BIBLIOGRAFIA

Ackerman, B., Social Justice in the Liberal State., New Haves, 1980.
Aiken, H.D., “Rights, Human and Otherwise” , Monist. 1968, 502s.
Alexy, R.. Theorie der Grundrechte, Baden-Baden. 1985.
Aristoteles, citado segundo a edição da Preussische Akademie.
Bedau, H., “The right of Life”, Monist 1968, 550s.
— . ‘International Human Rights”, in: T. Regan arid D. Van de-Veer
(ed.), And Justice for AU, Totowa (USA), 19S2 ; 207s.
Bentham. J., An Introduction tot the Principles of Morals and Legis-
lation, ed. por J.H. Bums und H.L.A. Hart, Londres, 1970.
Ebbinghaus, J., '"Deutung und Missdeutung des kategorischen
Imperativs'’, in: Gesammelte Aufsätze, 1968, 80s.
Feinberg, L, “Duties, Rights and Claims”, American Philos. Quar-
terly 3 (1966), 137s. W _~
Fichte, J.G., Werke (ed. por F. Medicus), Hamburg, 1912.
Frankena, W., Ethics, Prentice Hall, 1963; alem.: Analytische Ethik.
Freud, S., Gesammelte Werke, Frankfurt, 1960.
Fromm, E.. Die Furcht vor der Freiheit, Frankfurt, 1980 (Escape
from Freedom, Nova Iorque, 1947).
— . Psychoanalyse und Ethik, Frankfurt, 1978 (Man for Himself,
Londres, 1949).
— . Die Kunst des Liebem, Frankfurt, 1980 (The Art of
Loving, Nova Iorque, 1956).
Gert, B., The Moral Rules. Harper, 1966, nova ed.: Morality,
Oxford. 1988; alem.: Die moralischen Regeln, Frankfurt, 1983.

42!
Gewinn, A., Reason and Morality, Chicago, 1978,
Foot, Ph., “Morality as a System of Hypothetical Imperatives”,
Philosophical Review 81 (1972), 305s.
-—. “Virtues and Vices”, in: Virtues and Vices, Oxford, 1978, Is.
Habermas. JL “WahrheitstheorkrT, in; H. Fahrenbach (ed.). Wirk-
iichael and Reflexion. Festschr. f. W. Schulz, Pfullingen, 1973,
2! Is.
— . “Diskursethik - Notizen zu einem Begründungsprogramm”, in:
Moralbewusstsein und kommunikatives Handeln, Frankfurt,
1983, 53-126,
—. Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns, Frankfurt, 1981.
Hare, R.M., Freedom and Reason, Oxford, 1963; a!em.: Freiheit
und Vernunft, Düsseldorf, 1973.
Hartmann, N., “Die Wertdimensionen der Nikomachischen Ethik*",
Berlin, 1944 (Abh. Preoss. Akad.), ed. in: Kleine Schriften.
Ber-
■ lin, 1957, 11, 191s.
Hegel G.W.F., flferjfe, Frankfurt, 1971.
—. Phänomenologie des Geistes (ed. por Hoffmeister), Leipzig
(Phi- los. Bibi.), 1949,
Hraschka, H., “Die Konkurrenz von goldener Regel und Prinzip der
Verallgemeinerung in der juristischen Diskussion des 17./!8.
Jahrhunderts als geschichtliche Wurzel von Kants kategoris-
chen Imperativ", Juristen Zeitung 42 (1987). 941s.
Hume, D., Enquiries concerning the Human Understanding and
concerning the Principles of Morals (ed. Selby-Bigge),
Oxford, 1902.
Hunt, G.M.K., Philosophy and Politics, Cambridge, 1990.
Kant, I., Gesammelte Schriften, ed. pela Preuss. Akademie, Berlin,
1902s.
—. Kritik der reinen Vernunft, citado segundo a 2- ed. (“B”).
Kenny, A., Action, Emotion and Will Londres. 1963.
—. Freewill and Responsibility, Londres, 1978.
Kohlberg, L., “From Is to Outght”, in: T. Mischel Cognitive Deve-
lopment and Epistemology, Nova Iorque, 1971.
Lohmann» G., “Neokonservative Antworten auf moderne Sinnver-
lusterfahrimgen”, in: Faber, E (ed.), Konservatismus in Ges-
chichte und Gegenwart, Würzburg, 1991, 183s.
Maekie, JtL.H., Ethics, Penguin, 1977; alem.: Mul, Stuttgart, 1981.
—. “Can there be a right-based moral theory?” in: I. Waldron, TJko-
ries of Rights, Oxford, 1984, 168s.
MacIntyre, A., After Virtue, Londres, 1981; alem.: Der Verlust der
Tugend , Frankfurt, 1987.
Marquard, O., 14Über die Un vermeid! ichkeit der Geisteswissenschaf-
ten’\ in: Apologie des Zufalls, Stuttgart, 1986, 98s.
Mil!, J.St, Utilitarianism, Indianapolis, 197!,
Miller, D., Social Justice. Oxford, 1976.
Musil, R., Nachlass zu Lebzeiten, Hamburg, 1957.
Nowell-Smith, EH., Ethics, Pelican, 1954.
Nozick, R., 5/ate Anarchy and Utopia. Nova íorque, 1974.
Patón, HJ., T7*e Categorical Imperative, Londres, 1947: alem.: Der
kategorische Imperativ, Berlin, 1962.
Piaget, I., Les jugements morales diez Venfant, Paris, 1932: alem.:
Düs moralische Urteil beim Kinde. Frankfurt, 1973.
Platon, Werfe (übliche Zitations weise nach der Stephanus-Ausgabe).
Raphael, D.d. (ed.), British Moralists 1650-1800, Oxford, 1969.
Rawls, I, ,4 Theory of Justice, Harvard, 1971; alem.: Eine Theorie
der Gerechtigkeit, Frankfurt, 1979.
—. Justice as Fairness: Political not Metaphysical^, Philosophy and
Public .Affairs 14 (1985), 223s.
W
Regan, T. und Van de Veer, D. (ed.), And Justice for All, Totowa./'
1982.
Ryle, G., Dilemmas, Oxford, 1954.
Schiller» F.. Werke, ed. por L. Bellermann, Meyers Klassiker-
Ausgaben, Leipzig e Wien o.J.
Schmidhäuser, E., Vom Sinn der Strafe, Göttingen, 1963.
Schopenhauer, A., Preisschrift über die Grundlage der Moral, in:
Sämtliche Werke (ed. I. Frauenstädt), Leipzig, 1916, IV, 103-
275.
Schweitzer, A., Kultur und Ethik , München, 1923,
Shue, H., Basic Rights, Princeton, 1980.
Sieghsrt, P., Tlie Lawful Rig. ,s of Mankind, Oxford, 1985.
5'tr-iih, A., The Theory of Moral Sentiments (ed. D.D. Raphael und
AX. Macüe), Oxford» 1976.
Stevenson. Ch.L.» “The Emotive Meaning of Ethical Terms”, Mind,
1937.
Strawson, R, “Freedom and Resentment”, Proceedings of the
British Academy 48 (1962), 187s; alem.: in: Pothast, ü. (ed.),
Freies Handeln und Determinismus, Frankfort, 1978, 20 Is,
Taylor, G., Pride Shame -and Guilt, Oxford, 1985.
Tugendhat, E.,'Der Wahrheitsbegriff bei Husserl und Heidegger ,
Berlin, 1967*
—. “Sprache and Ethik” (1978). in: Philosophische Aufsätze,
—. Selbstbewusstsein und Selbstbestimmung, Frankfurt, 1979.
—. “Comments on some Methodological Aspects of Rawls. Theory
of Justice”, in: Analyse imd Kritik I (1979), 77-89; alem.: in:
Probleme der Ethik .
—. Drei Vorlesungen über Probleme der Ethik” (1981), in:
Probleme der Ethik.
—. “Retraktationen” (1983), in: Probleme der Ethik .
— . Probleme der Ethik , Stuttargt, 1984.
— . “John Rawls, Eine Theorie der Gerechtigkeit”, in: F. Raddatz
(ed.), Zeit-Bibliothek der 100 Sachbücher , Frankfurt, 1984.
—. Nachdenken über die Atomkriegsgefahr und warum man sie
nicht sieht. 2- ed. Berlin, 1988.
—. “Liberalism, Liberty and the Issue of Economic Human
Rights'” (1988), in: Philosophische Auj'sätze.
—. Philosophische Aufsätze, Frankfurt, 1992.
—. Ethik und Politik , Frankfurt, 1992.
Urmson, J.O., “On Grading”, in: A. Flew, Logic and Language, 2- ed.s
Oxford, 1953, 159s.
Vlasios, G., “Justice and EciaLr ”, in: J. Waldron, Theories of
Rights, Oxford, 1984, 41s.
Wamock, G.H., The Object of Morality, londres, 1971.
Williams, B., “A critique of utilitarianism”, in: J.J.C. Smart und B.
_ Williams, Utilitarianism for und against, Cambridge,
1973,77s,
—. Ethics and the Limits of Phiios^pny, Londres, 1985.
Winnicott, D.W., The Mazurationci Processes and the Facilitating
Environment Loodres, 1965.
Wolf, UL “Brauchen wir eine ökologische Ethik?” Prokla 69
(1987), 148s.
—•. Dm Tier in der Moral, Frankfurt» 1990.
Wright, G.fL von, The Varieties of Goodness, Londres, 1963.
 ¿ Mk U T I C D
Apriori, 15s, iCs2s.,
Absoluto, gramaticalmente, 37..
Admiração. 221, 254s.
.Afetos morais, 20.
Altruísmo, 101 s.
Amor ao próximo, 294, 3.01.
Animais, 190s, 200$. 2Q2s,
205. 208, 344, 384s.
Aprovar. 58s, 62, 337s.
Auto-estima, 60s.
Autonomia. 66. 96s, 98, 100,
105.
Bom, 62s, 64, 68s, 81s, 85-
93, 97.'
Colisões de deveres, 158.
Compaixão, 190s, 195s, 199s,
206s; generalizada, 199.
Conceito de moral formai,
25, 32.
Consciência mora!
(Gewissen), 29s, 31 s. 63s,
65s, 68,74, 87, 105, 110s,
342.
Coniratualismo, 29, 31, 66, 71,
78s„ 80-91.96.
Convenções, 49» 253.
Costumes, eticidade, 35s, 219s.
Crianças, 190s, 294, 299.
Desprezo, 252s, 254$, 328.
Dever, 26, 37-43, 49, 104.
Dignidade, 38ós. 390.,
Direitos naturais, 37Is.
Direitos: gerais. 365s; morais,
363. 370-378. 391; especiais,
350s, 354, 365; subjetivos,
362s. 374: dos animais, 384$.
Egoísta, 27s, 98-102.
Emotivismo, 226, 229s, 234.
Ética, 11, 13s, 35s. 41 s.
Ética da compaixão, 190.
Exigir reciprocamente, 63.
Falácia naturalista, !03s.
Feto, 202, 207.210.
Fundamentação (de uma mo-
ral): absoluta. 14, 73, 75s;
contratualista, 80-82; natural.
74; não-tradicionalista, 73;
relativa, 83s, 86;
tradicionalis-
ta, 24, 72; transcendente, v.
tradicionalista, 74.
Identidade, 60s, 7Gs; moral,
73.
Imparcialidade, 332.
Imperativo, 43, 46, 75;
eniegé- rico, 47, 87-91, 94s,
lOIs,
Indignação, 12, 20s? 31, 62-
64, 8!, 252, 255.
liiízos morais, 12, 15-20,
22s, 25s, 34s, 39s, 57, 67s,
83s, I02s.
Lack of moral sense, 65s, 82,
92.96s, 125, 135.
Mérito, 39és, 399s; em
sentido estrito, 407s, 412.
Mera*. 27-32, 34; ema. 24.
67; política. 363;
tradicionalista. 205.
Modvaçâo moral, l'30s, 139,
19Is/
Motivos, v. razões.
Nascimento, 208-210.
Natureza do ser humano, 74,
7ós.
Necessidade prática, 37s, 45.
Normas. 43s; morais, !3s,
38, 42, 46, 58; sociais, 48s.
Normas da razão, 45s, 48.
Obrigação morai, 33, 67.
Pingente moral, 342.
Prometer, 342.
Quase-moral, 81,83.
Razão, escrito com maiúscula,
47.
Razões de plausibilidade, 93s.
Reconhecer, 362. 371, 382s.
Regras de jogo. 44s, 48.
Respeito, 31. 87 90, 94, I0L
348-350, 362. 372, 404, 420.
Sanção, 45-49. 63-65, 80s,
95- 97*
Sentimento de culpa, 254s.
Sentimentos’morais, v. afetos.
Ser bom, conceito de, 65.
69; plausível, 3L 85s, 93-95.
Teológico, 164, 192, 197.
Ter de, 25, 37-45, 50, 63,
65, 68, 75. 77, 96. 105.
Utilitarismo, 214. 232, 248,
305.
Valor absoluto. 372.
Vergonha, 12, 20s, 6Qs, 62s,
8Gs, 254s; moral, 61, 63.
Virtudes de felicidade, 267,
269, 278.
Ackerman, B., 215,393,395,
401, 407, 411.
Adorno, Til., 17.
Agostinho, St., 42.
Aiken, H.D., 385.
Alexy, R., 180, 386s, 388s.
ApeL K.O., 47, 173, 178s, 181.
Aristoteles, 20» 32s, 35, 4L
59, 61. 76, 97s. 212, 224,
228, 233. 235-239, 242s, 246,
250s, 255-268, 269-282,
285s, 304s,-326, 396s.
Ayer, A., 229.
Bedau, H., 369.
Bentham, 1, 202, 242, 348,
351-353.
Bento, S., 240.
Böhler, D., 173.
Cicero, 4L
Dworkln, 215.
3: :/:r I., 193,
Z:ch:ranr..A., 122.
Feinberg, I.. 3S3:.
Fichte, I.G., 22 L 285, 296s.
FOOL Ph., 48, 250.
Frankena, W., 135.
Franklin, B., 253,
Freud, S., 30, 64, 287s, 290..
Fromm, E., 266, 280, 283-
298, 300, 325.
Gauthier, D., 78.
Gert, B., 24, 232, 239.
Gewirth, A., 172, 232.
■Habermas, I., 20, 47, 164,
173- 185, 188s, 318s, 395.
Hare, R.M., 103, 158s, 177,
215,354-356.
Hart, H.L.A., 44.
Hartmann, N., 270.
Hayek, E, 387.
Hegel, G.W.F., 36,58, 171,
212. 215, 217-224« 240s,
283, 285s, 291, 295-297,
330, 345, 352, 387.
I:. ’33. 2.L.« \ 2:1
288, 387.
.-Zite:. A.. 373.
Kobens. Tu., 8 . r;
licr'j c. ir-er. M.,
ZriscVrz. I, 73.
Hunte. 5.. ¿6,5~-C9 53,
74, 82s, 125, 127, 167s,
191s, 250s, 274s, 298. 305-
308, 319.321.325,
335.347s, 352.
Hutcheson, E, 74, 77, 195,
335,344, 347-349, 351 s.
Jesus, 67.
KamharteL F., 173.
Kami ah, W„ 173.
Kant. 15s. 25s. 29, 36. 38. 42-
47. 56s, 74-77. 82-96.102. IC6-
I71, 213. 215, 230-233, 239.
242. 246s. 248. 307.
314. 318. 332. 335, 340s.
349, 354, 358s, 364, 372,
384.387, 391,399.
Kenny. A., 279, 321,401.
Kierkegaard, S., 231,234.
Kohlbert, L„ 204.
Kubie, L., 290.
Lessing, G., 70s.
Locke, J„ 378, 409.
Lohmanr,, G., 222.
Lorenz. -i., 173.
Lorenzen, P., 173.
Lübbe. H., 215, 222, 233.
I A., 173, 212.2;?s,
223-2-:, 243-245, 248-250,
250s. 2:5, 267, 273. 40".
Mackie, J.L.. 373, 78-80, 86,
164, 177, 23C, 353, 363s.
Marquard. O ,215. 222.
Marx, K.. 18s, 2!?. 285s, 411.
Mill, J.2c., 35?-00.
Miller, D., 407.
Moore, G.E., 103.
Musii, R., 202.
Nietzsche. E, 14, 233s, 235.
Paton, J.J., 156, 163.
Piaget, I., 299.
Pinochet, A., 373.
Platão, 16, 32, 40, 79s, 97s,
101, 112s. 115s, 258-262,
266. 268. 270. 282, 395-
397.
Protágoras. 80.
Rawls, J„ 26s. 78, 85s,
215s, 393-395,401,407.
413s, 418s.
Ritter, J„ 212.217s. 219,
221- 223, 240.
Ryle. G„ 279.
Sandel, M.. 216.
Sartre, J.-R. 357.
Schiller, E, 121, 125, 127-
130.
Schmidhãuser, E., 401.
Schopenhauer, A., 77. 83, !
24, 193-202, 107. 308s.
398s.
Schvvemmer, O., 173.
Shklar, J„ 200.
Shu a, H„ 378. 380. 383,
385s, 389-392.
■29
)
■
) 2 ^;, ,2 --
. . .

2^...
* 2_ \ 27 ..
~* -

> :;: ‘->2 ^ : 2 2 22:\;.„ 2 I.. 2..

.: . 2 . 2 2 ^; 2 ... : - 2„. ic r, Vi'T 22- 222,12 ... 1" 2,
il, 2 2 2 .
2 *' 2,2.. 2. _ 2-9.
Stalin, I, 373.
22e2c A.. i” ?2.
■> Stevenson, Ch., 225, Williams, B.. 40. 9?, 136, 173,
2 LT?„ V?C ^ 21 s. 29, 4-3 1. lay 246.
> ^InrLcd, D.W2 52.
lor, Ch., 216.
Taylor, G., 6L Wkn\sre*ii, 2-., -2.
> Wolf. L\. 199-202. 206.
.> Wright. G.2L 37. 55. 60 250-
‘ **> -2572
* 274s.
*

>■
'

>
>
)
 . ' “ _ - _ J.1 ' ~ -\-r. Ar'~ JS r*:¿v - . c.ncnesse e =
S' • ■ : ■/ ' cy 1 -■ ': '*:-r.iio a r- cor. "rcdr zZàaaóa.

Home:_______________________________
Sexo:,__Dota de / / Escolaridade: Profissão:
nascimento:
Endereço:
Bairro: Gdade:
CZ?: zJ^ln: fel: f .1 ' ................ .........
Fax: I ) ' E-Maü:
i C?r/CGC:________________________

.
| Áreas de interesse:

CULTURAL rei;g:c:a G 103. Anjos

Q 60. Administração 8 Economia D 80. Cotscuese e Ensino Religioso Q 81. Docurr.e.-
Q 61. Antropologia Tos da greia Q 82. !L*pir::;’-soe e vida, Auto-ajuda
D 62 Ccrr^nicccão U 33. Franáscarisn'o D 8¿. liturgia 3
Q ó3- CuivG' ;a Devocionarios U 106. Mariologia
Li ó5. biosora D 85. .';rcra sac-a renta!, familiar e social
i_j ó." Historie e Geografia □ 107. ç:!*g.co
iJ 1C-.. .nrcnro-Juvenis □ 86. Z ^ - ^ d z brcrVjra - Textos e comentário:
D 67. Letras e Literatura C1G5. 3::-
□ 68. Pedagogia e -Educação U O7. 7
> 2, <'c r a' 3 igreja
LJ «V\ Poir;;a a Sociologia
'ZJ Psicr :g*c ‘-iccn^V 3 ! o.“ - ~ r>
Li 7.. Cfcp ':c Sv . Seu, • - ’

U Outras (especificar):_________________________

' 2 C '* . 'C.T.3 „ *cr ~ í>'

. ‘ _ F ¿ " ‘ c ~ ~s

O j‘- :r*w’ r, c^~ * '•" , ' ’ ■ '-rr. \ :

1_ ' . Z ' Z ; Q L, C- : __ _ _ \ z z i z / * de terceirc: