Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
e
Downloaded by UNIVERSITY OF STRATHCLYDE on October 15, 2014 | http://arc.aiaa.org | DOI: 10.2514/3.6964
NCENTRIC cylinders are among the more common Fig. 1 Concentric cylinder configurations.
mfigurations encountered in radiation heat transfer
analyses, being descriptive of assemblies ranging from in-
frared telescopes to tube furnaces. In performing thermal
analyses on such structures with finite-element computer SURFACE 1
programs, it is often necessary to break the shell and tube into
various concentric ring elements and compute radiation view
factors between these elements. Figure 1 depicts a collection
of concentric cylindrical geometries. In general, the tube-shell
view factors of Fig. 1 can be determined using available com-
puter programs which numerically integrate over the areas in-
volved. However, these programs are cumbersome; thereby
limiting their casual usage.
A recent paper by Reid and Tehnant * numerically analyzed
configuration IV in Fig. 1 for the special case where L=Y. SURFACE 2
The more general case, along with the other configurations in Fig. 2 Cylinder-disk view factor geometry.
Fig. 1, is not in the open literature, although the equal-length
case is given in Ref. 2. The novelty of the method presented in
this Note lies in the utilization of the cylinder-disk view fac-
tor Fj.2 of Figs. 2 and 3. By combining various cylinder-disk
view factors, for any of the structures in Fig. 1 F';_5 can be cr
determined in closed form where it is the diffuse view factor o
from the outer curved surface of the inner tube to the outer
cylinder. The view factors from the ends of the inner cylinder
to the outer cylinder in configurations II, III, and IV are not
considered since they can be determined using disk-disk
relations2 as can the shell-shell view factors. 1 Of course, F3.j C/5
Q
can be readily computed from Fj_3 using reciprocity.
0.1
Analysis
A literature survey indicates that the cylinder-disk view fac- 2 4 6 8 1 0 1 2 14
tor is not explicitly available so it is derived first and then ap- CYLINDER LENGTH RATIO, 0>/r
plied to the Fig. 1 structures. By definition, 3 with the Fig. 3 Cylinder-disk view factors.
geometry of Fig. 2:
The integration in Eq. (1) is given by
(1) . „ , e2-R2+r2
where Fd]_2 can be derived from Ref. 4:
?2 + R2-r2
r2')2-4R2r2] * (2)
The cylinder-disk view factor F}_2 given by Eq. (2) is pre-
X COS" 7 2 -cos~ ; ( — sented in parametric form in Fig. 3.
-r22) The view factors Fj_3 for the various structures in Fig. 1
Received February 3, 1975; revision received March 28, 1975. are presented in the following. The derivation for con-
Index category: Radiation and Radiative Heat Transfer. figuration I is shown in some detail to illustrate the procedure.
*Engineering Supervisor. In all cases L is the length of the inner cylinder and Y is the
AUGUST 1975 TECHNICAL NOTES 1123
Fdl-3dy (3)
Effect of Thermal Gradient on
By introducing appropriate view factor algebra, Eq. (3) can be
written Frequencies of Tapered
LF ,_3=\
A Rectangular Plates
J 0
C. Kameswara Rao*
(4)
In Fig. 1 and Eq. (4), surfaces 2 and 4 are imaginary annular and
disks covering the ends of the outer cylinder. A term-by-term
Downloaded by UNIVERSITY OF STRATHCLYDE on October 15, 2014 | http://arc.aiaa.org | DOI: 10.2514/3.6964