/web/home/about/news/170116-forest-dev.html
21. Brahic, Catherine. “Amason deforestation leads to economic boom and bust.” New
Scienctist, 11 June 2009, https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn17298-amazon-
deforestation-leads-to-economic-boom-and-bust/
22. “Deforestation: the human costs.” Cultural Survival Quarterly, vol 6, no. 2, 1982.
https://www.culturalsurvival.org/publications/cultural-survival-quarterly/deforestation-
human-costs
23. Stief, Colin. “Slash and Burn Agriculture.” ThoughtCo, 1 Feb. 2018,
https://www.thoughtco.com/slash-and-burn-agriculture-p2-1435798 (same as 9)
24. See citation 9
25. Nix, Steve. “The Debate over Clearcutting.” ThoughtCo, 4 June 2017,
https://www.thoughtco.com/clearcutting-the-debate-over-clearcutting-1343027
26. “Clearcutting.” Earthroots, n.d., https://earthroots.org/index.php/clearcutting-item
27. Stief, Colin. “Slash and Burn Agriculture.” ThoughtCo, 1 Feb. 2018,
https://www.thoughtco.com/slash-and-burn-agriculture-p2-1435798
28. Radford, Tim. “Planting Trees Will Not Slow Global Warming.” Climate News Network,
26 May 2017, https://climatenewsnetwork.net/planting-trees-not-slow-global-warming/
29. “Illegal Logging.” World Wildlife Fund, n.d.,
http://wwf.panda.org/about_our_earth/deforestation/deforestation_causes/illegal_logging
30. “Stopping Illegal Logging.” World Wildlife Fund, n.d.,
https://www.worldwildlife.org/initiatives/stopping-illegal-logging