Sie sind auf Seite 1von 3

“AS-IS” PROCESS DETAILS Company : ETPL

Process Name : Process # Page 1 of 3


Vendor :MM/PURC/10
Upgradation TPM
(Way)

Description of Process

Implementation of TPM at Vendor end (Vendor Upgradation by TPM methodology)

This Process is preceded by which process & what is the Triggering activity

1.Realizing need of vendor up-gradation in terms of Quality, Delivery etc

2. Triggering activity ( Input) is ,


a) Quality issues in supplied components ( Customer complaints, warranty )
b) Inferior Deliver performance
c) Issues in Material Handling (Packing standard)
d) Incidences of Line stoppages / material shortages

This Process is followed by which process and triggers which activity, if any

Identification/selection of vendors for implementation of TPM based on defined criteria

Documents
Name of the input Frequency Owner Format Encl (Ref)
Vendor 1.Trend of Supplier Quality (PPM)
1.Supplier Quality Monthly TPM cell 2.No. of line stoppages at Endurance
performance 3.Delivery Performance/adherence in %
2.Delivery 4.No.of short supply incidences
Input Performance
3.Line stoppage
incidences
4.Issues in
material handling

Output Name of the


Frequency Owner Format Encl (Ref)
Output
Vendor Monthly Progress Report attached
1. Improved TPM cell
Quality
Performance of
Vendor Parts.
2.Improved
Delivery
Performance
“AS-IS” PROCESS DETAILS Company : ETPL
Process Name : Process # Page 2 of 3
Vendor :MM/PURC/10
Upgradation TPM
(Way)

Authorization Details

Criteria for Decision Within the Process

Customer complaint (PPM), Line stoppages, Delivery performance data


Time Taken in the Process (If possible note down time taken for various steps)

Statutory Requirements
NIL

Pain Areas / Concerns / Bottle-Necks (list from Major Pain areas to Minor Pain areas)

1. Poor Sustenance of Improvements require system help for tracking


2. No linkage of Supplier Quality, Delivery performance with SOB , Plan for new development
3.No method available in system for tracking delivery performance in terms of Daily / Weekly /
Monthly schedule adherence
4.No system To track & analyze vendorwise plant wise Quality performance (PPM) ,Defect
phenomenon

Process Improvement Opportunities

Manual Operations
All reports are being made manually

Reports & Data


Report Name of the Purpose Owner Storage Storage Format Encl (Ref)
Report Method Locatio
n
progress Vendor wise TPM Progress Vendor Soft copy Vendor Attached
Report progress Report Tracking TPM cell TPM cell
office
“AS-IS” PROCESS DETAILS Company : ETPL
Process Name : Process # Page 3 of 3
Vendor :MM/PURC/10
Upgradation TPM
(Way)

AS-IS Process Flow Chart

Phase wise selection of vendors Selection criteria:-


based on selection criteria Ph.1:-Component criticality, Quality issues
& spend
Ph.2:-Quality issues & spends
Ph.3:-C class component & less spend
Initiation meeting with CEO/Owners
for explaining the need of TPM.

TPM awareness & other need based training


to Vendors

Fortnightly visit, guidence & audits of

interest & Our strategy


supplier site in line with Ph.1 activity plan
Based on vendor

Publishing monthly progress report based


on the progress observed during visits & as
per targets for different progress indicators
IF Not Satisfactory

Review &
Monthly Progress audit by Task Force
reduce
SOB and
stop new
Review & revision in SOB, new developme
development plans as per progress report &
time to time guideline by SBU Heads,
DGM (P), DGM (Q) & AGM (P)

QM Module
Quarterly progress review by TPM
Secretariat

Track the progress for Quality & TPM


Award

Declaration of Quality & TPM awards

Distribution of Quality & TPM awards in


Vendor meet.

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen