Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Group Members:
Zach Bonifas
Josh Davidson
Chris Fenter
Alex Haban
Eric Michael
Bria Million
Logan Montgomery
Nonso Okonji
Brad Weidner
Name, Location: Our group volunteered at UMC Food Ministry in Covington, Kentucky.
Mission: UMC Food Ministry is a non-profit organization that provides free meals to at-
risk children in Kentucky and the Greater Cincinnati Area. They provide meals to Boys
and Girls Club, YMCA, and Children’s Home of Northern Kentucky, various after school
programs, and churches in the area. They operate solely through the US Department of
Agriculture (USDA) Child Nutrition Program, which is run at the state level through the
Vision: UMC’s vision consists of two main goals; to consistently feed everybody in need
of a meal, and to live out the Gospel through generosity and hospitality. UMC Food
Ministry strives not only to fill the stomachs of people in need, but to connect with
children and adults on a personal level and minister to them through genuine, loving
relationships. UMC Food Ministry wants to become a stable part of the community by
allocating food to other nonprofit organizations and reaching as many people as they
Values: “For I was hungry and you gave me something to eat,” Matthew 25:35. UMC
Food Ministry’s core values are identity, meals, and faith. Identity: The Ministry upholds
the beliefs of John Wesley, by taking food to the places where kids need it the most
instead of expecting the children to come to them. Meals: UMC Food Ministry makes a
point to serve balanced meals that provide the nutrients that children need. They serve
all of their meals based upon USDA food patterns, which include a combination of
bread/grains, protein, fruits, vegetables, and milk. They also try to serve hot meals with
fresh fruits and vegetables, given that they can safely do so in accordance with health
department regulations. Faith: UMC Food Ministry is transparent about being largely
programming that may be held when serving food under their program. Though faith is
one of their core values, this only shows through the way they interact with and treat
others. They do not directly or indirectly advertise any type of belief system.
Impact: Since their culmination in 2008, UMC Food Ministry has provided millions of
meals to children and youth in the Northern Kentucky area who have struggled to be
fed. UMC Food Ministry grows larger each year. In 2017, UMC Food Ministry served
nearly 1.5 million meals, most of which were provided to their partner agencies, Boys
and Girls Clubs, YMCA, and Children’s Home of Northern Kentucky. UMC Food Ministry
impacts a large area because they have 8 central kitchens and 92 feeding sites.
Metrics for Success: UMC Food Ministry measures success by the number of USDA
Certified Nutritional Meals provided per season (correlating with school schedules in the
area; Fall, Spring, Summer, Breaks and Holidays). Everyday, UMC Food Ministry
strives to provide food rations that contain a serving of a fresh fruit or vegetable. UMC
believes this fresh fruit drive sets them apart from other food banks and overall UMC
provides healthier options to at risk children. They encourage the growth of personal
Type of Service: The group was able to clean, cut, package, and seal fresh fruits and
vegetables so at risk children had a healthy option in their meals. The group also
packaged food together that gets shipped out to local non-profit food distribution
food to areas where there is a substantial population of children who receive free and
reduced lunches in their schools. They mainly serve and operate out of the Northern
3. Group Roles:
Video team: Nonso Okonji, Eric Michael
Presentation team: Brad Weidner, Alex Haban (Nonso Okonji, Eric Michael)
Our initial action as a group was to break up into four separate groups to
complete the five main components of the project. The communication between our
team and the UMC Food Ministry began by Alex establishing contact with Brady Dean,
an intern with the organization. Once the contact had been established, Bria took over
and planned our visits and kept in touch with the agency. Nonso and Eric headed up the
video team. Nonso did all of the on-site filming for the video, and Eric assisted him in
the editing phase for the final video. There was a lot of work that went into editing the
video to be ready for our presentation. Logan and Bria were tasked to complete the
infographic. Logan and Bria did background research on the UMC Food Bank and
drafted up several sample demographics for the rest of the team to discuss and select.
After this Bria and Logan finalized a couple of graphs to include in the paper. Zach,
Josh, and Chris were given the task to complete the executive summary. Chris
completed the Group Roles section of the report by communicating with the rest of the
team. This allowed him to effectively document a detailed report of the each member’s
contributions. Josh finished the Group Project’s Outcome section. He elaborated on the
strengths and weaknesses of the group in Project Impact and other projects during this
academic year. Zach started the Agency and Project Information section. He was able
to gather background information on UMC Food Ministry and explain their purpose. All
three writers did editing to the paper. The presentation team is made up of Brad, Alex,
Nonso, and Eric. Nonso and Eric are focused on the video aspect of the presentation,
but all 4 team members worked together to practice and complete the presentation. The
timeline wasn’t set in stone; however, it was implied that each group member does their
part by the final breakout session before the Project Impact due date. Josh, Zach, Bria,
Brad, and Alex were able to volunteer on-site at UMC Food Ministry for eight hours,
which is impressive because we all have busy schedules. Chris, Nonso, Logan, and
Eric volunteered for over 4 hours at UMC Food Bank because they had earlier classes.
These individuals made up for lost time by taking on extra roles in the project.
Our two volunteering days were March 20th and March 27th. We volunteered from
8-12 on these two days. We met at the CRC Circle at 7:30am for both trips. UMC Food
8am and were met by Tracie and Brady. Tracie described the two functions our group
would be doing during our volunteer hours. Before she explained the two tasks, she
divided us into two groups according to what time we had to leave. The first function
was packaging the organization’s “enhanced meals” which they deliver to local children
around the Covington area. Tiara was the head of this operation, so she specifically
showed us how to package the meals efficiently. Our specific task was to pack Ziploc
bags with one can of chicken salad, two pickles, three crackers, and a fruit. UMC Food
Bank will hold events for children to come and get their “enhanced meals” or they will
deliver the packages in bulk to churches, schools, and the YMCA for kids to eat. We
produced over 300 “enhanced meals” over the two days. The second function was
slicing various fruits and sealing bags of the sliced fruit. Ralph was the head of this
operation, so he gladly demonstrated what needed to be done. During the first visit, we
sliced and bagged cucumber. As a team, we bagged over 1,000 servings of cucumbers
for at risk kids. The second visit we bagged over 1,000 servings of cantaloupe and
squash. During our first visit, Nonso, Eric, Chris, and Logan packed the enhanced
meals. Josh, Brad, Alex, Bria, and Zach sliced and bagged the cucumbers. During our
second visit, Josh and Bria packed the enhanced meals, while Nonso, Eric, Brad, Alex,
Logan, Zach, and Chris sliced and bagged the cantaloupe and squash.
project. One strength the group presented well was communication within the group.
The group was able to communicate very effectively from the beginning of the project.
We always knew the deliverables of the day, and were able to complete them
effectively. The group was also able to schedule multiple days of community service via
great communication. Another strength our group displayed was honesty and
transparency. We were always honest with group members about the work that needed
to be done and the work that had already been done. Everything in the group was
transparent to insure great productivity and efficiency within the group. Participation
and cooperation was also strong within the group. The roles that were given to each
member appeared to be equal and established equal cooperation among all members.
As with any project, or group effort, there are weaknesses associated with
strengths. One weakness that our group displayed was procrastination. We, as a
group, waited until the last minute to complete assignments and work. Along with
procrastination, our group did not do a great job of setting goals outside of breakout
sections. We tried to rely solely on completing work in class and that proved to be quite
difficult. We later assigned roles outside of class to combat the time management issue
we faced. We were also not very efficient in communicating with our organization. This
created a big problem early on as we could not effectively achieve lasting contact
between our first organization, the Freedom Center. Once we changed organizations,
communication skills have been a great asset. Through both semesters, we were able
to to get the projects done with equal shares among all members and in a timely
manner. Procrastination, however, was a theme that hindered our group’s efficiency in
both semesters. Though we achieved to get all projects done on time, we waited and
had to rush more than needed. The chemistry within the group appeared to be well.
There did not appear to be any feuds between any members, and that was a great
theme to have.
5. Infographic
6. Service Hours
Zach: 8
Josh: 8
Bria: 8
Brad: 8
Alex: 8
Chris: 6 and worked extra on the project
Nonso: 6 and the video
Eric: 6 and the video
Logan: 6 infographic and more