You've got to learn to self-moderate dude.

You want cooperation from all these different people, but you get extremely

abrasive quickly. People are less likely to help you with shit if you just act like an asshole.

1. Group Intelligences Differ Genetically …….maybe

2. Genetic differences lead to indelible institutional inequality

3. Immigration leads to different groups with different IQs living together

4. Institutional inequality between groups leads to conflict, war, violence.

_______________________________________________________________________________

Outline for Point 4.

CONFLICT, WAR, VIOLENCE

Source: https://www.americanimmigrationcouncil.org/research/criminalization-immigration-united-states

"Immigrants are Less Likely to be Criminals Than the Native-Born Higher Immigration is Associated with Lower Crime Rates"

Source: https://www.policefoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/Appendix-D_0.pdf

“Both contemporary and historical studies, including official crime statistics and victimization surveys since the early 1990s,

data from the last three decennial censuses, national and regional surveys in areas of immigrant concentration, and

investigations carried out by major government commissions over the past century, have shown instead that immigration is

associated with lower crime rates and lower incarceration rates”

Source: https://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/hpnvv0812.pdf

In so many words, this study correlates poverty and population density with crime.
ECONOMIC BENEFITS OF DIVERSITY AND IMMIGRATION

Source: https://object.cato.org/sites/cato.org/files/pubs/pdf/working-paper-21-fix.pdf

"The economic benefits of immigration are unambiguous and large, but the fiscal effects are dependent upon the specifics of

government policy over a long time period, which means that the net fiscal impact of immigration could be negative while the

economic benefit is simultaneously positive. "

Source: http://d279m997dpfwgl.cloudfront.net/wp/2016/09/0922_immigrant-economics-full-report.pdf

"…immigrants’ children—the second generation—are among the strongest economic and fiscal contributors in the

population. Estimates of the long-run fiscal impact of immigrants and their descendants would likely be more positive if their

role in sustaining labor force growth and contributing to innovation and entrepreneurial activity were taken into account."

Source: http://davidcard.berkeley.edu/papers/mariel-impact.pdf

"...this study shows that the influx of Mariel immigrants had virtually no effect on the wage rates of less-skilled nonCuban

workers. Similarly, there is no evidence of an increase in unemployment among less-skilled blacks or ocher nonCuban workers.

Rather, the data analysis suggests a remarkably rapid absorptioil of the Mariel immigrants into the Miami labor force, with

negligible effects on other groups. Even among the Cuban population there is no iildicatioll that wages or uilemployrnent rates

of earlier immigrants were substailtially affected by the arrival of the Mariels."

Source: https://dornsife.usc.edu/assets/sites/242/docs/DiversityInclusion_Benner_Pastor_ACCE_2017.pdf

“Cities and regions that embrace diversity do better economically: Income inequality, geographic concentrations of the poor,

city-suburb disparities and racial segregation are all associated with slower growth over the last three decades. Economists at

the Cleveland Federal Reserve have found that high levels of racial inclusion and progress on income equality also correlate

with strong economic growth. Regions with higher levels of income inequality and racial segregation are less resilient to

economic downturns.”
Source: https://i.forbesimg.com/forbesinsights/StudyPDFs/Innovation_Through_Diversity.pdf

 Diversity is a key driver of innovation and is a critical component of being successful on a global scale

 A diverse and inclusive workforce is crucial for companies that want to attract and retain top talent

 Nearly all respondents reported that their companies have diversity and inclusion strategies in place

BENEFITS OF RACIAL DIVERSITY AND HOW IT AFFECTS AFFIRMATIVE ACTION

Source: http://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/11-345-respondent-amicus-Putman.pdf

“Dr. Putnam has conducted a nationwide study on the effects of a more diverse and multicultural society, finding that on

balance, diversity is an important social asset. This conclusion reaffirms Dr. Putnam’s views, based upon his experience as a

professor of social sciences for over 40 years, that diversity in higher education not only has substantial benefits for all

students but also facilitates greater learning.”

Source: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.515.6374&rep=rep1&type=pdf

 Ethnic diversity will increase substantially in virtually all modern societies over the next several decades, in part

because of immigration. Increased immigration and diversity are not only inevitable, but over the long run they are

also desirable. Ethnic diversity is, on balance, an important social asset, as the history of my own country

demonstrates.

 In the short to medium run, however, immigration and ethnic diversity challenge social solidarity and inhibit social

capital. In support of this provocative claim I wish to adduce some new evidence, drawn primarily from the United

States. In order to elaborate on the details of this new evidence, this portion of my article is longer and more

technical than my discussion of the other two core claims, but all three are equally important.

 In the medium to long run, on the other hand, successful immigrant societies create new forms of social solidarity

and dampen the negative effects of diversity by constructing new, more encompassing identities. Thus, the central

challenge for modern, diversifying societies is to create a new, broader sense of ‘we’.
“…Scientific examination of immigration, diversity and social cohesion easily could be inflamed as the results of research

become part of the contemporary political debate, but that debate needs to be informed by our best efforts to ascertain the

facts. It would be unfortunate if a politically correct progressivism were to deny the reality of the challenge to social solidarity

posed by diversity. It would be equally unfortunate if an ahistorical and ethnocentric conservatism were to deny that

addressing that challenge is both feasible and desirable. Max Weber instructed would-be political leaders nearly a century ago

that ‘Politics is a slow boring of hard boards.’ The task of becoming comfortable with diversity will not be easy or quick, but it

will be speeded by our collective efforts and in the end well worth the effort. One great achievement of human civilization is

our ability to redraw more inclusive lines of social identity. The motto on the Great Seal of the United States (and on our dollar

bill) and the title of this essay – e pluribus unum – reflects precisely that objective – namely to create a novel ‘one’ out of a

diverse ‘many’.”