Entdecken Sie eBooks
Kategorien
Entdecken Sie Hörbücher
Kategorien
Entdecken Sie Zeitschriften
Kategorien
Entdecken Sie Dokumente
Kategorien
The first version of Red Hat Enterprise Linux to bear the name
originally came onto the market as "Red Hat Linux Advanced Server".
In 2003 Red Hat rebranded Red Hat Linux Advanced Server to "Red
Hat Enterprise Linux AS", and added two more variants, Red Hat
Enterprise Linux ES and Red Hat Enterprise Linux WS.
It is often assumed the branding ES, AS, and WS stand for "Entry-level Server", "Advanced Server" and "Work Station",
respectively. The reason for this is that the ES product is indeed the company's base enterprise server product, while AS is the more
advanced product. However, nowhere on its site or in its literature does Red Hat say what AS, ESnd
a WS stand for.
[9][10]
In Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 there are new editions that substitute former Red Hat Enterprise Linux AS/ES/WS/Desktop:
Fedora serves as upstream for future versions of RHEL. RHEL trees are forked off the Fedora repository, and released after a
substantial stabilization and quality assurance effort.[13] For example, RHEL 6 was forked from Fedora at the end of 2009
(approximately at the time of the Fedora 12 release) and released more or less together with Fedora 14. By the time RHEL 6 was
released, many features from Fedora 13 and 14 had already been backported into it. The Fedora Project lists the following lineages
for older Red Hat Enterprise releases:[13]
Red Hat Linux 6.2/7 → Red Hat Linux Enterprise Edition 6.2E
Red Hat Linux 7.2 → Red Hat Enterprise Linux 2.1
Red Hat Linux 10 beta 1 → Red Hat Enterprise Linux 3
Fedora Core 3 → Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4
Fedora Core 6 → Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5
Fedora 12, 13 → Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6[13]
Fedora 19, 20 → Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7[14]
(Note about Fedora Core 1 and Red Hat Enterprise Linux 3: Red Hat released Red Hat Linux 10 beta 1, then took two forks from that
codebase to seed both Fedora Core 1 and Red Hat Enterprise Linux 3 beta releases. There was some cross-pollination between the
two up until shortly before the first production RHEL 3 release. Therefore, both FC1 and RHEL3 came from a common fork of
RHL10beta1.)
In addition, the Fedora project includes Extra Packages for Enterprise Linux (EPEL), a community-provided set of packages for
RHEL going beyond the ones that Red Hat selected for inclusion in its supported distribution. The Fedora project provides the
following explanation:[15]
Both Fedora and Red Hat Enterprise Linux are open source. Fedora is a free distribution and community project and
upstream for Red Hat Enterprise Linux. Fedora is a general purpose system that gives Red Hat and the rest of its
contributor community the chance to innovate rapidly with new technologies. Red Hat Enterprise Linux is a
commercial enterprise operating system and has its own set of test phases including alpha and beta releases which are
separate and distinct from Fedora development.
Rebuilds
Originally, Red Hat's enterprise product, then known as Red Hat Linux, was made freely available to anybody who wished to
download it, while Red Hat made money from support. Red Hat then moved towards splitting its product line into Red Hat
Enterprise Linux which was designed to be stable and with long-term support for enterprise users and Fedora as the community
distribution and project sponsored by Red Hat. The use of trademarks prevents verbatim copying of Red Hat Enterprise Linux.
Since Red Hat Enterprise Linux is based completely on free and open source software, Red Hat makes available the complete source
code to its enterprise distribution through its FTP site to anybody who wants it. Accordingly, several groups have taken this source
code and compiled their own versions of Red Hat Enterprise Linux, typically with the only changes being the removal of any
references to Red Hat's trademarks and pointing the update systems to non-Red Hat servers. Groups which have undertaken this
include CentOS (the 8th most popular Linux distribution as of November 2011),[16] Oracle Linux, Scientific Linux, White Box
Enterprise Linux, StartCom Enterprise Linux, Pie Box Enterprise Linux, X/OS, Lineox, and Bull's XBAS for high-performance
computing.[17] All provide a free mechanism for applying updates without paying a service fee to the distributor
.
Rebuilds of Red Hat Enterprise Linux are free but do not get any commercial support or consulting services from Red Hat and lack
any software, hardware or security certifications. Also, the rebuilds do not get access to Red Hat services like
Red Hat Network.
Unusually, Red Hat took steps toobfuscate their changes to the Linux kernel for 6.0 by not publicly providing the patch files for their
changes in the source tarball, and only releasing the finished product in source form. Speculation suggested that the move was made
to affect Oracle's competing rebuild and support services, which further modifies the distribution. This practice however, still
complies with the GNU GPL since source code is defined as "[the] preferred form of the work for making modifications to it", and
the distribution still complies with this definition.[18] Red Hat's CTO Brian Stevens later confirmed the change, stating that certain
information (such as patch information) would now only be provided to paying customers to make the Red Hat product more
competitive against the growing number of companies offering support for products based on RHEL. CentOS developers had no
objections to the change since they do not make any changes to the kernel beyond what is provided by Red Hat.[19] Their competitor
Oracle announced in November 2012 that they were releasing a RedPatch service, which allows public view of the RHEL kernel
changes, broken down by patch.[20][21]
Related products and add-ons
A number of commercial vendors use Red Hat Enterprise Linux as a base for the operating system in their products. Two of the best
known are the Console Operating System inVMware ESX Server and Oracle Linux respin.
Version history
RHEL 2.1
( ensacola), March 26, 2002, uses Linux kernel 2.4.9-e.3[22]
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 2.1 AS P
RHEL 3
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 3 (Taroon), October 22, 2003, uses Linux kernel 2.4.21-4[22]
RHEL 5
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 (Tikanga), 2007, uses Linux kernel 2.6.18-8[22]
aka added ELS entitlement until ELS end Date November 30, 2020
RHEL 6
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 was forked fromFedora 12 and contains many backported features from Fedora 13 and 14.
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 (Santiago), November 10, 2010, uses Linux kernel 2.6.32-71[22]
aka added ELS entitlement until ELS end Date June 30, 2024
RHEL 7
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 (Maipo) is based on Fedora 19, upstream Linux kernel 3.10, systemd 208, and GNOME 3.8 (rebased to
GNOME 3.26 in RHEL 7.5).[24] The first beta was announced on 11 December 2013,[14][25] and a release candidate was made
available on 15 April 2014.[26] On June 10, 2014 Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 was officially released.[27]
In the last years of the support lifecycle (after seven years for the version 4 and earlier, or after 10 years for the version 5 and later),
critical and security-related fixes are only provided to customers who pay an additional subscription ("Extended Lifecycle Support
[34]
Add-On") that is available for versions 3, 4 and 5, and covers a limited number of packages.
End of
End of End of End of
RHEL Extended Last Minor
Release date Production 1 Production 2 Production 3
Version Lifecycle Release
phase phase phase
Support
26 March
2002 (AS) 30 November 31 May
2.1 31 May 2005 N/A
1 May 2003 2004 2009[35]
(ES)
Kernel backporting
To maintain a stable application binary interface (ABI), Red Hat does not update the kernel version, but instead backports new
features to the same kernel version with which a particular version of RHEL has been released. New features are backported
throughout the Production 1 phase of the RHEL lifecycle.[38] Consequently, RHEL may use a Linux kernel with a dated version
number, yet the kernel is up-to-date regarding not only security fixes, but also certain features.[39] One specific example is the
SO_REUSEPORT socket option which was added to Linux kernel 3.9, and was subsequently backported and became available since
[40][41][42]
RHEL 6.5, which uses version 2.6.32 of the Linux kernel.
Extended Update Support (EUS) / Z Tree
The Extended Update Support (EUS) allows an organization / company to choose when they change to a new minor version. For the
first 6 months of the EUS channel / yum repo, features may be added, but then the channel is locked down so that only bug and
security fixes are patched. The organization / company then has 24 months to move to a new EUS branch. EUS allows the
organization / company to stay on a minor version if required by a third party application which is only tested with a particular minor
version of RHEL, such as Oracle Database, IBM DB2, IBM Cloud Orchestrator, etc. There may also be extra costs associated with
using the EUS repos/channels depending on the agreement the organization / company has with Red Hat.[43] For more information
on what is Included/Excluded from the EUS see.[44]
Note
The EUS update mechanism for using older minor version branches is not available to CentOS, Oracle Linux and
Scientific Linux, as Red Hat do not publish source packages for rebuilding. As such, projects clearly state to ensure
[45]
users run on the latest available minor version within a supported major release
RHEL 6
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 was forked fromFedora 12 and contains many backported features from Fedora 13 and 14.
[22]
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 (Santiago), 10 November 2010, uses Linux kernel 2.6.32-71
RHEL 7
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 (Maipo) is based on Fedora 19, upstream Linux kernel 3.10, 10 June 2014, uses Linux kernel 3.10.0-
123[22]
External links
Official website
Brian Stevens, CTO and vice president of engineering, Red Hat on why Red Hat Enterprise Linux is "The Business
OS for Flexibility and Value"
Red Hat Enterprise Linuxat DistroWatch
Text is available under theCreative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License ; additional terms may apply. By using this
site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of theWikimedia
Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization.