TATA CONSULTING ENGINEERS LIMITED

PROJECT : Project Mangament Services for PVC Resin Plant, Ethiopia.

COMMENT SHEET
Consolidated
Received TCE Comment
Sl. No. Document Number Title Rev No. Comment Issue
Date Issue Date
Date
 TATA CONSULTING ENGINEERS LIMITED
PROJECT : Project Mangament Services for PVC Resin Plant, Ethiopia.
COMMENT SHEET

Calculation Report for Regulating pond

Regulating pond structure drawing
Calculation Report for Middle water pond,Reclaimed water pond and Sludge pond
Middle water pond,Reclaimed water pond and Sludge pond structure drawing 1/2
Middle water pond,Reclaimed water pond and Sludge pond structure drawing 1/2
Calculation Report for NaClO oxidation reaction pond
NaClO oxidation reaction pond structure drawing 1/2
NaClO oxidation reaction pond structure drawing 2/2
Calculation Report for PRE- sedimentation tank
"PRE- sedimentation tank structure
Doc Title : drawing 1/2"
"PRE- sedimentation tank structure
drawing 2/2"
Calculation Report for Primary bio-tank and Secondary bio-tank
Primary bio-tank and Secondary bio-tank structure drawing 1/7
Primary bio-tank and Secondary bio-tank structure drawing 2/7
Primary bio-tank and Secondary bio-tank structure drawing 3/7
Primary bio-tank and Secondary bio-tank structure drawing 4/7
Primary bio-tank and Secondary bio-tank structure drawing 5/7
Primary bio-tank and Secondarybio-tank structure drawing 6/7
Primary bio-tank and Secondary bio-tank structure drawing 7/7

8299-D-6304C-19-001
8299-D-6304C-23-001
8299-D-6304C-19-002
8299-D-6304C-23-002
8299-D-6304C-23-003
8299-D-6304C-19-003
8299-D-6304C-23-004
8299-D-6304C-23-005
8299-D-6304C-19-004
8299-D-6304C-23-013
Doc No :
8299-D-6304C-23-014
8299-D-6304C-19-005
8299-D-6304C-23-006
8299-D-6304C-23-007
8299-D-6304C-23-008
8299-D-6304C-23-009
8299-D-6304C-23-010
8299-D-6304C-23-011
8299-D-6304C-23-012

Revision: A /B / C / D
Date of
18-Apr-18
issue:
PPD BY: Amol R Khismatrao

Comments By
Comments- Comments By Consultant (TCE) /
Sl. No. Reference Comments By Consultant (TCE) / Employer (DCEP) Response By EPC contractor (CEC) Response Date Comments By Consultant (TCE) / Employer (DCEP) Comments-Date Response By EPC contractor (CEC) Response Date Consultant (TCE) / Comments-Date Response By EPC contractor (CEC) Response Date Comments-Date Status (Open/Resolved)
Date Employer (DCEP)
Employer (DCEP)

Contractor to submit Mechanical GA drawing incorporating final vendor

drawing details which include -
1) Layout GA drawings were presented by CEC in
Changsha Meeting. The GA drawing for
2) Centre to centre dimensions 11/9/2017 information will be uploaded as per
12/8/2017
3) Elevations and sections meeting MOM.
4) Operational and maintenance space
5) Erection / installation requirement as applicable

Contractor to submit Civil loading requirement which include -

1) Contractor's reviewed and accepted vendor drawing references. The loads have been considered from GA
11/9/2017 drawings.
12/8/2017 Resolved
2) Loading diagrams ( Current drawing submitted shows loads put up by CEC CEC has confirmed in the
without any back up / references) meeting held at CEC,
Changsha that all design,
GA drawings were presented by CEC in serviceability check, strength
Changsha Meeting. The GA drawing for design has been carried out 1/2/2018
Contractor to resubmit the calculation reports after submission of above data. 11/9/2017 information will be uploaded as per
12/8/2017 Resolved
as per GB codes.
meeting MOM. CEC has also confirmed that
Contractor to submit architetcural and GA drawings for review and approval of calculation Comments as indictaed above. all loading details have been
reports and drawings. considered as per GA.

The submitted documents are ponds, so

without architectural drawing for them. GA
drawings are being prepared. Because GA GA drawings were presented by CEC in
drawings are related to equipment Changsha Meeting. The GA drawing for
1 10/17/2017
information and it need time to finish all
10/27/2017
information will be uploaded as per
12/8/2017 Resolved
the detail. We suggested to begin the civil meeting MOM.
work first. Water discipline engineer can
ensure the location and size of ponds.

Design calculation details and drawings of other sections / units of 6304 is yet to be released
by Contractor. Will be submitted after the other part
2 1/5/2018
finished.
3/7/2018 Open

Contractor to note that the wall top and bottom elevations are given in chinese. Consultant
presumes that Contractor is done calaculations as per process requirements. Contractor shall The Chinese in wall top and bottom EL
Contractor has only provided only Layout
ensure that design requirements are in line with GA / process requirements. means "default". Bottom slab EL is -4m as
Drawings of GA, however elevations are still not
3 8299-D-6304C-19-001 1/19/2018 shown in clause 3. Contractor confirmed 3/7/2018
submitted and loading diagrams are not
4/18/2018 Open
this is match with water discipline
subitted.Contractor to submit the same
requirement.

4 8299-D-6304C-19-001
5 8299-D-6304C-19-004
Contractor to note that sizes and reinforcement details of 11-5, 13-14. Calcualtion report There is no beam in the drawing for the pond,
indicates beam at 7-8, 12-7, however doesn’t indicate any beams in the same location. 1/19/2018 Checked and corrected the node number. 3/7/2018 however in report the beam calculations are 4/18/2018 Open
presented contractor to clarify the same
Contractor to revert if walls have been checked for hoop stress. The calculation is based on finite element
1/19/2018 analys. The hoop stress has been 3/7/2018 Resolved
considered by programme.
Comments mentioned on drawing with reference no

Reference
no on
drawing
As per Minutes of Meeting - 014 dated 26th September 2017 between TCE,DCEP & CEC at
Mekelle site, Contractor to ensure that the SBC value considered in design calculations shall
be ensured at site.
In case design SBC is not available at depth as shown in drawing,Contractor shall take
necessary steps as follows:-

a)Contractor to excavate upto founding level where design SBC shall be available.OR
c)Contractor to reach upto founding level where design SBC shall be available and Contractor
to put plum/ lean concrete and bring lean concrete level up to foundation level as mentioned
8299-D-6304C-23-003,
1 8299-D-6304C-23-005
in design drawings. Resolved
c)If above options are not feasible ,Contractor to redesign the foundations with actual SBC at
site at no extra cost and time to the Owner.
d)Each above changes shall be certified by TCE & DCEP at site and shall be recorded and
all records shall be made available at site for review purpose at any time.
e)Any modification executed due to above changes and acepted at site shall be included in
As built drawing by Contractor

Comments mentioned on drawing with reference no

Reference
no on
drawing
1 8299-D-6304C-23-001
2 8299-D-6304C-23-001
3 8299-D-6304C-23-001
4 8299-D-6304C-23-001
Contractor to revert if the bottom slab is checked for KZ-1 / KZ - 2 punching shear and
1/19/2018 Checked and added in revised report. 3/7/2018 Resolved
moments.
Regulating pond indicates minimum calculated area requirement of 600mm2 as per Bar no. 3 is D12@150,as added in the
calculation report. Reinforcement indicated herein is lesser than that required. 1/19/2018 latest drawing. The bar area satisfied the 3/7/2018 Resolved
calculation 600mm2.
Slab at EL-2.75 is suspended slab. Load seems to be transferred from slab to wall. EL -2.75m slab is not a suspended slab. It
Assumptions made by contractor is unavailable. Contractor shall ensure proper transfer of is supported by RC wall and column KZ-
forces. 1/19/2018
2. The calculation of it is shown as slab-1
3/7/2018 Resolved
in report.
Cut out for vertical ladder to be provided.
The location of the vertical ladder indicated in
There is no slab above -1.95m slab, so no the drawing there is a slab of 120 mm thk.
1/19/2018
need to provide additional cut out.
3/7/2018
Contractor to verify the location and confirm
4/18/2018 Open
whether the cutout is reqd or not.
 Contractor to clarify the requirement of these bars.
This is the additional stirrup at joint point
of beam.It is to bear the concentrate force
5 8299-D-6304C-23-001 1/19/2018 of secondary beam. The constructional 3/7/2018 Resolved
requirement of these bars see Standard
Design 11G101-1.

Calculation report shall indicate pressure calculation in line with concept shown in
construction drawings. Complete circular area is taken for pressure calculation which is not See page 28 of 8299-D-6304C-19-004,
the same as indicated herein. we have provided the calculation of
6 8299-D-6304C-23-013 1/19/2018 bottom slab whick is supported only at 3/7/2018 Resolved
edge. It is in line with the construction
drawing.

Embedded parts / insert plate location, sizes and design shall be ensured by the Contractor
8299-D-6304C-23-014, as the equipment layout / vendor drawings related to requirement of these plates has not Contractor ensured these informations are
7 8299-D-6304C-23-009 been provided to Consultant. 1/19/2018
according to the relative data.
3/7/2018 Resolved

Drawing shall be in line with calculation report.

This is constructional slab. We have
provided a typical calculation in 8299-D-
7402C-19-003. The RC wall and the
bottom slab adjacent to wall can be
8 8299-D-6304C-23-006 1/19/2018
considered as a self- stable retaining wall.
3/7/2018 Resolved
The constructional slab in middle part only
bear the water's weight. Its rebar is set as
constructional require.

Midspan reinforcement as per calculation report exceeds 1000mm2. Contractor to recheck on This is constructional slab. We have
reinforcement provided. provided a typical calculation in 8299-D-
7402C-19-003. The RC wall and the
bottom slab adjacent to wall can be
9 8299-D-6304C-23-006 1/19/2018
considered as a self- stable retaining wall.
3/7/2018 Open
The constructional slab in middle part only
bear the water's weight. Its rebar is set as
constructional require.

8299-D-6304C-23-010 1. Contractor to provide calculations

10 8299-D-6304C-23-011 for the top slab 4/18/2018 Open