Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Preface
The conference “High Strength Steels for Hydropower Plants”, which was held from 18.-20. September 2013 in
Graz is judged to be a great success and a valuable contribution in this field of research and technical
application. About 100 participants were present and contributed after the oral presentations as well as in the
final discussion with critical questions and remarks.
The major outcome of these contributions is summarized in this document. Three different types can be
distinguished:
1. Contributions which refer directly to the presentations. These are placed directly after the title of the
individual papers (chapters 0-7)
2. Oral contributions as a part of the final and summarizing discussion, which was organised in the three
major topics of the conference (chapter 8.1-8.3)
3. Written statements, which were received after the conference (chapter 8.4).
With this document we’d like to provide some more explanations of different approaches and solutions
available for different challenges and to give some insights into possible arising questions when reading the
book published in course of the conference.
Norbert Enzinger
N. Enzinger 1/10
HSS2013 18.-19.9.2013
0 Plenary Lecture
0.1 Development, Experiences and Qualification of Steel Grades
for Hydro Power Conduits
H. Cerjak, N. Enzinger (TU Graz, Institute for Materials Science and
Welding), M. Pudar (Magna Steyr Fahrzeugtechnik AG & Co KG) –
AUSTRIA
Disucssion:
Discussion:
Are the surge tanks aerated? Yes;
In Norway there are pressurized surge tanks in service
Did you consider losses in the aeration? No
A fluid Model for de-aeration was considered
Loading case is very seldom – a wall was installed for the prevention of this.
Pump storage plants have to be more complex leading to more complex surge-tanks. What is
the future development to consider this in modelling? General numerical layout combined
with physical simulation based on experience.
Discussion:
35mm limit for application of PWHT is based on experience and is an engineering measure only.
Nowadays new tough steels do not show embrittlement in HAZ anymore. Therefore this 35mm is not
a law. The application of a heat treatment is not only positive but often has negative influence (e.g.
plastic deformation). A plate behaves differently compared to a uniaxial tensile test. Therefore wide
plate tests are necessary showing much less necking. Inhomogeneous materials are applied. Especially
the weld depending on the matching behaviour can be critical.
Discussion:
Measure convergence after excavation. Elastic deformation is in the range of accuracy, which makes it
even more difficult. Measured data show a large scatter.
N. Enzinger 2/10
HSS2013 18.-19.9.2013
Discussion:
Why are no measurements performed to determine the stiffness (like in tunnel design)? It is not an
elastic behaviour, therefore it cannot be applied. Additionally the local gradients and deviations are
severe. Furthermore you have to know the properties before excavation which is a precondition for
proper measurement.
Discussion
fatigue analysis was performed
consideration of concrete for fatigue by partial loading
Tolerances regarding rooftopping? Common standard (CECT) was applied and confirmed by testing of
parts.
Discussion:
Stop/start of turbine. How do you judge additional wear of mechanical system? An additional safety
factor is considered for all mechanically loaded parts
2.3 The Renewal of the Pressure Shaft for the High Head
Hydropower Plant Kaunertal in Austria - Part 1
P. Bonapace, A. Hammer, R. Maldet, O. Schüller (TIWAG -Tiroler
Wasserkraft AG) – AUSTRIA
Discussion:
Time planning is challenging but in time at the moment
Any risk analysis was performed? Yes, but…it is concentrated on the project and not on the program.
Was dolomite reported before excavation? Due to existing power plant it was not a severe problem.
Discussion:
Which friction losses are taken into account? Eddy losses are significant
Inclined vs. vertical shaft – what is the reason? It depends on the construction period which is shorter
for the vertical shaft. Economically a vertical shaft is worse; additionally ground water pressure could
be higher
Discussion:
Is there a device to get back the energy which is removed from the system?
N. Enzinger 3/10
HSS2013 18.-19.9.2013
How much time was necessary for erection time for 3D? Volume of power house was reduced;
erection time similar to other project.
Failure case in Russia: 65% of the area was covered with cracks…?
Discussion:
Discussion:
Did you measure the wall thickness? Yes by means of UT
Difference of strains and stresses? Asymmetry of the steel lining in the shaft; maybe shaft is not
perfectly round
Safety margin in region with rock is 1.5 and without rock participation 1.1? no; between 1.33 and 1.66
15% pressure increase for max. dyn. loading? Loading by pumps
Discussion:
Which safety factor was considered? No safety factor was considered
FKM-approach? Linear elastic model
Did you consider the effect of water? On the inner side crack: yes
Did you consider residual stresses? No
Material properties were taken from literature. No measurements were done on real materials
LEFM approach is no suitable. Instead LEPM or even plastic collapse should be applied. Therefore
critical crack size is much larger.
Discussion:
Fatigue assessment for damage sum for crack initiation
No estimation of circumferential welds are available at the moment.
Austrian standard does not allow these big imperfections.
Discussion:
CECT standard fits to penstocks which are mainly static loaded. For fatigue loaded components the
requirements have to be redesigned.
N. Enzinger 4/10
HSS2013 18.-19.9.2013
Discussion:
Did you check the stress level on the inner side when lowering the sickle height? An optimisation
between stress level and hydraulic losses is necessary.
What are the required toughness requirements of the material and the associated heat treatment? –
Do you apply stress relief heat treatment? No – even no static pressure test is applied
(Why is small sickle leading to lower losses? )
Discussion:
Bifurcator was performed by another contractor
Circumferential weld in the tunnel using backing strips is tested by phased array and TOFD
Roof toping and misalignment was followed CECT. But in fact roof toping was avoided due to
calibration after welding (grinding inside; outside max. 1.5mm is allowed)
4.3 New Design Aspects for Steel Linings of Pressure Shafts made
of High Strength Steel
R. Greiner (TU Graz, Institute of Steel Structures), G. Innerhofer sen.
(Vorarlberger Illwerke AG), W. Stering (TU Graz, Institute of Steel
Structures) – AUSTRIA
Discussion:
Standards are required
Discussion:
Pressure distribution on the thrust ring. What is the recommended peak stress in the concrete? Higher
stresses also lead to higher stresses in the pipe
What is the situation if you consider more thrust rings? This was not investigated. It will be considered
in further investigations.
Are practical lab tests continued? No budget available for that at the moment.
Large deformation of the ring. Additional stiffener rips behind the thrust ring? Was not investigated.
N. Enzinger 5/10
HSS2013 18.-19.9.2013
Discussion:
A lot of welding is necessary. Stiffener welded to the box. How do you guarantee the quality of the
welds? Detailed specification and NDT is applied.
Fatigue was considered within the project
How did you consider elastic deformation? The body behind was modelled to estimate the stiffness
Equations are from FKM recommendation. Are tensile and compressive stresses distinguished?
According FKM yes.
Discussion:
No further strain gauges were considered
Only local behaviour was considered.
Did you also check 1:1 X weld? No significant change is expected.
Discussion:
Safety guidelines can be estimated if no data are available
Structure is very specific.
Max. possible angle in the kink to apply this approach?
Discussion:
How much stress occurred in the penstock? No fatigue cracks in the past. But nowadays with grouting
holes fatigue becomes essential.
Discussion:
Qualification program only for GTAW? Yes, SAW was considered not to be so critical.
6.2 The Renewal of the Pressure Shaft for the High Head
Hydropower Plant Kaunertal in Austria - Part 2
A. Hammer, O. Schüller, R. Maldet, P. Bonapace, (TIWAG -Tiroler
Wasserkraft AG) - AUSTRIA
N. Enzinger 6/10
HSS2013 18.-19.9.2013
Discussion:
Technical J0,2 why not physical (SZW, slide 7)? It is simpler; for shallow cracks this simplification is not
critical
Residual stresses reduction to 25% after PWHT? Will be measured in future
Discussion:
(Measurement of elongation of wide plate test; deformation (bending) influencing the results?)
Double sided welded. Single sided with backing strip – same results expected? Very similar results are
expected. Nevertheless due to the backing strip stress situation will be completely different…
Discussion:
Discussion:
PWHT of thick bifurcation and influence on properties? Is not applied.
Sickle plate up to 70mm, over that a sandwich plate is proposed? Exceeding 75mm QT type is applied.
No heat treatment is applied for bifurcation in Japan
Very low preheat temperatures; what about hydrogen level? It is very low (less 3ppm)
Discussion:
Which PWHT process is recommended? Depending on control
Discussion about PWHT parameters before destroying microstructure
Discussion:
Importance of low O content. How to maintain this value in application? – flux components are
designed properly… no special measure available.
Details about chemistry of stick electrodes could be answered.
N. Enzinger 7/10
HSS2013 18.-19.9.2013
Discussion:
GTA not included – why? Not involved in the project; no answer possible
FAT 210 really achieved? Not involved in the project; no answer possible
8 Overall Discussion
First time different faculties joined to discuss issues relevant to hydropower plant, which was very useful to
learn from each other.
N. Enzinger 8/10
HSS2013 18.-19.9.2013
8.4.1 Introduction
At first it shall be emphasized that Japanese concept is based on hygiene and safety of personnel working in
tunnel or cavern. Hygiene and safety take precedence over construction costs.
PWHT is not applied to HSS for HPP since around 1960 when hygiene/safety incident happened at fuel
heating in tunnel/cavern.
Target temperature of pre- and post-heating is 100℃ as higher temperature is not preferable for
humanity.
Researches and developments of structural design, steel, consumables and welding procedures are
executed under this concept.
8.4.2 PWHT
One HT70, fifteen HT80 and two HT100 HPP are constructed without PWHT satisfactory.
N. Enzinger 9/10
HSS2013 18.-19.9.2013
Not only pipe shafts but also bifurcation are fabricated without PWHT nor hydro-pressure test.
Fracture toughness test may be recommendable on welding joints without PWHT.
Avoiding PWHT reduces anti-softening elements, which is better effect for cold cracking.
Effect of residual stresses on fracture is discussed in paper S6-3(M. Mochizuki et al.) of this
conference.
Effect on fatigue is dealt by many papers, one of which is:
K. Horikawa et al.: Fatigue crack grows rate in welded joints after stress relief heat treatment, Trans.
JWRI vol.10, pp91-95, 1981
It says in conclusion “If residual stress can’t be cancelled perfectly, it seems that stress relief heat
treatment on prototype members is of little effect on fatigue crack growth rate.” PWHT is unable to
cancel perfectly.
Railway bridges, including Seto-ohashi Bridges which contain up to 75mm HT80, are not applied
PWHT.
Glass wool backing / Ceramic baking are used instead of metal backing to avoid the risk of welding cracks or of
welding defects possibly remained root. Refer following paper:
K. Horikawa et al.: Application of Extra-High Tensile Strength Steel for Hydropower Plants in Japan,
HSS2009, pp3-1 – 3-9, 2009
Closing by Cerjak: such a conference is needed in future continuously; please plan the next conference
therefore in Japan.
N. Enzinger 10/10