1 . A –it is not necessary that the act be committed.

2. B- It is sufficient if the plan is formed before the commission of the criminal act. Not
necessary that the prior plan should be before they set out for the crime.

3. A; X did not have any dishonest intention as he genuinely believed that the pen was his own.

4. A; the impugned rule imposed a financial obligation on the petitioner under Article 32 and
created a great possibility that if he failed to comply with it, his petition would fail on this
account itself. This possibly impairs the guarantee provided under the Article 32 to access the
SC. Hence, the impugned rule having the effect of retarding the vindication of the fundamental
rights of a petitioner, shall be unconstitutional.

.5.A

6.C. Any hurt which endangers life or which causes the sufferer to be during the space of twenty
days in severe bodily pain, or unable to follow his ordinary pursuits, will fall under grievous hurt

7. D It is mere preparation & not attempt, because she still had the option to change her mind &
not commit suicide.
8.D; As we know that FD’s are not legally enforceable, NGO cannot file a writ for it’s
enforcement.
It can however file a suit addressing it in a different manner and interpreting it to include
Fundamental right.

9. B; As given in the principle, such a step can easily be considered under reasonable restriction
based on decency and morality and there is no vilation of freedom of speech and epression on
this ground.

10, B; Since Bunny is aware and delivers it knowingly, as per the given principle it will come
under the definition of the offence. Bhim delivered it mistakenly so there was not guilty intent on
his part.
11. B. As per the Rules and facts provided, Dhruv, who is born after the commencement of the
Constitution, is domiciled in India and born in India as well. Thus, he is an Indian citizen.
12.B

13 Ans: (b) The Principle clearly states that no person can be tried and punished for the same
offence twice. As A is being tried for a new offence, he will not be protected by the principle of
double jeopardy.

14Ans: (d) The police discriminated between the two leaders on unreasonable grounds when
they did not have the discretion to do so.

15. Ans: (b) (b) is the direct answer and self-explanatory.

16. Ans: (a) Consent taken through coercion, fraud, misrepresentation or undue influence renders
contract voidable at the instance of the aggrieved party.

17Ans: (a) Self-explanatory

18.A

19. Ans: (b) (Both assertion and reason are factually correct. However, the reason ascribed is not
the actual reason why the official language of India can be said to be Hindi. Article 343(1)
clearly provides that the official language of the union shall be Hindi in Devanagriscript.

20.B

21.BDelegated legislation (sometimes referred as secondary legislation or subordinate legislation

or subsidiary legislation) is a process by which the executive is given powers by primary
legislation to make laws in order to implement and administer the requirements of that primary
legislation.

22.B

23.C

24.B

25.C
SECTION ENGLISH:

1 B. The best answer is B. In the first sentence of the passage, the author characterizes the
preoccupation of many United States companies with the search for legal protection from import
competition as unfortunate. Thus, it can be inferred that the author’s primary concern is to warn
about possible unintended negative consequences of applying trade laws

2 D. The best answer is D. Bases for complaints to the International Trade Commission are
discussed in the first paragraph. That a “simple claim” is “sufficient grounds to seek relief”
suggests that the minimal basis for a complaint to the ITC is injury from the sale of imports in
the United States, as stated in choice D.

3.D. The best answer is D. The last paragraph discusses a specific case in which a United States
subsidiary of a Dutch conglomerate accused a Canadian branch of a United States company of
“dumping” rock salt in the United States market

4.D. The best answer is D. The “danger” of import relief laws is stated in the passage : “that
foreign companies will use import relief laws against the very companies the laws were designed
to protect.” Import relief laws are the legal protection referred to in choice D. The passage does
not mention the situations described in choice A, B, C, and E.

5.D. The best answer is D. In passage the author warns that it is “unlikely that a system of import
relief laws will meet the strategic needs of all the units under the same parent company.” Thus, it
can be inferred that the United States trade laws dealing with import relief will not necessarily
help all units of a company, as stated in choice D.

6.B. The best answer is B. In passage the author states that “The bizarre aspect of the complaint
was that a foreign conglomerate…was crying for help against a United States company…” It can
be inferred that import relief laws were designed to protect United States companies from foreign
competition. Thus, the lodging of a complaint by a foreign conglomerate against a United States
company violated the intent of the laws.

7.D
8.A

9.B

10. A

11. D. To catch a tartar means to catch a dangerous person

12. B. To drive home means to emphasize

13. C. To have an axe to grind means to have a private end to serve

14. D. To cry wolf means to give false alarm

15. C. To end in smoke means to ruin oneself

16. C. a capella means singing without any instrument.

17. B. Jeud‟ spirit means mind games.

18. B. Proxime means second.

19. A. A deux means two.

20. A. Jeunesse Doree means wealthy and fashionable people.