Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Quiz
Hydrodynamic Assessment
Hull-Appendages Interference
Analysis Methods for Snorkels
Quiz
DNV GL © 2013
2
Recommended reading
27 pages
DNV GL © 2013
3
Recommended reading
DNV GL © 2013
4
Focus on resistance & propulsion
DNV GL © 2013
5
Basic approaches have pros and cons
Basic approaches
DNV GL © 2013
6
Empirical approach
DNV GL © 2013
7
Empirical approach - Serious drawbacks
DNV GL © 2013
8
Empirical approach - Serious drawbacks
DNV GL © 2013
9
Experimental approach
Basic idea:
- perform test on scaled down model
- extract information
- scale (transform) to full-scale ship
ship
? ship model
Speed
Full-scale ship “s” Force Model “m”
Power
DNV GL © 2013
10
Experimental approach
DNV GL © 2013
11
Experimental approach
Source: HSVA
DNV GL © 2013
12
Experimental approach
No full-scale data
for submarines
DNV GL © 2013
13
Numerical approaches
Source: Voith
DNV GL © 2013
14
CFD used increasingly for manoeuvring
Hydrodynamic
Coefficients
Source: Voith
DNV GL © 2013
15
CFD allows formal optimization
• Parametric design
• Design evaluation by CFD
• Formal optimization
DNV GL © 2013
16
Navigator
Quiz
Hydrodynamic Assessment
Hull-Appendages Interference
Analysis Methods for Snorkels
Quiz
DNV GL © 2013
17
Design target: Hydrodynamic efficiency
These interact !
DNV GL © 2013
18
Consider mission profile
Conclusion:
• Virtually zero wave resistance
• Wave making only important for signature
in snorkeling condition
DNV GL © 2013
19
Resistance usually decomposed
DNV GL © 2013
20
Friction resistance
60-70%
DNV GL © 2013
21
Friction resistance
DNV GL © 2013
22
Sphere as best solution?
But:
• Form resistance
• Propulsive efficiency
• (other design aspects: strength, producibility, manoeuvrability, ...)
DNV GL © 2013
23
Form resistance (Viscous pressure resistance)
DNV GL © 2013
24
Form resistance
• full hull shapes have higher form resistance than slender shapes
DNV GL © 2013
25
Opposing requirements...
DNV GL © 2013
26
Some background 1/4
DNV GL © 2013
27
Some background 2/4
DNV GL © 2013
28
Systematic series
Parameters varied:
DNV GL © 2013
29
Results 1/5
Fineness ratio
• key parameter for resistance (influences wetted surface for given volume)
• L/D ≈ 7 optimum (considering also control surfaces)
DNV GL © 2013
30
Results 2/5
Prismatic coefficient
• key parameter for resistance
• CP ≈ 0.61 optimum
• no significant change if considering also control surfaces
DNV GL © 2013
31
Results 3/5
Nose Radius
• different r0 [0...1] investigated, but mostly r0 = 0.5
• real submarines: German submarines: typically r0 ≈ 2.5
based on L w/o parallel midbody r0 < 1.0
US nuclear submarines: typically r0 ≈ 1.5
Results little more than indication due to much higher nose radius in practice
DNV GL © 2013
32
Results 4/5
Tail Radius
• different r1 [0...0.2] investigated, but mostly r1 = 0.1
• drag differences in this range: ±1%
DNV GL © 2013
33
Results 5/5
DNV GL © 2013
34
Some background 3/4
Forebody
• slender forebody good for resistance and low noise
• no consensus on forebody shape
DNV GL © 2013
35
Some background 4/4
Aftbody
• must consider propulsion (propeller changes flow completely)
• cone angles > 20° (in propelled condition)
• thicker aftbody good for weight distribution and space requirements
DNV GL © 2013
36
Aspects of noise and sonar reflection
• Low noise streamlined shape has low resistance & low noise
DNV GL © 2013
37
Navigator
DNV GL © 2013
38
Quiz: Do you know your design of submarines ?
ENGINEER
DNV GL © 2013
39
What is not used in (submarine) design?
DNV GL © 2013
40
Which design approach is simple, fast and cheap?
DNV GL © 2013
41
What is a typical drawback of empirical approaches?
DNV GL © 2013
42
CFD is popularly referred to as...
a. Design of Experiments
b. Rapid Prototyping
c. Numerical Towing Tank
d. Virtual Reality
DNV GL © 2013
43
Which methods allows formal optimisation?
DNV GL © 2013
44
To minimize required power you should...
DNV GL © 2013
45
Which resistance component can be neglected...
a. appendage resistance
b. form resistance
c. friction resistance
d. wave resistance
DNV GL © 2013
46
Friction resistance accounts for X% of hull resistance...
a. X = 5 – 10%
b. X = 20 – 30%
c. X = 40 – 50%
d. X = 60 – 70%
DNV GL © 2013
47
Boundary layer thickness in aftbody of submarine ≈
a. 5 mm
b. 5 cm
c. 50 cm
d. 5m
DNV GL © 2013
48
Sphere is best solution only in terms of...
a. Form resistance
b. Friction resistance
c. Producibility
d. Propulsive efficiency
DNV GL © 2013
49
Ideal shape for form resistance is like a ...
a. needle
b. lentil (parabola)
c. teardrop shape
d. sphere
DNV GL © 2013
50
Laminar flow designs for submarines...
DNV GL © 2013
51
Landweber & Gertler performed systematic tests ...
Landweber Gertler
DNV GL © 2013
52
Landweber & Gertler’s family of streamlined bodies...
modern AUV
DNV GL © 2013
53
Landweber & Gertler’s recommended for L/D...
a. 3
b. 5
c. 7
d. 9
DNV GL © 2013
54
Forebody of real submarine less slender...
DNV GL © 2013
55
Aftbody of real submarine less slender...
DNV GL © 2013
56
Navigator
CFD Methods
Model tests
Flow analysis on the sonar part
Hull-Appendages Interference
Analysis Methods for Snorkels
Quiz
DNV GL © 2013
57
What is CFD ?
DNV GL © 2013
58
Potential flow codes
RANSE
• expensive
• better model (breaking waves, flow separation)
DNV GL © 2013
59
Wave resistance codes
DNV GL © 2013
60
Panel codes – fast enough for design
Main application:
• analyses in snorkeling condition
• also seakeeping & propeller flows
25 years
of experience
DNV GL © 2013
61
Moderate nonlinearities handled
But not
wave breaking
Source: HSVA
DNV GL © 2013
62
Propeller “poti” methods 1/2
Lifting-surface method
Particularly: Vortex-Lattice Method (VLM)
DNV GL © 2013
63
Propeller “poti” methods 2/2
Panel method
DNV GL © 2013
64
Potential flow codes
RANSE
• expensive
• better model (breaking waves, flow separation)
DNV GL © 2013
65
RANSE - Better model, more effort
• Volume grid
• 0.5 - 5 million cells
• mesh generation: 0.5 - 5 days
• CPU times: 1-5 days (on PC cluster)
DNV GL © 2013
66
Typical application: Appendages
Misalignment increases
resistance,
causes vibrations and
sometimes erosion
Soure: HSVA
DNV GL © 2013
67
Typical application: Appendages
Soure: HSVA
DNV GL © 2013
68
Submarines are prime candidates for CFD
Source: HSVA
DNV GL © 2013
69
Navigator
CFD Methods
Model tests
Flow analysis on the sonar part
Hull-Appendages Interference
Analysis Methods for Snorkels
Quiz
DNV GL © 2013
70
Initially it did not work...
DNV GL © 2013
71
Wave forces follow Froude
Froude number Fn = V / g ⋅ L
DNV GL © 2013
72
Viscous forces follow Reynolds
V ⋅L
Rn = Reynolds number
ν
DNV GL © 2013
73
Model test basin
~300 m
Recirculation tunnel
(propeller testing) Model
basin
Model
storage
Model
manufacturing
Source: HSVA
DNV GL © 2013
74
Scaled-down models
• as large as possible …
4 m < L < 10 m
~ 1000 kg
Source: HSVA
DNV GL © 2013
75
Model tests not 100% similar
DNV GL © 2013
76
Navigator
DNV GL © 2013
77
Appendages 1/3
DNV GL © 2013
78
Like propeller, like foil...
Lifting surface
RANSE
Lifting body
(panel)
Source: HSVA
DNV GL © 2013
79
Hull and foil interact
DNV GL © 2013
80
Some insight from wind tunnel tests
• extensive experiments
for aerospace industry
submarine
foils
DNV GL © 2013
81
CFD application to aft hydroplane
Source: HSVA
DNV GL © 2013
82
Navigator
DNV GL © 2013
83
Two approaches used for free-surface RANSE
Interface tracking
- Exact representation of free surface
- Unsuited for complex geometries
Interface capturing
- Ability to handle wave breaking
- VOF, Level Set, Two-Phase
DNV GL © 2013
84
Interface capturing allows complex wave breaking
0 0 0 0 0
DNV GL © 2013
85
High Froude numbers and breaking waves
DNV GL © 2013
86
Also in struts for underwater model tests
DNV GL © 2013
87
Free-surface RANSE captures wave breaking
Source: HSVA
DNV GL © 2013
88
Wave height increases with thickness of profile
thickness
almost
doubled
DNV GL © 2013
89
Wave characteristics changed
DNV GL © 2013
90
Transverse plate reduces waves
tranverse
plate
attached
Parabolic strut
DNV GL © 2013
91
Transverse plate reduces waves
Source: HSVA
DNV GL © 2013
92
Thank you for your attention – and now...
DNV GL © 2013
93
Navigator
DNV GL © 2013
94
Quiz: Do you know your design of submarines ?
ENGINEER
DNV GL © 2013
95
What is definitely not a CFD method ?
a. Euler solver
b. Laplace solver
c. Paint solver
d. RANSE solver
DNV GL © 2013
96
The Reynolds number ...
DNV GL © 2013
97
What cannot be captured by wave resistance codes ?
a. breaking waves
b. dynamic trim & sinkage
c. lifting surfaces
d. limited water depth
DNV GL © 2013
98
Order computational methods in increasing complexity
DNV GL © 2013
99
Stroboscopic light is used...
DNV GL © 2013
100
What is best for assessing flows on appendages ?
DNV GL © 2013
101
The Froude number is a ...
DNV GL © 2013
102
Snorkels are best shaped like ...
a. cylinders (circular)
b. lentils (parabolic)
c. reverse teardrop
d. teardrop (profile)
DNV GL © 2013
103
Model tests in ship model basins ...
DNV GL © 2013
104
Ship models in professional basins weigh ...
a. 10 kg
b. 100 kg
c. 1000 kg
kg
d. 10000 kg
DNV GL © 2013
105
Propeller models are typically tested in...
a. cavitation tunnels
b. propulsion test basins
c. towing tanks
d. wind tunnels
DNV GL © 2013
106
Compared to condition in open water, a control foil ...
a. has less lift (due to the lower velocity in the boundary layer)
b. has more lift (due to the higher speed around the hull)
c. has same lift. That is why we generally work with open-flow
diagrams...
d. is complicated due to spanwise changes both in magnitude
and direction
DNV GL © 2013
107
Hull-propeller-rudder interaction best investigated by
DNV GL © 2013
108
What is not a recommendation for appendages?
DNV GL © 2013
109
Different physics between model test and real ship...
DNV GL © 2013
110
Potential flow codes generally use...
DNV GL © 2013
111
Time for a break ?
DNV GL © 2013
112
Thank you...
Volker Bertram
volker.bertram@dnvgl.com
www.dnvgl.com
DNV GL © 2013
11
3