Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Learning Outcomes
Knowledge and Understanding:
The main tasks involved in account planning and execution of advertising campaigns for
consumer goods and services;
The main tasks in media planning and management of campaigns.
As the Account Planner of an Advertising Agency for Proton, you are required to develop an
Advertising Campaign for Proton in Malaysia that would help the company to address the
current challenges or improve its market performance.
Perusahaan Otomobil Nasional Sdn Bhd (Proton), the national car manufacturer in Malaysia, has
been losing market share year after year. With the recent acquisition by Zhejiang Geely Holdings
Group of a stake in Proton Holdings Bhd is proving to be highly positive as the national car
manufacturer will now be able to tap into the Chinese group’s advanced auto technology and
resources. However, the journey ahead remains challenging, given the competitive automobile
market in terms of performance, pricing and service level.
Your advertising plan should include the following elements as specified below:
Where are we now? Describe the current position of the brand, its
background and the key issues it faces defines the start
point for the journey on which communications will
take the brand.
e.g.
Product Description (Key Attributes and Benefits)
Distribution Channels
Market Size (Volume and Value)
Customer Usage Data
Brand’s Positioning
History of Brand Communications
MKT3221 (INDIVIDUAL ASSIGNMENT) / Page 3 of 6
Competitive Brands
Who do we need to talk The target groups should be defined and prioritised as
to? accurately as possible via demographics, lifestyle,
product usage, attitudes, etc.
Advertising Campaign
e.g.
Print
Radio
Television
Website
Mobile
Social Media
Out of Home
Guerrilla, etc.
Media Plan
e.g.
Media Vehicle
Geographical Area
Ad Unit
Scheduling
Placement
Estimated Impression
Budget
MKT3221 (INDIVIDUAL ASSIGNMENT) / Page 4 of 6
Source: IPA
Important Tips:
Penalty:
Late submission without agreed extension carries a penalty: submitted up to one (1) week
after the published deadline will receive a maximum numeric grade of 40.
Failure to keep the word count of 2,000 (+/-5%) words carries a penalty of 5% deduction.
MKT3221 (INDIVIDUAL ASSIGNMENT) / Page 5 of 6
Use & Presentation of Content/ Terms/ Findings/ Business Application & Discussion /Analysis /Critical
REPORT Presentation & Structure
Harvard Referencing Definitions/ Calculations Integration Of Data/ Literature Evaluation &/Or Reflection
Follows the structure specified &
Task details Follows HBS Harvard style for in-text Content included – a holistic and Integration & application of
keeps to word limit within 2000 Level of analysis, discussion and
citation & reference list. creative advertising plan that meets information – media research outputs,
words. Creativity in the presentation of critical evaluation.
Use a minimum of 10 academic sources. SMART criteria. report data, theories and literature.
creative brief.
100 marks 15 Marks 5 marks 30 Marks 30 Marks 20 Marks
Outstanding... Presentation & report Outstanding... Standard of referencing Outstanding... Exploration of topic Outstanding... Business insight & Outstanding... Level of
structure, with numbered paragraphs, list within text & consistent use of Harvard showing excellent knowledge & application. discussion/analysis/ critical evaluation
80-100 of contents/figures &appendices. referencing system. understanding through thorough & Breadth, depth & integration of &/or reflection.
Articulate & fluent academic writing Accuracy of in-text references & full details appropriate research. literature/data into work. Highly developed/ focused work.
Outstanding style with ideas cross referenced. No shown in Reference list. Impressive choice and range of
grammatical / spelling errors. appropriate content.
Excellent ... Presentation & report Excellent... Standard of referencing within Excellent ... Level of knowledge & Excellent ... Business insight & Excellent... Level of
structure, with numbered paragraphs, list text & consistent use of Harvard understanding demonstrated. application. discussion/analysis/ critical evaluation
70-79
of contents/figures, appendices & cross referencing system. Evidence of appropriate reading. Breadth, depth & integration of &/or reflection clearly developing points
referencing. Accuracy of in-text references & full details Covers all relevant points & issues. literature/data into work. in the appropriate way with thorough
Excellent
Articulate & fluent academic writing shown in Reference list. consideration of all possibilities.
style. Only a minor error.
Very good... Presentation & report Very good... Standard of referencing Very good... Level of knowledge & Very good... Business insight & Very good... Level of
structure, paragraphing, use of within text & consistent use of Harvard understanding demonstrated. application. discussion/analysis/ critical evaluation
60-69 numbering, list of contents/figures, referencing system. Covers most relevant points & issues. Breadth, depth & integration of &/or reflection & a few ideas/points
appendices & cross referencing. Accuracy of in-text references & full details Few errors / omissions in literature/data into work. could benefit from further development
Very Good Fluent academic writing style. shown in Reference list. content/calculations. &/or evaluation/comparison.
Very few grammatical errors & spelling
mistakes.
Good... Clear presentation & report Good... Standard of referencing within text Good... Grasp of the topic & some of its Good... Business insight & application. Good... Level of discussion/analysis/
structure, use of numbering & & consistent use of Harvard referencing implications presented. Breadth, depth & integration of critical evaluation &/or reflection but
50-59
appendices. system. Knowledge & understanding is literature/data into work. more ideas/points could be addressed
Writing is mainly clear but some spelling Accuracy of in-text references & full details demonstrated. /developed further.
Good
&/ or grammatical errors. shown in Reference list. Minor errors / omissions in content/
calculations.
Satisfactory... Basic report structure. Satisfactory... Basic referencing within text Satisfactory... Content / level of Satisfactory... Business insight & Satisfactory... Basic evidence of
40-49 Not always written clearly & has & consistent use of Harvard referencing knowledge of the topic. Addresses part of application. Limited integration with discussion/analysis/ critical evaluation
grammatical & / or spelling errors. system. the task. Some errors / omissions in literature/ data. &/or reflection but some points
Satisfactory Accuracy of in-text references & full details content/ calculations. May benefit from Use of literature/data but limited in superficially made so need further
shown in Reference list. further research. breadth OR depth. development.
Weak... Report format, limited or poor Weak...Use of Harvard referencing system Weak... Limited content / knowledge/ Weak... Unsatisfactory evidence of Weak... Limited evidence of
30-39 structure. with errors & inconsistently applied. calculations. Limited or muddled business application & insight discussion/analysis/ critical evaluation
Muddled work with many spelling & / or Limited referencing within the text. Limited understanding of the topic/question. Work needs to show better links &/or reflection.
Marginal Fail grammatical errors. accuracy of in-text references compared to Does not meet all the learning outcomes. between practical application and More development & comment needed.
those in the final Reference list. theory. May need to do more than describe.
Inadequate... Report format and poor Inadequate... Use of Harvard referencing Inadequate... Lacking in relevant content/ Inadequate... Lacks evidence of Inadequate... Lacking / inadequate level
20 – 29 paragraphing / signposting. with many errors &/or inconsistencies. knowledge/calculations. Content business application & insight. Some of discussion/ analysis/critical evaluation
Inappropriate writing style irrelevant / inaccurate. Does not meet all literature irrelevant to topic. & /or reflection. Descriptive.
Clear Fail Poorly written &/or poor spelling & the learning outcomes.
grammar.
1 – 19 Nothing of merit... Poorly written work, Nothing of merit... No or little attempt to Nothing of merit... Unsatisfactory level Nothing of merit... No evidence of Nothing of merit... Unsatisfactory level
lacking structure, paragraphing / use the recommended Harvard referencing of knowledge demonstrated. appropriate business application & of discussion/analysis/critical evaluation
Little or signposting. system. Content used irrelevant / not appropriate/ insight. &/or reflection
Nothing of Many inaccuracies in spelling & to the topic. Does not meet the learning
Merit grammar. outcomes.
MKT3221 (INDIVIDUAL ASSIGNMENT) / Page 6 of 6
Please refer to Grading Criteria for Report when awarding marks (upon 100). Each criteria weightage is given below (X%).
Grading Criteria 100m X% Comments / Feedback / Feed Forward
C1. Presentation & Structure
Follows the structure specified & keeps to word limit within 2000
words. Creativity in the presentation of creative brief. /100 /15
C2. Use Academic Recourses with Harvard Referencing
Follows HBS Harvard style for in-text citation & reference list.
Use a minimum of 10 academic sources. /100 /5
C3. Content
Content included – a holistic and creative advertising plan that meets
SMART criteria. /100 /30
C4. Business Application & Integration of Data/Literature
Integration & application of information – media research outputs,
report data, theories and literature. /100 /30
C5. Discussion /Analysis /Critical Evaluation
Level of analysis, discussion and critical evaluation. /100 /20
Total (Assessor) /100