In the last assignment, my analysis focus on the field f Artificial Intelligence

(AI). Hence, in this assignment, I also find the special issue article named “Artificial

cognition for social human-robot interaction: An implementation” [1] from the

“Artificial Intelligence” journal. To briefly summarize this topic, this research [1]

describes that the challenge between Human-Robot interaction (HRI) and the

researchers attempt to organize those challenges to explain and illustrate some

methods that they have investigated. After studying and analyzing, the paragraphs are

divided three parts which are overall structure, rhetorical elements, and create-a-

research-space (CARS) [2] to detail the analysis result.

 Overall Structure

Before beginning to compare the structure with IMRD [2], there are six

sections of this paper [1]. The structure order is like the book “Academic Writing

for Graduate Student” [2] which illustrates the IMRD structure. “Table I” shows
 Table I. Overall Structure information

Sections Title IMRD

1 The challenge of human-robot interaction I

2 Deliberative architecture and knowledge model I&M

3 Cognitive skills I&M

4 Support studies R

5 Discussion: D

when artificial intelligence enables human-robot interaction

6 Conclusion D

the result I collected and analyzed. Although this article structure is similar to

IMRD, I think the second and third parts that are little different from IMRD.

They mix literature and methods to show the study.

 Rhetorical Elements

 Object of Study

The object of study of this paper [1] is artificial cognition for social

human-robot interaction. The researchers focus on cognition since they

want to show how cognition is an important technique for HRI.

 Purpose

The purpose is to describe those challenges and to exhibit a set of key

 decisional issues which include solving for a cognitive robot to share space

and tasks with a human.

 Exigence

From the introduction section [1], the exigence is that the researchers

do not claim to address HRI. They attempt to organize it into a coherent

challenge for AI and to explain and illustrate those key factors for human-

robot interaction because the previous research was only focus on itself. The

previous research did not integrate those key factors.

 Relevance

In 6.2 section (The next steps) [1], the researchers hope their research

help other researchers who want to implement a personal robot since they

already address those mentioned challenges. However, there are more

challenges for improving HRI.

 CARS

In this part, I identify whole sentences in the introduction section

whose page is between 45 to 47 [1], and then simplify the result I analyze.

In page 45 [1], all content which only describes the background is Move 1

[2]. In page 46 [1], first paragraph is Move 1 [2] until to second paragraph.

The move 2 [2] I find is in abstract first sentence. “… in many regards:

 dynamic, partially unknown environments that were not originally designed

for robots; a broad variety of situations with rich semantics to understand

and interpret; physical interactions with humans that requires fine, low-

latency yet socially acceptable control strategies…” [1]. Then, the third

paragraph [1] which talk about purpose and stating the value of the present

research is Move 3 [2] until the end of introduction section. The authors [1]

listed three challenges which are communication, joint action, and human-

aware execution and interpreted the research of structure. I think it is Move

3 [a] that outline this article purposes and Move 3 [e] [2]. Also, the authors

mentioned about their research contribution that I think it is Move 3 [d]

which state the value in 1.2 section

References

[1] S. Lemaignan, M. Warnier, E. A. Sisbot, A. Clodic and R. Alami, "Artificial

cognition for social human–robot interaction: An implementation," Artificial

Intelligence, vol. 247, pp. 45-69, 1 June 2017.

[2] J. M. Swales and C. B. Feak, Academic Writing for Graduate Students, Ann

Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2012.