Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Sections
1 – Scope and General
1.1 Scope and General
New paragraph included:
‘Where the additional loading does not exceed the foundation or major structural element
capacities, it is not necessary to comply with this Standard. Modifications may be made to comply
with the Standard applicable to the original design. Major structural elements include poles, lattice
tower legs and foundations.’
3 – Electrical Requirements
3.5 Electrical clearance distances to avoid flashover
Standard now references NZECP 34 Code of Practice for Electrical Safe Distances
Clarification that vertical clearances (rather than all clearances) shall be based on the
maximum operating temperature of conductors
Section 3.5.4.4 ‘Operating temperature under serviceable wind’ has been added.
3.6 Determination of structure geometry
The reference for maintenance approach distances in Australia has changed to AS 5804.1
(previously a mixture of ENA standards were referenced). NZ references remain the same.
3.7 Spacing of conductors
The standard gives the minimum requirements to minimize the potential for circuit to circuit
flashover, rather than to prevent it as in the previous version for the spacing of conductors
of different circuits on different supports
Reference to Appendix Q for mid span separation calculations has been removed.
Note 7(h) added to the situations to take into account when considering spacing of
conductors: Fire prone areas (e.g. burning of sugar cane trash) where ionized air will have a
reduced dielectric strength.
3.8 Structure Clearances
Reference to Table 3.5 “minimum A.C. Live line approach distances” has been removed and
replaced with references to AS 5804 and NZECP 46.
1
Produced by:
Juliet Clendon, Technical Advisor
Mail: juliet@eea.co.nz DDI: +64 4 282 1239
For Table 6.1 ‘Ultimate Limit State Wind Return Periods For Design Working Life And Line
Security Levels’ there is a clarification that the ‘design return period’ represents the
probability of a wind speed being exceeded in any given year, not the probability of a wind
speed being exceeded over the design working life of the line.
6.3 Ultimate limit states
Section title changed from ‘Strength limit states’ to ‘Ultimate limit states’
The second paragraph has been reworded to be more concise
Table 6.2 ‘Strength reduction factor φ for component strength’ has been updated and there
are significant changes to the notes.
7 – Action on Lines
7.2 Actions, General Approach
Note edited regarding reducing minimum loadings for construction and maintenance
Changes to design requirements for structural elements that can be climbed and are inclined
with an angle less than 30⁰ to the horizontal.
Changes to the section 7.2.7.1 ‘Failure containment loads’ including:
- Alteration allowing for “ductile failure of individual structure components (e.g. steel cross-
arms or post insulator gain bases) on intermediate structures, provided that failure of the
primary structure component does not occur and cascade failures of adjacent structures are
avoided”
- Inclusion of alternative structures (e.g. stop structures)
- Failure containment load cases don’t need to be applied when assessing existing structures
- ‘two or more’ circuits are considered instead of a ‘double circuit’ for suspension or
intermediate supports
- Sections on tension supports and distribution systems have been rewritten.
8 – Supports
Section on Timber Poles no longer references AS 1720.1, AS/NZS 1328, NZS 3603 or AS 2209.
2
Produced by:
Juliet Clendon, Technical Advisor
Mail: juliet@eea.co.nz DDI: +64 4 282 1239
9 – Foundations
Wording added “Component strength factors up to 0.9 may be considered where there is a
high level of certainty of the material property of the soil and the design methodology.”
Appendices
APPENDIX A - REFERENCE AND RELATED DOCUMENTS
References to the following standards have been added:
AS 5804 High-voltage live working (all parts)
AS/NZS 331 Overhead Line Design.
The standard no longer aligns with AS 1720.1 for timber poles in Australia. In NZ the
standard still aligns with NZS 3603
In many cases the wording has been strengthened from ‘should’ to ‘shall’
Sections F4.4 ‘Pole degradation factors’ and F5.6 ‘Pole top deflection’ have been significantly
edited
Section F4.8 ‘Stability factor for compression’ has been added.
3
Produced by:
Juliet Clendon, Technical Advisor
Mail: juliet@eea.co.nz DDI: +64 4 282 1239
This appendix has been removed. The lettering on successive appendices have been reassigned.
A reference to the overhead line handbook SA HB 331 for worked examples has been added.
The standard now considers both combined and separate wind and ice loads
The range of ice thickness considered has been increased for Australia, but not for New
Zealand
There are changes to the tables used for differential ice loading checks
Section DD3.11 ‘Snow loading on pole structures’ has been extensively edited.
New Appendix