Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
www.elsevier.com/locate/mee
a
Microelectronics Centre, School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Nanyang Technological University,
Nanyang Avenue, Singapore 639798, Singapore
b
Department of Physics, Auburn University, AL 36849, USA
Abstract
A double recessed SiC MESFET was proposed and its electrical performances were studied by numerical simulation. Our simulated
results showed that the saturation current of the double recessed structure is about 77% larger than that of the conventional structure.
However, their threshold voltages are comparable and are 9.2 and 8.4 V for the double recessed and conventional structure, respec-
tively. The output power density of the double recessed structure is about 37.5% larger than that of the conventional structure though its
breakdown voltage is lower. The cut-off frequency (fT) and the maximum oscillation frequency (fmax) of the double recessed structure are
15.3 and 70.6 GHz, respectively, which are higher than that of the conventional structure. Therefore, the double recessed 4H-SiC MES-
FET has superior DC and RF performances compared to the similar device based on the conventional structure.
2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
0167-9317/$ - see front matter 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.mee.2005.10.054
C.L. Zhu et al. / Microelectronic Engineering 83 (2006) 92–95 93
controlled by the gate bias. The DC and RF performances design rules and are 9.2 and 8.4 V, respectively. The
of the double recessed 4H-SiC MESFETs have been stud- simulated drain current (Id) versus the drain–source voltage
ied in detail and the results compared with those obtained (Vds) for 4H-SiC MESFET with the double recessed struc-
from the conventional channel recessed structure. ture under the gate bias (Vgs) from 0 to 10 V with a step
of 2 V are shown in Fig. 2(b). The corresponding charac-
2. Device structure and simulation method teristics for the device with conventional recessed structure
are shown in Fig. 2(a) for comparison. It is found that the
SiC MESFETs based on the conventional channel saturation current (Isat) of the double recessed 4H-SiC
recessed and double recessed structures are as shown in MESFETs at Vgs = 0 V is about 77% larger than that of
Fig. 1. The double recessed structure in Fig. 1(b) has a the conventional structure at Vgs = 0 V, arising from a
channel thickness of 0.25 lm, and is etched 0.05 lm wider channel opening outside of the buried gate region.
before metal deposition to form the second recessed gate. Therefore, the double recessed structure provides a larger
As a result, the thickness of the channel layer underneath Isat than the conventional structure while maintaining a
the lower gate is 0.20 lm. To have a meaningful compar- comparable Vt.
ison, the channel thickness of the MESFET based on the The three-terminal breakdown characteristics of the
conventional structure is also set at 0.20 lm. This ensures devices were simulated with an applied Vgs = Vt, as
that both devices will have comparable pinch-off volt- shown in Fig. 3. The drain current (Id) and the gate
ages. Nickel was chosen for the gate Schottky contact leakage current (Ig) versus Vds are presented for both
with a work function of 5.1 eV. The other dimensions double recessed and conventional structures. For both
of both devices are as follows: gate length of the device
Lg = 0.7 lm, gate-drain spacing Lgd = 1 lm, gate–source
spacing Lgs = 0.5 lm and channel doping Nd = 3 ·
1017 cm3. The doping and thickness of the buffer layer
are 1.4 · 1015 cm3 and 0.50 lm, respectively. The semi-
insulating substrate is modeled as a compensation-doped
(vanadium) semiconductor with a high concentration
(8 · 1016 cm3) of deep level impurities. The activation
energy of vanadium acceptor is selected as 1.05 eV
[3,7]. A two- dimensional simulator, MEDICI [8] is used
in the simulation and the details of the models and sim-
ulation method are presented elsewhere [3].
a Source Drain
n+ Gate n+
N-Channel
P-Buffer
Semi-insulating substrate
b Source Drain
n+ Gate n+
N-Channel
P-Buffer
Semi-insulating substrate
Fig. 1. The cross-section of 4H-SiC MESFETs with: (a) conventional Fig. 2. Drain current versus drain voltage under different gate voltages
structure and (b) double recessed structure. with: (a) conventional structure and (b) double recessed structure.
94 C.L. Zhu et al. / Microelectronic Engineering 83 (2006) 92–95
References [5] H.Y. Cha, C.I. Thomas, G. Koley, L.F. Eastman, M.G. Spencer,
IEEE Transactions of Electron Devices 50 (2003) 1569.
[1] R.C. Clarke, J.W. Palmour, Proceedings of the IEEE 90 (2002) 987. [6] H.Y. Cha, Y.C. Choi, L.F. Eastman, M.G. Spencer, Electronics
[2] M.W. Huang, N. Goldsman, C.H. Chang, I. Mayergoyz, Journal of Letters 40 (2004) 271.
Applied Physics 84 (1998) 2065. [7] N. Sghaier, J.M. Bluet, A. Souifi, G. Guillot, E. Morvan, C.
[3] C.L. Zhu, Rusli, J. Almira, C.C. Tin, S.F. Yoon, J. Ahn, Materials Brylinski, IEEE Transactions of Electron Devices 50 (2003) 297.
Science Forum 483–485 (2005) 849. [8] MEDICI UserÕs Manual, Avant Corporation, Version 2001.4, 2001.
[4] K.P. Hilton, M.J. Uren, D.G. Hayers, P.J. Wilding, B.H. Smith, [9] C.S. Chang, D.S. Day, Solid-State Electronics 32 (1989) 971.
Proceedings of IEEE International Symposium on High-Performance [10] C.E. Weitzel, in: International Conference on Silicon Carbide and
Electron Devices Microwave Optoelectronic Applications (2000) 67. Related Materials (ICSCRM – 1995) Kyoto, Japan, 1995. p. 765.