Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
History
Historically, the work on Interval String Theory (IST) can be traced to the early twentieth
century, in 1917 Ernst Lecher Bacon published "Our Musical Idiom" in The Monist (see
References). Bacon's work contains a list of interval strings. Later, in 1960, Howard Hanson
used interval strings in his book, Harmonic Materials of Twentieth Century Music.
In 1973, Yale University Press published Allen Forte's The Structure of Atonal Music
(SAM), which became the de facto standard for musical set theory. SAM contains a list of
pitch set classes but it does not address interval strings. The title "atonal" with which SAM
confines itself remains undefined. Atonality was considered nonexistent by Schoenberg and
others who regarded it as a poor, derogatory term invented by critics. At the very least,
"atonality" seems to be an arbitrary and subjective rubric. IST provides an alternative to
SAM, especially for those who would like a theory that accounts for the difference between
major and minor chords, as well as all other inversionally related chords. IST is not
restricted to atonal or any other style of music. IST is comprehensive for all tone
combinations in the twelve-tone equal-tempered system.
Chords
IST provides a powerful way to identify any chord structure by using the same semitonal
notation. It is not intended to displace traditional chord nomenclature systems, e.g., C#7,
D+, Dm7, V7, etc. Instead, it embraces and supplements these in a more general system,
but gives up some specificity in order to be comprehensive. IS are especially useful when
the traditional nomenclature breaks down or does not work. For example, there is no
traditional chord name for C F# B. How, then, can this chord be identified? One way is to
use SAM, although SAM does not distinguish between major and minor chords (as well as
many other chords and scales) and makes an arbitrary distinction between tonal and atonal
music. IST provides a complete catalog of interval combinations, including those used in
chords and non-tonicized modes. Furthermore, it distinguishes major from minor.
A major chord has no specific pitch content; i.e., it can be any major chord. E major,
C major, F# major, etc. chords are recognized as major, regardless of the positions,
spacings, roots, or doublings. IST accounts for the factor makes them all major.
Additionally, we recognize minor chords as distinct from major, regardless of positions,
spacings, doublings, or roots. Differing major chords have different notes or pitches or pcs
demonstrating that the quality of major does not depend upon pitch. Therefore, a pitch or
pc designation for a chord type (or set class) does not account for the essential aspect that
determines its quality; i.e., major, minor, diminished, etc. However, all major chords have an
IS=435. It is this that remains constant, regardless of the roots, the positions, spacings, or
doublings. The ear and brain must recognize the IS to determine the quality of a chord,
because it is the only constant. It seems more appropriate and logical, therefore, to
designate chords by IS rather than by pc numbers.
The master table provides more information besides common or descriptive names.
Some sets are named with the suffix "-chord" and others with "-mode" (which actually
represents a mode-class) depending on how the set is more commonly known in the
literature. Generally, sets with cardinality less than 5 are called chords, whereas larger
cardinalities are more often considered modes (or scales). However, this distinction is
somewhat arbitrary. None of the IS in this table are restricted to a temporal order. Since
modes consist of IS and scales consist of pitches or pcs, the suffix "mode" is used here for
a scale-like IS.
* an asterisk indicates that a set is a mirror, i.e., an axis of symmetry exists somewhere in
the set.
** For SAM system, ignore sets with b endings and cardinalities less than 3 and greater
than 9.
31
12111213
3
332
65
4
An IS of odd numbers can be grouped into three or four digits plus the remainder; e.g., the
following IS is "two-twenty-two, thirty three”.
11 2223
9 3
References
Bacon, Ernst Lecher, "Our Musical Idiom", The Monist 27:1 (October 1917)
Chrisman, Richard, "Describing Structural Aspects of Pitch-Sets Using Successive Interval
Arrays", Journal of Music Theory 21:1 (Spring 1977)
Forte, Allen. The Structure of Atonal Music (New Haven CT, 1973)
Hanson, Howard. Harmonic Materials of Twentieth-Century Music (New York:Appleton-
Century_Crofts, 1960)
Regener, Eric, "On Allen Forte's Theory of Chords", Perspectives of New Music 13:1 (1974)
Solomon, Larry, "The List of Chords, Their Properties, and Uses", Journal of New Music
Research 11:2 (1982)