Sie sind auf Seite 1von 2

"What is the meaning of ‘Everlasting Father’ in Isaiah 9:6?


Answer: “For to us a child is born, to us a son is given; and the government shall be upon his
shoulder, and his name shall be called Wonderful Counselor, Mighty God, Everlasting Father,
Prince of Peace” (Isaiah 9:6, ESV).

In context, this verse is proclaiming the redemption of Israel and the activities, titles, and
blessings of the Messiah who is to rule the earth and usher in a reign of blessing and peace
that will have no end. One of His titles is “Everlasting Father.”

The Hebrew phrase translated “Everlasting Father” could be translated literally “Father of
Eternity.” For this reason, some have suggested that the title means that this coming Messiah
is also the creator of everything: He is the father of time and eternity, the “architect of the
ages.” While we know this to be true from the New Testament (John 1:1–3, Colossians 1:16–
17), that is not the emphasis in Isaiah. In the Hebrew construction of the phrase, father is the
primary noun, andeverlasting (ESV, NIV, KJV) or eternal (NASB) is the term that describes His
fatherhood. He is Father forever.

The Hebrew word translated “everlasting” has the idea of “in perpetuity” or “without end.”
Indeed, the next verse says of the Messiah, “Of the greatness of his government and peace
there will be no end” (Isaiah 9:7). The emphasis is forward looking, so “everlasting” is
probably a better translation than “eternal,” which not only indicates “without end” but also
“without beginning.” (Again, from the New Testament we may argue that the Messiah is
without beginning, but that is not the emphasis of this term in Isaiah.)

So, as the Everlasting Father, the Messiah will be a father, and His fatherhood will be without
end. Some have objected that this designation as father seems to confuse the roles within
the Trinity, calling “Father” the one who is really “the Son.” Some in the Oneness
movement use this verse as a proof text to show that Jesus really is the Father and that there
is only a Unity, not a Trinity. In both cases, the interpreters are reading New Testament
concerns back into the Old Testament. Neither Trinitarian nor anti-Trinitarian concerns are
being discussed inIsaiah 9:6.

Many rulers in ancient times were considered “father of the country.” Americans who read
this term might immediately think of George Washington who is called “the father of his
country.” It was Washington’s determination and leadership that lead to victory in the
Revolutionary War and his support of a strong national government that led (at least in part)
to ratification of the U.S. Constitution. Without Washington, the United States might not
exist today, or it might exist with a far different form of government. However, if some of
the interpretations discussed so far are guilty of reading New Testament theological concerns
into Isaiah in an anachronistic fashion, using George Washington as an interpretive clue to the
meaning of the phrase is also anachronistic. The most appropriate analogy is far more

In ancient times, the “father of the nation” was viewed in much the same way as the father
of a family. It was the father who was to protect and provide for his children. In the same
way, this Child to be born will become a king who will be a father to the children of Israel—
He will protect and provide for them. And His role as protector and provider will not be
limited by aging or death. His role as father (protector and provider) will continue in
perpetuity. Just how this will come about is not revealed in Isaiah’s prophecy. The full
identity of the Messiah—that He is God in the flesh, the second Person of the Trinity who
would protect and provide for His people by His death and resurrection on their behalf; and
that Gentiles could also be grafted into the family of Israel—may be hinted at in Isaiah, but
God’s people would have to wait almost 700 years to see the Messiah revealed in the
“fullness of time” (seeGalatians 4:4).