Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Thomas Starr
Ben Henderson
CAS 138
13 April 2018
Intro
Stan Brock was living with the Wapishana Indians in Guyana, South America, when the idea
of Remote Area Medical (or RAM) popped into his mind. Having suffered a minor injury while
there, he soon started to realize how many of the people around him were dying from things that
could have been easily treated in any first world hospitals. Because the closest hospital to him
was a 26 day journey away, many of those he was living with would never be able to get
treatment for even the most basic medical needs. After he left Guyana, Brock made it his own
personal goal to tackle this problem head on. Years later, Brock founded RAM in 1985. Since
then, RAM has been providing free medical services to inaccessible areas throughout the world
(ramusa.org, 2018). However, RAM does not just serve the inaccessible areas of third world
countries, but actually aim to serve inaccessible areas of the United States. By creating what are
known as temporary “mobile medical clinics,” RAM has been able to serve thousands in states
such as Texas, Virginia, West Virginia, Ohio, Louisiana, Oklahoma, New Mexico, Tennessee,
and Florida. With the help of volunteers and doctors from the community, as well as from
surrounding states, these clinics have been very successful in providing medical services to those
who may not normally have access to or be able to afford them (ramusa.org, 2018).
Starr 2
The Problem
Despite the number of states that RAM already serves, Pennsylvania is simply inaccessible
due to some legislative hurdles. In fact, there are plenty of doctors from surrounding states who
are willing to volunteer, but due to the legislative complications, much more time and money is
required of these doctors to do so. This becomes a problem for RAM because as mentioned in an
article written by John Ross, a reporter who interviewed Stan Brock, some RAM clinics gain
60% of their doctor volunteers from the surrounding states (Ross, 2013). If there were enough
doctors in Pennsylvanian alone, this may not be an issue, but as explained by the Hospital and
barriers, there are “significant health professional shortages” (The Hospital and Healthsystem
Association of Pennsylvania, 2017). As a result, providing services through the mobile medical
clinics becomes a much more complicated process. As it currently stands, in order to obtain a
Pennsylvania medical license, one must not only pass the Pennsylvania Board Exam, but must
also go through an application process that may take up to 2-3 months to complete (Medical
Licensure Group, 2016). Having to go through procedures like this make it very difficult for
Solution
With the current policies that are enforced in Pennsylvania, it seems that being able to run
one of RAM’s mobile medical clinics in the inaccessible areas of the state may be impossible.
The current insurance and liability laws also add a lot of strain on the out-of-state doctors who
may wish to volunteer. However, if more specific policies are implemented, those who are most
vulnerable in our society can receive the care they so desperately need. In fact, Tennessee once
Starr 3
faced the very same issue and has since then resolved it by passing what is known as the
[The act] provides a certain level of immunity for volunteer physicians who provide
this statute.
Lee goes on to describe how the bill also protects doctors from being liable for “Civic
Damage” granted that is was not committed with “gross negligence or willful misconduct” (Lee,
2014). If a similar policy is implemented in Pennsylvania, then out-of-state doctors would easily
be able to volunteer in services like RAM, but would also still be required to go through the
normal licensing process in order to open a practice or make a living within the state.
The benefits that come with implementing a policy like Tennessee's “Volunteer Healthcare
Services Act” is that it would not require a mass amount of changes to policies already in place
within Pennsylvania's “medical licensing world”. To elaborate, this bill targets a very specific
situation and may almost be considered an official exception to the current Pennsylvanian
policies. This “specific situation” is actually outlined within the bill itself and clarifies that
doctors with out-of-state licenses may only provide their services at free clinics (Lee, 2014). The
bill goes even further by outlining that a “free clinic” qualifies as “a not for profit, out-patient,
non-hospital facility in which a health care provider engages in the voluntary provision of health
Starr 4
care services to patients without charge to the recipient or a third party” (Lee, 2014). With that
said, it actually seems it would be fairly simple to implement a bill like this into Pennsylvania's
legislature. The bill itself would only be affecting a very small percentage of actual licensing
cases. And despite affecting only a small number of these licensing cases, passing this policy
would help hundreds of underserved patients across Pennsylvania’s most underserved regions.
In addition to being very feasible to implement, any obstacles that may arise from trying to
implement this change would be worth it compared to the benefits it would provide. As Stan
Brock has said, “RAM is the way that I have kept my promise” (ramusa.org, 2018). With the
implementation of this bill, his promise to provide basic medical services to those in need will be
extended to those living in Pennsylvania. And for as long as RAM has been operating, being able
to utilize the services they provide is something that is extremely valuable to the people who
need it. As described in an article by Ariel Leve, many of the patients that showed up at a clinic
in Tennessee waited in line for hours so that they would be sure to get a ticket to enter. In fact,
many even sleep overnight in their cars because of how important is it for them to be served.
Sometimes patients even have to be turned away because there is just not enough time in the day
to serve all that show up (Leve, 2016). Therefore, it seems the underserved people in PA will
certainly benefit from this bill like everyone else does in other states. Unfortunately, none of
these services will be available in Pennsylvania if a bill similar to the “Volunteer Healthcare
While being able to get the free medical services that RAM provides, having this policy
passed will also cut down on the amount of travel needed to reach these clinics. One of RAM’s
main goals is to provide free and quality medical services, but in order to reach these
communities in need, it’s very important that the people in these communities are able to reach
the actual clinic to get these services. Yes, there are currently RAM clinics serving communities
in states surrounding Pennsylvania, but in many cases, going to these would take days of
planning. Patients may even have to book rooms in hotels or motels, which may not be an option
to some families due to money restrictions. What use would the free clinic be if no one could
afford the time or money necessary to reach it? Fortunately, if Pennsylvania had something like
Tennessee's own Volunteer Healthcare Services Act, the amount of doctors necessary to run a
clinic would be met, and these clinics could be run right in the Pennsylvanian communities that
Disaster Relief
Another benefit that comes from having a policy like the Volunteer Healthcare Services Act,
is that in the cases of natural disasters, it may allow out-of-state doctors to help much sooner in
Pennsylvania than the current policy allows. According to a survey and report conducted by Lori
Boyajian-O’Neill (DO), Lindsey Gronewold (MS), and Alan Glaros (PhD), under the context
that a natural disaster has occured in Pennsylvania out-of-state doctors can go through an
accelerated licensing process (Boyajian-O’Neil, 2008). As mentioned prior though, with a policy
such as the Volunteer Healthcare Services Act, this even shortened process could be by-passed
completely, allowing doctors to provide their services as soon as they possibly can.
Starr 6
Despite the number of benefits that come with a policy like this, there may be some groups or
organizations that would be against it. As explained by Michael Ollove, a writer for The Pew
Charitable Trusts, the reason many states do not allow reciprocal license (which are similar to
driver's license in that they are valid no matter what state your in) is because each state likes
being able to create their own regulations for this process (Ollove, 2015). In Pennsylvania
specifically, detractors for a Volunteer Healthcare Services Act may come from the people and
or organizations that set the qualifications (and therefore the fees) for gaining a license to
practice medicine within the state. By adopting a policy like this, they may feel their means to
revenue may be attacked. Understandably, this is a valid reason why these organizations may
fear the new policy. However, when considering what percentage of revenue would be lost from
this, there may not be a significant loss at all. Since free clinics, like RAM, only operate once or
twice a year in a particular state, the amount of times that out-of-state doctors would be
bypassing Pennsylvania’s license fees would be very minimal. Additionally, if RAM is a main
reason these out-of-state doctors would be crossing the state lines in the first place, then it is
unlikely that the licensing organizations would notice any significant change in their revenue at
all.
Closing
In conclusion, a policy like Tennessee’s Volunteer Healthcare Services Act should most
certainly be implemented in Pennsylvania. With this policy, organizations like RAM would be
able to recruit the amount of out-of-state doctors needed to run a free clinic. These clinics would
go on to serve basic medical needs to the underserved rural areas of Pennsylvania, and would be
Starr 7
a great value to the patients who have those needs. This policy would not require a large number
of current laws to be changed due to how specific of an area and context it affects. In addition to
all this, allowing out-of-state doctors to volunteer freely in Pennsylvania would not be straining
any of the current organizations in the state that make their money off of the normal licensing
procedures. Once this policy is in place, I believe thousands of underserved people will be able
to finally have access to and afford medical attention they need, and will continue to utilize these
Works Cited
Boyajian-O’Neill LA, Gronewold LM, Glaros AG, Elmore AM. Physician Licensure
During Disasters: A National Survey of State Medical Boards. Retrieved April 2, 2018
from https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/1149358
Lee, J. (2014, August 10). Volunteer Doctors who Provide Free Services Under the
Volunteer Healthcare Services Act are Not Liable for Medical Malpractice
http://www.tennesseedefenselitigation.com/BlogEntry.aspx?id=171
Leve, A. (2016). Saint Stan Brock: Who Are You? Retrieved April 3, 2018, from
http://www.ariel-leve.com/all-articles/sunday-times-magazine/features/saint-stan-
brock-who-are-you/
license.shtml
Ollove, M. (2011, December 15). Make Doctor’s Licenses Like Driver’s Licenses?
arch-and-analysis/blogs/stateline/2015/12/11/make-doct
ors-licenses-like-drivers-licenses-medical-groups-say-no
about/
Starr 9
http://www.aaem.org/UserFiles/Jan-Feb14MOLawmakers.pdf
Access Hospitals: Key To Rural Health Care. Retrieved April 2, 2018, from
https://www.haponline.org/Portals/0/docs/Reports-FactSheets/Critical-Access-Ho
spitals-Key-to-Rural-Health-Care-April2017.pdf?ver=2017-05-23-084551-487