Sie sind auf Seite 1von 16

GT63A

THE UNIVERSITY OF THE WEST INDIES, MONA


MSc [GOVflrMEN

EXAMINATION OF TANUARY 2005


Code and Name of Course GT6 3A-CARIBBE2%JI POLITICAL SYSTEMS I

Date and Time: Friday, January 7, 2005 Duration: 3 Hours


9am to 12noon
INSTRUCrIONS TO CANDIDATES: This paper has ipages and 5 questions

Candidates are reminded that the examiners shall take into account the proper use of the
English Language in determining the mark for each response.

Answer TUREE questions.

1. To the extent that the Plantation School is or has been helpful in studying Caribbean
political systems, it has been so because ofits emphasis on the legacies ofPlantation
political culture. How true is this and how useful does its propositions remain as guides
for studying contemporary Caribbean political systems considering recent claims of a
New Political Culture?

2. How true is it to say that the Westminster-Adapted model has served well as a
transitional model, being an advance on what existed before, but because ofits
own limitations, an obstacle to what should exist today? Can the model transcend
its present limitations?

3. Would you say that new ideas ofdemocracy and better fonnulae for governance,
current in the Caribbean, constitute a new paradigm of Caribbean politics? How
radical a departure are they from the kind of democracy and governance that is
associated with the Westminster-Whitehall system?

4. To what extent can one identify a CARJCOM political system from the Rose Hall
Declaration 2003 and other landmark agreements? How do these past and future
trends propose to address concerns with unity and unification under integrated
development?

5. The 2l century calls for new theories and research on Caribbean political systems.
What kinds of approaches do scholars need to fill the research and theoretical gaps
that exist in the Caribbean if one is to distinguish properly between what is old and
what is new about Caribbean political systems?

END OF QUESTION PAPER.


6T63A

THE UNiVERSiTY OF THE WEST INDIES, MONA


MSc [GOVERNMENT

EXAMINATION OF JANUARY 2005

Codeandflameofcourse GT63A-CAIUBBEAN POLITICAL SYSTEMS I

DateandTime Friday, January 7, 2005 Duration: 3 Hours


9am to 12noon
IINSTRUCrIONS TO CANDIDATES: This papa hasipages and 5 questions

Candidates are reminded that the examiners shall take into account the proper use of the
English Language in determining the mark for each response.

Answer THREE questions.

1. To the extent that the Plantation School is or has been helpful in studying Caribbean
political systems, it has been so because ofits emphasis on the legacies ofPlantation
political culture. How true is this and how useful does its propositions remain as guides
for studying contemporary Caribbean political systems considering recent claims ofa
New Political Culture?

2. How true is it to say that the Westminster-Adapted model has sewed well as a
transitional model, being an advance on what existed before, but because ofits
own limitdions, an obstacle to what should exist today? Can the model transcend
its present limitations?

3. Would you say that new ideas of democracy and better fomiulae for governance,
current in the Caribbean, constitute a new paradigm of Caribbean politics? How
radical a departure are they from the kind of democracy and governance that is
associated with the Westminster-Whitehall system?

4. To what extent can one identity a CARICOM political system from the Rose Hall
Declaration 2003 and other landmark agreements? How do these past and future
trends propose to address concerns with unity and unification under integrated
development?

5. The 21" century calls for new theories and research on Caribbean political systems.
What kinds of approaches do scholars need to fill the research and theoretical gaps
that exist in the Caribbean if one is to distinguish properly between what is old and
what is new about Caribbean political systems?

END OF QUESTION PAPER.


GT63A

THE UNiVERSITY OF THE WEST INDIES, MONA


MSc [GOVERN4ENTJ

EXAMINATION OF JANUARY 2005


CodeandNameofcourse GT63A-CARIBBEAN POLITICAL SYSTEMS I

Date and Time: Friday, January 7, 2005 Duration: 3 Hours


9am to 12noon
INSTRUCIIONS TO CANDIDATES: This paper had pages and 5 questions

Candidates are reminded that the examiners shall take into account the proper use of the
English Language in determining the mark for each response.

Answer THREE questions.

I. To the extent that the Plantation School isox has been helpful in studying Caribbean
political systems it has been so because of its emphasis on the legacies ofPlantation
political culture. How true is this and how useful does its propositions remain as guides
for studying contemporary Caribbean political systems considering recent claims of a
New Political Culture?

2. How true is it to say that the Westminster-Adapted modd has sewed we!! as a
transitional model, being an advance on what existed before, but because ofits
own limitations, an obstacle to what should exist today? Can the model transcend
its present limitations?

3. Would you say that new ideas ofdemocracy and better formulae for governance,
curTent in the Caribbean, constitute a new paradigm of Caribbean politics? How
radical a departure are they from the kind of democracy and governance that is
associated with the Westminster-Whitehall system?

4. To what extent can one identi’ a CARICOM political system from the Rose Hall
Declaration 2003 and other landmark agreements? How do these past and flulure
trends propose to address concerns with unity and unification under integrated
development?

5. The 21" century calls for new theories and research on Caribbean political systems.
What kinds of approaches do scholars need to fill the research and theoretical gaps
that exist in the Caribbean if one is to distinguish properly between what is old and
what is new about Caribbean political systems?

END OF QUESTION PAPER.


GT63A

THE UNIVERSITY OF THE WEST INDIES, MONA


MSc [GO YERIMEN11

EXAMINATION OF JANUARY 2005

Code and Name of Course GT63A-CARIBBEAN POLITICAL SYSTEMS I

Date and Time: Friday, January 7, 2005 Duration: 3 Hours


9am to 12noon
INSTRUCI1ONS TO CANDIDATES: This paper has ipages and 5 questions

Candidates are reminded that the examiners shall take into account the proper use of the
English Language in determining the mark for each response.

Answer THREE questions.

1. To the extent that the Plantation School is or has been helpful in studying Caribbean
political systems, it has been so because oft emphasis on the legacies ofPlantation
political culture. How true is this and how useful does its propositions remain as guides
for studying contemporary Caribbean political systems considering recent claims of a
New Political Culture?

2. How true is it to say that the Westminster-Adapted model has served well as a
transitional model, being an advance on what existed before, but because ofits
own 1imit,tions, an obstacle to what should exist today? Can the model transcend
its present limitations?

3. Would you say that new ideas ofdemocracy and better formulae for governance,
current in the Caribbean, constitute a new paradigm of Caribbean politics? How
radical a departure are they from the kind ofdemocracy and governance that is
associated with the Westminster-Whitehall system?

4. To what extent can one identify a CARICOM political system from the Rose Hall
Declaration 2003 and other landmark agreements? How do these past and future
trends propose to address concerns with unity and unification wider integrated
development?

5. The 2lM century calls for new theories and research on Caribbean political systems.
What kinds of approaches do scholars need to fill the research and theoretical gaps
that exist in the Caribbean if one is to distinguish properly between what is old and
what is new about Caribbean political systems?

END OF QUESTION PAPER.


GT63A

THE UNIVERSiTY OF ThE WEST INDIES, MONA


MSc [GO VERNME Nil

EXAMINATION OF TANUARY 2005


Code and Name of Course GT6 3A-CARIBBEAN POLITICAL SYSTEMS I

Dateandtime: Friday, January 7, 2005 Duration: 3 Hours


9am to 12noon
JNSThUCIIONS TO CANDrDATES:This paper baa ipages and 5 questions

Candidates are reminded that the examiners shall take into account the proper use of the
English Language in determining the mark for each response.

* Answer THREE questions.

1. To the extent that the Plantation School is or has been helpful in studying Caribbean
political systems, it has been so because ofits emphasis on the legacies of Plantation
political culture. How true is this and how useful does its propositions remain as guides
for studying contemporary Caribbean political systems considering recent claims ofa
New Political Culture?

2. How true is it to say that the Westminster-Adapted model has served well as a
transitional model, being an advance on what existed before, but because ofits
own limitations, an obstacle to what should exist today? Can the model transcend
its present limitations?

3. Would you say that new ideas of democracy and better formulae for governance,
current in the Caribbean, constitute a new paradigm of Caribbean politics? How
radical a departure are they from the kind of democracy and governance that is
associated with the Westminster-Whitehall system?

4. To what extent can one identify a CARJCOM political system from the Rose Hall
Declaration 2003 and other landmark agreements? How do these past and future
trends propose to address concerns with unity and unification under integrated
development?

5. The 2 l century calls for new theories and research on Caribbean political systems.
What kinds ofapproaches do scholars need to fill the research and theoretical gaps
that exist in the Caribbean if one is to distinguish properly between what is old and
what is new about Caribbean political systems?

END OF QUESTION PAPER.


GT63A

THE UNiVERSITY OF ThE WEST iNDIES, MONA


MSc [GOVERNMEN1]

EXAMiNATION OF TANUARY 2005


Code and Name of Course GTE 3ACARIBBEAN POLITICAL SYSTEMS I

DateandTime Friday, January 7, 2005 Duration: 3 Hours


9am to 12noon
INSTRUCFIONS TO CANDIDATES: This papa basipages and 5 questions

Candidates are reminded that the examiners shall take into account the proper use of the
English Language in determining the mark for each response.

Answer THREE questions.

1. To the extent that the Plantation School is or has been helpful in studying Caribbean
political systems, it has been so because of its emphasis on the legacies of Plm,taton
political culture. How true is this and how useful does its propositions remain as guides
for studying contemporary Caribbean political systems considering recent claims of a
New Political Culture?

2. How true is it to say that the Westminster-Adapted model has served well as a
transitional model, being an advance on what existed before, but because of its
own limitations, an obstacle to what should exist today? Can the model transcend
its present limitations?

3. Would you say that new ideas of democracy and better formulae for governance,
cunent in the Caribbean, constitute a new paradigm of Caribbean politics? How
radical a departure are they from the kind of democracy and governance that is
associated with the Westminster-Whitehall system?

4. To what extent can one identify a CARICOM political system from the Rose Hall
Declaration 2003 and other landmark agreements? How do these past and future
trends propose to address concerns with unity and unification under integrated
development?

5. The 2 l century calls for new theories and research on Caribbean political systems.
What kinds of approaches do scholars need to fill the research and theoretical gaps
that exist in the Caribbean if one is to distinguish properly between what is old and
what is new about Caribbean political systems?

END OF QUESTION PAPER.


The University of the West Indies
SEME5TER
SEMESTER I ii SUPPLEMENTAL/SUMMER SCHOOL

Examinations of January E31 Anril/May LI / July LII 2008


Originating Campus: Cave Hill LI Mona St. Augustine
Mode: On Campus By Distance
LI
Course Code and Title: GT63A- CARIBBEAN POLITICAL SYSTEMS 1
Date: Tuesday, January 15, 2008 Time: 9:00 am - 12:00 noon
Duration: 3 Hours. Paper No:
Materials required:
Answer booklet: Normal Special Not required fl
Calculator: Programmable [III’ Non Programmable LI
wtem applicalfle
Multiple choice answer sheets: numerical LI alphabetical LI 1-20 LI LI
Auxiliary/Other materials Please specify:
-

Candidates are permitted to bring the following Items to their desks:

Instructions to Candidates: This paper has 2 pages & 8 questions.

Candidates are reminded that the examiners shall take into account the proper use of the English
Language in determining the mark for each response.

Answer THREE questions


No more than one from any section.

Section 1

1. Explain the relationship of nation and state building to democracy and governance in Caribbean
political systems that are at different levels of development, subject to different socio-economic
conditions and shaped by different histories. Must the relationship be sequential or holistic?

2. What theoretical contribution has the Anglo-Governance perspective made to the study of
Westntjter political systems and what further contribution can Caribbean scholarship make to the
Anglo-Governance perspective?
2

63A

Section 2

3. "Many of the institutions which we inherited at the time of independence, and which were
designed for different conditions, different times, and different circumstances, are still being used,
albeit less efficiently, by our current administration. It should not be surprising to learn, therefore,
that many of them act as a brake on our development", Guyana National Development Strategy,
-

2000. Respond to this in light of more recent attempts at ‘participatory and inclusive governance’
in Guyana.

4. Consider the problems of ethnicity in state governance in Trinidad and Tobago, especially against
claims and evidence of political discrimination. Discuss the idea of ‘representative bureaucracy’
and the creation ofthe Equal Opportunity Commission 2000 in this regard.

Section 3

5. Buss and Gardner 2006 say, "Haiti is and has been among the worst governed and most
undemocratic states. The international donor community classifies Haiti as a fragile state-the
Government cannot or will not deliver core functions to the majority of its people, especially the
poor. Haiti is also a post-conflict state-one emerging from a coup d’etat and civil war. Others
have characterized Haiti as a nightmare, with a state variously described as predator, collapsed,
failed, failing, parasitic, kieptocratic, phantom, virtual, pariah, and at best, patrimonial".

What then should the priorities of democratic governance be for a fragile state like Haiti if the
country is to avoid once again becoming a failed state?

6. The Cuban Research Institute speaks of governance "within accepted traditions and institutional
frameworks, [where] interests are articulated by different sectors of society, decisions are taken,
and decision-makers are held to account" 2005. Is such a conception legitimate for a
revolutionary socialist system like that in Cuba when contrasted to the conception held by the
World Bank?

Section 4

7. The National Strategic Plan of Barbados, 2005-2025, conceives of ‘new governance for new times’
in order to make Barbados into a fully developed society. What is the importance of social capital
and social partnership for governance in this vision?

8, A study submitted to the Human Resource Council of the Jamaican Cabinet identified a critical
problem of governance as being, ‘lack of a culture of outcome orientation, evaluation and
responsiveness to users of the public service’. Consider this in relation to Jamaica’s post-colonial
state building and the idea of the ‘service state’ based on better accountability, transparency and
performance in government and politics.

EN] OF QUESTION PAPER


_
Lei
The University of the West Indies
SEMESTER I S1ESTER ii L_J SUPPLEMENTAIJSUMMER SCHOOL

Examinations of January H May/June fl 2009


Originating Campus: cave Hill Mona St. Augustine

Mode: On Campus By Distance

Course Code and Title: GOVT 6078 GT63A CARIBBEAN POLITICAL SYSTEMS 1
Date: onday, January 12, 2009 rime: 9:00 am - 12:00 noon
Duration: 3 Hours. Paper ;o:

Answer booklet: Normal [3] Special ii] Not required _J


fl-I
Calculator: Programm2hio LU Non Prorair.mable I__i
whern applicable
Multiple choice answer sheets: numerical LI alphabedca! Li 1- 2Oj 1 100
Auxiliary/Other materhis - Please specify:

Candidates are permitted to bring the following items to their desks:

!nicuction&tQ Candidates: This paper has 2 pqes &

Candidates are reminded that the examiners shall take into :‘ccniint the proper use of the Englist?
Language in determining the mark for cacti response.

ANSWER THREE QUESTIONS, ONE FROM EACH SECTION

Section A: Theories and Concepts

I. In the hook, Governance in the Caribbean Eds. Ryan and Bissessar, 2002, a number of Caribbeai
scholars offered analyses of "the problem" and preseriptious for the problcms of governance. Asses
their views and say how relevant they remain in light of We crises facing the governrncnis of thi
region today.

2. Scholars of development debate the proper place and sequence of nation-building. democracy
building, peace-building, and state-building, usually from the perspcclive of the international done
community. Do the crises of governance suggest that a particular sequence is to be recommended c
should all of these be complementary somehow?

The University of tire West Indies Course Code GOVT 6078 2008 112 /08.
2
GOVT 6078 GT63A

Section B: Case Studies

3. Two revolutionary states Haiti and Cuba are very differently positioned to manage the crises of
- -

human, economic and political development. What issues of state-society organisation make this
so? Is it that Cuba is structured for crisis management while Haiti is not?

4. Compare any two of the three English-speaking Caribbean states Jamaica, Guyana, Trinidad and
-

Tobago and say whether the problem of governance is that of the Westminster system or whether it
-

is the system of governance that is unprepared for meeting crises of poverty, energy, violence,
HI V/AIDS, and climate change.

Sec/lw: C: Regionalism

5. CARICOM aspires to regional cooperation but no other time has exposed the need for regional
Cooperation and the inadequacy of CARICOM’s response than now. Is this because regionalism was
not built for the crises that the region now faces? How could issues of sovereignty, supranationality,
and inter-governmentalism explain this?

6. The Organisation of Eastern Caribbean States and Trinidad and Tobago The Maiming Initiative
appear to be moving in the direction of closer political unity. Yet, the capacity for reducing
vulnerability and dependency of such small states is still limited, especially without an explicit
model of crisis governance. Comment.

END OF QIJI:slION PAPER


____

The University of the West Indies

[IIi]
SEMESTER I [III]
SEMESTER II SUPPLEMENTAIJSUMMER SCHOOL

Examinations of January [1 Mav/Junefl 2009


Originating Campus: Cave Hilt [_J H Mona St. Augustine [1111
Mode: On Campus By Distance

Course Code and Title: GOVT 6078 GT63A CARIBBEAN POLITICAL SYSTEMS I
Date: onday, January 12, 2009 Tne: 9-00 am - 12:00 noon

Duration: 3 Hours. Paper No:


Materialssg!&:
Answer booklet: Nomial Special Not required [iii]
Calculator: Programmable Non Prcsrair,mabIe
whore app//ca We
Multiple choice answer sheets: numerical [I alphabelical [1111 1-20[] i.iooLi
Auxiliary/Other materials - Please specify:

Candidates are permitted to bring the following items to their desks:

Ipsiructionj.q Candidates: This paper has 2 aqes & 3tiQf

Candidates are reminded that the examiners shall take into :ccniint the proper use of the English
Language in determining the mark for each response.

ANSWER THREE QUESTIONS, ONE FROM EACH SECTION

Section A: Theorie.c and Co:’cepts

In the hook, Governance in the Caribbean Eds. Ryan and Bissessar, 2002 a number of Caribbea
scholars offered analyses of "the problem" and prescriptions for the problems of governance. Asses
their views and say how relevant they remain in light of the crises facing the govemmenis of th
region today.

2. Scholars of development debate the proper place and sequence of nation-building democracy
bui1dng, peace-building, and state-building, usually from the perspective of the international donc
community. Do the crises of governance suggest that a particular sequence is to be recomiriended c
should all of these be complementary somehow?

The University of the West Indies Course Code ;OVT 6078 2008 /12 /08.
2
GOVT 6078 GT63A

Section B: Case Studies

3. Two revolutionary states Haiti and Cuba are very differently positioned to manage the crises of
- -

human, economic and political development. What issues of state-society organisation make this
so? Is it that Cuba is structured for crisis management while Haiti is not?

4. Compare any two of the three English-speaking Caribbean states Jamaica, Guyana, Trinidad and
-

Tobago and say whether the problem of governance is that of the Westminster system or whether it
-

is the system of governance that is unprepared for meeting crises of poverty, energy, violence,
I-Il V/AIDS, and climate change.

Section C: Regionalism

5. CARICOM aspires to regional cooperation but no other time has exposed the need for regional
cooperation and the inadequacy of CARICOM’s response than now. Is this because regionalism was
not built for the crises that the region now faces? How could issues of sovereignty, supranationality,
and inter-governmentalism explain this?

6. The Organisation of Eastern Caribbean States and Trinidad and Tobago The Manning Initiative
appear to be moving in the direction of closer political unity. Yet, the capacity for reducing
vulnerability and dependency of such small states is still limited, especially without an explicit
model of crisis governance. Comment.

END OF QUESTION PAPER


THE UNIVERSITY OF THE WEST INDIES
Semester I U Semester II U SupplementaL’Summer School U
Examinations ofDecember * /April/NIay 0 /July 0 2009
Originating Campus: Cave Hill 0 Mona St Augustine U
Mode: On Campus N By Distance 0

Course Code and Title: CHEMI9OI - INTRODUCTORY CHEMISTRY A

Date: December 17, 2009 Time: 9:00-11:OOa.m.


Duration: 2 Mourn. Paper No: 2

Materials required:

Answer booklet: Normal U Special N Not required U


Calculator: Programmable U Non Programmable N
where applicable
Multiple Choice answer sheets: numerical U alphabetical U 1-20 U 1-100 El
Auxiliary/Other materials - Please specify:
CHEMISTRY ANSWER BOOKLET

Candidates are permitted to bring the following items to their desks:

Instructions to Candidates: This paper has 4 pages & 6 questions.

Candidates are reminded that the examiners shall take into account the proper use of the English Language
in determining the mark for each response.

This paper has TWO sections.


You are required to answer FOUR questions in total
TWO questions from EACH section.

Answer each SECTION in a separate booklet

The numbers in brackets on the right hand side of the paper are the marks allocated.

SEMESTER 1 2008/2009
The University of the West Indies - Course Code
2

Section A
INORGANIC CHEMISTRY
Answer any TWO fj questions

1. a Briefly outline how Linus Pauling determined the electronegativity values


of various elements in his scale of electronegativities. Refer to any
assumptions he made and/or equations that he used. 7

b Calculate the effective nuclear charge Z* for a 2p electron in N, 0 and F.


Are the calculated values of Z consistent with the relative sizes of these
atoms? 5

c Using VSEPR, explain why the Cl-N-Cl bond angle in Nd3 is 107° while
the F-N-F bond angle in NF3 is 102°. 5

d List all the symmetry elements of Nd3 and show that BF3 has a S3 but
NCI3 does not. 8

2. a Differentiate between molecular orbital MO theory and valence bond


VB theory. 4

b i Using a MO energy level diagram, determine how bond lengths AND


bond dissociation energies will vary for the series of diatomics, B2,B2
and B22. 9

ii Draw a Lewis structure for B2 and compare the magnetic properties of B2


predicted from the MO diagram above with the magnetic behavior
predicted from its Lewis structure. 6

-.
- c Sketch the sigma a bonding MO that results from positive overlap of the
following orbitals on separate atoms: Take the internuclear axis as the z axis.
i sands ii Pz andp2 iii s andp 2 x3

- -3, a Distinguish between hexagonal and cubic close-packing. 4

- -:
b For each of the following ionic crystals, NaCI, CsCl and Ti02:

i describe the packing of both anions and eations, 6


ii sketch the structure of the unit cell, 6
iii state the coordination number and geometry of the cation, 3

c Show that the ideal r/f ratio for cation-anion and anion-anion contact for
an octahedral arrangement of anions around a cation is 0.414. 6

Semester I 200912010
___________

Section B
ORGANIC CHEMISTRY
Answer any TWO jfl questions

The examiners will attach importance to carefully drawn structures in


which charges, if any, are clearly labeled.

4. Answer ALL parts.


a With the use of appropriate examples, define the following terms:
i constitutional isomers, 2
ii geometric isomers, 3
iii conformational isomers conformers 3

b When 2-methyipropane, CH33CH, is reacted with chlorine in the presence of


ultraviolet light, two nionohalogenated products are formed.
Li i Propose structures for these two compounds and name them. 4
ii Indicate which is the major product and show mechanistically
‘-1 how it is formed. 6

c A hydrocarbon, A, C4H6 pICa = 25 is treated with sodium amide NaNH2


foliowed by methyl iodide CH3I and produces B C5H8. When B is treated
with hydrogen in the presence of Lindlar’s catalyst, C C5H10 is formed. C is
oxidized with ozone Oj followed by reductive work-up Zn/acetic acid to
give D C2H40 and it C3H6O. Deduce the structures of A-E. 7

5. Answer ALL parts.


a Draw structures for compounds G-L formed in the scheme below. 9

NaBH4, OH® ¶H3


FlgOAc2, THF-H20 HBr. peroxides
K
FI3C *CH

DOsO
Na!1S03

b Write mechanisms for the reactions leading to compounds G, H and K above. 12

C Devise a reaction sequence for achieving the conversion:


0!-!
C113CWCH3 S CH3-CH2-CH9-OH

Give reagents and conditions and draw the structures of the intermediate
compounds formed. Reaction mechanisms are not required. 4
Semester I 2039/2010
4

6. Answer ALL parts.


a Provide IIJPAC names for the following compounds Indicate stereochemistry where
appropriate

I;I
CH3CH2><F u. iii. H3C-ç-cH2-CH=d112
Cl CH3 CH
Br

cFI3 çH3 IjI


iv. H3C-CCCCJICH3 V. H3CXCH2CH3
ci-i3 Br
10

b Give a mechanistic explanation for the formation of the three products obtained when
I ,2-dimethyl- I -propanol F is dehydrated under the conditions shown.
7
Cl-I3 CH3 CH3
I
H3C-CH---CH-OH
H3P04 I
H3C-CFJ---CH=CH,
heat -

F CF!3

H3C-CCH-CH3

CH3

H2C=C-CHrCH3

c Give the mechanisms for the following transformations.


8

i. CH3CC1 + CH3CU2ONa CH32CCH2

HgSO4, H2S04aq
ii. CH3CCH

END OF QUESTION PAPER

semester i 2009/2010

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen