Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
The terms of a contract describe the duties and obligations that each party assumes under their
agreement. Contracts may contain express terms and implied terms.
Express terms are terms that have been specifically mentioned and agreed by both parties at the
time the contract is made. They can either be oral or in writing.
Implied terms are terms which have not been mentioned by either party but will nonetheless be
‘included’ in the contract, often because the contract doesn’t make commercial sense without
that term.
Held: The trial judge held that the sales predictions were not a warranty, but that the plaintiffs
were liable for negligent representation. The House of Lords held that the gas sales predictions
were a contractual warranty because it was a factual statement on an important matter made by a
party who claimed to have special skill and knowledge. Furthermore the statements were made
with the intention of inducing the contract and did in fact induce Marden to enter into the
contract. therefore Esso breached the warranty and were liable for damages flowing from
the breach. The House of Lords (Denning) held further that if not a warranty, the sales
predictions were negligent representations made by a party claiming to have special skill and
knowledge. Esso was therefore under a duty to take reasonable care ensure that all
representations were accurate. It was held that the duty existed before the contract was formed
and continued to apply once the contract was underway. Accordingly, the plaintiffs were liable
for damages under the tort of negligence.
Note that warranties normally pertain to present or past facts. However in this case a breach of
warranty was found regarding future facts.
Oscar Chess Ltd v Williams [1957]
Facts: Mrs Williams purchased a second hand Morris car on the basis that it was a 1948 model.
The registration document stated it was first registered in 1948. The following year her son used
the car as a trade in for a brand new Hillman Minx which he was purchasing from Oscar Chess.
The son stated the car was a 1948 model and on that basis the Oscar Chess offered £290 off the
purchase price of the Hillman. Without this discount, Williams would not have been able to go
through with the purchase. 8 months later Oscar Chess ltd found out that the car was in fact a
1939 model and worth much less than thought. They brought an action for breach of contract
arguing that the date of the vehicle was a fundamental term of the contract thus giving grounds to
repudiate the contract and claim damages.
Held: The statement relating to the age of the car was not a term but a representation. The
representee, Oscar Chess ltd as a car dealer, had the greater knowledge and would be in a better
position to know the age of the manufacture than the defendant.
Principle: A statement made by the 'knowledgeable' party is more likely to be treated by the
court as factual than as mere opinion or belief.
Schawel v Reade(1913)
Facts: The defendant told the plaintiff, who required a horse for stud purposes, "You need not
look for anything: the horse is perfectly sound. If there was anything the matter with the horse I
would tell you". A few days later the price was agreed and, three weeks later, the plaintiff
bought the horse. Later however it turned out that the horse was not fit for stud purposes.
Held: The statement was held to be a term of the contract, but here the defendant, who was the
owner of the horse, would appear to have had special knowledge. The court held that this was
not an express warranty that the stallion was fit for stud purposes but it was implied as this
assurance was the purpose for which the claimant was buying the horse.
Bannerman v White
Facts: The buyer of hops (used to make beer) asked whether sulphur had been used in their
cultivation. He added that if it had he would not even bother to ask the price. The seller assured
him that it had not. It later transpired that sulphur had been used and the Claimant brought an
action for breach.
Held: This assurance was held to be a condition of the contract. It was of such importance that,
without it, the buyer would not have contracted. It was a term of the contract rather than a
representation as the claimant had communicated the importance of the term and relied on the
statement in purchasing the goods.
Pym v Campbell
Facts: John Pym, P, invented a “crushing, washing, and amalgamating machine,” which he
solicited the sale of 1/8 interest in the benefits to accrue from future sales. At trial the P
produced a document, which was signed by both P and D, that outlined the terms of the
agreement. A meeting was set for two engineers to examine the machine for approval. One
approved but the other did not. The D did not honour the written agreement and the P filed
suit claiming a breach of contract. Trial judge informed the jury that a condition precedent to
formation could be required before an agreement was determined to be valid.
Issue: Whether a condition precedent to the agreement, the second engineer’s approval,
invalidated a written agreement.
Analysis: Evidence has shown that the written agreement was conditional. The jury’s finding
that the writing was signed on the terms that it was to be an agreement if Abernethie approved of
the invention, and not otherwise. The signed paper was never intended to be the record of the
terms of the agreement. Before the paper was signed it was explained to the P that the D did not
intend the paper to be an agreement until Abernethie had been consulted, and approved. The P
assented to this and received the writing on those terms. There was no agreement.
Held: The precedent condition invalidated the written agreement.
As well as the express terms laid down by the parties, further terms may in some circumstances
be read into contracts by the courts. These implied terms may be divided into four groups: terms
implied in fact, terms implied in law, terms implied by custom and terms implied by trade usage.