lective Paper Itis important to note that, ‘This means identifying strengths and weaknesses, then reaching a judgement. Rofiective papers which simply provide 2 narrative of what the team did, however fluently this is expressed, will not be able to do this. This conclusion to a candidate's evaluation of their team's collaboration is @ good example of how this can be done in a straightforward but effective way: invatfrankvand thenestway: This went beyond simply saying what everyone's role was to thinking more Closely about how individuals exploited their strengths, added breadth and depth to the arguments, and considered others’ views before coming to a group solution. In the same way, for the second criterion of the reflective paper, Itisiimportant forieandidatesito'specifically These perspectives, may come from research they have done or from the findings of other team members, as in this extract from a reflective paper related to a team project on the Intemet: A few candidates did not write about either the process of collaboration or what they had leamt from the project, so were unable to gain any credit from the Reflective Paper, but the majority clearly engaged with ‘this opportunity to think about what they had done and how their skills and knowledge had developed as a result.