Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Tate J. Hedtke
Wisconsin Teacher Standard (WTS) 7: Teachers are able to plan different kinds of lessons.
Knowledge.
The teacher knows when and how to adjust plans based on student responses and other
contingencies.
Dispositions.
Performances.
The teacher creates short-range and long-term plans that are linked to student needs and
performance, and adapts the plans to ensure and capitalize on student progress and motivation.
Wisconsin Teacher Standard (WTS) 8: Teachers know how to test for student progress.
Knowledge.
The teacher knows how to select, construct, and use assessment strategies and
instruments appropriate to the learning outcomes being evaluated and to other diagnostic
purposes.
Dispositions.
The teacher values ongoing assessment as essential to the instructional process and
recognizes that many different assessment strategies, accurately and systematically used, are
Performances.
help them become aware of their strengths and needs, and to encourage them to set personal
Pre-assessments
Element:
● Grouping of Students
As the researcher embarked on his goal of improving social and emotional learning skills
(SEL) and competencies, he began by reflecting on the Danielson Domain’s and identified the
two above elements he wished to focus on. Grouping of students has always been identified as a
difficult area by the teacher as his classes are typically small, and contain students with varying
abilities and limitations. Next, the researcher identified at the beginning of the research and
implementation process that he was “unsatisfactory” regarding having students perform self-
As SEL is a relatively new focus by the Wisconsin Department of Instruction at the time
of research and implementation, and with mental health being a relatively new focus by the DPI
and school districts, there are no concrete standards that have been provided for educators in
Wisconsin. That being said, several researchers such as John D. Mayer and Maurice Elias, and
the Collaborative for Academic, Social, and Emotional Learning group (CASEL) have identified
several areas that students with emotional disabilities lack, and successful students possess. The
researcher will focus on helping his students improve in the five areas identified by CASEL as
being most important to SEL skill development (Elias and Weissberg 2007)
Hedtke 5 of 30
1. Self-awareness
2. Social awareness
4. Responsible decision-making
5. Relationship management
The researcher teaches one section of pull-out US Government at Medford Area Senior
High School (MASH). He has been teaching special education for over four years, all at MASH.
Throughout his time teaching, his Individualized Education Plan (IEP) caseload of students has
shifted from students with primarily learning disabilities and other health impairments (e.g.
attention deficit disorder and dyslexia) to that of students with mental health concerns and
Emotional and Behavioral Disabilities (EBD). This shift in the researchers IEP students was
perhaps the first antecedent resulting in his interest in the topic of integrating social and
The high school has students in grades 9-12 and the researcher’s class consists of all
sophomores. The students are taught using the Wisconsin Model Academic Standards for social
studies which are antiquated and currently under review. While the students are able to achieve
at a proficient level as far as performance in the course curriculum is concerned, the researcher
grew aware of lack of character and social and emotional awareness of the students in his
Based upon how the researcher felt the students were behaving and treating one another
over the course of the school year, he began gathering anecdotal data and having conversations
Hedtke 6 of 30
with fellow staff members about the group of individuals and their perceived lack of empathy
and social emotional development. As several of the students are on the researchers IEP
caseload, further discussions were had with families and former teachers that heightened the
researchers desire to address the perceived lack of character and emotional competencies in the
group of students. Upon initial assessments, there was a distinct discrepancy between student
awareness of their behavior and the researcher’s evaluations of their behavior as they pertain
The students will be instructed in character education as well as social and emotional
learning using the five domains identified by Harvard scholar, Stephanie Jones, and supported by
The Aspen Institute Education & Society Program (Johnsen & Wiener 2017). These five
domains are: emotional, social, cognitive, character, and mindset which are then further broken
down into smaller categories such as grit, curiosity, optimism, and ethics in the character
category.
The researcher’s classroom is on the first floor of MASH located in Medford, Wisconsin.
It is an exterior room consisting of two windows, two teacher desks for the researcher and
another certified teacher, three rows of four student desks, and large kidney bean shaped tables
with five chairs around them on either side of the room. The room is conjoined with another
special education teacher’s room which leads to frequent disruptions. The room is decorated
The city of Medford has 4,326 residents, but the school district draws from a much larger
area as it is the county seat and largest community for nearly an hour in any direction. The
Medford Area Public School District had 2,170 enrolled during the 2016-2017 school year with
654 of them enrolled at MASH. Medford High students reported a 95.4% graduation rate for
that same school year which is typical of recent years. The city of Medford is unique in the fact
that it possesses an unusually large number of manufacturing employers, banks, and other
industry for a community of its size. A large area of the school district and county remain
The students selected consist of nine sophomore students with various disabilities
including autism spectrum disorder, emotional and behavioral disabilities, labels including other
health impairment and specific learning disabilities. Eight of the students are male while one is
female. Seven of the students are assessed using the typical ACT state standardized testing while
two of the individuals are assessed using the Dynamic Learning Maps for those that suffer
intellectual disabilities.
The class is taught in the pull-out setting, meaning the students are removed from the
general education setting and are taught by a special education teacher using the same curriculum
and standards as the regular education students. This course meets five times a week for forty-
three minutes per meeting, with the exception of block schedule days which are eighty-three
minute class periods. Block schedule days only happen when the schedule is not otherwise
modified throughout the week for early-release, assemblies, or other calendar modifications.
Hedtke 8 of 30
as well as self-reported behavioral concerns of the students in his class, it was apparent to him
that something needed to be done in order to address the lack of SEL and character awareness of
the students. Also, the researcher is aware of the lack of time in the school day and the ability to
skills type class. With this in mind, the researcher decided to focus on the following question:
“Can social skills instruction effectively increase student’s awareness of their own detrimental
Research Summary
Public education fills many roles for families in 21st century America. It is a wonderful
springboard for college-bound students and provides travel, athletic, and music education
opportunities for others. When asking businesses however, what they view the most important
trait for potential employees is, the answer is consistently this: “We want them to be able to get
along with other people” (Johns, Crowley & Guetzloe, 2005, p. 2).
Several meta-analyses have been conducted seeking to answer the question: does social
skills instruction work? Unfortunately, many of the analyses seem to contradict one another in
some regard. The one question that resurfaced in every article reviewed for this project reaches
far deeper, and that is “how can teachers increase social skills instruction to students, and which
practices are the most effective.” Social and emotional learning is not a new focus in schools but
is receiving more attention with the modern focus on addiction and mental health issues in
American schools. The awareness and philosophy of SEL in an individual are as old as
Hedtke 9 of 30
philosophy and educational thought themselves when Aristotle wrote: “Anyone can become
angry- that is easy. But to be angry with the right person, to the right degree, at the right purpose
and in the right way- this is not easy” (Elias et al, 2007). The research and consideration of SEL
has been increased dramatically over the past two centuries as psychology began to take its
modern form by men such as Darwin, Gardner, and Piaget (Elias & Weissberg, 2007 p.248). As
the fire that drives education is constantly fueled by increasingly more difficult issues such as
school violence, drug abuse, and mental health issues, the onus is placed upon the educator to
help provide SEL not all American students have access to at home. The purpose of this
research paper is to not only prove the need for SEL instruction in the special education
Social and emotional learning is a phrase used synonymously with character education.
Neither of these terms however have a universally accepted set of criteria which constitute the
culture, which can vary between religions, countries, states, school districts, and even between
neighbors. Ultimately, “social-emotional learning focuses on the skills and attitudes needed to
function in relevant social environments” (Elias & Weissberg, 2007, p.248). In other words,
SEL is needed to help create individuals who are capable of being independent, functional, and
Many of the skills identified as SEL, moral, or character education traits are those
historically taught by one’s direct caregivers, typically parents. When leading SEL scholar
Maurice Elias lead a discussion between educators and parents to create a list of necessary skills
needed by an individual to be successful, hundreds of skills and traits were brought into the
conversation. They were eventually summarized into the following five main categories (with
Hedtke 10 of 30
selected descriptors for clarification) by the early founders of SEL, including CASEL, Mayer
1. Self- awareness
2. Social awareness
● Appreciating diversity
4. Responsible decision-making
5. Relationship management
viewpoints
The list, although not comprehensive, is intended to show the complexity of certain skills such as
self-management and organization which has ten subcategories, many of which a person could
argue are intrinsic from birth and may not be teachable to the secondary student.
Further proof for the need of SEL instruction in schools comes from Clayton Cook
(2008) and his research team when they noted that 48% of students identified as having
Hedtke 11 of 30
emotional disabilities scored below the 16th percentile in the area of social skills. Eleven percent
of students with EBD are involved in the criminal justice system by the time they graduate, and
half are in trouble with schools. Cook went on to discuss that children with social competency
deficits are at greater risk for poor school adjustment and adult psychopathology than students
who are socially competent. Students who lack social competency are at higher risk of dropping
out of school, being arrested by graduation age, and having the inability to maintain employment
as a teen and adult. Unfortunately, there is an often shared belief that SEL training in secondary
students is not effective as their behaviors are likely entrenched in the adolescent by the time the
student reaches about 8 years of age. This belief contradicts an analysis research conducted by
Cook that about two-thirds of of EBD students who participate in SEL instruction experience
favorable outcomes when compared to controls. The need for social skills instruction in schools
is clear.
Identifying the need for SEL in the classroom is only one small hurdle, recognizing
effective and time-sensitive strategies is another difficulty. Johns et al. identified seven different
methods or areas in the school, where SEL can be approached (2005, p.3):
1. Direct instruction
6. Conflict resolution
management
Hedtke 12 of 30
Johns’ article acts as a handbook for how to identify and teach the different skills needed to gain
emotional competencies. The methods described are similar to instruction of other academic
skills, but with a heavy emphasis on rewarding and providing feedback on positive behavior, as
well as seizing the “teachable moment,” that moment when a student’s behavior is completely
unacceptable and they cannot identify in themselves the error in their behaviors. The teachable
moment is often underutilized or missed altogether by the ineffective teacher. Instead of simply
removing an agitated student from a classroom or reprimanding them verbally, teachers need to
have strategies in place in order to turn an unfavorable situation into a positive learning
experience.
Another important aspect noted by Johns et al. is simply a teacher modeling appropriate
social skills (2005). It is important for teachers to realize their place as role models and
understand not all students have positive role models in their lives to help them identify positive
social behaviors or effectively correct their negative social behaviors. The old adage “one must
give respect to earn respect” comes to mind when considering appropriate ways to act as an
individual, how to access the teachable moment, and how to facilitate direct instruction.
It is also interesting to note that some disciplines have social and emotional development
written into the college and career ready standards that have already been adopted by many
states. Wisconsin, for example, uses the Next Generation Science Standards that have language
deliberately added to facilitate the development of curiosity, grit, and ethics which have been
identified as key components of character development (NGSS 2013). Further, SEL outcomes
have been included in the 7th standard which promotes positive and constructive arguments
which are essential to the scientific method, development, and research process. As these
standards have changed, so too must educators. Gone are the days of simply teaching students to
Hedtke 13 of 30
regurgitate facts and prepare for tests. As cultures change, educational outcomes change, and
educators need to be able to adapt to those changes. This may be one of the more difficult
variables to consider when it comes to promoting the instruction of SEL in schools: the veteran
The need for SEL instruction is obvious for the future success of students when
considering graduation rates, criminal activity, and the need for positive employability skills.
Also, it is quite clear that much research has been conducted on how to give this instruction in
the classroom. It also seems feasible that any educator can be a proponent of SEL instruction
based on the modern standards that have been written for the core academic areas, and the need
for every educator to be a positive role model in the lives of their students.
Research Implications
Can social skills instruction effectively increase students’ awareness of their own
detrimental behavior towards learning in the pull-out social studies classroom? The research
supports the idea that social skills instruction is necessary not only in pull-out special education,
but in all classrooms. This is evident when looking at how the current academic standards have
been written according to Johnson and Wiener, as well as the deficiencies reported by business
Also, in order to address this skill deficiency in the researcher’s students he will have
ample opportunity to practice Wisconsin teaching standards 7 (teachers are able to plan different
kinds of lessons) and 8 (teachers know how to test for student progress). In respect of time, the
researcher understands that he will not be able to address all of the social and emotional learning
Hedtke 14 of 30
needs of his students, but hopes that helping to bring awareness of their actions to their attention
will help facilitate growth in the five different areas identified by CASEL.
The researcher plans on integrating mini lessons over the course of several weeks to help
1. Perform initial survey gauging students’ perceptions of how their own behaviors affect
2. Conduct introduction to the Social Emotional Learning unit using the Skittle/M&M
3. The teacher will teach a mini lesson on Grit as a way of introducing CASEL’s Social
4. Each student will complete a short presentation explaining one of the thirty-eight sub-
5. The teacher will focus on the “teachable moment” when it comes to students lack of
6. The teacher will have the students complete a self-assessment similar to the initial
1. Standardized goal: Students will become more aware of CASEL’s standards for social
and emotional learning and will share proficiency of one of the sub-domains with the
group.
1. Task: Students will complete surveys before and after the unit as well as present
a. Students will show improvement between their pre and post surveys
showing they have greater recognition of their behaviors and how they
b. Students will complete their presentation before the end of the unit.
3. Anecdotal data gathered by the researcher based upon observations made before
Post-assessments
This project has been extremely valuable for me as an educator. Not only did it give me
the opportunity to focus on unit planning and student assessment, but it allowed me the
opportunity to research an entire field of education that I had been unfamiliar with prior: social
and emotional learning. As a special education teacher, I have a much better understanding of
the need for SEL instruction in the classroom, and how it can be incorporated into the general
curriculum. This project helped me develop a plan of action that I will be able to integrate in the
future and help answer the question I am asked by parents all too often: “how can you help get
my kid ready for the real world?” This is a plan I intend to share with the rest of my special
education staff as I feel these standards are tangible and accessible for all of our students.
Through this process I learned that the majority of my students came into the unit with a
general idea of socially appropriate behavior on “good” days, but have difficult times making
correct decisions or exemplifying positive SEL skills when they are agitated or worked up. I
believe the only thing that can help break the cycle for a lot of these students is frequent
instruction and reminders, positive reinforcement and support when students exhibit positive
SEL skills, and to take the opportunity to seize the teachable moment.
Reflecting on the first Danielson Domain regarding preparation and planning, I feel that I
have grown in the area of using self-assessment with students to facilitate data driven discussions
and instruction. Using the results of the student survey and teacher comparison survey, I found
some students reported adequate understanding of their SEL deficiencies and maintain adequate
are able to plan different kinds of lessons) and 8 (teachers know how to test for student progress).
This unit was unique in the fact that I was not able to simply gather objective data of student
performance. I needed to gather anecdotal data, as well as student submitted surveys of their
own performance, and then compare the information. Integrating student-driven assessment
forced me to create lesson plans I have not created before based on student perceived needs
My students showed adequate performance toward the recognition of their SEL abilities
over the course of the three month research and implementation process. When comparing the
survey results given at the beginning of the unit, and after the unit (results shown in Artifacts A
and E), out of a possible score of 15, scores increased from a 7.89 to 8.89 when concerning an
individual's behavior and involvement in the classroom and meeting learning objectives. After
reflecting on the implementation process and my initial goals, I realized I was unable to
incorporate as many mini lessons as I would have liked with the frequent disruptions caused by
my job description: students in crisis, absences for school functions, standardized testing, to
name a few. I was unable to effectively address the five areas I had hoped to have my students
master.
I have noticed growth in my students throughout this process, their affect towards one
another, and responsiveness towards my social instruction. They became more aware of the
Hedtke 18 of 30
similarities of their life situations and schemas, and because of this, have started treating one
another with more respect. I noticed less disruptive, rude, and disrespectful behaviors between
students in the classroom and have found students more willing to participate in classroom
activities and discussions. I think the self-awareness activities I built into place helped increase
2. Students participated in surveys with fidelity and seemed to take the surveys seriously
to my surprise. I was not anticipating high school-aged students with emotional and
emotional learning.
4. Simply by making students aware and reminding them of the CASEL doctrine made
the students more aware of their own actions and cognizant of their demeanor in classes.
1. Two students identified as having the greatest discrepancy between their initial survey
results and the teacher reports did not participate well in classroom discussions and
activities.
Hedtke 19 of 30
2. Several students did not take the activities serious and were not able to make the
comparison between their success in school and lack of fluency and recognition of the
CASEL standards.
3. I had hoped to make each student a master of at least one of the SEL areas, which
ultimately did not happen. Some students did not have the interest or academic ability to
4. I also realized my research did not focus on the two areas of self-awareness and
these two areas seeing as how I identified those as my target areas before the
5. The rubric I created for my project was not as descriptive as I thought it was, and
although I modeled an example of my expectations for the project, many students seemed
My Next Steps
1. I will continue teaching mini lessons on the thirty-eight identified sub-domains by the
CASEL group on a weekly basis and use reminders throughout the week of the focus.
2. As there are almost an equal number of sub-domains for SEL standards identified by
the CASEL group as there are weeks in the school year, I will make a plan to incorporate
one of these a week with my future classes throughout the entire school year. I will start
by teaching a mini lesson on the first day of the school week, and then offer frequent
reminders, positive feedback, and capture the teachable moment in order to facilitate
References
Cook, C. R., Gresham, F. M., Kern, L., Barreras, R. B., Thornton, S., & Crews, S. D. (2008).
Social skills training for secondary students with emotional and/or behavioral disorders.
Elias, M.J., Parker, S.J., Kash, M., Weissberg, R.P., & O’Brien, M. (2007). Social and emotional
learning, moral education, and character education: A comparative analysis and a view
toward convergence.
Johns, B.H., Crowley, E.P., Guetzloe, E. (2005). The central role of teaching social skills.
Johnson, H., & Wiener, R. (2017). This time, with feeling: Integrating social and emotional
development and college- and career- readiness standards (pp. 2-21, Rep.). Washington,
Kress, J.S., & Elias, M.J., (2006). Implementing school-based social and emotional learning
Mayer, J.D. (2001). A field guide to emotional intelligence. In J. Ciarrochi, J.P. Forgas, & J.D.
Mayer (Eds.), Emotional intelligence in everyday life (pp. 3-24). Philadelphia: Taylor &
Francis.
NGSS Lead States. 2013. Next Generation Science Standards: For States, By States.
Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
Hedtke 21 of 30
Artifact A
Artifact A shows the results of an initial survey taken to gather the students perceptions of their
own behaviors and how they influence the learning of themselves and others. Several questions
were asked, but three were selected to assess the students’ awareness of their behaviors: “My
behaviors affect my learning,” “My behavior affects the learning of others,” and “I say or act
towards others in a disrespectful way.” This data was gathered using a survey on Google Forms
and compiled into a spreadsheet. The green bar shows a composite score of the survey
questions. The survey was a self assessment using a sliding scale of scores between one and
five, one meaning “almost never,” and five meaning “almost always.”
Hedtke 22 of 30
Artifact B
Artifact B shows a comparison between the teachers assessment of the students behaviors in the
social studies classroom before the in class instruction began. The red bar is the teachers
assessment of student behavior based on the same three questions as shown in Artifact A,
compared with the composite score of student reported behaviors in Artifact A. Some students
self assessment scores were very consistent with the assessments of the teachers, while others
were vastly different.
Hedtke 23 of 30
Artifact C
Artifact C shows the survey students took at the beginning of the unit. They took the quiz on
their own chromebooks in class without any prompting as to what the results would be used for.
They were only directed to answer the questions as their behavior pertains to US Government,
the class they took the survey in.
Hedtke 24 of 30
Artifact D
Materials:
● Several different types of candies, Skittles, M&M’s
● List of questions “what do bullies do?”
Time: 20 minutes
Procedure:
1. Spread desks around the room facing outwards so students are not within eyesight of one
another
2. Give each student a piece of paper towel, plate, etc and a handful of the candy, instruct
them to not eat the candy yet
3. Go through the list of questions pertaining to what bullies to to hurt others, or why kids
might not like going to school.
4. Instruct the students to move one piece of candy to a separate pile for each statement that
is true for them.
5. Tell students that there are many reasons by the time they reach high school years they
might not enjoy attending school, but that these issues do not simply disappear when you
walk out of school at the end of the day, year, or even graduation. All of your
experiences are inside of you, they follow you, positive and negative. Often, we dwell on
the negative and they have a tendency to eat away at us. We need to learn to deal with
the negative experiences so they do not define us as individuals, and allow ourselves to
focus on our positive traits and experiences.
6. Go over the reasons why individuals bully others.
Hedtke 25 of 30
There’s a lot of reasons kids get picked on, there are a lot of reasons an individual might get
singled out and made fun of. Clothing, they try hard at school, involved in band, sexual
orientation, ethnicity, hairstyle, weight, glasses, disability, the amount of money their parents
make, whether or not a family member is in jail
But why do we do these things to others? Why do bullies do it at all. All too often, it is because
they have their own issues they are trying to hide, trying to cover up, trying to deflect. They do
it because they get lack of attention from parents, teachers, or friends. Often times, if a kid is a
younger sibling and they have been picked on by an older sibling, they can develop into a bully.
● Bullied bullies get relief from feeling helpless and overpower others
● Social bullies have poor self-esteem and manipulate others through gossip and
being mean
● Detached bullies plan their attacks and always likeable to everyone but their
victims
● Hyperactive bullies don't understand how to socialize and acts inappropriately and
sometimes physically.
●
Hedtke 26 of 30
Artifact E
Artifact E shows a the results of a follow up survey at the end of the instructional unit. The
survey contained the same questions as the initial survey and shows six students reporting a total
score at or above a nine, where as during the initial survey only four students score dat or above
a nine. This shows a greater awareness of the individual’s SEL skills in the classroom.
Hedtke 27 of 30
Artifact F
The following project shows the rubric used to assess a final presentation students had to give
focusing on one of the different areas of SEL.
CASEL Project
Your job is to make a one page “poster” presenting one of the following areas of social understanding,
and competencies. You need to include the following information. You will have to present this
information to the class. Make sure you reflect on why these skills are important to you currently, and
hypothesis why they might be important to you in the future workplace.
Total 25
Hedtke 28 of 30
Artifact G
The following is an example of high student performance on the final presentation project. This
student used multiple clear examples to define each category and did an excellent job presenting.
This student is labeled as student one, so they can be compared to their surveys at the beginning
and end of
unit (Artifacts
A, B, and E).
Hedtke 29 of 30
Artifact H
The following is an example of median student performance on the final presentation project.
The student used adequate examples for some of the categories, and lacked sufficient definition
of the SEL category. The label of student 4 coincides with the student survey in Artifacts A, B,
and E.
Artifact I
The following is an example of low student performance on the final presentation project. The
student used little example and detail describing any of the areas of SEL and life application, and
did not present. This student is student 5 as mentioned in Artifacts A, B, and E.