Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Hailey David
Freedom of the press is protected by the First Amendment which was adopted on
December 15th, 1791 as part of the Bill of Rights (History, 2017). The ideals for free press
were first published in Cato’s Letters. The letters were essays written by John Trenchard
and Thomas Gordon that criticized British politics. They were first published under the
pseudonym of Cato sometime in the 1720’s. Letter fifteen contained the quote “Freedom
of speech is the great bulwark of liberty; they prosper and die together.” (G. Galles, 2003).
protection for or against something.” In other words, the writers of Cato’s letters believed
that freedom of speech protected liberty which we’ll explore more in this paper.
Perhaps the biggest pro of freedom of press is keeping the government in check
North Korea is a great example of this. In North Korea, “all reporting that is not
2016). In North Korea, listening to “unauthorized foreign broadcasts” actually carries the
punishment of hard labor, a prison sentence, or even the death penalty. North Korea is so
determined to prevent their citizens from hearing other sources of news that they’re
willing to kill their own people over it. It makes you question what they are trying to hide.
As outsiders, many of us know very well that North Korea routinely lies to it’s citizens.
If we were to follow in North Korea’s footsteps and only allow Americans to listen
to government-controlled news stations, we could very well be in the same place. Every
American president would have appreciated only being able to share their version of the
news. They wouldn’t have to worry about speculations of their actions because it simply
wouldn’t be allowed. We wouldn’t know the entire truth about what happens in our own
Running head: FREEDOM OF THE PRESS
country’s borders. U.S. Supreme Court Justice Hugo Black said, "The press was to serve
President Donald Trump has coined the term “fake news”. He particularly enjoys
using the term when a news story comes out that doesn’t work in his favor. I see the term
“fake news” all the time in the comment sections of news stations. These comments are
usually left by people that seem to report Donald Trump. The funny thing is, I see these
comments on reputable news sources such as CNN and Fox. If we were to get rid of
freedom of the press this would become even more prevalent. Reporters wouldn’t be able
to ever say anything bad about President Trump and a lot of his actions wouldn’t be made
public because he simply wouldn’t want us to know about it. Giving this type of control to
the government is just a bad idea, no matter who is President. We need to know the whole
truth, both sides of the argument and not just what our government wants us to hear.
Another positive part of freedom of the press is it allows us to make our own
decisions. If our news sources were controlled by the government, we would have very
biased elections. For example, President Obama did not support Donald Trump when he
was running for president. If President Obama had control of the press he could have
made sure only the bad information about Donald Trump was made available while only
show casing the good of Hillary Clinton. Because of freedom of the press we were able to
hear the good and bad of not just those two candidates but also of other, third party
candidates. We were able to weigh our options and ultimately elected the candidate that
the majority of the country supported. Using North Korea as an example again, they
certainly don’t get to vote and choose the leader of their country, but they also don’t get to
Freedom of the press not only makes the actions of political candidates public, but
it also holds them accountable for their actions. Because of freedom of press we were able
to learn about the actions of Anthony Weiner and prevent him from becoming more
involved in our government. We were able to impeach eight of our presidents and hold
them accountable for harming our country. We should be able to know all about our
country as possible and we simply wouldn’t have that if we didn’t have freedom of the
press.
Whistle Blowers are another example of our government being unable to hide
secrets. Do you think North Korea has whistle blowers that leak government secrets to
their press? No, because even if a whistle blower were to leak information the government
would be able to prevent that information from becoming public. In our government we
have had people expose secrets of the government for worse or for better. It gives us a
sense of transparency, that not everything is how it seems. It’s less likely for our
government to cover up wrong doings. Even the tragedy of 9/11, while we have no
definitive proof if it was Osama Bin Laden, another terrorist group, or even our own
president that initiated the attack, we have the ability to speculate and gather evidence and
decide for ourselves who we believe. If our government did attack those people, we have
the opportunity to learn about it and prevent it from happening again. It’s a luxury that
many other people don’t have. North Korea isn’t able to impeach its leader or make
decisions to keep it’s citizens safer. They are led to believe everything they’re told
because they don’t have any other option, they don’t have any other sources of
information and until they do they are stuck where they are.
Running head: FREEDOM OF THE PRESS
Freedom of the press allows us to see the pros and cons of everything, not just our
own government. Tobacco and drug companies can promote their products nearly
however they want but we can also learn about why smoking cigarettes or taking narcotics
are bad for us. We can choose how we want to live rather than being told. Not only can I
choose if I want to smoke but also what I want to smoke. Nowadays there are different
brands of cigarettes, vapes, and even different strains of marijuana. I can learn as much
about these substances as possible. Even though these substances can be harmful, I have
According to Ted.com, The United States ranks number 43 out of 180 countries on
the World Press Freedom Index. We may think we have a free press but there are 42
countries ahead of us including Ghana, South Africa, Jamaica and several other third
world countries. There are also 137 countries with worse press freedom than us. While we
have a long way to go we are very lucky to have the freedoms that we do have. Syria is
ranked 177, Iran is 165, and North Korea is 180. We’ve had major conflicts with these
three countries. Imagine how much information about them we have compared to their
own citizens? We should consider ourselves lucky to be able to hold our government
accountable and make our own decisions. It’s something many of us take for granted but
it’s an important part of our life. There are still many countries out there who are
punished, even by death, just for speaking their mind and giving their own opinion. There
are places in this world where even this paper wouldn’t be allowed. We should be grateful
to even be able to have this debate because it’s something many people in this world are
still fighting to achieve. It’s an important part of our life, without freedom of the press
Sources
2017 World Press Freedom Index | Reporters Without Borders. (n.d.). Retrieved from
https://rsf.org/en/ranking
K. (2003, October 20). Cato's Letters on Liberty and Property | Gary Galles. Retrieved from
https://mises.org/library/catos-letters-liberty-and-property
https://www.history.com/topics/freedom-of-the-press
https://www.history.com/topics/impeachment-in-us-history
press/2016/north-korea
Why freedom of the press is more important now than ever. (2017, August 18). Retrieved from
https://ideas.ted.com/why-freedom-of-the-press-is-more-important-now-than-ever/