Relationships and Project Marketing Success (2002)

Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing
Relationships and project marketing success

Maria Anne Skaates Henrikki Tikkanen Jarno Lindblom
Article information:
To cite this document:
Maria Anne Skaates Henrikki Tikkanen Jarno Lindblom, (2002),"Relationships and project marketing success", Journal of
Business & Industrial Marketing, Vol. 17 Iss 5 pp. 389 - 406
Permanent link to this document:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/08858620210439068
Downloaded on: 07 May 2015, At: 00:52 (PT)
References: this document contains references to 31 other documents.
To copy this document: permissions@emeraldinsight.com
The fulltext of this document has been downloaded 2609 times since 2006*
Users who downloaded this article also downloaded:
Downloaded by UNIVERSITY OF MALTA At 00:52 07 May 2015 (PT)
Christian Grönroos, (2004),"The relationship marketing process: communication, interaction, dialogue, value", Journal of
Business & Industrial Marketing, Vol. 19 Iss 2 pp. 99-113 http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/08858620410523981
Christian Grönroos, (1994),"From Marketing Mix to Relationship Marketing: Towards a Paradigm Shift in Marketing",
Management Decision, Vol. 32 Iss 2 pp. 4-20 http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/00251749410054774
Dave C.A. Butcher, Michael J. Sheehan, (2010),"Excellent contractor performance in the UK construction industry", Engineering,
Construction and Architectural Management, Vol. 17 Iss 1 pp. 35-45 http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/09699981011011302
Access to this document was granted through an Emerald subscription provided by 417379 []
For Authors
If you would like to write for this, or any other Emerald publication, then please use our Emerald for Authors service
information about how to choose which publication to write for and submission guidelines are available for all. Please visit
www.emeraldinsight.com/authors for more information.
About Emerald www.emeraldinsight.com
Emerald is a global publisher linking research and practice to the benefit of society. The company manages a portfolio of
more than 290 journals and over 2,350 books and book series volumes, as well as providing an extensive range of online
products and additional customer resources and services.
Emerald is both COUNTER 4 and TRANSFER compliant. The organization is a partner of the Committee on Publication Ethics
(COPE) and also works with Portico and the LOCKSS initiative for digital archive preservation.
*Related content and download information correct at time of download.

An executive summary for
managers and executive Relationships and project
readers can be found at the
end of this article marketing success
Maria Anne Skaates
Assistant Professor, Department of International Business, Aarhus
School of Business, Denmark
Henrikki Tikkanen
Professor of Marketing, Department of Management, Helsinki
University of Technology, Finland
Jarno Lindblom
Project Manager, Tactica Marketing Communications, Helsinki
Keywords International business, Networks, Projects, Marketing

Abstract Project operations are a dominating mode of international business. Managing
relationships and networks is crucial to project marketing success both at the level of the
individual project and at the level of multiple projects. This article first defines key
characteristics of project business, identifies potentially relevant actors in the project
marketing milieu, and emphasizes the importance of constantly nurturing project business
relationships, also in ``sleeping relationship'' periods where concrete projects are not
expected. Thereafter the points made are illustrated with a Finnish-Chinese turnkey
project case at the level of the individual project and a Danish-German professional
service project case at the level of multiple projects. It is concluded that project managers
and marketers should focus their attention on the management of project relationships
before, during, and after projects, as well as on relevant environmental factors in the
project marketing milieu, instead of using resources on sporadic or last minute running
after potential projects.
Introduction
International business Project operations are one of the dominating modes of international business
today today (Hadjikhani, 1996), as the ``products'' of industrial companies
increasingly exhibit project-like features (GuÈnter and Bonaccorsi, 1996).
This is due to the increased complexity and ``systemization'' of the offerings
of many international companies. This implies that industrial marketers have
to develop their capabilities in supplying ever more complex ``total
solutions'' that include both tangible (products) and intangible (services)
aspects (e.g. GroÈnroos, 1997). Thus, it is not surprising that projects, project
management, and project marketing have recently received increased
scholarly attention (see e.g. the project management special issue of
Scandinavian Journal of Management, 1995; the project marketing and
systems selling issue of International Business Review, 1996; Hadjikhani,
1998).
There is also an issue-based research group called the International Network
for Project Marketing and System Selling or INPM (Cova and Ghauri, 1996;
GuÈnter and Bonaccorsi, 1996; Skaates, 2000). Closely affiliated with the
IMP (Industrial Marketing and Purchasing) community of researchers, the
INPM's research emphasizes the role of relationships and networks of
relationships in project marketing.
In the 1990s, relationship marketing and management were established as
key areas of research (Gummesson, 1999; GroÈnroos, 1997). However,
The research register for this journal is available at

http://www.emeraldinsight.com/researchregisters
The current issue and full text archive of this journal is available at
http://www.emeraldinsight.com/0885-8624.htm
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS & INDUSTRIAL MARKETING, VOL. 17 NO. 5 2002, pp. 389-406, # MCB UP LIMITED, 0885-8624, DOI 10.1108/08858620210439068 389
variations in project marketing relationships and situations have not yet been
studied systematically or in detail (cf. Hadjikhani, 1996; 1998; Skaates,
2000). Therefore this article analyzes the management of relationships and
networks at two separate levels, first focusing upon the level of individual
projects (AlajoutsijaÈrvi, 1996). Thereafter the emphasis shifts to the level of
multiple projects (AlajoutsijaÈrvi, 1996), which encompasses relationship
development and maintenaince during a (longer) period of multiple project
activity, including possible periods in which there are no projects. At both
levels, the aim of the article is to illustrate the relevance of the project
marketer's awareness of the project marketing milieu (Cova et al., 1996) and
important relationships, as well as his or her identification of potentially
relevant actors in the project marketing milieu. It is proposed that the
management of relationships at both levels influences project marketing
success defined as the acquisition of subsequent projects.
Multiple projects The article is structured as follows: First, main project marketing concepts
are defined, and key characteristics related to managing relationships in
project business are examined. Second, a turnkey project ± a Finnish-Chinese
technology transfer project ± is used to illustrate the importance of
inter-organizational relationship management during a complex individual
project acquisition and delivery process. Third, the case of Danish

architectural design project exports to Germany in the 1990s is used to
illustrate the role that relationships play in the marketing of multiple
projects. Finally, on the basis of the two cases presented, suggestions for
practitioners in project marketing and systems selling firms are made and
avenues for further studies are proposed.
Projects and the project marketing process

There are many definitions of the term project (Ahmed, 1993); however, in
the project marketing literature, as opposed to the project management
literature, where one also finds projects within one firm, the projects of the
project marketing literature always involve purchasing and selling
organizations. On a general level, a project refers to `à transaction
concerning a functioning whole which is delivered to the buyer'' (Holstius,
1987). Following Cova and Ghauri (1996), a project is `à complex
transaction covering a discrete package of products, services and other
actions designed to create (capital) assets for the buyer over a certain period
of time'' (emphasis added). Systems selling, i.e. the sale of a complex
combination of products and services offered by a company in an industrial
market (see e.g. Mattsson, 1973; Kosonen, 1991), often appears to be
synonymous with the delivery of projects (cf. GuÈnter and Bonaccorsi, 1996).
However, while a project can most often be considered as system[1], a
system does not have to be supplied as a project, i.e. in the sequential manner
of Cova and Ghauri's (1996) definition.
Project operations Project operations are classified by Luostarinen and Welch (1990) as
contract operations (other contractual operations being licensing,
franchising, management contracts, and subcontracting) and subdivided into
partial projects, turnkey projects and turnkey plus projects. Partial projects
include partial system deliveries such as the delivery of professional services
projects or a waste disposal system to a factory in construction. In a turnkey
project, a complete unit is delivered to the buyer. Turnkey plus projects are
complete unit deliveries plus supplementary services such as personnel
training.
390 JOURNAL OF BUSINESS & INDUSTRIAL MARKETING, VOL. 17 NO. 5 2002

Delivery process The INPM argument for studying project marketing rests on the assertion
that it is not enough to regard a project delivered by one firm/a group of
firms to another organization/group of organizations as a set of managerial
actions taken by the suppler(s), i.e. as mere ``project management''
(Tikkanen and Lindblom, 1998). Instead project acquisition and delivery
processes entail the coordination of buyer and seller activities, as the details
of the project are agreed upon during extensive buyer-seller interaction, often
over a substantial period of time. Consequently relationships between actors
in the buying and selling firms are important before, during, and after the
delivery process (cf. Hadjikhani, 1996). Thus project marketing is a broader
term than project management; it always implicitly includes project
management but not vice versa.
Relationship development INPM researchers also emphasize that relationship development has an
overall effect on a firm's project acquisitions, as will be explained in the
following. However, relationships are not easy to maintain, due to three
D-U-C features that distinguish project marketing from other types of
business-to-business marketing (see e.g. Cova and Ghauri, 1996; MandjaÂk
and Veres, 1998; Tikkanen, 1998):
D. the discontinuity of demand for projects;

U. the uniqueness of each project in technical, financial and socio-
political terms; and
C. the complexity of each individual project in terms of the number of
actors involved throughout the supply process.
The implication of discontinuity is often a lack of bonding, dependence, and
mutual orientation beyond the single project, although there is substantial
interaction during the delivery of an individual project. The uniqueness and
complexity of each project may furthermore imply that different actor firm
constellations or actors from a given firm are used in each individual project,
thus further affecting the discontinuity of relationships.
Building on the above insights, AlajoutsijaÈrvi (1996) has stated that there are
two ``nested'' levels of relationship management in the marketing of
industrial projects. The first level is that of managing networks and
relationships related to individual projects from beginning to end. The
second level is ``the level of multiple projects''; it encompasses relationships
during a (longer) period of multiple project activity, including possible
periods in which there are no projects.
Individual project At the level of the individual project, each project passes through a relatively
similar process (Baum, 1982; Cova and Holstius, 1993; Holstius, 1987),
which is characterized by substantial buyer/seller interaction during each
phase and substantial corporate function overlap, i.e. between the marketing
and management department (cf. GroÈnroos, 1997). Seen from the project
selling firm's point of view, the six phases are as follows (Holstius, 1987;
Cova and Holstius, 1993):
(1) Search phase: identifying project opportunities and relevant industry
developments.
(2) Preparation phase: undertaking a feasibility study; preparation for the
bidding process; establishing contacts to buyer(s); evaluating the
competitive situation.
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS & INDUSTRIAL MARKETING, VOL. 17 NO. 5 2002 391

(3) Bidding phase: preparing the bidding documents after receiving the
invitation to bid; making decisions concerning price and the use of local
resources.
(4) Negotiation phase: starts when the seller makes the preliminary offer for
the project; ends at the signing of a contract.
(5) Implementation phase: delivering and supervising the project; training
buyer's personnel; possibly creating after-sales systems.
(6) Transition phase: evaluating the project as a whole; building up
knowledge for future offerings; possibly supplying additional services to
the buyer.
Concerning the level of multiple projects, the project marketing cycle is
self-renewing, in that the sum of experiences related to a particular project
are evaluated in the transition phase for use in subsequent project activities
(Holstius, 1987). At this multiple project level, however, discontinuity (i.e.
the ``D'' characteristic of the D-U-C framework) in buyer-seller relationships
is the major strategic problem in project marketing (Hadjikhani, 1996).
``Sleeping relationship'' After a project is completed, the relationship becomes a ``sleeping
relationship'' (Hadjikhani, 1996), i.e. a relationship without contract-related
activity and resource ties, but possibly with bonds of after-market

dependency, social ties, and trust. It is thus necessary for project marketers to
focus on the implications of a single project for subsequent project marketing
efforts during the delivery process of the project in question. Furthermore,
they must nurture both sleeping and potential relationships in periods when
concrete projects are not being prepared for or competed (Cova et al., 1996).
To aid in this task, Cova et al. (1996) have developed the concept of the
``milieu'' of project marketing. It is a socio-spatial configuration
characterized by:
. a network of actors;
. a representation constructed and shared by these actors; and
. a set of rules and norms regulating the interactions between these actors.
Within the milieu, project marketing firms have to generate credibility, i.e.
convince other actors of their ability to perform what they claim they can do
(Blomqvist, 1997) and follow the rules and norms of the milieu, to be able to
nurture sleeping and potential relationships. This credibility generation is
undertaken within relationships inside the milieu as well as through word-of-
mouth and the use of references (Salminen, 1997). Potentially relevant actors
with regard to credibility generation activities are presented in Table I (see
also Hadjikhani, 1998). In this table, actors have also been classified at
different levels of aggregation because formal collectives such as a board of
directors or a governmental organization often make marketing/purchasing
decisions based on information received from individuals and informal
collectives (Webster and Wind, 1973).
Establishment and In our first case, the establishment and maintenance of credibility in
maintenance relationships and networks is examined in depth at the level of the individual
project. The second case more specifically focuses upon credibility
generation at the level of multiple projects. Concerning methodology, the
cases have been taken from two research projects concerning international
project selling firms (Skaates, 2000; Tikkanen and Lindblom, 1998). The
studies included embedded case studies (Yin, 1994), in which the primary
source of data was semi-structured qualitative interviews (Kvale, 1996).

Business actor Community actors Government actors
The level of Employees, owners of Citizens as owners, Governmental
individuals firms influencers, employees, politicians
consumers, etc.
The level of formal Intra-firm Formal bodies of Intra-organizational
intra-organizational departments or formal non-governmental, departments or formal
bodies ad hoc bodies: e.g. not-for-profit ad hoc bodies of
marketing organizations: party governmental
departments, R&D boards and organizations: e.g.
units, project teams committees, boards of ministry departments,
directors of not-for- committees, project
profit organizations teams
etc.
The level of whole Firms in their Non-governmental Governmental
formal organizations different roles: not-for-profit organizations:
suppliers, buyers, organizations ministries,
competitors, universities, research
consultants, etc. units etc.
The level of formal Formal business Formal civil Formal governmental
collectives collectives: collectives: e.g. collectives: national,
corporations, formal regional or regional, or local
alliances, industry international umbrella governments, the EU,
organizations, etc. organizations of not- the UNDP etc.
for-profit
organizations
The level of informal Informal networks, Circles of friends/ Informal public sector
collectives e.g. within firms or relatives, ethnic networks
industries groups, social classes,
political cliques, etc.
Source: Tikkanen and Lindblom, 1998
Table I. Potentially relevant project marketing milieu actors
Supplementary data, i.e. annual reports, minutes from meetings, and export
statistics, were acquired from other sources to enable data triangulation (see
Silverman, 1993; Marshall and Rossmann, 1989).
Relationship management within a single project: the FinSys case

The Finnish project selling firm FINSYS[2] started to operate in China in the
1980s. It has since delivered more than a dozen large projects there. The
turnkey plus project under scrutiny in this article, a complex technology
transfer project, was successfully delivered at the beginning of the 1990s.
The project concerned the supply and start-up of a medium-sized power
plant in the Quangzhou area.
Project marketing cycle In order to study the relationships during the process, the project was divided
into the phases of the project marketing cycle (Holstius, 1987). However, a
distinction between the search and the preparation phase was not made
because FINSYS China was informed of the project by the agent at the
buyer's initiative. Instead the search and preparation phases are combined
into a ``scanning phase''.
The scanning phase

From the seller's perspective, the project started when an agent contacted
FINSYS China. FINSYS then determined whether it would respond to the
invitation to bid on the basis of a feasibility assessment, i.e. a study of
project-related opportunities and threats. An initial offer was sent to the
buyer via the agent. The relevant project network of this phase and a further
phase description are presented in Figure 1.

Figure 1. The project network in the scanning phase
The bidding phase

In this phase, a second, more detailed offer was prepared and sent. The
project network is presented in Figure 2.
The negotiation phase

Negotiations started when the buyer accepted the second offer as a basis for
further negotiations. FINSYS' marketing and sales team, FINSYS China, the

Figure 2. The project network in the bidding phase
buyer's negotiators, the agent, the bank's representatives, and the warrantor
were involved in the detailed negotiations. During this phase, the scope of
the solution, the equipment, guarantees, and training of Chinese employees
were agreed upon. Negotiations finished with the signing of the contract. The
units presented in Figure 3 participated in the negotiations.
The implementation phase

Project responsibility At the beginning of this phase, the responsibility for the project shifted from
the M&S team to FINSYS projects organization in a kick-off meeting where
all information concerning the project was given to the selected project
management team. Even though the general features, e.g. equipment and
materials, were defined in the contract, technical negotiations (so-called
follow-up negotiations) between the FINSYS project management team and
the buyer continued. After all technical details had been agreed upon, the

Figure 3. The project network in the negotiation phase
project team delivered the needed equipment and materials to the site.
FINSYS' project team in Europe also sent orders to subcontractors and
arranged for their delivery to the site. Chinese contractors set up the plant in
accordance with FINSYS' instructions. The buyer's employees were trained
by FINSYS' employees in China and in Europe, where a training course for a
Chinese delegation was held. When the plant was ready to run, the
equipment was checked and tested for commercial use, then handed over to
the buyer. The project network in the implementation phase is presented in
Figure 4.
The transition phase

Guarantee engineer After the plant had been handed over to the customer the transition phase
began. FINSYS' guarantee engineer stayed at the site for a year, educating
the local employees. If a problem had occurred, the guarantee engineer
would have been able to help and give advice, due to his on-site presence.
The project network is presented in Figure 5.

Figure 4. The project network in the implementation phase
Case analysis
In this section, the relationship dynamics of the FINSYS case are analyzed.
With regard to governmental actors (see Table I), the Chinese government
was involved in the first phase, as they decided on law-related issues.

Figure 5. The project network in the transition phase
Community actors, on the other hand, never played any role. Concerning
business actors, the agent's role was extremely strong during the first three
phases of the project. After these phases, when FINSYS was familiar with
the project's milieu, it was less strong. FINSYS China and FINSYS Europe's
marketing and sales were strongly involved in the project until the end of the
third phase. The project management team and the project organization were
committed to the project during the implementation phase. Their role was to
deliver and implement as promised. The involvement of the guarantee
engineer was key in the transition phase, which also was the longest
individual phase in real time. Furthermore, the actions of the guarantee
engineer probably affected the customer's final perception of the project
measurably, as he was the person to whom it had its final contacts.
Buyer-seller interaction As is evident from the above and Figure 6 below, no single actor from
FINSYS was involved throughout the project nor was the buyer-seller
interaction limited to a single level of Figure 1. From a project marketing

Figure 6. Project involvement
perspective, the lack of an individual coordinating actor throughout the entire

project supply process made FINSYS' development of credibility in the

relationship to the Chinese customer more difficult.
Information flow Buyer-seller relationships may be severed if there are substantial breaks in
the selling firm's information flow. In the FINSYS example, there were two
possible information break-points. The first one occurred at the kick-off
meeting, when the marketing and sales department passed the responsibility
for the project to the project management team. The second break-point was
the shift from the implementation phase to the transition phase, when the
plant was handed over to the customer by the project management team and
a guarantee engineer from FINSYS was sent to the site. However, in both
cases, FINSYS managed to achieve a high level of informational continuity,
thus maintaining the trust of their Chinese customers and safeguarding the
relationships that had been established and also putting itself in a good initial
position for the work of nurturing the relationship in its ``sleeping'' phase.
Relationship management across projects: Danish architectural firms in

Germany
At the beginning of the 1990s, all EU construction markets, with the
exception of the German and Luxembourg markets, were in the midst of a
recession. Therefore many European construction industry firms decided to
begin operations on the German market, to achieve higher turnover and
alleviate capacity problems. The expectations of most of these firms were,
however, not fulfilled, as achieving credibility in the eyes of potential
German customers, and thus relationships, was much more difficult than
expected.
Acquisition practices Danish architectural firms were no exceptions. Therefore the project
acquisition efforts of unsuccessful Danish architectural firms were initially
studied; subsequently the focus was placed upon the acquisition practices of
a few Danish architectural firms that had managed to secure successive
German orders.
Among these ``successful'' firms were one of the largest Danish architectural
firms, which has decades of experience in its home market, and a small firm
that had only had four years of experience in its domestic market when it

began its activities in Germany. Both firms initially greatly underestimated
the differences in the milieus of the Danish and German construction
industries. In their initial years in Germany, they therefore had to learn about
``rules and norms'', e.g. German construction laws, common German terms
of contract, German building norms, and the German interpretation of the
EU Public Services Directive. Furthermore, they had to familiarize
themselves with German actors' understanding, or mental representations, of
e.g. `ìnexpensive, high quality construction'', `ènvironmentally friendly
design'', or ``Nordic architecture''. This necessitated personal interaction,
yet contact with potential clients was difficult to establish. These were
receiving many calls from foreign firms, many of whom did not seem
``serious'' in the eyes of the Germans. Thus many Danish firms found
themselves in a Catch-22 situation.
German construction In this difficult situation, German construction industry receptions and
industry discussion forums, as well as official cooperation agreements between the
Danish Ministry of Housing and the corresponding German ministries at the
federal and state levels, served as door openers. At these occasions, business,
community, and governmental actors (see Table I) were present and
interacted, making it necessary for the Danish firms to make a good
impression upon all parties present.

Additionally, in order to establish credibility, the two Danish firms initially
served as general advisors to potential design project clients, preparing initial
bidding specifications to be given to other architectural firms that would be
asked to submit design proposals. (On the Danish market, in contrast, the
Danish firms did not involve themselves in this initial preparatory work, as
they had the relationships contacts necessary to be asked to submit the more
lucrative design proposals.) Moreover, the Danish architectural firms showed
interest in the design/construction projects for which they had been initial
project specifications advisors after their tasks had been completed, in order
to maintain these relationships during their ``sleeping'' phase.
Search phase The above-mentioned activities can be characterized as part of the search
phase. After having generated credibility in the new milieu as part of the
search for projects, the successful Danish architectural firms also
participated in bidding and negotiations, eventually winning design projects.
In these projects, they ensured that each project phase was completed
smoothly and to the satisfaction of the purchaser, to create further client trust
and own firm credibility that would potentially endure during the phase of
the ``sleeping relationship'' (Hadjikhani, 1996). This entailed more intra-
firm cooperation than in domestic projects, as the initial phases of the project
were usually completed by employees in Denmark and then passed on to
German-born employees/Danish employees working in Germany.
Special purpose facilities Furthermore the Danish firms informed their previous German clients of
projects that they subsequently won (and, thus, of some of the special
purpose facilities they now had designed in Germany) and well as of market
changes, in order to maintain as close bonds as possible. This is illustrated by
the following statement from a partner in the large firm:
I believe that if one is loyal towards one's customer ± who after all has proved his
confidence in us [. . .], one must be just as loyal by saying to him ``Now the market
is changing and this means that we are lowering our prices'' or the opposite. [. . .]
One must do this before the customer himself discovers the changes on the market
because otherwise he may begin to speak of changes in the premises for our
cooperation.

Finally previous German clients were invited to receptions and informational
gatherings in further efforts to nurture sleeping relationships, when this was
deemed in accordance with the social rules of the German milieu.
However, as many clients only have a very intermittent need for architectural
projects, and as public sector tendering procedures encourage arm's length
relations, only a small number of German clients placed repeat orders or
considered placing repeat orders with the two Danish architectural firms,
despite their substantial relationship nurturing efforts. Nevertheless the two
firms considered each incident in which a client considered them in
subsequent projects to be a business success, because it gave them the
potential for acquiring projects without having to start the very
time-consuming and expensive process of credibility and relationship
building from scratch.
Managerial implications and suggestions for further research

Management of In this article, we have illustrated that the identification of relevant actors
relationships and management of relationships influence success in project marketing, as
work in subsequent project phases as well as subsequent project acquisitions
are facilitated by these actions. However, as highlighted in the above cases,
differences in relationships mandate variations in managerial attention. To
take a point from the Finnish-Chinese turnkey case, relationships

characterized by short-term interactions relating to minor contracting issues
during the implementation phase of one project probably do not often require
long-term attention on the part of the project marketer. On the other hand,
relationships with, for example, central financiers or customers need
different, long-term oriented attention, which involves coordination during
all project phases as well as the ``sleeping'' phase of the relationship between
individual projects, when, for example, the customer considers his potential
future demand (cf. Cova, 1998; Hadjikhani, 1996). This latter type of long-
term attention is also illustrated by the Danish-German architectural case, in
which contacts to previous customers are discretely maintained, whereas
government and civil society actors are given more intermittent attention.
From a practitioner's perspective, it is important that the issues of
relationship management in all phases of the projects as well as the
post-project ``sleeping relationship'' and credibility generation among the
relevant actors of the milieu not be overlooked. Our experience tells us that
this point cannot be stressed enough, as project marketing firms all too often
focus only upon the management of individual projects during the delivery
process and on sporadic, last moment ``pell-mell'' running after ``promising''
potential projects (cf. Mazet and Cova, 1992; Tikkanen and Lindblom,
1998).
Theoretical implications With regard to theoretical implications, to date only a few longitudinal and
contextual studies have been made of individual projects (e.g. Welch et al.,
1996; Tikkanen and Lindblom, 1998) or of the more long-term development
of relationships related to project business (e.g. Ahmed, 1993; AlajoutsijaÈrvi,
1996; Skaates, 2000). We therefore still lack general understanding of
networks dynamics and processes, i.e. how networks and relationships
develop in various situations of discontinuous, complex and differentiated
project business.
Furthermore, although institutional theory (e.g. Scott, 1995) has provided
insights into the relationship between actor representations and actor's
actions and requirements, we lack knowledge of the interplay between the
socially constructed representations, norms, and rules of the milieu (Cova

et al., 1996) and specific project-related criteria. For example, we do not
know whether the socially constructed actor representations are more
volatile in professional services projects, due to the greater percentage of
(potentially evolving) knowledge-content, and, if so, how this influences
project-related specifications. Similarly, we lack knowledge as to whether
the norms, rules, and representations change more rapidly in newer project
business areas such as software projects.
Professional service Moreover, one might intuitively expect that for professional service partial
projects in, for example, architecture, engineering, or advertising, the
relationships between the client and selling firm would take place primilarly
at the level of individuals, as one or a few specific individuals in the project
selling firms would represent the firm. In contrast, for the more complex
turnkey or turnkey plus projects, the expectation would be that the
relationship would take place at several levels of Table I. As in the FINSYS
project, many individuals would only be active in certain project phases and
formal collectives generally would play a greater role throughout the project
marketing cycle. These differences could in turn have consequences for
practitioners' project marketing efforts. For example, a given project selling
professional service firm might want to manage its relationships in such a
way as to ensure that the client perceived itself as having a relationship

to the firm, to guard itself against the situation where a departing
professional takes clients with him. Thus it is also relevant for future
research to encompass comparative studies of the levels of actor links in
varying types of projects.
A final unexplored issue is client learning processes. If clients demand
similar projects over time, they may learn from each project cycle, thus
influencing their specifications for the next project (see e.g. Lùwendahl,
2000). However little is known about the exact nature of these learning
effects in different project situations.
Further retrospective On the basis of the above research deficits, we suggest that there is a need for
further retrospective or real-time case studies that focus on the dynamic
effects between the social construction of meaning in projects at the level of
individual and multiple projects and the ``concrete'' specifications of
individual projects. Subsequent comparison of such in-depth studies could
contribute to increased understanding of the dynamics of relationships and
networks in different project marketing situations as well as the specific
needs of practitioners in these situations. This could, in turn, contribute to
rigorous institutional theory building for the specific case of project
marketing.
Notes
1. One possible exception is professional service partial projects, e.g. the supply of design,
planning, and/or engineering services.
2. To ensure anonymity, all firm names have been changed in this article.
References
Ahmed, M.M. (1993), International Marketing and Purchasing of Projects: Interactions and
Paradoxes. A Study of Finnish Project Exports to the Arab Countries, PhD dissertation,
Swedish School of Economics and Business Administration, Helsinki.
AlajoutsijaÈrvi, K. (1996), ``Rautainen pari. Kymmenen ja Valmetin suhde, laÈhiverkosto ja
makrovoimat 1948-1990'' (`À dyad made of steel. Kymmene Corporation and Valmet
Paper Machinery and their relationship, local network and macro environment
1948-1990''), PhD dissertation, JyvaÈskylaÈ Studies in Computer Science, Economics and
Statistics, University of JyvaÈskylaÈ, JyvaÈskylaÈ.

Baum, W.C. (1982), The Project Cycle, World Bank, Washington, DC.
Blomqvist, K. (1997), ``The Many Faces of Trust'', Scandinavian Journal of Management,
Vol. 13, No. 3, pp. 271-286.
Cova, B. (1998), ``Holstius' project marketing cycle: a basis for theory building in project
marketing'', in Tikkanen, H. (Ed.), Marketing and International Business. Essays in
Honour of Karin Holstius on her 65th Birthday, Turku School of Economics and Business
Administration, Turku, pp. 63-84.
Cova, B. and Ghauri, P. (1996), ``Project marketing. Between mass marketing and networks'',
Working Paper, European Seminar on Project Marketing and System Selling.
Cova, B. and Holstius, K. (1993), ``How to create competitive advantage in project business'',
Journal of Marketing Management, Vol. 9, pp. 105-21.
Cova, B., Mazet, F. and Salle, R. (1996), ``Milieu as the pertinent unit of analysis in project
marketing'', International Business Review, Vol. 5 No. 6, pp. 647-64.
GroÈnroos, C. (1997), ``Relationship marketing logic'', Asia-Australia Marketing Journal,
Vol. 4 No. 1, pp. 7-18.
Gummesson, E. (1999), Total Relationship Marketing. Rethinking Marketing Management:
From 4Ps to 30Rs, Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford.
GuÈnter, B. and Bonaccorsi, A. (1996), ``Project marketing and systems selling: in search of
frameworks and insights'', International Business Review, Vol. 5 No. 6, pp. 531-7.
Hadjikhani, A. (1996), ``Project marketing and the management of discontinuity'',
International Business Review, Vol. 5 No. 3, pp. 319-36.
Hadjikhani, A. (1998), ``Political risk for project-selling firms: turbulence in relationships

between business and non-business actors'', Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing,
Vol. 13 No. 3, pp. 235-55.
Holstius, K. (1987), Project Export, Research Report 1:1987, Lappeenranta University of
Technology, Lappeenranta.
Kosonen, H.M. (1991), The Internationalization of Industrial System Suppliers. A Case Study
of the Internationalization Process of Industrial Systems Suppliers with Special Emphasis
on Strategy and Organization, PhD dissertation, Helsinki School of Economics and
Business Administration, Helsinki.
Kvale, S. (1996), InterViews. An Introduction to Qualitative Research Interviewing, Sage,
London.
Lùwendahl, B.R. (2000), Strategic Management of Professional Service Firms, 2nd ed.
Copenhagen Business School Press, Copenhagen.
Luostarinen, R. and Welch, L. (1990), International Business Operations, Helsinki School of
Economics and Business Administration, Helsinki.
MandjaÂk, T. and Veres, Z. (1998), ``The D-U-C model and the stages of project marketing
process'', in Halinen, K. and Nummela, N. (Eds), 14th Annual IMP Conference
Proceedings, Vol. 1, Turku School of Economics and Business Administration, Turku,
pp. 471-90.
Marshall, C. and Rossman, G. (1989), Designing Qualitative Research, Sage, Newbury Park,
CA.
Mattsson, L.-G. (1973), ``Systems selling as a strategy in industrial markets'', Industrial
Marketing Management, Vol. 3, pp. 107-20.
Mazet, F. and Cova, B. (1992), ``Project marketing strategies: pell-mell or planned?'', in
Salle, R., Spencer, R. and Valla, J.P. (Eds), Proceedings of the 8th IMP Conference,
Groupe ESC Lyon, Lyon, pp. 229-49.
Salminen, R.T. (1997), ``Role of references in international industrial marketing ±
a theory-building case study about supplier's processes of utilizing references'', PhD
dissertation, Lappeenranta University of Technology, Lappeenranta.
Scott, W.R. (1995), Institutions and Organizations, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
Silverman, D. (1993), Interpreting Qualitative Data. Methods for Analysing Talk, Text, and
Interaction, Sage, London.
Skaates, M.A. (2000), ``Danish architecture sales to Germany in the 1990s: an IMP/INPM
approach to examining the professional service and project-related internationalization of
Danish architectural service firms'', PhD dissertation, Copenhagen Business School,
Copenhagen.

Tikkanen, H. (1998), ``Research on international project marketing a review and implications'',
in Tikkanen, H. (Ed.), Marketing and International Business. Essays in Honour of Karin
Holstius on her 65th Birthday, Turku School of Economics and Business Administration,
Turku, pp. 261-85.
Tikkanen, H. and Lindblom, J. (1998), `À network approach to international project
marketing. A case study of a technology transfer project to the PRC'', Working Paper
No. 11, University of Oulu, Oulu.
Webster, F.E. and Wind, Y. (1973), Organizational Buying Behavior, Prentice-Hall,
Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
Welch, D., Welch, L., Wilkinson, I. and Young, L. (1996), ``Network development in
international project marketing and the impact of external facilitation'', International
Business Review, Vol. 5 No. 6, pp. 579-602.
Yin, R. (1994), Case Study Research: Designs and Methods, Sage, Newbury Park CA.
&

This summary has been Executive summary and implications for managers and
provided to allow managers executives
and executives a rapid
appreciation of the content The need for ``total solutions''
of this article. Those with a As the products of industrial companies become increasingly complex,
particular interest in the industrial marketers have to be able to supply total solutions that include
topic covered may then read both tangible (products) and intangible (services) aspects. This development
the article in toto to take means that new emphasis is being placed on projects, project management
advantage of the more and project marketing.
comprehensive description
of the research undertaken Project marketing and project management
and its results to get the full The process of acquiring and delivering projects entails co-ordinating the
benefit of the material activities of buyers and sellers, as the details of each project are agreed
present during often-extensive interaction between the two sides. The relationships
between employees in the buying and selling firms are therefore important
before, during and after delivery. The term ``project marketing'' embraces
all this. Project marketing is a wider term than project management. It
always implicitly includes project management, but not vice versa.
The discontinuity of demand

Project marketing differs from other types of business-to-business marketing

because of:
. the discontinuity of demand for projects;
. the uniqueness of each project; and
. the complexity of each project in terms of the number of people involved
throughout the supply process.
During the course of each project, there may be substantial bonding,

dependence and mutual orientation. This, however, may not last beyond that
project. Furthermore, because each project is unique and complex, different
projects are likely to involve different people. Both these factors tend
towards discontinuity of relationships.
Individual and multiple projects

Networks and relationships in an individual project must be managed from
the project's beginning to its end. Multiple projects, in contrast, encompass
relationships during a (longer) period of multiple project activity, including
possible periods in which there are no projects.
The individual project, seen from the project-selling firm's viewpoint,
involves the following phases:
. search ± identifying project opportunities and relevant industry
developments;
. preparation ± undertaking a feasibility study, preparing for the bidding
process, establishing contacts with buyers and evaluating the
competitive situation;
. bidding ± preparing the bidding documents after receiving the invitation
to bid, and making decisions about price and use of local resources;
. negotiation ± which starts when the seller makes the preliminary offer
for the project and ends with the signing of a contract;
. implementation ± delivering and supervising the project, training the
buyer's employees and possibly creating after-sales systems;

. transition ± evaluating the project as a whole, building up knowledge for
future offerings and possibly supplying additional services to the buyer.
At the level of multiple projects, the project marketing cycle is self-renewing,

in that the sum of experiences related to a particular project is evaluated in
the transition phase for use in subsequent project activities. But discontinuity
in buyer-seller relationships is the major strategic problem at the
multiple-project level.
The sleeping relationship

A sleeping relationship is entered after the project is completed. Although
the contract-related activity is then over, there may be a bond of dependency,
social ties and trust. Project marketers should therefore focus on the
implications of a single project for subsequent project marketing efforts
during the delivery process of the project in question. They must also nurture
both sleeping and potential relationships in periods when concrete projects
are not being prepared for or competed.
The project-marketing milieu

At the level of both individual and multiple projects, the project marketer
must be aware of the project-marketing milieu, which is made up of a

network of actors, a representation constructed and shared by these actors
and a set of norms and rules regulating the interactions between the actors.
Within the milieu, project-marketing firms have to generate credibility. They
must convince other actors that they can perform what they claim they can
do, and follow the rules and norms of the milieu.
What project managers and marketers should do

Skaates et al. conclude that, in order to increase their chances of acquiring
subsequent projects, project managers and marketers should focus their
attention on:
. the management of project relationships before, during and after
projects; and
. relevant environmental factors in the project-marketing milieu instead of
using resources on sporadic or last-minute running after potential
projects.
(A preÂcis of the article ``Relationships and project marketing success''.

Supplied by Marketing Consultants for Emerald.)

This article has been cited by:
1. Paula Savolainen, Jarmo J. Ahonen, Ita Richardson. 2015. When did your project start? – The software supplier's perspective.
Journal of Systems and Software 104, 32-40. [CrossRef]
2. Ilkka Tapani Ojansivu, Kimmo Alajoutsijärvi, Jari Salo. 2015. Business relationships during project afterlife: antecedents, processes,
and outcomes. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing 30:5. . [Abstract] [PDF]
3. Ilkka Ojansivu, Kimmo Alajoutsijärvi. 2015. Inside service-intensive projects: Analyzing inbuilt tensions. International Journal of
Project Management 33, 901-916. [CrossRef]
4. Per Erik Eriksson. 2015. Partnering in engineering projects: Four dimensions of supply chain integration. Journal of Purchasing
and Supply Management 21, 38-50. [CrossRef]
5. Karlos Artto, Aku Valtakoski, Heikki Kärki. 2015. Organizing for solutions: How project-based firms integrate project and service
businesses. Industrial Marketing Management 45, 70-83. [CrossRef]
6. Jaakko Kujala, Soili Nystén-Haarala, Jouko Nuottila. 2015. Flexible contracting in project business. International Journal of
Managing Projects in Business 8:1, 92-106. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
7. Hedley Smyth, Laurence Lecoeuvre. 2015. Differences in decision-making criteria towards the return on marketing investment:
A project business perspective. International Journal of Project Management 33, 29-40. [CrossRef]
8. Paula Savolainen, Jarmo J. Ahonen. 2015. Knowledge lost: Challenges in changing project manager between sales and
implementation in software projects. International Journal of Project Management 33, 92-102. [CrossRef]
9. Thommie Allan Burström, Mattias Jacobsson, Timothy L. Wilson. 2013. Integrating service practice into project management:
a matter of “do or die”?. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business 7:1, 5-22. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
10. Tiia Vissak, Barbara Francioni. 2013. Serial nonlinear internationalization in practice: A case study. International Business Review
22, 951-962. [CrossRef]
11. Ilkka Ojansivu, Kimmo Alajoutsijärvi, Jari Salo. 2013. The development of post-project buyer–seller interaction in service-
intensive projects. Industrial Marketing Management 42, 1318-1327. [CrossRef]
12. Martin Voss, Alexander Kock. 2013. Impact of relationship value on project portfolio success — Investigating the moderating
effects of portfolio characteristics and external turbulence. International Journal of Project Management 31, 847-861. [CrossRef]
13. Tuomas Ahola, Jaakko Kujala, Teuvo Laaksonen, Kirsi Aaltonen. 2013. Constructing the market position of a project-based firm.
International Journal of Project Management 31, 355-365. [CrossRef]
14. Jaakko Aspara, Joel Hietanen, Pekka Mattila, Antti Sihvonen, Henrikki Tikkanen. 2013. Generative mechanisms in project
marketing – an agenda for inquiry. Journal of Global Scholars of Marketing Science 23, 196-212. [CrossRef]
15. Per Erik Eriksson, Ossi Pesämaa. 2013. Buyer‐supplier integration in project‐based industries. Journal of Business & Industrial
Marketing 28:1, 29-40. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
16. Tuija Mainela, Pauliina Ulkuniemi. 2013. Personal interaction and customer relationship management in project business. Journal
of Business & Industrial Marketing 28:2, 103-110. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
17. Satu Nätti, Teea Palo. 2012. Key account management in business-to-business expert organisations: an exploratory study on the
implementation process. The Service Industries Journal 32, 1837-1852. [CrossRef]
18. Cristina Mele. 2011. Conflicts and value co-creation in project networks. Industrial Marketing Management 40, 1377-1385.
[CrossRef]
19. Rui Wang, Jing Song. 2011. Business Marketing in China: Review and Prospects. Journal of Business-to-Business Marketing 18,
1-49. [CrossRef]
20. Kirsi Aaltonen, Jaakko Kujala, Päivi Lehtonen, Inkeri Ruuska. 2010. A stakeholder network perspective on unexpected events
and their management in international projects. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business 3:4, 564-588. [Abstract]
[Full Text] [PDF]
21. Anders Segerstedt, Thomas Olofsson. 2010. Supply chains in the construction industry. Supply Chain Management: An
International Journal 15:5, 347-353. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
22. Anne Jalkala, Bernard Cova, Robert Salle, Risto T. Salminen. 2010. Changing project business orientations: Towards a new logic
of project marketing. European Management Journal 28, 124-138. [CrossRef]
23. Ines Heer, Stefan Mann. 2010. Acting under spatial restrictions: success factors of German local food‐marketing networks. British
Food Journal 112:3, 285-293. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
24. Catherine L. Welch, Lawrence S. Welch. 2009. Re-internationalisation: Exploration and conceptualisation. International Business
Review 18, 567-577. [CrossRef]
25. Anne Jalkala, Risto T. Salminen. 2009. Communicating customer references on industrial companies' Web sites. Industrial
Marketing Management 38, 825-837. [CrossRef]
26. Laurence Lecoeuvre Soudain, Philippe Deshayes, Henrikki Tikkanen. 2009. Positioning of the stakeholders in the interaction
project management-project marketing: A case of a coconstructed industrial project. Project Management Journal 40:10.1002/
pmj.v40:3, 34-46. [CrossRef]
27. Tuula Lehtimäki, Henri Simula, Jari Salo. 2009. Applying knowledge management to project marketing in a demanding
technology transfer project: Convincing the industrial customer over the knowledge gap. Industrial Marketing Management 38,
228-236. [CrossRef]
28. Doina Olaru, Sharon Purchase, Nathan Peterson. 2008. From customer value to repurchase intentions and recommendations.
Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing 23:8, 554-565. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
29. Catherine L. Welch, Denice E. Welch, Marja Tahvanainen. 2008. Managing the HR dimension of international project operations.
The International Journal of Human Resource Management 19, 205-222. [CrossRef]
30. Karlos Artto, Kirsi Eloranta, Jaakko Kujala. 2008. Subcontractors' business relationships as risk sources in project networks.
International Journal of Managing Projects in Business 1:1, 88-105. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
31. Jaakko Kujala, Jarkko Murtoaro, Karlos Artto. 2007. A negotiation approach to project sales and implementation. Project
Management Journal 38, 33-44. [CrossRef]

32. Jarkko Murtoaro, Jaakko Kujala. 2007. Project negotiation analysis. International Journal of Project Management 25, 722-733.
[CrossRef]
33. Henrikki Tikkanen, Jaakko Kujala, Karlos Artto. 2007. The marketing strategy of a project-based firm: The Four Portfolios
Framework. Industrial Marketing Management 36, 194-205. [CrossRef]
34. Florence Crespin-Mazet, Pervez Ghauri. 2007. Co-development as a marketing strategy in the construction industry. Industrial
Marketing Management 36, 158-172. [CrossRef]
35. Bernard Cova, Robert Salle. 2007. Introduction to the IMM special issue on ‘Project marketing and the marketing of solutions’
A comprehensive approach to project marketing and the marketing of solutions. Industrial Marketing Management 36, 138-146.
[CrossRef]
36. Marjorie J. Cooper, Charlene Spoede Budd. 2007. Tying the pieces together: A normative framework for integrating sales and
project operations. Industrial Marketing Management 36, 173-182. [CrossRef]
37. Rajesh Kumar, U. Srinivasa Rangan, Carlos Rufín. 2005. Negotiating complexity and legitimacy in independent power project
development. Journal of World Business 40, 302-320. [CrossRef]
38. Gary L. Simon. 2005. The Case for Non-Technical Client Relationship Managers in B2B Professional Services Firms. Services
Marketing Quarterly 26, 1-18. [CrossRef]
39. Catherine Welch. 2005. Multilateral organisations and international project marketing. International Business Review 14, 289-305.
[CrossRef]
40. Maria Anne Skaates, Bernard CovaMARKETING INDUSTRIAL PROJECT-RELATED SERVICES
INTERNATIONALLY: A MULTI-LINGUAL LITERATURE REVIEW 149-174. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] [PDF]

Relationships and Project Marketing Success (2002)

Hochgeladen von

Dokumentinformationen

Originaltitel

Copyright

Verfügbare Formate

Dieses Dokument teilen

Dokument teilen oder einbetten

Freigabeoptionen

Stufen Sie dieses Dokument als nützlich ein?

Sind diese Inhalte unangemessen?

Copyright:

Verfügbare Formate

Relationships and Project Marketing Success (2002)

Hochgeladen von

Copyright:

Verfügbare Formate

Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing

Relationships and project marketing success

*Related content and download information correct at time of download.

Keywords International business, Networks, Projects, Marketing

The research register for this journal is available at

project acquisition and delivery process. Third, the case of Danish

Projects and the project marketing process

390 JOURNAL OF BUSINESS & INDUSTRIAL MARKETING, VOL. 17 NO. 5 2002

D. the discontinuity of demand for projects;

JOURNAL OF BUSINESS & INDUSTRIAL MARKETING, VOL. 17 NO. 5 2002 391

activity and resource ties, but possibly with bonds of after-market

392 JOURNAL OF BUSINESS & INDUSTRIAL MARKETING, VOL. 17 NO. 5 2002

Table I. Potentially relevant project marketing milieu actors

Relationship management within a single project: the FinSys case

The scanning phase

JOURNAL OF BUSINESS & INDUSTRIAL MARKETING, VOL. 17 NO. 5 2002 393

Figure 1. The project network in the scanning phase

The bidding phase

The negotiation phase

394 JOURNAL OF BUSINESS & INDUSTRIAL MARKETING, VOL. 17 NO. 5 2002

Figure 2. The project network in the bidding phase

The implementation phase

JOURNAL OF BUSINESS & INDUSTRIAL MARKETING, VOL. 17 NO. 5 2002 395

Figure 3. The project network in the negotiation phase

The transition phase

396 JOURNAL OF BUSINESS & INDUSTRIAL MARKETING, VOL. 17 NO. 5 2002

Figure 4. The project network in the implementation phase

JOURNAL OF BUSINESS & INDUSTRIAL MARKETING, VOL. 17 NO. 5 2002 397

Figure 5. The project network in the transition phase

398 JOURNAL OF BUSINESS & INDUSTRIAL MARKETING, VOL. 17 NO. 5 2002

perspective, the lack of an individual coordinating actor throughout the entire

project supply process made FINSYS' development of credibility in the

Relationship management across projects: Danish architectural firms in

JOURNAL OF BUSINESS & INDUSTRIAL MARKETING, VOL. 17 NO. 5 2002 399

impression upon all parties present.

400 JOURNAL OF BUSINESS & INDUSTRIAL MARKETING, VOL. 17 NO. 5 2002

Managerial implications and suggestions for further research

take a point from the Finnish-Chinese turnkey case, relationships

JOURNAL OF BUSINESS & INDUSTRIAL MARKETING, VOL. 17 NO. 5 2002 401

way as to ensure that the client perceived itself as having a relationship

402 JOURNAL OF BUSINESS & INDUSTRIAL MARKETING, VOL. 17 NO. 5 2002

Hadjikhani, A. (1998), ``Political risk for project-selling firms: turbulence in relationships

JOURNAL OF BUSINESS & INDUSTRIAL MARKETING, VOL. 17 NO. 5 2002 403

404 JOURNAL OF BUSINESS & INDUSTRIAL MARKETING, VOL. 17 NO. 5 2002

The discontinuity of demand

Project marketing differs from other types of business-to-business marketing

During the course of each project, there may be substantial bonding,

Individual and multiple projects

JOURNAL OF BUSINESS & INDUSTRIAL MARKETING, VOL. 17 NO. 5 2002 405

At the level of multiple projects, the project marketing cycle is self-renewing,

The sleeping relationship

The project-marketing milieu

must be aware of the project-marketing milieu, which is made up of a

What project managers and marketers should do

(A preÂcis of the article ``Relationships and project marketing success''.

406 JOURNAL OF BUSINESS & INDUSTRIAL MARKETING, VOL. 17 NO. 5 2002

Management Journal 38, 33-44. [CrossRef]

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen