Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
: A New Estimation Model of the Lightning Shielding Performance of Transmission Lines Using a Fractal Approach
ABSTRACT
The path of the lightning discharge shows characteristics of branching and tortuosity,
and the lightning shielding failure of the transmission line also has statistical features.
In this paper, an improved leader progression model using a fractal approach is
introduced, which considers both the deterministic and stochastic features of the
downward lightning leader. Based on the proposed model, the statistical features of
lightning shielding failure on transmission lines will be analyzed. First, the fractal
dimensions of the downward lightning trajectory in simulation are calculated and the
value of breakdown probability constant η will be determined based on the fractal
dimensions of natural lightning. Second, using the proposed model the shielding failure
probability contour around the transmission line space is also obtained and used to
describe the shielding failure zone and then the contour curve is applied to analyzing
the characteristics of transmission lines that suffer from direct lightning strokes.
Moreover, a method to estimate the lightning shielding failure rate of transmission lines
is put forward, and the influence of the line height and the shielding angle of ground
wires on the shielding failure rate of transmission lines are also investigated.
Index Terms — LPM, fractal approach, estimation method, shielding failure, UHV
transmission line.
and others believed that the striking distance was not only proposed model is also put forward to estimate the lightning
related to the lightning current, but also related to the height of shielding performance of transmission lines.
grounded objects, and they proposed the improved EGM.
EGM and Eriksson’s improved EGM can calculate the choice 2 BASIC PRINCIPLES OF THE
of shielding angle of the transmission line under different line ESTIMATION MODEL
parameters and topographies, so they are widely used in
lightning protection design of transmission lines. However, in The proposed model is developed on the basis of the
[9-14], it is shown that the actual shielding failure number of conventional LPM. According to LPM theory, the direct
large-sized transmission lines is larger than the calculated lightning striking process on transmission lines can be divided
results of EGM and Eriksson’s improved EGM. In the 1990s, into four stages, as shown in Figure 1. First, the downward
based on the observation and research on long air gap lightning leader propagates vertically from the cloud bottom. At
discharges in the laboratory, Dallera and Garbagnati [6], Rizk the same time, since there are many charges in the lightning
[7] and others put forward the LPM for lightning shielding channel, the electric field intensity is also increased around the
failure analysis. LPM gives an initial description of the whole lines and the earth. As the downward lightning leader
direct lightning striking process on a transmission line from a propagates towards the earth, the induced electric field intensity
physical perspective. The model uses a mathematical approach around the lines and the earth also continuously increases.
to describe the initial upward leaders, the leader progression While the downward lightning leader propagates to a critical
and the final jump. It also introduces the lateral distance and height, due to the effect of the increased electric field,
shielding failure width, which provide an effective method to continuous upward leaders are produced from the surface of the
estimate the lightning shielding performance of transmission phase conductors and the ground wires. The upward and the
lines and to analyze lightning shielding failures. However, downward leaders continue to propagate in the space. At this
LPM assumes the leader propagates in the direction of time, the electric field intensity between the upward and the
maximum electric field intensity. In other words, it only downward leaders, and the electric field intensity between the
considers the deterministic factors in the lightning leader downward lightning leader and the ground continuously grow.
progression and ignores the influence of leader branches on When the electric field intensity in the gap between leaders is
the spatial distribution of the electric field intensity. This high enough, a final jump will occur. There are thus several
simplification influences the determination of the stroke object. factors influencing the direct lightning strike process: the
If LPM can consider the stochastic features of lightning leader distribution of charge in downward leaders, the initial criterion
progression, its simulation process will be closer to the natural of continuous upward leaders, the progressing rules of leaders
lightning strike process. and the criterion of the final jump. In this section the setting of
Recently, many researchers use the fractal approach to these criteria in the proposed model are discussed.
model the observed paths of lightning discharges [15-20]. The
photographed data of natural lightning discharge reveals that
the lightning leader has an obvious effect of branching and
tortuosity, which can be described by fractal mathematics.
Kawasaki and Matsuura [15], and Tsonis and Elsner [16] were
the first to use the fractal approach to simulate the lightning
trajectory. Then Petrov and Petrova [17] use the fractal
approach to model the lightning channel and to research the
probability of direct lightning strikes to buildings. However,
the lightning shielding model of transmission lines is not a
simple lightning trajectory simulation. It is also different from
lightning protection of buildings. The occurrence of a
lightning shielding failure is also affected by the competition
of upward leaders from the ground wires and the phase
conductors. The upward initial process of a horizontal
conductor is different from the upward initial process of
buildings. Therefore, the above models using the fractal
approach cannot be used directly in the research on lightning
shielding performance of transmission lines.
The leader progression is not only deterministic, but also
stochastic, with the phenomena of branching or tortuosity in the
progressing process. The influences of these stochastic factors
should not be ignored in the estimation of lightning shielding
performance of transmission lines. Therefore, in the present Figure 1. The direct lightning strike process on transmission lines.
study based on the fractal features of the lightning discharge, the
basic theory of LPM is combined with fractal theory, in which The proposed model simulates the downward lightning
the deterministic factors and stochastic factors in downward leader using the fractal approach from the initial start of an
lightning leaders are considered. A method based on the upward leader. That is, the proposed model assumes that when
1714 J. Li et al.: A New Estimation Model of the Lightning Shielding Performance of Transmission Lines Using a Fractal Approach
an upward leader has not yet started on ground objects, the The height of the cloud HC is set at 2.5 km in this paper [21].
lightning leader propagates vertically from a cloud towards the For the main lightning channel, when the height of the leader
ground, and the leader channel has no fractal features. Once an is HC, the line charge density τ=0; when the height of the
upward leader has started on ground objects, the fractal leader tip is H0, the line charge density τ=τmax, with τmax as the
approach can be used to simulate the upward and the largest line charge density. Then according to the linear
downward leaders, and to study the direct lightning strike distribution, the total volume of charge will be [21]
process to transmission lines. Such simplification is based on (H H0 )
the following two reasons: (a) The simulation of the proposed QT max C Q0 (2)
2
model does not start from the lightning leader's initial where Q0 (C) is the charge inside the leader tip, which can be
progression from cloud bottom, because when the lightning obtained by [21]:
leader tip propagates from the cloud bottom to the height
Q0 2 r0 2 EB (3)
Hi ,which is the height of the lightning leader tip at the upward
leader initial moment, the stochastic feature of its position will where ε is the dielectric constant of air; r0 is the radius (m) of
increase the stochastic feature of the lightning shielding failure the lightning leader tip, can be set as 6m [25]; and EB (kV/m)
probability, which is unfavorable for the research on factors is the critical electric field intensity for propagation of the
influencing the transmission line’s lightning shielding leader. For positive lightning, EB can be set as 500 kV/m, and
performance. (b) The existing lightning shielding models for negative lightning, EB is set as 1000 kV/m [17].
generally assume that when an upward leader has not been Therefore, the line charge density inside the main channel
generated, the ground and the earthed objects have very small of lightning will be [21]
influence on the progression of the downward lightning leader. m 2(QT Q0 )
( h) ( H C h) ( H C h) (4)
This influence is so small that it can be ignored, and the HC H0 ( H C H 0 )2
downward lightning leader propagates downward randomly. where τ(h) (C/m) is the charge intensity inside the lightning
So, on any horizontal level above the height Hi, the leader.
distributions of lightning density are the same. Therefore this For the fractal lightning leader, the line charge density
simplification will not affect the estimation result of shielding inside the lightning branch is taken to be uniform distribution
failure rate. and is given by:
HC
2.1 THE CHARGE DISTRIBUTION IN DOWNWARD QT Q0 (h) dh
LEADERS F
Hi
ambient field necessary for the upward leader continuous the probability to have a discharge is very low and even zero.
inception, of which the critical radius is the one required to This phenomenon confirms that in the progression of lightning
initiate a direct corona-to-leader transition [6]. Dellera et al [6] leaders, the ionization in air has stochastic features, and it is
believe that for the conductor-plane configuration, when the also controlled by the distribution of electric field in space.
conductor radius is larger than the critical radius, the criterion The proposed model uses the DBM to simulate the trajectory
for the initiation of the continuous upward leader is the same of the leader. The calculation process of the fractal leader
as the criterion for corona onset. When the conductor radius is progression is shown in Figure 2 and the procedure is
smaller than the critical radius, the upward leader continuous described as follows:
inception criterion is obtained by calculating the conductor Step:1 Discretize the space and set the initial fixed particles,
corona inception criterion under critical radius [6]. Therefore, which are also called seeds, at the tips of the downward
the critical initial electric intensity can be obtained from the leader, the conductors and the ground wires, as shown by
formula [21, 26]: the solid points in Figure 3;
0.03 Step:2 Set the moving particles around the tip of the leader, as
EC 3000 m (1 ) (6) shown by the moving particles in point B on Figure 3.
r
Moving particles have random Brownian motion in the
where EC (kV/m) is the critical initial electric field intensity; m
discrete space, which is shown as the trace of the dashed
is the roughness coefficient of the conductor surface; δ is
line in Figure 3. The upward and downward leader
relative air density; and r (m) is conductor critical corona
progresses most quickly at their tips respectively, and in
radius. For the ground wires, the radius of ground wire is
the calculation of lightning shielding, the progression in
usually smaller than critical radius, so r is set at the critical
leader tips plays a decisive role in the issue whether
radius, r= 0.1 m [6]; For the phase conductor, the radius of
lightning will strike conductors. Thus it is reasonable to
conductor bundles is usually larger than the critical radius, and
set the initial position of moving particles at the tips of
r is set as the equivalent radius of the conductor bundles.
the leader.
2.3 THE PROGRESSION RULES OF LEADERS Step:3 In each leader branch, when the moving particles move
LPM assumes that the leader’s progression direction always to the possible breakdown point around any seed, for
goes towards the position around the leader tip, where the example shown in Figure 3 at the semisolid points
electric field intensity is largest. But in fact, the observation of around point P as possible breakdown points. When a
direct lightning strikes on earthed objects show that the path of particle moves to point P′, its Brownian movement will
lightning discharge can be branching and tortuous, and the stop, and the probability to have breakdown at point P′ is
effect of branching and tortuosity of the lightning channel calculated by [30]:
would also influence the electric field intensity in space and p ( P, P ') 0, if E ( P, P ') EB
thus further influence the progression of the leader. Otherwise,
the effect of branching and tortuosity of the lightning ( E ( P, P ') EB )
p ( P, P ') N ,if E ( P, P ') EB (7)
discharge indicates that the progression of the leader has
fractal features. The fractal approach can be used in analyzing
i 1
( E ( P, Pi ') EB )
Step:5 If point P′ meets the condition to have breakdown, and electric field spatial distribution determines that each leader
breakdown happens, then the moving particle becomes a branch progresses most probably towards the point with most
new seed. It will form a “seed cluster” together with intense electric field at their tips. This feature makes the
other seeds and hence a new leader discharging channel proposed model maintain the deterministic factor of the
comes into being. If point P′ does not meet the leader’s progression. This method not only considers the
breakdown condition, then the moving particle will be deterministic feature that breakdown happens more probably
stopped. The program returns to Step 2 and keeps on when the electric field at the leader tip is more intense, but
operating, until it determines the occurrence of lightning also stochastic features in the process of leader progression.
strikes.
4 THE SELECTION OF KEY
PARAMETERS OF THE FRACTAL-
CHARACTERIZED LPM
The fractal dimension reflects how effectively the complex
graph occupies space. It is a measure of the orderliness and
randomness of the stochastic and deterministic features of
fractal graphs. From the above description of the proposed
model, it can be found that the value of the breakdown
probability constant η in (7) influences the progressing
probabilities at every point of the fractal leader channel, and it
determines the stochastic and deterministic features of the
lightning leader progression. In order to simulate the whole
lightning path accurately, it is very important to select a proper
η value. In this paper, the lightning leader will be simulated
with different η values, hoping to determine how the constant
η will influence the dimensions of the lightning path in
simulation, and to determine the proper value of the constant η
for the proposed model.
The fractal dimensions of lightning progression based on
the box-counting method is given by [31-33]:
ln N (lb )
Db lim (8)
lb 0 ln(1 / lb )
where Db is the fractal dimension, lb is the measurement scale,
Figure 2. Calculation process of the fractal leader progression and N(lb) is the least number of squares that can cover the
fractal graph, with lb as the side length.
Based on the box-counting method, the fractal dimensions
of the simulated lightning path with different values of η are
calculated and are shown in Table 1. The lightning paths in
simulation with three different η values are shown in Figure 4.
Η 0.1 0.5 1 5 10
Db 1.46±0.07 1.31±0.05 1.20±0.04 1.09±0.05 1.04±0.02
Yes
The fractal upward leader
progresses
No Lightning strike Figure 6. Direct lightning strike on the simulated transmission line.
or not?
progressing probabilities in every direction of the leader tip tend where SFN is the shielding failure number, strokes; NL is the
to be the same, which leads to excessive branches in the leader ground flash density, flashes/km2-year; Aeq is the shielding
channel, as shown in Figure 4a. In such a condition, the failure areas, km2; I is the lightning current amplitude, kA;
stochastic feature plays the main role in the leader progression, SFW is the shielding failure width, km; L is the length of the
and the corresponding fractal dimension is relatively larger than transmission line, km; T is the observation time, years; and PL
that of natural lightning. Conversely, when the η value is larger is the probability density distribution of lightning
than the proper value, the direction with most intense field in currents, %/kA.
the leader tip will gain more probability to progress, while the Conventional LPM believes that when lightning occurs in the
probabilities for leaders to progress in other directions are shielding failure area of transmission lines, shielding failure will
smaller. The leader progresses along the direction with most inevitably happen. In the proposed model, it is believed that the
intense field, but less probably along the branches, as shown in lightning discharge has stochastic features. Even though
Figure 4c. In such a condition, the deterministic feature plays lightning reaches into the shielding failure area of transmission
the main role in the lightning leader progression, and the lines, because of the attraction from the upward leader of
corresponding fractal dimension is relatively smaller than that ground wires and from the earth, shielding failure is not
of natural lightning. Therefore, to some extent, the selection of ŋ inevitable. There exists a probability to have shielding failures,
value decides whether the lightning model can reflect the as shown in Figure 7. Therefore, for a certain lightning current
characteristics of branching and tortuosity of lightning path amplitude I, weight SFW as in (9) and use the equivalent SFW,
properly. Kawasaki, Matsuura [15] and Tsonis and Elsner [16] SFWeq(I) to replace it. The weighting value is set to be the
measure the fractal dimension of still pictures of natural lightning probability PS so that SFWeq(I) is:
lightning channels. They find that the empirical fractal SFW ( I ) SFWeq ( I ) PS ( I , D) dD (10)
dimensions of the natural lightning discharge paths exist in the 0
range from 1.1 to 1.4; and as shown in Table 1, when the ŋ where PS (%) is the probability of lightning strikes on the
value is set between 0.5 and 5, the fractal dimension of the phase conductor, and D (km) is the lateral distance between
simulated lightning path Db exists within the fractal dimension lightning leader and the transmission line.
1718 J. Li et al.: A New Estimation Model of the Lightning Shielding Performance of Transmission Lines Using a Fractal Approach
PS can be obtained by a large number of repeated has its peak value decrease as the lightning current amplitude I
calculations in the proposed model. By the model, the grows. Therefore, under the same line parameters, PS is a
shielding failure probability PS at all levels of lightning function of lightning current I and lateral distance D. In order
currents can be calculated. For example, the 500 kV to obtain SFR, calculate the shielding failure probability
transmission line tower in Guangdong province of China is distribution under every lightning current level I for different
shown as Figure 8 and PS can be shown as the distribution lateral distance D, and by data fitting, a shielding failure
curve in Figure 9: probability function is fitted with lateral distance D and
lightning current I as its variables [35]:
PS PS ( I , D) (11)
Based on (9), (10) and (11), the SFN and SFR of the
transmission line can be calculated as follows:
SFN N L T L PS ( I , D) PL ( I ) dI dD (12)
SFN
SFR
100 L T (13)
0.01 N L PS ( I , D ) PL ( I ) dI dD
where SFN is shielding failure number of the transmission line,
strokes; SFR is shielding failure rate of the transmission line,
strokes/100 km-year; NL is the ground flash density,
flashes/km2-year; PL is the probability density distribution of
Figure 7. The shielding failure probability PS as a function of lateral distance. lightning currents, %/kA; T is the observation time, years; L
(km) is the length of the transmission line; I is the current
amplitude, kA; and D (km) is the lateral distance between the
lightning leader and the transmission line.
If the parameters of different parts of the line are different,
they can be calculated one by one, and then by adding those
up the total SFN will be calculated.
5.2 VALIDATION OF THE ESTIMATION METHOD
As for the EHV transmission line, the China Southern
Power Grid uses the lightning location system (LLS) to record
the lightning trip numbers of 2550 km 500kV AC transmission
line in Guangdong Province of China [36], and they also
measured the lightning current amplitude of every lightning
stroke on the line. From 1999 to 2003, there have been 40
Figure 8. Structural figure of 500 kV EHV transmission line in Guangdong lightning trip accidents on the line [36]. The 500 kV
province of China. transmission line in Guangdong province of China [28] has its
structure model in Figure 8. The SFR of the 500 kV
100 transmission line is estimated by Eriksson’s improved EGM,
LPM and the proposed model.
The thunderstorm days and the ground flash density are 40
80
days/year and 2.9 flashes/km2-year, respectively [28], and the
probability density function of the lightning crest current is
60 distributed as [3, 9]:
I I
PL ( I ) 0.0475 exp( ) 0.0010 exp( ) (14)
40 20 50
The observation results of direct lightning strikes and the
20
calculation results of the three estimation methods are shown
in Figure 10 [36].
The data in Figure 10 show that, compared with Eriksson’s
0
0 50 100 150 200
improved EGM, the calculation results of LPM and the
proposed model are closer to observation data. According to
Figure 9. Probability of lightning strike on the conductor versus lateral Eriksson’s improved EGM, the largest lightning shielding
distance D. failure current amplitude is 9.5 kA, that is, that lightning
current higher than 10 kA will not cause lightning shielding
It can be found from Figure 9 that under a certain lightning failure. This result is obviously different from the observation
current I, as the lateral distance D increases, PS will increase data. Moreover, Eriksson’s improved EGM believes that with
first and then decrease. PS under different lightning currents I the increase of lightning current, the lightning shielding failure
IEEE Transactions on Dielectrics and Electrical Insulation Vol. 18, No. 5; October 2011 1719
arc of transmission lines will decrease gradually, as shown in among which there were 79 negative lightning strikes. The
Figure 11. Therefore, with the increase of lightning current, number of lightning strikes on the upper, middle and lower
the corresponding SFR will continue to decrease to zero. LPM phase conductors are 34, 27 and 18 strokes respectively. The
and the proposed model show that as the lightning current I proposed model estimates the ratio of strokes reaching each
increases, SFR shows a tendency of growing at first and then phase conductor, and also compares the calculation results of
decreasing. As shown in Figure 9, the calculation of the the conventional EGM, the improved EGM by Sakae
proposed model reveals that for the 5 kA lightning current, Taniguchi [9] and the 3-D LPM [37]. The calculation and
though the peak value of lightning shielding failure probability observations are shown in Figure 12. Conventional EGM and
PS is larger than that of the 25 kA lightning current, SFW the Sakae Taniguchi’s improved EGM show that the lightning
(I=5kA, PS>10%) is smaller than the SFW (I=25kA, PS>10%). shielding failure arc length of the lower phase conductor is the
Through the calculations of (10) and (13), it is revealed that largest, so the percentage of strikes on the lower phase
from 5 kA to 25 kA, SFWeq rises as the lightning current I conductor is higher than that of the upper and middle phase
increases, so the SFR also increases. Correspondingly, SFWeq conductors. However, observation data show that the SFN of
(I=5kA) and SFR (I=5kA) are smaller than SFWeq (I=25kA) upper phase conductor and middle phase conductor are close
and SFR (I=25kA) respectively, and the increasing tendency to each other, but the SFN of the lower phase conductor is
from 5 kA to 25 kA can be calculated by (13). For the 45 kA obviously lower than the other two conductors. Therefore,
lightning current, though the SFW (I=45kA, PS>10%) is larger Conventional EGM and improved EGM by Sakae Taniguchi
and the SFW (I=25kA, PS>10%), its peak value of PS is less still give different results from the observations [9]. The
than 20%, and the corresponding SFWeq(I=45kA) is smaller proposed model believes that when the downward lightning
than that of 25 kA lightning current. Therefore, based on the progresses, the phase conductor in the higher position is easier
calculation of (10) and (13), the SFR under lightning current to generate an upward leader. Meanwhile, the shielding angle
higher than 25 kA shows a decreasing tendency. This result is also has obvious influence on the inception of upward leaders.
closer to the observation data. For this transmission line in Japan, the shielding angles of
0.14 upper, middle and lower phase conductor are respectively -
the improved EGM 6.24, -3.37 and -2.05 [11, 12]. Compared with the other two
0.12 LPM
phase conductors, the upward leader inception of the upper
0.1 proposed model
observation
phase conductor is restrained because of smaller shielding
0.08 angle. These two factors determine the probability distribution
0.06 of SFN of every conductor. Therefore, the rates of the upper
0.04 phase conductor and middle phase conductor’s SFN are
0.02
obviously higher than that of the lower phase conductors. The
calculation result of the proposed model is close to 3D-LPM;
0
and compared with EGM, it is closer to the observation data.
Observation
Figure 10. Distribution of lightning shielding failure rate under different 3-D LPM
lightning current amplitude. The proposed model
50 Sakae Taniguchi’s improved EGM
45 EGM
40
B3
Stroke percent (%)
35
B2
30
25
20
Rgw2 15
B1
10
Rgw3
5
Ground wire
O
0
Rgw1 C2 Rl3
C1 Upper Phase Middle Phase Lower Phase
Rl1
Rl2 D2 Figure 12. Percentage of lightning strokes reaching each phase conductor.
Phase conductor D1
ground wires. Thus, when lightning strokes with current In the above analysis, based on the proposed model, the
amplitude around 20 kA happen around the transmission line, lightning shielding failure zone is described by the shielding
lightning shielding failure will occur most easily. failure probability contour. The result shows statistical
characteristics and reflects the deterministic and stochastic
features of the lightning discharge. It is also in accord with the
data distribution rules of the laboratory lightning simulation
experiment [38, 39]. The proposed model can reflect the natural
lightning progression rules better than LPM. Compared with the
lightning shielding failure zone described in EGM, the shielding
failure probability contour can better reflect the lightning
shielding failure performance of transmission lines. Therefore,
the transmission line estimation method based on the proposed
model is more accurate and well-founded.
The data in Table 3 shows that decreasing the shielding angle of line and the choice of 3-D lightning leader path, would
the transmission line will lower its SFR. When the lightning influence the lightning shielding performance of transmission
leader progresses downward, the decrease of shielding angle line, so as to improve the current estimation method.
suppresses the conductor’s upward leader, then the ground wire’s
upward leader will predominate over the conductor’s upward ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
leader. The protecting function of the ground wire is enhanced, so This work was supported by the National Basic Research
the SFR of the line will decrease correspondingly. Therefore, to Program of China (973 Program) (2009CB724504), the
reduce the shielding angle is the main method to improve the National “111” Project of China (B08036) and the National
lightning shielding performance of UHVDC transmission lines. Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) (50707036).
Table 3. The shielding failure rate (strokes/100km-year) of transmission lines
with different shielding angles. REFERENCES
shielding angles (o) -5 0 5 10 [1] I.P. Vereshchagin and W. Wu, “The analysis of lightning protection for
EHV and UHV transmission lines in Russia”, High Voltage Eng., Vol.
SFR 0.086 0.107 0.122 0.141 24, pp. 76-79, 1998. (In Chinese)
[2] F. S. Young, J. M. Clayton, and A. R. Hileman, “Shielding of
transmission lines”, IEEE Trans. Power Apparatus Syst., Special
In the UHVDC transmission project design in Yunnan- Supplement, Vol. S82, pp. 132- 154, 1963.
Guangdong province of China, the China Southern Power [3] H. R. Armstrong and E. R. Whitehead, “Field and analytical studies of
transmission line shielding”, IEEE Trans. Power Apparatus Syst., Vol.
Grid Corporation uses the calculation estimation of the 87, pp. 270-281, 1968.
proposed model. In mountainous regions, the shielding angle [4] J. G. Anderson, Transmission Line Reference Book, 345 kV and Above,
of ±800 kV dc transmission lines is set at -9.6 degree; in plain 2nd Edition, Chap. 12, Electric Power Research Institute, Palo Alto,
regions, the shielding angle is set at -1.8 degree. California, USA, 1982.
[5] A. J. Eriksson, “An improved electrogeometric model for transmission
line shielding analysis”, IEEE Trans. Power Delivery, Vol. 2, pp. 871-
8 CONCLUSIONS 886, 1987.
[6] L. Dellera and E. Garbagnati, “Lightning strokes simulation by means of
In order to make the model closer to the discharge features of the leader progression model, Part I: Description of the model and
natural lightning, the fractal approach is applied to the LMP in evaluation of exposure of free-standing structures”, IEEE Trans. Power
this paper. By comparing the fractal dimension of natural Delivery, Vol. 5, pp. 2009-2022, 1990.
[7] F.A.M. Rizk, “Modeling of transmission line exposure to direct lightning
lightning, the fractal parameters are adjusted, so as to control the strokes”, IEEE Trans. Power Delivery, Vol. 5, pp. 1983-1997, 1990.
deterministic factor and stochastic factor of lightning progression [8] E. R. Love, Improvement on lightning stroke modeling and application
within a reasonable range. Based on the proposed model, the to design of EHV and UHV transmission lines, M.Sc. thesis, University
lightning shielding failure probability distribution of the of Colorado, USA, 1973.
[9] S. Taniguchi, T. Tsuboi, S. Okabe, Y. Nagaraki, J. Takami, and H. Ota,
transmission line is proposed and the method to calculate the SFR “Improved method of calculating lightning stroke rate to large-sized
is improved. These factors are used to analyze the lightning transmission lines based on electric geometry model”, IEEE Trans.
shielding performance of transmission lines, and lead to the Dielectr. Electr. Insul., Vol. 17, pp. 53-62, 2010.
following conclusions: [10] S. Taniguchi and S. Okabe, “A contribution to the investigation of the
shielding effect of transmission line conductors to lightning strikes”,
1) The lightning stroke simulation figure of the proposed IEEE Trans. Dielectr. Electr. Insul., Vol. 15, pp. 710-720, 2008.
model describes the effects of tortuosity and branching of [11] S. Taniguchi, T. Tsuboi, and S. Okabe, “Observation Results of
the lightning channel, and reflects the stochastic and Lightning Shielding for Large-scale Transmission Lines”, IEEE Trans.
deterministic features shown in the progression process Dielectr. Electr. Insul., Vol. 16, pp. 552-559, 2009.
[12] S. Taniguchi, T. Tsuboi, and S. Okabe, “Method of calculating the
of lightning. lightning outage rate of large-sized transmission lines”, IEEE Trans.
2) When lightning occurs within the shielding failure width, Dielectr. Electr. Insul., Vol. 17, No.4, pp. 1276-1283, 2010.
lightning shielding failure is not inevitable, but appears [13] S. Taniguchi, S. Okabe, T. Takahashi, and T. Shindo, “Discharge
with a probability. The lightning shielding failure Characteristics of 5m Long Air Gap under Foggy Conditions with
Lightning Shielding of Transmission lines”, IEEE Trans. Dielectr.
probability PS is related to the lightning current amplitude Electr. Insul., Vol. 15, pp. 1031-1037, 2008.
I and the lateral distance D. [14] S. Taniguchi, S. Okabe, A. Asakawa, and T. Shindo, “Flashover
3) The lightning shielding failures are most likely when Characteristics of Long Air Gaps with Negative Switching Impulses”,
lightning strikes with current amplitude under 20 kA and IEEE Trans. Dielectr. Electr. Insul., Vol. 15, pp. 399-406, 2008.
[15] Z. Kawasaki and Z. Matsuura, “Does a lightning channel show a
occur in a position that is close to the transmission line, fractal?”, Applied Energy, Vol. 67, pp. 147-158, 2000.
and the peak value of the lightning shielding failure [16] A. A. Tsonis and J. B. Elsner, “Fractal Characterization and Simulation
probability under small lightning current amplitude is of Lightning”, Contr. Atmosph. Phys., Vol. 60, pp. 187-192, 1987.
larger than that of large lightning current amplitude. [17] N.I. Petrov, G.N. Petrova and F. D'Alessandro, “Quantification of the
probability of lightning strikes to structures using a fractal approach”,
The estimation method on the lightning shielding IEEE Trans. Dielectr. Electr. Insul., Vol. 10, pp. 641- 654, 2003.
performance of transmission lines in the proposed model has [18] K. Kudo, “Fractal analysis of electrical trees”, IEEE Trans. Dielectr.
been used on the ±800 UHVDC transmission project design in Electr. Insul., Vol. 5, pp. 713-727, 1998.
Yunnan- Guangdong province of China, by China Southern [19] J.M.K. MacAlpine, D.H. Qiu and Z.Y. Li, “An analysis of spark paths in
air using 3-dimensional image processing”, IEEE Trans. Dielectr. Electr.
Power Grid Corporation. Besides, the authors intend to develop Insul., Vol. 6, pp. 331-336, 1999.
a 3-D fractal LPM in the future, study the 3-D lightning [20] D.H. Qiu, J.M.K. MacAlpine and Z.Y. Li, “An incremental analysis of
shielding failure probability space of transmission lines, and spark paths in air using 3-dimensional image processing”, IEEE Trans.
analyze how the factors such as line sag, the corridor terrain of Dielectr. Electr. Insul., Vol. 7, pp. 758-763, 2000.
IEEE Transactions on Dielectrics and Electrical Insulation Vol. 18, No. 5; October 2011 1723
[21] J. He, Y. Tu, R. Zeng, J.B. Lee, S.H. Chang, and Z. Guan, “Numerical Wenxia Sima was born in Henan province, China, on
analysis model for shielding failure of transmission line under lightning 13 July 1965. She graduated from Chongqing
stroke”, IEEE Trans. Power Delivery, Vol. 20, pp. 815- 822, 2005. University in 1988 and obtained the Ph.D. degree in
[22] G. A. Wurden and D. O. Whiteson, “High-speed Plasma Imaging: A 1994 from Chongqing University. Her employment
Lightning Bolt”, IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci., Vol. 24, pp. 83- 84, 1996. experience includes the college of Electrical
[23] R. H. Golde, Lightning, New York, USA, Academic Press, 1977. Engineering of Chonging University. Her fields of
[24] B. Vahidi, M. Yahyaabadi, M.R.B. Tavakoli and S.M. Ahadi, “Leader interest include high voltage outdoor insulation and
Progression Analysis Model for Shielding Failure Computation by overvoltage protection.
Using the Charge Simulation Method”, IEEE Trans. Power Delivery,
Vol. 23, pp. 2201- 2206, 2008.
[25] M. A. Uman, The Art and Science of Lightning Protection, Cambridge
University Press, New York, USA, 2008. Caixin Sun received the B.S. degree in electrical
[26] G. N. Alexandrov, V. L. Ivanov, and V. E. Kizevetter, Electric Strength engineering in 1969 from Chongqing University.
of External High Voltage Insulation, Leningrad: Energija, 1969. (In Currently, he is Professor of Chongqing University,
Russian) leading the research group on high voltage
[27] G. Carrara and L. Thione, “Switching surge strength of large air gaps: A engineering. He is a member of the Chinese Academy
physical approach”, IEEE Trans. Power App. Syst., Vol. 95, pp. 512- of Engineering and Director of Electrical Power
524, 1976. Engineering Committee of the National Science
[28] B. Wei, Z. Fu, and H. Yuan, “Analysis of lightning shielding failure for Foundation of China. His research interest is in high
500-kV overhead transmission lines based on an improved leader voltage engineering, especially online detection of
progression model”, IEEE Trans. Power Delivery, Vol. 24, pp. 1433- insulation condition and insulation fault diagnosis for
1440, 2009. high voltage equipment, discharge mechanism of outdoor insulation in
[29] R H Golde, Lightning Protection, London, UK, Edward Arnold, 1973. complicated environments, and high voltage techniques applied in
[30] L. Niemeyer, L. Pietronero, and H. J. Wiesmann, “Fractal dimension of biomedicine. He is an author and coauthor of over 200 publications.
dielectric breakdown”, Phys. Rev. Letts., Vol. 52, pp. 1033-1036, 1984.
[31] A.L. Barabási and H. E. Stanley, Fractal Concepts in Surface Growth,
Tao Yuan received the B.S degree in 1999 from
Cambridge University Press, New York, USA, 1995.
Sichuan Polytechnic Institute, China, and received the
[32] V. Rajini and U. K. Kumar, “Quantification of Damage due to Surface
Master’s and Ph.D. degrees, respectively, in 2001 and
Tracking”, IEEE Trans. Dielectr. Electr. Insul., Vol. 14, pp. 1224- 1231, 2007.
2010 from Chongqing University, China. He is now a
[33] A. Krivda, E. Gulski, L. Satish and W.S. Zaengl, “The use of fractal
lecturer in Chongqing University, and his research
features for recognition of 3-D discharge patterns”, IEEE Trans.
interests include overvoltage protection and grounding
Dielectr. Electr. Insul., Vol. 2, pp. 889- 892, 1995.
technology in power systems.
[34] J. Fu, W. Sima, J. Li, Q. Yang, and C. Sun, “Estimation on lightning
shielding performance of the transmission lines based on the fractal
theory”, High Voltage Eng., Vol. 35, pp. 1274- 1278, 2009. (In Chinese)
[35] W. Sima, J. Li, Q. Yang, T. Yuan, and J. Fu, “Fractal characteristics of
lightning channels and its application to the analysis of the lightning
shielding performance of UHVDC transmission lines”, High Voltage Markus Zahn (S'68-M'71-SM'78-F'93) received the
Eng., Vol. 36, pp. 86- 91, 2010. (In Chinese) B.S.E.E., M.S.E.E., Electrical Engineer, and Sc.D.
[36] D. Gu and L. Fan, “New consideration of 500 kV transmission line degrees from the Department of Electrical Engineering at
lightning protection in China”, Electric Power, Vol. 37, pp.18-21, 2004 the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT),
(In Chinese). Cambridge, MA, in 1968, 1968, 1969, and 1970
[37] M.R.B. Tavakoli and B. Vahidi, “Transmission-Lines Shielding Failure- respectively. He then joined the Department of Electrical
Rate Calculation by Means of 3-D Leader Progression Models”, IEEE Engineering at the University of Florida, Gainesville
Trans. Power Delivery, Vol. 26, pp. 507-516, 2011. until 1980 when he returned to MIT where he is now
[38] G. Qian, X. Wang, X. Xu, and Z. Ding, “Study of scatter of shielding Professor of Electrical Engineering working in the
failure on transmission line”, High Voltage Eng., Vol. 24, pp. 17- 20, Research Laboratory of Electronics, Laboratory for
1998. (In Chinese) Electromagnetic and Electronic Systems and the High Voltage Research
[39] H. He, J. He, Z. Jiang, C. Wang, H. Ye, X. Wang, K. Bian, and S. Xie, Laboratory. He is also the Director of the MIT Course VI-A EECS Internship
“Experimental study on lightning shielding performance of ±500 kV Program, a cooperative work/study program with industry. He is the author of
HVDC transmission line”, Proceedings of the Chinese Society for Electromagnetic Field Theory: A Problem Solving Approach (now out of print) but
Electr. Eng., Vol. 29, pp. 20-26, 2009. (In Chinese) is working on a new reference book with a complete collection of solved
electromagnetism problems. He has also co-developed a set of educational
Jianbiao Li was born in Guangxi province, China, on videotapes on demonstrations of electromagnetic fields and energy for the enriched
5 October 1984. He received the B.S degree in teaching of electromagnetism. He has received numerous excellence in teaching
electrical engineering in 2007 from Chongqing awards at the University of Florida and at MIT. His primary research areas are
University, China. He is now a Ph.D. candidate in the ferrohydrodynamics and electrohydrodynamics for microfluidic and biomedical
State Key Laboratory of Power Transmission applications; nanoparticle technology for improved high voltage performance of
Equipment & System Security and New Technology, electric power apparatus; modeling of electrical streamer initiation and propagation
Chongqing University. His major research interest is leading to electrical breakdown; Kerr electrooptic field and space charge mapping
lightning protection for transmission lines. measurements in high voltage stressed materials, and for the development of model
based interdigital dielectrometry and magnetometry sensors for measurement of
dielectric permittivity, electrical conductivity, and magnetic permeability with
applications to non-destructive testing and evaluation measurements and for
Qing Yang received the B.S and Ph.D. degrees in identification of metal and low-metal content dielectric landmines and unexploded
electrical engineering, respectively, in 2002 from ordnance. Professor Zahn is co-inventor on 19 patents. He has contributed to about
North China Electrical Power University and in 2006 10 book and encyclopedia chapters, about 115 journal publications, and about 175
from Chongqing University, China. He is now an conference papers. He was a Distinguished Visiting Fellow of the Royal Academy
Associate Professor in the State Key Laboratory of of Engineering at the University of Manchester, England; was the 1998 J.B.
Power Transmission Equipment & System Security Whitehead Memorial Lecturer, and was the first James R. Melcher Memorial
and New Technology, Chongqing University. His Lecturer in 2003; is an Associate Editor of the IEEE Transactions on Dielectrics
research interests include outdoor insulation in and Electrical Insulation; is on the International Scientific Committee on Magnetic
complex ambient conditions and electric-field Fluids; and has received a Certificate of Achievement for completion of the
calculations. He is the author and coauthor of more “Deminers Orientation Course” at the Night Vision and Electronic Sensors
than 30 journal and international conference papers. Directorate Countermine Division at Ft. Belvoir, VA, USA.