Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Downloaded from ascelibrary.org by UTEP LIBRARY-SERIALS on 11/08/14. Copyright ASCE. For personal use only; all rights reserved.
INTRODUCTION
Geogrid reinforced retaining walls have been used widely in many fields
because of their many merits. At present, lakeshore walls, bank slopes, docks,
bridge abutments and dams are made of reinforced soil retaining walls. The
flexibility of this reinforced structure improves its seismic resistance capacity,
which has been validated and recognized during recent earthquakes such as
Chi-Chi earthquake of Taiwan in 1999, Kobe earthquake of Japan in 1995 and
so on. Protruding swelling deformation and overturning multiple damage
occurred respectively (2000) for geogrid reinforced retaining walls in
reinforced retaining wall is still an assignment worth studying. As for this aspect,
efficient functioning of reinforced soil retaining walls during the recent
catastrophicearthquakes is observed and reported in literature(Tatsuoka et al.,
1995; Sandri, 1997; Kramer and Paulsen,2001; Tatsuoka et al., 2007)
Izawa (2010) tested the effect of the stability of the geo-grid reinforced
retaining wall under saturated condition of backfill sand by conducting
centrifuge shaking table tests.
test model site soil is about 75 m/s tested by seismic lateral expansion
instrument SDMT, which is simulated to 150 m/s of representative prototype
site. According to the formula, the geometric similarity ratio S l of the test model
is 1/4. Based on time similarity relations( S t S l / S a , S a is the acceleration
similarity ratio, S t is time similarity ratio), the time similarity ratio of the
foundation soil in the model is 5.0. Thereby, geometric similarity ratio and other
similarity ratio of each variable can be deduced.
Downloaded from ascelibrary.org by UTEP LIBRARY-SERIALS on 11/08/14. Copyright ASCE. For personal use only; all rights reserved.
The size of the reinforced retaining wall used in the test is 70(height)
×5 cm(width). The groundwater level is 5cm below the ground surface. The
clay of 50 cm below the base is to reduce the water penetration of the backfill
sand. The material of the wall in the test model is mainly made up of low
resistance concrete and a grade reinforced bar. Coarse aggregate of the concrete
is relatively small size gravel particle, and fine aggregate of the concrete is fine
sand. By adjusting their mixture ratio, the reasonable elastic modulus
requirements can be achieved. The unit weigtht of the wall model is 19kN/m3.
The geo-grid is a kind of relatively low strength geo-grid, which is produced by
Huatai Geosynthetics Corporation in Yixing, and the type is TGDG60. When
the extensibility of this geo-grid reaches 2%, the pulling force of it is 15kN/m.
The distribution form is horizontal, and the spacing distance is 15cm. The
reinforced length is 70cm, which is the same as wall height. The test model is
shown in FIG.1. The backfill sand is Nanjing fine sand, which is prepared by
submerging in water. The particle size distribution of the fine sand is shown in
Table.1.
W pore water pressure gauge A accelerometer
wall
A3-5 DV1 DV2
DH5 S10-1 S10-2 S10-3 S10-4
S9-1 S9-2 S9-3 S9-4
P1-5 W1-5 A1-5 W2-5 A2-5
DH4 S8-1 S8-2 S8-3 S8-4
S7-1 S7-2 S7-3 S7-4
DH3 A3-3
P1-4 W1-4 A1-4 geogrid
S6-1 S6-2 S6-3 S6-4
S5-1 S5-2 S5-3 S5-4
DH2 P1-3 W1-3 A1-3 W2-3 A2-3
S4-1 S4-2 S4-3 S4-4
S3-1 S3-2 S3-3 S3-4 sand
DH1 P1-2 W1-2 A1-2
A3-1 S2-1 S2-2 S2-3 S2-4
S1-1 S1-2 S1-3 S1-4
P1-1 W1-1 A1-1 W2-1 A2-1
1
base
clay
clay
FIG.1 Shaking table test model of geo-grid reinforced retaining wall
(model dimensions: cm)
Amplitude (m/s)
0.04
Acceleration(g)
SP
0.02 SP
0.001
0.00
-0.02
-0.04
0.000
0 50 100 150 200 0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Frequency (Hz)
Time(s)
(a) Acceleration recording (b) Fourier spectrum
FIG.2 Acceleration recording and Fourier spectrum
0.025
0.3 SPA3-1
0.2 0.020
A3-1
-1
0.1
a /g
FFT/ms
0.015
0.0
-0.1 0.010
-0.2 0.005
-0.3
0.000
0 20 40 60 80 100 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14
t /s f / Hz
Downloaded from ascelibrary.org by UTEP LIBRARY-SERIALS on 11/08/14. Copyright ASCE. For personal use only; all rights reserved.
0.10
0.08 SPA3-3
0.6
-1
0.4 0.06
FFT/ms
A3-3
0.2
a /g
0.04
0.0
-0.2 0.02
-0.4
-0.6 0.00
0 20 40 60 80 100 0 2 4 6 8 10
t /s f / Hz
0.14
0.8 0.12
SPA3-5
0.6 0.10
-1
0.4 A3-5
FFT/ms
0.08
0.2
a /g
0.06
0.0
-0.2 0.04
-0.4 0.02
-0.6 0.00
0 20 40 60 80 100 0 2 4 6 8 10 12
t /s f / Hz
FIG.3 Responses of wall accelerations and spectra in different positions
The time history curve of lateral deformation of the reinforced wall top is
shown in FIG.4 under different earthquake intensities of SP wave. Amplitude
distribution of lateral deformation along the reinforced wall height is shown in
FIG.5 under near-field and far-field earthquake waves. DH1, DH2 and DH3
correspond respectively to the bottom, middle and top of the wall. As is shown
in the figure, the deformation of the reinforced retaining wall is like the flexion
and bulking deformation mode. The higher the earthquake intensity is, the
greater the deformation is, and the deformation of the wall top(DH3) is at the
maximum. When the earthquake intensity is relatively high, the deformation of
wall is nearly slid outwards. Lateral deformation caused by far-field earthquake
wave is the greatest, and that caused by middle-far field earthquake wave is
smaller, and that caused by near-field earthquake wave is smallest.
0.04 0.2g
0.03 0.3g
0.02 0.5g
0.01
Sh /m
0.00
-0.01
-0.02
-0.03
-0.04
Downloaded from ascelibrary.org by UTEP LIBRARY-SERIALS on 11/08/14. Copyright ASCE. For personal use only; all rights reserved.
0 20 40 60 80 100
t /s
FIG.4 Lateral displacement time history of geogrid-reinforced wall top
0.7
H /m 0.4
SF-0.3g
0.1 TA-0.3g
SP-0.3g
The time histories of the settlement on backfill sand surfaces are shown in
FIG.6 in the reinforced area and non-reinforced area under SP-0.3g earthquake
wave. As is obviously shown in the figure, the soil settlement in the reinforced
area is much smaller than that in non-reinforced area, and the former is only
about the half value of the latter. It is shown that the geo-grid can effectively
decrease the seismic settlement of the backfill soil and this kind of reinforced
structure has good seismic resistance ability.
t /s
0 20 40 60 80 100
0.00
-0.04
-0.08
-0.12
Sv/m
-0.16
-0.20
-0.24 reinforced zone
-0.28 unreinforced zone
4 CONCLUSIONS
of wall, and the distributions of Fourier spectra of the wall are symmetrical. The
distribution of Fourier spectrum of the reinforced wall at different locations is
consistent. The whole vibration frequency range becomes narrow. The value of
the Fourier spectrum of the wall top is the greatest, and that of the bottom of the
wall is the smallest.
(2) The deformation of the reinforced retaining wall is like the flexion and
bulking deformation mode. The deformation of the wall top is the greatest. The
higher the earthquake intensity is, the greater the deformation is. When the
earthquake intensity is high, the deformation of the wall is almost slid outwards.
(3)Settlement value of backfill soil surface in the area of reinforced backfill
surface is half of that of the non-reinforced area. It is shown that the geo-grid
can effectively decrease the seismic settlement of the backfill soil and this kind
of reinforced structure has good seismic resistance ability.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
REFERENCES