Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
z g
h(r, t)
2R(t)
A related problem is the spreading of a spherical drop due to capillary effects only. This is the problem
studied by Blake et al (1997). Hu and Larson have also studied the flow in a spherical drop but in this
case the flow is induced by the evaporation of liquid inside the drop. In their study the contact line was
taken to be pinned.
In the problem considered here we study spreading driven by wetting effects, capillary pressure and
gravity. We examine the shape of the drop after it has reach a condition where its thickness varies
slowly with position. Then the flow is nearly one-dimensional and inertial effects can be neglected. The
flow state is governed by the lubrication approximation. This is the case studied by Lopez et al (1976).
In this report, will show that the evolution equation for h(r,t) that determines the shape of an axisymmet-
ric drop during spreading as a result of capillary and gravity driving forces( see Resnik and Yarin
(2002)) is
∂h 1 ∂ ∂h ∂ 1 ⅆ ⅆh
= rh3 ρ g -− σ r
∂t 3 μ r ∂r ∂r ∂r r dr ⅆr
In our study we will ignore capillary pressure effects.
The position of the contact line during spreading is given by r=R(t). Note that in the absence of capillary(
wetting) forces the slope of the interface at the contact line is not specified.
For the axisymmetric spreading drop the mean curvature ℋ of the interface is ( see Appendix)
2 SpreadingAxisymetricDrop.nb
Flow Equations
We will consider the flow problem where the fluid velocity is a function of both r and z. Let the radial
velocity be u(r,z,t) and the axial velocity v(r,z,t). The relevant flow equations ignoring inertial effects are
1 ∂(r u) ∂v
Continuity : + =0
r ∂r ∂z
∂ 1 ∂ ∂2 u ∂P
R -− component of momentum : μ (r u) + = (4)
∂r r ∂r ∂z2 ∂r
1 ∂ ∂v ∂2 v ∂P
z -− component of momentum : μ r + = +ρ g
r ∂r ∂r ∂z2 ∂z
In the later stages of spreading the flow in the drop can be approximating as a lubricating flow such that
the radial component of velocity u(r,t) is much larger in magnitude than the axial component of velocity
v(r,t), i.e.
u (r, t) >> v (r, t)
A formal order of magnitude analysis shows that the flow equations can be approximated as
1 ∂(r u) ∂v
Continuity : + =0
r ∂r ∂z
∂2 u ∂P
R -− component of momentum : μ = (5)
2 ∂r
∂z
∂P
z -− component of momentum : 0= +ρ g
∂z
Integrating the z-component of momentum gives
P (r, z, t) = -−ρ g z + C1 (r, t) (6)
In the later stages of spreading, when the lubrication approximation holds, we may assume that ⅆh/ⅆr is
small so that we can approximate the curvature as
ⅆ2 h 1 ⅆh 1 ⅆ ⅆh
2H≈ + = r (8)
ⅆr2 r ⅆr r dr ⅆr
Now at the interface of the drop, the normal stress boundary condition subject to the lubrication approxi-
mation yields the following expression for the pressure field at the interface:
1 ⅆ ⅆh
P (h, t) = PA -− σ r (9)
r dr ⅆr
where PA is the ambient pressure outside the drop. The kinematic condition subject to the lubrication
approximation gives
∂h
= v, at z = h (r, t) (10)
∂t
At the interface z=h(r,t), the vanishing shear stress condition gives (where τ𝜏rr , τ𝜏zr and τ𝜏zz are the stress
components):
hz τrr + τzr 1 -− h2z -− hz τzz = 0 (11)
∂v ∂u (12)
+ = 0, at z = h (r, t)
∂r ∂z
and applying the lubrication approximation, the vanishing of the shear stress at the interface is approxi-
mated by
∂u
= 0, at z = h (r, t) (13)
∂z
Lubrication Solution
The governing equations we need to solve are
1 ∂(r u) ∂v
+ =0
r ∂r ∂z
1 ∂P z2
u= + C1 Z + C2
μ ∂r 2
∂P ∂h ∂ 1 ⅆ ⅆh (18)
=ρg -− σ r
∂r ∂r ∂r r dr ⅆr
∂u
= 0, at z = h (r, t)
∂z
u (0, t) = 0, v (0, t) = 0
We begin by integrating the continuity equation to determine an expression for the normal velocity at the
interface
h 1 ∂(r u)
v (h) = -− ⅆz
o r ∂r
(19)
1 ∂ h
= -− r u ⅆz
r ∂r o
∂P ∂h ∂ 1 ⅆ ⅆh
=ρg -− σ r (25)
∂r ∂r ∂r r dr ⅆr
Thus
1 ∂ ∂h ∂ 1 ⅆ ⅆh
v (h) = rh3 ρ g -− σ r (26)
3 μ r ∂r ∂r ∂r r dr ⅆr
At t = 0 : h (r, t) = H (R)
We will seek a similarity solution to this problem
Similarity Analysis
It will be convenient for the analysis that follows to introduce a dimensionless time τ𝜏 given by
τ = ρ g t /∕ (3 μ) (32)
Thus the evolution equation becomes
∂h 1 ∂ ∂h
= r h3 (33)
∂τ r ∂r ∂r
6 SpreadingAxisymetricDrop.nb
1 1 ⅆ ⅆf
= ξ τ4 α f3 (37)
τ2 β ξ ⅆξ ⅆξ
1 ⅆ ⅆf
-− τ4 α-−2 β ξ f3
ξ ⅆξ ⅆξ
Regrouping terms we get
ⅆf 1 ⅆ ⅆf
τα-−1 α f (ξ) -− β ξ = τ4 α-−2 β ξ f3 (38)
ⅆξ ξ ⅆξ ⅆξ
Thus for f(ξ𝜉) to be independent of τ𝜏- the similarity solution postulate, we must have
α -− 1 = 4 α -− 2 β ⟶ 3 α -− 2 β + 1 = 0 (39)
Consider next the conservation of mass of he drop during spreading ( recall evaporation of liquid in the
drop is assumed to be negligible). Thus the volume of the drop V at any time t is
R (t)
V=2π h (r, t) r ⅆr (40)
0
1 1
β= , and α = -− , and ξ0 = R (t) τ1/∕8 ⟹ R (t) = ξ0 τ1/∕8 (43)
8 4
The similarity equation that must be solve for f(ξ𝜉) such that Eq. (43) is satisfied is
ⅆf 1 ⅆ ⅆf
α f (ξ) -− β ξ = ξ f3 (44)
ⅆξ ξ ⅆξ ⅆξ
By regrouping terms and using Eq. (43) this equation can be expressed as
ξ ξ2 ⅆf ⅆ ⅆf
-− f -− -− ξ f3 =0 (45)
4 8 ⅆξ ⅆξ ⅆξ
A further reorganization gives
1 ⅆ ⅆ ⅆf
ξ2 f -− ξ f3 =0 (46)
8 ⅆξ ⅆξ ⅆξ
Integrating gives
1 ⅆf
ξ2 f -− f3 ξ = K1 (47)
8 ⅆξ
Now at the contact line ξ𝜉 = ξ𝜉0 , but f (ξ𝜉0 ) =0 so that K1 =0. Thus the equation that f(ξ𝜉) must satisfy is
ξ ⅆf
+ f2 = 0, where ξ → ξ0 = Lim r τ1/∕4 (48)
8 ⅆξ r→R (t)
Integrating gives
3 1/∕3
1/∕8
f (ξ) = ξ20 -− ξ2 (49)
16
where ξ𝜉0 is the position where f(ξ𝜉)=0, i.e., where h(r,t)=0 , i.e., the contact line R(t).
The volume V of the drop is then ( see Eq. (41)) becomes
3 1/∕3 ξ0
1/∕3
V=2π ξ20 -− ξ2 ξ ⅆξ
16 0
(50)
3 3 1/∕3
4/∕3
= π ξ0 2
8 2
Thus we can find ξ𝜉0 . Solving for ξ𝜉0 gives
2 × 21/∕4
ξ0 = V3/∕8 (51)
3 π3/∕8
Hence the position of the wetting line R(t) in terms of the original variables is
2 × 21/∕4
R (t) = ξ0 τ1/∕8 = V3/∕8 τ1/∕8
3/∕8
3 π
1/∕4
2×2 ρ g V3 1/∕8
= t
3μ (52)
3 π3/∕8
8 SpreadingAxisymetricDrop.nb
ρ g V3 1/∕8
= 0.893914 t
3μ
We can also determine the shape of the spreading drop in terms of original variables
Substituting Eq. (49) into Eq. (34) gives
h (τ, ξ) = τα f (ξ)
3 1/∕3
1/∕3
= τ-−1/∕4 ξ20 -− ξ2
16
3 1/∕3 ξ 2 1/∕3
= τ-−1/∕4 ξ2/∕3
0 1 -−
16 ξ0
References
◼ T. D. Blake, A. Clarke, J. De Coninck and M. J. de Ruijter, “Contact angle relaxation during droplet
spreading: Comparison between molecular kinetic theory and moleciular dynamics.”, Langmuir,
13,1997 pp. 2164-2166.
◼ J. Lopez, C. A. Miller and E. Ruckenstein, “Spreading kinetics of liquid drops on solids”, J. Colloid
Interface Sci., 56, pp 460-468, 1976.
◼ H. Hu and R. G. Larson, “Analysis of the microfluid flow in an evaporating sessile droplet”, Langmuir,
21, pp 3963-3971, 2005.
◼ S.N. Reznik and A.L. Yarin, “Spreading of an axisymmetric viscous drop due to gravity and capillarity
on a dry horizontal wall”, Int. J. Multiphase Flow, 28, pp 1437-1457, 2002
Appendix
Curvature Term
(52)
For an axisymmetric drop the twice the mean curvature of the interface can be expressed as
SpreadingAxisymetricDrop.nb 9
1 1
2H= + , where r1 , r2 are the principal curvatures of the interface
r1 r2
where r1 and r2 are the principal curvatures of the interface. We can express the height of the interface
by h=h(r) . Then the curvature becomes
ⅆ2 h dr2 ⅆh /∕ ⅆr
2H= +
3/∕2 1/∕2
1 + (ⅆh /∕ ⅆr)2 r 1 + (ⅆh /∕ ⅆr)2
where r and z=h are the cylindrical coordinates of the spreading drop. If the drop curvature is small, we
can neglect the terms in the denominator, i.e. (∂𝜕h/∕∂𝜕r)2 <<1, to get
ⅆ2 h 1 ⅆh 1 ⅆ ⅆh
2H≈ + = r
ⅆr2 r ⅆr r dr ⅆr