Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Our perception of the Arctic region is that its distance from industrial centers keeps it pristine
and clear from the impact of pollution. However, through a process known as transboundary
pollution, the Arctic is the recipient of contaminants whose sources are thousands of miles away.
Large quantities of pollutants pour into our atmosphere, as well as our lakes, rivers, and oceans
on a daily basis. In the last 20 years, scientists have detected an increasing variety of toxic
contaminants in the North, including pesticides from agriculture, chemicals and heavy metals from
industry, and even radioactive fall-out from Chernobyl. These are substances that have invaded
ecosystems virtually worldwide, but they are especially worrisome in the Arctic.
Originally, Arctic contamination was largely blamed on chemical leaks, and these leaks were
thought to be “small and localized.” The consensus now is that pollutants from around the world
are being carried north by rivers, ocean currents, and atmospheric circulation. Due to extreme
conditions in the Arctic, including reduced sunlight, extensive ice cover and cold temperatures,
contaminants break down much more slowly than in warmer climates. Contaminants can also
become highly concentrated due to their significantly lengthened life span in the Arctic.
Problems of spring run-off into coastal waters during the growth period of marine life are of
critical concern. Spring algae blooms easily, absorbing the concentrated contaminants released
by spring melting. These algae are in turn eaten by zooplankton and a wide variety of marine
life. The accumulation of these contaminants increases with each step of the food chain or web
and can potentially affect northerners who eat marine mammals near the top of the food chain.
Pollutants respect no borders; transboundary pollution is the movement of contaminants across
political borders, whether by air, rivers, or ocean currents. The eight circumpolar nations, led by
the Finnish Initiative of 1989, established the Arctic Environmental Protection Strategy (AEPS) in
which participants have agreed to develop an Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Program (AMAP).
AMAP establishes an international scientific network to monitor the current condition of the Arctic
with respect to specific contaminants. This monitoring program is extremely important because it
will give a scientific basis for understanding the scope of the problem.
In the 1950’s, pilots traveling on weather reconnaissance flights in the Canadian high Arctic
reported seeing bands of haze in the springtime in the Arctic region. It was during this time that
the term “Arctic haze” was first used, referring to this smog of unknown origin. But it was not
until 1972, that Dr. Glenn Shaw of the Geophysical Institute at the University of Alaska first put
forth ideas of the nature and long-range origin of Arctic haze. The idea that the source was long
range was very difficult for many to support. Each winter, cold, dense air settles over the Arctic.
In the darkness, the Arctic seems to become more and more polluted by a buildup of mid-latitude
emissions from fossil fuel combustion, smelting and other industrial processes. By late winter, the
Arctic haze has been studied most extensively in Point Barrow, Alaska, across the Canadian Arctic
and in Svalbard (Norway). Evidence from ice cores drilled from the ice sheet of Greenland indicates
that these haze particles were not always present in the Arctic, but began to appear only in the last
century. The Arctic haze particles appear to be similar to smog particles observed in industrial areas
farther south, consisting mostly of sulfates mixed with particles of carbon. It is believed the particles
are formed when gaseous sulfur dioxide produced by burning sulfur-bearing coal is irradiated by
sunlight and oxidized to sulfate, a process catalyzed by trace elements in the air. These sulfate
particles or droplets of sulfuric acid quickly capture the carbon particles, which are also floating in
the air. Pure sulfate particles or droplets are colourless, so it is believed the darkness of the haze is
caused by the mixed-in carbon particles.
The impact of the haze on Arctic ecosystems, as well as the global environment, has not been
adequately researched. The pollutants have only been studied in their aerosol form over the Arctic.
However, little is known about what eventually happens to them. It is known that they are removed
somehow. There is a good degree of likelihood that the contaminants end up in the ocean, likely
into the North Atlantic, the Norwegian Sea and possibly the Bering Sea — all three very important
fisheries.
Currently, the major issue among researchers is to understand the impact of Arctic haze on global
climate change. The contaminants absorb sunlight and, in turn, heat up the atmosphere. The global
impact of this is currently unknown but the implications are quite powerful.
Read the passage about alternative farming methods in Oregon again and look at
the statements below.
16 Arctic conditions mean that the break down of pollutants is much accelerated
18 The AEPS has set up scientific stations in the Arctic to monitor pollution.
20 Evidence that this smog has only occurred in the 20th Century has been found in
the ice on the polar ice cap.
21 Research has shown that aerosol arctic pollutants remain the air indefinitely.
Choose your answers from the box below the summary and write them in boxes
22 – 27 on your answer sheet.
NB There are more words than spaces, so you will not use them all.
Example Answer
(eg) ______________________ that the origins of spring, arctic haze, first seen over
the ice cap in the 1950s, came from far away were at first not (22) _______________
_______. This haze is a smog formed in the dark, arctic winter by pollution delivered to
starting to occur in the 20th Century. The smog consists of sulphates and carbon, the
latter creating the (25) ______________________ of the haze. Due to lack of research,
the final destination of the pollution is unknown but it probably ends up in the (26)
______________________ and therefore into the food chain. Scientists are presently
more worried about the (27) ______________________ effect it has on climate change.