UNIVERSITY OF SAINT LOUIS

ARCHITECTURE DEPARTMENT

B.S. ARCHITECTURE THESIS GUIDELINES

The Architecture Department of the School of Engineering, Architecture Interior Design and
Information Technology Education Thesis Program is divided into two (2) phases- Research
Phase (Architectural Design 9 – Thesis Research Writing) and Design Documentation Phase
(Architectural Design 10 - Thesis Research Application).

At the end of the program the student must be able to:

1. Learn the importance of research in architecture.

2. Discover new aspects of architectural planning, technology and research.
3. Solve and Develop complex problems based on their own selected research focus.
4. Develop a terminal project involving a comprehensive problem in building, interior and
landscape architecture integrating the process and issues of previous studies.

ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN - 9

A. Submission and approval of Thesis Title and Project as a

requirement upon acceptance of the Architecture Department
Thesis committee.
B. Write a formal Thesis Proposal for the approval of the
Department Head as endorsed by the Thesis Adviser.
THESIS RESEARCH C. An overview of the architectural field and the Built Environment,
WRITING Challenges and Opportunities
D. Research: Process and methodologies, assessment of the
areas of proposal and development of the Thesis proposal.
E. Deeper establishment of Research need, situation analysis,
development of the theoretical framework, operational
definitions, applicable methodologies.

ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN 10

A. Spatial Translation
THESIS RESEARCH B. Form Concept Translation
APPLICATION C. Functional Concept Translation
D. Economic Concept Translation
E. Thesis Oral Defense

1
1. THESIS REQUIREMENTS

1.1 RESEARCH

1. Research must be written in English and with strict observance of proper grammar,
simple vocabulary, and rules in academic/ creative writing.
2. Acknowledge sources used in research. Undocumented information is a case of
PLAGIARISM and is a violation of R.A. 8293 (Intellectual Property Code of the
Philippines) and of the USL Policies and Procedures as contained in the USL
Student Handbook. Sanctions or penalties on Plagiarism shall be imposed in
accordance with the handbook. Observe proper in-text citation of sources in ALL
pertinent discussions. Use APA citation format only.
3. Research must be on Letter size paper (8 ½”X 11”) with 1 ½” margin on the left and
1” on every side.
4. Indent headings, subchapter heads and paragraphs to the left. ½” tab on the first line
of every paragraph with left and right justified format.
5. Limit fonts to Arial, font 11. Observe legibility. No unnecessary typeface. Use black
ink only.
6. 1.5 spacing on ALL lines.
7. Indicate page numbers on the bottom right corner
8. The book shall have the following contents:

Preliminary Parts
Title page
Table of content
Dedication page
Acknowledgement
Approval sheet
Jury’s Approval Sheet
Thesis Abstract

Introduction
Background of the study
Statement of the problem/research question/objectives of the study
Significance of the study
Literature review
Underpinning theory (if applicable) or linking statement
Discussion of literature by themes
Hypothesis (if any)
Research paradigm
Definition of terms

Methods
Specific method and research design (if applicable)
Participant/Subjects/Respondent (scope and delimitation)
Instrument and Procedures

2
 Data Analysis
Instrument (questionnaire, etc…)

Result/Technical Aspects
Project Technical Feasibility
Project Operational Feasibility
Project Economic Feasibility
Project Risk Feasibility

DISCUSSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
RECOMMENDATIONS
REFERENCE

APPENDICES
Literature matrix
Variable matrix
Synthesis tally
Data collection forms
General tables
Supporting details
Letters to line agencies
Thesis proposal letter
Student’s Resume

1.2 DESIGN DOCUMENTS

 ALL design documents must be properly presented with the prescribe format
agreed upon during the start of the semester.
 Students may be allowed to seek assistance for design documents after the
schematics design phase have been approved. However, student shall take full
responsibility and liability for ALL errors incurred for the assistance.
 The production of design documents should contain detailed and extensively
prepared architectural drawings, working drawings and other related details of all
areas. These documents must include the following:

1. Site/Location of the project

1.1 Maximum positive benefit of the project to the locality

1.2 Site selection/Analysis
1.3 Geographical condition (socio-economic, demographic and cultural situation)
1.4 Environmental analysis
1.5 Consistency with land use/Zoning restrictions
1.6 Affordability
1.7 Accessibility
1.8 Availability of utilities and support facilities

2. Site development plans

3
 2.1 Lot description (TCT)
2.2 Topographic map/contour plan
2.3 Schematic diagram/lay-out of the site
2.4 Siting of structures for complex projects
2.5 Other methods/techniques in developing a Physical Development Plan

3. Architectural Drawings

3.1 Perspective

3.1.1 Aerial Perspective if complex project

3.1.2 Man’s eye view perspective
3.1.3 Interior Perspective if necessary
3.1.4 Any 3D presentation applicable

3.2 Floor Plans

3.2.1 Depending on the number of floors required

3.3 Elevations

3.3.1 Front Elevation

3.3.2 Right side Elevation
3.3.3 Left side Elevation
3.3.4 Rear Elevation

3.4 Sections

3.4.1 Cross Section

3.4.2 Longitudinal Section
3.4.3 Bay Section
3.4.4 Detailed Sections

3.5 Reflected Ceiling Plans

3.5.1 Section Details

3.6 Doors and Windows

3.6.1 Door Details

3.6.2 Window Details
3.6.3 Schedule of Doors and Windows

3.7 Schedule of Floor, Wall (Interior/ Exterior) and Ceiling Finishes

3.8 Kitchen Details

3.9 Toilet Details

3.10 Stair Details

4
 3.10.1 Detailed Plan
3.10.2 Sectional Detail

3.11 Other Architectural Details

3.11.1 Cabinet and Closet Details

3.11.2 Moulding, Grilles, etc. Details

4. Structural and Civil Works Documents

4.1 Foundation Plan and Floor System Plan

4.1.1 Foundation (Footing- Spread/ Isolated, Combined, Continuous, Strip, Pile

Foundation, Footing Tie Beam, etc. Details
4.1.2 Column Details and Schedule
4.1.3 Floor Beam Details and Schedule
4.1.4 Slab Details and Schedule

4.2 Roof Framing Plan

4.2.1 Roof Beam Details

4.2.2 Truss Diagrams and Details

5. Plumbing Drawings

5.1 Water Supply Piping Plan

5.2 Sanitary Drainage Plan

5.3 Storm Drainage Plan

5.4 Plumbing Isometry

5.5 Plumbing Details

5.5.1 Septic Tank Detail

5.5.2 Catch Basin Detail
5.5.3 Cistern Detail

5.6 General Notes and Specification

6. Electrical Documents

6.1 Electrical/ Auxiliary Plan

6.1.1 Lighting Layout

6.1.2 Power Layout
6.1.3 Auxiliary Line Layout

6.2 Schedule of Loads

5
6.3 Panel board Diagrams

6.4 Riser diagram

6.5 General Notes and Specifications

6.6 Location Plan

1.3 PROJECT COST AND WORK SCHEDULE

1.3.1 Main Structure of their own choice (if complex project)

1.3.2 Quantity cost estimates
1.3.3 Work schedule
1.3.4 Manpower/equipment requirements
1.3.5.Other management tools in the implementation of the project

1.4 ORAL DELIBERATION

 After research and design documentation, students will defend their concept and
design to a panel of jury.
(see procedures on deliberation Proper)

2. POLICIES and PROCEDURES

2.1 GENERAL POLICIES

a. The Thesis Adviser and the student shall observe intellectual property rights at all
times.
b. Meeting of adviser with the advisee should be within the USL campus. Consultation
form should always be accomplished.
c. The Thesis Adviser Mentioned here in shall be the Subject in charge of Architectural
Design 9 and 10 and any faculty member of the architecture department.
d. Assigning of Thesis consultant in coordination with the student is the responsibility of
the Department Head.
e. Students with deficiencies in other courses shall not be allowed to pursue the
program, unless, completed prior to the first semester of the fifth year.
f. There shall be no repetition of thesis problem presented within the last three (3)
years.
g. If a student is unable to pursue the thesis, he/she will NOT be allowed to adapt the
same topic for the next academic year.
h. Students are restricted to use thesis topics and projects that promote immoral
campaigns, liquor and cigarette products, social and racial discrimination, religious
and criminal violence, vices, destructive weapons and politically- biased opinions/
judgments.
i. Endorsement Schedule will be strictly enforced.

6
 j. Failure to submit and comply with any of the requirements and guidelines set by the
Thesis Adviser disqualifies the student for the Deliberation and will automatically be
issued a grade of WP (dropped) in Architectural Design 9 and 10 as the case maybe.
k. The Thesis Adviser shall emphasize strict compliance to all rules and regulations of
the University.
l. Problems and disputes within the scope of the Thesis Guidelines, policies, and
requirements shall be settled with the Thesis committee. The decision of the Thesis
committee is FINAL and IRREVOCABLE.
m. Irregularities, complaints and other cases will be addressed to the Thesis committee
for discussion and deliberation.

2.2 PROCEDURES

2.2.1 CONSULTATION PROCEDURE

a. Consultations with the Thesis Adviser shall be conducted within the USL Campus.
b. Student shall bring consultation form every consultation. Signature of the Advisee
and the Thesis Adviser should be affixed at all times.
c. The role of the Thesis Adviser is limited to the guidance and correction of contents in
the research and will not include editing. Editing of content may be incurred through
the services of a copy editor.
d. All editing must be done during the research phase of the program. Unedited content
will be basis of rejection from the program.
e. Advisee should regularly consult the Thesis Adviser regarding the Design concept
and working drawings.

2.2.2 ENDORSEMENT & APPROVAL

a. The Department Head shall approve the thesis proposal endorsed by the student.
b. Endorsement period will be determined by the Department Head which must not
overlap with the period of the pre-deliberation and deliberation proper.
c. Time table for the program shall be strictly enforced by the Thesis Adviser.
d. During the Final Endorsement only research and design documents which are
complete and 100% finished will be endorsed. Duly signed consultation forms are
also required.
e. The Thesis book, all working drawings and other documents needed for the defense
should be affixed with the required format by the Architecture Department. All
documents should be marked/stamped and signed by the Thesis Adviser.
f. Thesis Adviser shall have the prerogative NOT TO ENDORSE/ APPROVE the thesis
work of student who:
- Did not follow the regular schedule of consultation with the Thesis Adviser
- Did not regularly present the required design studies/ schematics for the review
and assessment of the Thesis Adviser’s
- Did not follow the required scheduled endorsement deadlines
- Did not meet the minimum quality standards set by the Architecture Design
Committee
- Did not abide with the Thesis Guidelines

7
 g. The Thesis Committee shall have the prerogative to issue a Deliberation Waiver to
students (who have incurred violations mentioned in 2.2.2-f) may be allowed to
Deliberate his/ her Thesis under the following conditions:
- The student will present and defend the Thesis without the assistance and
guidance of the Thesis Adviser.
- The Thesis Adviser will be absolved of any responsibility regarding the Thesis
work.
- The only grade the student will receive is 75% (PASSED) or 70% (FAILED).
h. Thesis Committee will discuss and deliberate on ALL cases of students issued a
deliberation waiver.
i. Students issued a deliberation waiver can no longer appeal his/ her case after
deliberation.

2.2.3 PRE-DELIBERATION

a. Pre-deliberation meeting of all qualified thesis candidate and the Thesis Committee
will be held before the deliberation period but not overlapping seven (7) days before
the deliberation period proper. Failure to attend may mean losing privilege to appeal
for consideration should irregularity in the process of the deliberation occur.
b. Thesis Advisers must submit to the Department Head the list of endorsed students
for the drawing of lots assignment schedule and panel of jurors.
c. Drawings of lots should be done 7 days before the deliberation day.

2.2.4 DELIBERATION PROPER

a. During the deliberation, students must be physically present on the specified venue
at least two (2) hours before his/ her scheduled deliberation time assignment. This is
to ensure the continuous flow of the deliberation proceedings.
b. A tentative schedule of the Deliberation, the venue and names of the students will be
set/posted three (3) days before the actual defense.
c. In case one of the defenders is absent/ late during the scheduled deliberation, the
next student shall be called in for the Deliberation. This is to ensure the smooth
transition of the deliberation proceedings.
d. The Department Head shall have the right to assign alternate jurors to avoid delay
during deliberations.
e. In the event the student arrives fifteen minutes after his actual time of presentation,
he/she shall be considered in default, thereby waiving his right for the defense.
f. Only students with complete and endorsed requirements will be allowed for final
deliberation.
g. The students must bring all the required presentation materials and research reports/
thesis books to the deliberation venue. The thesis book shall be in four (4) copies,
loose bind to be distributed to the panel of jurors.(submitted on an agreed date
before the deliberation for the jury to review)
h. In case of sickness, all pertinent for the deliberation MUST be submitted by a
representative on or before the scheduled deliberation to the Thesis Adviser and a
panel of jurors. The student will be required to submit a medical certificate issued by
the doctors and certified by the Head of USL Heath Center.

8
 i. A final grade of 70% (Failed) will be given to students who are not present during
deliberations. Except for reasonable and valid reasons such as force majeure,
untoward accident, sickness, or death of an immediate relative. A formal letter must
be furnished with proper signatories as evidence of absence.
j. In case of delay of the deliberation due to unforeseen circumstances, a waiver to
justify the delay should be signed by the Chairman of the jury and the student within
the deliberation room.
k. Each student is given 45 to 60 minutes to present and defend his/ her thesis. The
time allotted for each student shall include time for:
- Set-up
- Presentation of concept and design
- Question and answer
- collecting of materials after presentation
- In-case there are issues and concern to be resolved the Day chairman should be
notified for approval of extension of time.
l. Dress code for students during the deliberation will be business/ corporate attire.
m. The student must conduct himself in a professional manner during the entire course
of deliberation. He shall maintain his composure, observe proper and ethical
procedure, refrain in using languages or actuations that may be construed as
disrespectful, unprofessional, imprudent and irrelevant gestures addressed to the
jurors.
n. The student must provide the computer including the peripherals. The student is
required to conduct trial computer usage or testing at least two (2) hours before his
defense.
o. Students who need special equipment must make at least one month in advance
reservation with the SEAIDITE office. If the equipment is not available, the student
must provide the necessary equipment to be used during the deliberation.
p. The department forbids any form of giveaways during the deliberation, budget for
food/snacks shall depend on the consensus of the Thesis class.
q. The Panel of jury must be given time to read the research to familiarize them with the
thesis problem
r. During the grade deliberation of the jury, the student must leave the room to secure
strict confidentiality in the determination of the grade
s. The Panel of jury must sign ALL jury’s approval and evaluation sheets during
deliberation
t. The student acknowledges the result of the deliberation by affixing his signature on
the final summary sheet
u. The student will collect all the documents and other pertinent materials like mock-up
and prototypes right after the deliberation; except if the grading procedure is on-
going or in case of irregularities or appeals
v. If the panel of Jury is not satisfied with the thesis work presented they may require
retouches or revisions or additional materials to be submitted within seventy two (72)
hours after the schedules deliberation. Students who are NOT able to submit
revisions will be given a thesis grade of 70% (failed).
w. Students whose work needs revision should be given REASONABLE AMOUNT OF
REQUIREMENTS to enable him/ her to complete the work within 3 days.

3. DUTIES and RESPONSIBILITIES

9
3.1 THESIS ADVISER

a. The Thesis Adviser shall guide, direct, supervise and diligently advice the students to
accomplish the work on the designated date. This will be attested by the completion
form and other requirements.
b. The Thesis Adviser is to comply with the ethical code of conduct of the University.
c. The Thesis Adviser’s work and commitment to the student is terminated when the
student presents his work to the panel of jurors. The adviser must be totally impartial
and should not participate in the juror’s decision to grant grades.
d. The Thesis Adviser should refrain from doing actuations, comments and underlying
behavior that may be construed as influencing the deliberation procedure
e. The Thesis Adviser shall promote goodwill to all.
f. A Thesis Adviser is strictly prohibited to be a member of the panel of jurors to
examine his advisee.

3.2 DAY CHAIRMAN

a. The Day Chairman ensures smooth flow of the proceedings, advice observers to
refrain from doing any form of distraction, noise, remarks, while deliberation is on-
going. He/ she should put general order during deliberation session.
b. The Day Chairman shall announce or post in advance the hourly schedule of
candidates during the day of the Deliberation.
c. The Day Chairman shall orient all Guest Jurors before Deliberation.

3.3 PANEL OF JURORS

a. The Panel of Jurors will be composed of a chairman and two members. The
Chairman shall be a faculty member of the Architecture Department of University of
Saint Louis. The two members should be a licensed Architect. Guest Jurors based
on their specialty need to be endorsed by the Department Head.
b. The Jury Chairman must ensure strict implementation of the existing rules and
regulations during the Thesis Deliberation.
c. The Chairman will be the one to explain or convey to the student whatever the result
of the Deliberation, and all matters pertaining to it.
d. Panel of Jurors is expected to deliberate professionally and should not make any
actuation, remarks, comments or underlying behavior which may be construed as
personal insults and unpleasant.
e. The panel of jurors is expected to deliberate and evaluate the Thesis project based
on its merits with the highest level of fairness and professionalism.
f. In the event of controversy, the panel of jurors shall consult the Thesis Adviser and
Department Head for clarification. It is only the Thesis Committee who will have the
final decision, and this decision cannot be subjected to any further inquiry by any of
the above assembly.
g. The Panel of jurors should not divulge any information considered confidential which
may require secrecy, to the student regarding the grade and other circumstances
which transpired during the grade decision.

10
 h. The Panel of Jury shall have the right to hold the grade on the grounds of reasonable
doubt regarding the thesis work.
i. The Panel of Jury shall release the grade to student after evaluation.
j. The panel’s decision on the grade is FINAL.
k. The Panel of Jury will retain ALL thesis materials of student who obtained a grade of
70% (Failed), students issued a conditional grade, and students whose work needs
to be resolved. The materials must be submitted to the Thesis Committee.
l. The Panel of Jury shall immediately report to the Thesis Committee Chair about
problems and issues concerning questionable thesis work (i.e. questions on
authorship).

3.4 THESIS COMMITTEE

a. The Thesis Committee shall be composed of the Chairman, who is the Architecture
Department Head, ALL Architecture faculty, the Center for Engineering Research and
Technology Innovation of USL and the SEIDITE dean.
b. The Thesis Committee shall prepare the architecture Thesis Guidelines.
c. The Thesis Committee shall re-evaluate complaints regarding grades and pertinent
matters regarding the thesis.
d. The Thesis Committee shall deal with question of authorship of student’s research
and design documents.
e. The Thesis Committee shall exercise impartially regarding complaint/s about the
thesis only.
f. The Thesis Committee shall not favor any student or representation in behalf of the
student.

4. GRADING SYSTEM

4.1 GRADING CRITERIA OF THE THESIS BOOK

4.1.1 TITLE OF THE STUDY (5%)

1. Does it properly capsulate the main problem of the study?

2. Is it specific and clear?
3. Is it a duplication of past titles only changing the location of the study?

4.1.2 THEORETICAL/CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK (10%)

1. Does it show relationship of theories with the problem?

2. Is the theory/concept spelled out clearly and adequately in simple terms?
3. Are the concepts/ terms defined in functional or operational terms?

4.1.3 STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM (10%)

1. Is the problem stated briefly indicating the essential nature of it?

11
 2. Is the problem relevant and supportive of national development goals? Or is it
relevant to the needs of the society and significant enough to add to existing
knowledge?
3. Is the problem testable, that is, is it possible to collect data to answer the
questions asked?
4. Do the sub-problems taken together answer the main problem?
5. Are the sub-problems complete, researchable units?
6. Do sub-problems show clear interrelatedness to each other?

4.1.4 HYPOTHESES (10%)

1. Are they clearly stated? Are they specific, that is, prediction are spelled out?
2. Are they capable of being tested, meaning, can they be quantified or
measurable?
3. Are they deducted from the underlying theory/concept of the study?
4. Are they related to main or sub-problems?
5. Is there a clear relationship between the hypotheses and data to be
collected?
6. Are they expected to answer a problem?

4.1.5 SCOPE AND DELIMITATION OF THE STUDY (10%)

1. Does the study show the limitations of the research proposal?

2. Does the study indicate a reasonable area of the study?
3. Are the scopes and limits of the study properly defined?
4. Does the delimitation of the study consider specific constraints such as
weaknesses in the methodology and design, any weaknesses such as
statistical analysis and representativeness of sampling and time?
5. Does the scope and delimitation of the study spell out the coverage of the
study?

4.1.6 DEFINITION OF TERMS (10%)

1. Are all important terms and concept within the defined limits of the study, or
are they defined according to how they are use in the study? Do the
operational definitions of terms used include test measures or do they refer to
responses in data gathering instruments?

4.1.7 IMPORTANCE OF THE STUDY: (5%)

1. Does it explain why the research is important?

2. Is the study a replication or follow-up of a previous study or verification?
3. Does the importance of the study describe the contribution of the research
knowledge?
4. Does the researcher give the importance of the study to his/her profession, to
a particular discipline and the community as well?

4.1.8 REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE AND STUDY (10%)

1. Do the related literature and studies serve as a background to the problem

under study?
12
 2. Has there been adequate exploration of literature and studies related to and
pertinent to the problem being investigated?
3. Is the review presented thematically/logically and systematically to conform to
specific problems?
4. Does the review synthesize evidence from studies received to get an overall
understanding of the state of knowledge in the problem area?
5. Does the review include the research in Philippine setting as well as research
in foreign setting?

4.1.9 METHODOLOGY (10%)

1. Is the method of research identified, well organized and clearly defined?

2. Have all major variables been identified in research design?
3. Are the procedures employed adequately described or explained?
4. Does the methodology/strategy of investigation obtain the answers to the
research questions?

4.1.10 POPULATION, SAMPLING AND INSTRUMENTS (10%)

1. Is the research population clearly identified?

2. Is the sample clearly representative of the population to which the results are
to be generalized?
3. Are the instruments for gathering data properly identified?
4. Are the validation processes identified?
5. Are there adequate safeguards used to remove sample bias?

4.1.11 STATISTICAL TREATMENT (10%)

1. Is the data analysis procedure identified?

2. Are the statistical tools used appropriate for the analysis of the data?
3. Does the statistical design show how the results of the analysis and
interpretation are clearly presented and logically organized?

4.1.12 TOTAL POINTS ------------------- (100%)

4.1.13 OVERALL EVALUATION

PASSED FAILED

_____________ 1. no revision ____________ 1. Recast

_____________ 2. with minor revisions

13
 _____________ 3. with major revisions ____________ 2. Resubmit

_____________ 4. with minor edition

4.2 CONSIDERATION FOR GRADING THE THESIS ORAL DEFENSE

4.2.1 MECHANICS OF THE THESIS (10%)

a. General appearance including typing, margining

b. Sentences structure and composition
c. Semantics/Rhetoric
d. References: bibliographic entries, footnotes, or endnotes, appendices

4.2.2 PRESENTATION OF THE THESIS (20%)

a. Coherence/consistency (unity of ideas)

b. Clarity of expression
c. Mastery of the study through oral and logical presentation of the research
d. Unity of the Structure (from presentation, interpretation, to conclusion)
e. Appropriate use of visual and graphic illustrations

4.2.3 CONTENT OF THE THESIS (40%)

a. Originality
b. Appropriateness of the used of materials (tables, charts, illustrations, etc)
c. Appropriateness of statistical treatment
d. Soundness and depth of analysis and interpretation of findings
e. Relevance of conclusions and recommendations to the problem
f. Objectivity in presentation of the research
g. Attainment of the objectives of the research.

4.2.4 THE CANDIDATE’S ABILITY TO DEFEND THESIS (30%)

a. The candidate must show mastery of his work by being able to readily
refer to page, table, or paragraph which will support his answers to
the questions from the panel
b. The candidate must defend his position, explain his tables, justify his
interpretations/analysis and conclusions.
c. Clarity and comprehensiveness in the presentation of the research
d. Ability to orally communicate ideas well, and comprehend and
respond well to questions.
e. Ability to demonstrate a professional attitudes towards suggestions
and revisions

4.2.5 TOTAL 100%

4.2.6 THE PASSING GRADE IS 75%

14
The Architecture Department Thesis Guidelines of the University of Saint Louis for
School Year 2017-2018 by the Architecture Department Thesis Committee

ARCH. RODERICK T. BUNAGAN UAP ARCH. PETER PAUL I.ORTEZA

Faculty member Faculty member

ARCH. VANESSA GULATERA, UAP ARCH. JONEL CENTENO, UAP

Faculty member Faculty member

ARCH. CHERYLL MORENO, UAP ________________________________

Faculty member Guest Juror

ARCH. MA. ELEANOR C. LUCERO, UAP

Department Head

SEAIDITE DEAN

CENTER FOR ENGINEERING RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY INNOVATION

UNIVERSITY OF SAINT LOUIS

ARCHITECTURE DEPARTMENT

ARCHITECTURE THESIS GUIDELINES

After reading the Architecture Thesis Guidelines and Policies, accomplish the form below.
Submit the Return Slip to your Thesis Adviser.

15
 RETURN SLIP

I have read and understood the ARCHITECTURE Department Thesis Guidelines and
Policies of the University of Saint Louis.

______________________________________ Student ID Number: ____________

Student’s Signature over Printed Name

Date: ________________________________

Thesis Title:

Conforme:

_____________________________________
Parent’s Signature over Printed Name

Date: _____________________

16