Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Contributed by the Pressure Vessels and Piping Division and presented at the =0 (3)
dz
Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference (Joint with ICPVT), Minneapolis, Minne-
sota, June 19-23, 1994, of THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS.
Manuscript received by the PVP Division, September 17, 1998; revised manuscript The dynamical and kinematical boundary conditions at the free
received August 1999. Technical Editor: S. Y. Zamrik. surface are as follows:
Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology Copyright © 1999 by ASME NOVEMBER 1999, Vol. 121 / 413
1 */{• z=0
A2 = K2XAXC] + K22A\-
C2 = K23AxCx + a>2A2
C2 (12)
z=-h
x=0 x =a + K3iA2Cx + K3sxs-C3 (14)
-2- Xs
C3 = K36AXC2 + K31A2CX + KnAxC2 + mJA, (15)
Fig. 1 Coordinate system
where we took account of the terms up to the third order (Hutton,
1963) and K„m are given in Appendix A.
2
b§ 1 d<t> 1 d<f> Eliminating An from the foregoing equations, the following
+ 2 + ^JC + gz = 0 (z = T)) (4) simultaneous equations described only by generalized coordinates
3f 2 V dx Jz
of wave height Cn (n = 1, 2, 3) are obtained as
3T) 8(j> ST; B4>
= 0 (z = T?) (5) C, + a)?C, = QXXC] + QX2CXC] + QX3CXC2
~d7 a , a / ^
Velocity potential 4> and wave height 17 can be presented as + Ql4CxC2+Qxsxs (16)
follows using a series of natural modes obtained by free oscillation C2 + (o2C2=Q2lC2+Q22C (17)
response analysis:
2
cosh {k}(z + h)} C3 + w\C3 = Q3XC] + Q32CXC + Q33CXC2
4>(x, z, t) = Ax (f) sin (£,x)
cosh (&I/J) + Q34CxC2 + Q3Sxs (18)
A, = KXXAXC2 + KX2A2CX + KX3AXC\ + KUAXA2 2.3 Damping Produced by Submerged Nets. We consider
the case in which a submerged net with the resistance coefficient
+ KX5A2CX+Kxsxs-Cx (10) I is installed in the middle of a rectangular tank. If we write Ux for
Nomenclature
a = length of rectangular tank g = gravitational acceleration A-n = wave height difference across net
A „ = generalized coordinate of velocity h = mean liquid depth f = resistance coefficient of net
potential (rath mode) k„ = wave no. (nth mode) f„ = damping ratio (nth mode)
A, — amplitude of kinematic excitations m,„ = mass of contained liquid £r = equivalent damping ratio generated
b = width of rectangular tank p = pressure by net
C„ = generalized coordinate of wave P = momentum in direction of x 17 = wave height
height (nth mode) v, w = velocity in direction of x, y, v = coefficient of dynamic viscosity
/ = reactive force of rectangular tank xs = horizontal base motion p = density of liquid
/„, = fluid force generated by sloshing 8 = dimensionless mean liquid to = angular forcing frequency
fd = inertial force due to deadweight of depth = hla w„ = natural angular frequency of liquid
contained liquid A£ = dissipation energy per cycle sloshing (nth mode)
/ = free area coefficient of net Ap = pressure loss caused by net 4> = velocity potential
the average velocity passing through the net at the point where the
net is installed, the pressure loss Ap caused by the net can be C'K C\ sin k,xdx (32)
k,a
written as
Substituting Eq. (27) into Eq. (24), finally, the relation between AT/ C3 + 2f3a)3C3 + wjC3 = QMC\ + Qi2CxC] + Q,3CXC2
and C, can be derived as
+ QuCtCi + Q3SXS (39)
du 8u du 1 dp
— + w — +vv — = xs (41)
dt dx dz p dx
where the friction term is neglected.
If we rewrite this with the following equation of continuity:
du dw
0 (42)
dx dz
du du2 duw 1 dp
xs (43)
dt dx dz p dx
Integrating Eq. (43) with x from - a to a and with z from —h Fig. 3 Experimental apparatus
to 7), we obtain
3 Experiment
dt) 3T) 3.1 Experimental Apparatus and Procedure. To show the
udzdx " ^ > ~dt + " ^ Jx ~ w
^Hdx
at validity of the proposed modeling methodology and to study the
performance of TLD, a forced excitation experiment was carried
out. A rectangular tank was excited horizontally by a shaking
1 1
p\I=adz + p\x=~adz — 2ahxs (44) table. Experimental apparatus and measuring system are shown in
P Fig. 3. To measure the fluid force generated by sloshing, two load
cells LI and L2 were used to cancel the inertial force due to the
Multiplying Eq. (44) by the width of the container b yields the TLD container itself and the deadweight of the contained liquid.
following equation: Output L1-L2 is the reactive force of TLD purely due to the liquid
sloshing. The displacement of the shaking table was measured by
(45) a electromagnetic displacement meter. A rectangular tank with
f = U+U length 2o = 1.30m and width b = 0.4 m made of 2.0-cm acrylic
where /, /,„ and fd denote the reactive force, the fluid force plates was used. In the experiment, the tank was partially filled
generated by sloshing, and inertial force due to the deadweight of with water corresponding to the desired liquid depth ratio. A single
the contained liquid m„, respectively, and are expressed as fol- submerged net was installed exactly in the middle of the tank. At
lows: the start of the experiment, the TLD was quiescent. The amplitude
of shaking table was set 0.33 cm and the excitation frequency was
varied in the range of 0.9 < w* < 1.1, where w* is the forcing
f=b dz- b p\x=-adz (46) angular frequency nondimensionalized by the natural fundamental
angular frequency of the liquid sloshing.
8P 4
Calculated and Experimental Results
L (47)
~ ~~dt Calculation was performed with the case that the dimensionless
mean liquid depth was set 8 = 0.349. and a single net with
fa = -mjts. (48) resistance coefficient £ = 0, 0.496, 0.855 was installed in the
middle of a rectangular container. The rest of the calculation
The fluid momentum in the direction of x-axis can be calculated condition are the same as experimental ones. Figures 4(a), 5(a),
as 6(c) show calculated fluid force generated by liquid sloshing
against the displacement of base motion as a form of force-
" d(j> displacement diagram, where xs,fw is nondimensionalized by 2a,
P= dzdx (49) /o = S(2pabh)g/2, respectively. Figures 4(b), 5(b), 6(b) show the
dx
corresponding experimental results. Comparing the calculated re-
sults with experimental ones, good agreement is found.
Substituting Eq. (6) into Eq. (49) and from Eq. (47), we can Figure 7 shows dissipation energy per cycle against forcing
finally calculate the fluid force generated by sloshing f„ as a frequency, which corresponds to the enclosed areas in the force-
function of generalized coordinates of wave height C„ (n = 1,2, displacement diagram where AE is nondimensionalized by A.E0 =
3), written as 8a(2pabh)g/2. Good agreement between calculated and experi-
mental results is also found. In the case of £ = 0, we can hardly
f„ = Ri C, + R2C, + R3CXC2 + R,CXC2 + R5C\ expect dissipation energy because the dissipation source available
2 in this case is only the friction on the side walls and the bottom
+ R6ClC l + Rsxs (50)
plate. In the case of £ = 0.496, we can obtain larger dissipation
where R„ are given in Appendix C. energy than the case of £ = 0.855 so that the existence of the
If the tank is subjected to harmonic base motion of xs = Ar sin optimal value of f can be expected.
cot, the dissipation energy per cycle can be calculated as follows:
5 Performance of Vibration Suppression
To show the effectiveness of the proposed method of calculation
A£=(D -fjsdt' - f„Aru> cos u>tdt (51) for estimating the performance of TLDs, we calculate for two
<«>• = 0366 <»' « 1966 <»* = UB06 <u* « 1366 <»• « 0.986 <o* • 1JM6
K ^
6>* • 1 3 1 6 «• - UW6 w* ' L064 (U* ' 1 0 1 6 a' ' L046 id* = L064
ABSCISSA: x s (-0.005to0.005)
ORDINATE: fw (-1.0to 1.0)
at*' 1384
<*>• °\m
Fig. 4 Phase relation between base motion and reactive force (S = 0.349, £ = 0)
cases: 1) the case where TLDs are installed on top of an actual 5.1 Calculation of the Performance of TLD Installed on a
pylon of a cable-stayed bridge, and (2) the case where a TLD is Cable-Stayed Bridge. Calculation of vibration control effect is
installed on a single degree of freedom structure. Comparison performed in the case of TLDs with a single submerged net
between calculated and experimental results is made with the latter installed in the middle of a rectangular tank set on a top of a pylon
case. of a cable-stayed bridge. Assuming that the main structural system
a* =0.908 <a* « 1328 a? " 1946 <u* « 0308 a * ' 0328 a' = 0.946
• ^
.
o)' ' 0366 «o* - 1986 <a* » 1306 a>* •= 0366 w ' = 0386 <a* = 1.006
*^___ =»,
a* - 1326 a*'UK <a* • 1364 a* ' 1326 a' = 1346 &>' °= 1.064
ABSCISSA: x s (-0.005to0.005)
ORDINATE: fw (-1.0to 1.0)
J
w* « 1384 6i* « 1384
Fig. 5 Phase relation between base motion and reactive force (8 = 0.349, £ = 0.496)
_p
a* ' W& 6)' - 1.046 a* = U064 <u* = 1J026 U* ' 1.046 w* = 1X64
ABSCISSA: x s (-0.005to0.005)
ORDINATE: fw (-1.0to 1.0)
Fig. 6 Phase relation between base motion and reactive force (S = 0.349, ( = 0.855)
is the damped system with one degree of freedom, we calculate the corresponding wave height at the side wall of the tank, where
free oscillation response with the fundamental mode of the struc- initial displacement of the structure is set 0.01 m. From these
ture. Denoting P for the fluid momentum in the direction x and m„ figures, we can recognize the following mechanism of TLD:
for the fluid mass, the governing equation for the free oscillation
response can be written as 1 In the case that the resistance coefficient f is too small, the
liquid in TLD is free to move; therefore, it cannot dissipate much
dP energy. Then, the energy is transferring from the main structure to
(m + m„)xs + cxs + kxs = — (52) TLD and vice versa, and as a result, the transient damped beat
Jt
vibration is observed.
Parameters for the main structure are given a s m = 217 t, c = 2 On the other hand, in the case that the resistance coefficient
6.59 t/s, k = 2057 t/s 2 , and for the TLD as 2a = 1.6 m, b = 0.5 is too large, the liquid in TLD is not free to move and does not
m, h = 0.275 m. Calculations are performed with the case where work as a dynamic damper. Then, the main structural system
four identical TLDs with five kinds of resistance coefficient I of behaves as a single degree of freedom.
the submerged net are installed. The left figures in Fig. 8 show free 3 Accordingly, the existence of the optimal resistance can be
oscillation response of the main structure and right ones show expected.
10.0 1 1 10.0 1 1
1 1
0 CM 0.855 CM
8.0
•a *".
K" 0 EXP
8.0
A t = 085! m
6J) 6.0
4.0 4.0
2.0 2.0
•S*^ ""* -o****.
0.0 . o — °-"r
0.0
93 1J) »' 1.1 0.9 U a,' 1.1
10.0
,0.4! CAL
8.0
or 0.4! EXP.'
6.0
X
4J) .<r"
w
< 2.0
!>-
0.0
"0.9 1.0 «' 1.1
Fig. 7 Comparison between experimental and calculated results for dissipation energy (S = 0.349)
t = 0.496
,(U)
t = 0.855 .
,0J)
LO ~I r"—i 1 1 T 1 1 1 1 r-
t - 1.53
.OJO
-U)L 1 1 1 1 1 i_
50 ,D0
« / x
tlne(s)
OUlr I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 r~ LO 'I ' I I' • " ' I " I ••-"[•••' • | , 1 ' 'I 1—
t=3.09 t = 3.09
1M|| ,0.0
-1 I I I I I
-aoi^—•—•—'—'—±—l
_l • • • • I I 1_
100 -u 50 100
0 SO tUeCs) tinete)
5.2 Calculation and Experimental Results of the Perfor- 0.669, 0.855 by changing the initial amplitude to examine the
mance of TLD Installed on the SDOF Structure. To make a effect of the resistance coefficient and the initial amplitude on the
comparison between calculated and experimental results, we per- performance of a TLD. We measured the displacement of the
formed experiments with a simple experimental apparatus briefly bottom plate of the container and figured out the damping factor
shown in Fig. 9, where one degree of freedom system is consti- from free oscillation responses. In Fig. 10, experimental results are
tuted by a rectangular container and four hanging wires, the shown with calculated ones where logarithmic decrement is shown
lengths of which are 2.5 m, and the natural angular frequency of against initial amplitudes with four resistance coefficients. Good
which is 1.98 rad/s. Setting the fundamental natural angular fre- agreement between experimental and calculated results is found in
quency of the liquid sloshing equal to that of the main structure, the range that initial amplitude is less than 30 mm, which means
8 = 0.1077 is determined automatically. Then, we performed the method of calculation proposed in this paper is effective in the
experiments with four kinds of resistance coefficients f = 0, 0.496, range of small initial amplitudes.
References
Chaiseri, P., Fujino, Y., Pacheco, B. M„ and Sun, L. M., 1989, "Interaction of
Tuned Liquid Damper (TLD) and Structure-Theory, Experimental Verification and
Application," Structural Engineering/Earthquake Engineering, JSCE, No. 410/1-12,
Vol. 6, No. 2, pp. 273s-282s.
Chester, W., 1968, "Resonant Oscillations of Water Waves I: Theory," Proceed-
ings, Royal Society of London, Vol. A308, pp. 5-22.
Fujii, K., Tamura, Y., Sato, T„ and Wakahara, T„ 1988, "Wind-Induced Vibration
of Tower and Practical Applications of Tuned Sloshing Damper," Journal of Wind
Engineering, No. 37, pp. 537-646.
Fujino, Y„ Pacheco, B. M„ Chaiseri, P., and Fujii, K„ 1988a, "An Experimental
Study on Tuned Liquid Damper Using Circular Containers," JSCE Journal of Struc-
tural Engineering, Vol. 34A, pp. 603-616.
Fujino, Y„ Pacheco, B. M„ Chaiseri, P., and Sun, L. M„ 1988b, "Parametric
Studies on Tuned Liquid Damper (TLD) Using Circular Containers by Free-
Oscillation Experiments," Structural Engineering/Earthquake Engineering, JSCE,
No. 398/1-10, Vol. 5, No. 2, pp. 381s-391s.
Fujino, Y„ Pacheco, B. M, Sun, L. M., Chaiseri, P., and Isobe, M., 1989,
"Simulation of Nonlinear Waves in Rectangular Tuned Liquid Damper (TLD) and its
Verification," JSCE Journal of Structural Engineering, Vol. 35 A, pp. 561-574.
Fujino, Y„ Pacheco, B. M„ Chaiseri, P., Sun, L. M., and Koga, K„ 1990,
"Understanding of TLD Properties Based on TMD Analogy," JSCE Journal of
Structural Engineering, Vol. 36A, pp. 577-590.
Fujino, Y., Sun, L. M., and Koga, K., 1991, "Simulation and Experiment on Tuned
Liquid Damper Subjected to Pitching Motion," JSCE Journal of Structural Engineer-
ing, Vol. 37A, pp. 805-814.
INITIAL AMPLITUDE (mm) Hagiuda, H„ 1988, "Oscillation Control System Exploiting Fluid Force Generated
by Water Sloshing," Mitui Zosen Technical Review, Vol. 137, pp. 13-20.
Fig. 10 Comparison between experimental and calculated results for Hutton, R. E., 1963, "An Investigation of Resonant, Nonlinear Nonplanar Free
the damping effect of TLD (S = 0.1077) Surface Oscillations of a Fluid," NASA TND-1870.
=
1 1 1
2l4 771 ^16 ~~2 ^M4 + 77/2 ^M7
APPENDIX A ft), ft) ft),
_
Kn - 5 S co2 Ql\ - « 2 ^ 2 1 ~~ ^ 2 3
-
K13 = _ I S 22. 2
-I8 k —
u>l 1
G22 ,4 ^ 2 2 + , , 2 *V23
ft) I ft) 1
KH = {-ktk2 + \82ai\u>\ _
231 - ^ 3 7 ^ 2 1 ~~ «>3Ki2K2l - ft)3A"33 - A" 38
2
K]S= -8 (o\k\
ft)3 ft).3
LU 1
=
232 77? K32K22 ~ 4 2 Ki4K2i — w
2, w,2 " 3 7 ^ 2 3
ft) j ft) |ft)2 1 2
K if,
16 —— 2 kik2
2 K-lK-2 2 ^ 1
1 to3 2
Kn — 2k\k2 2k2 774 ^ 3 7 ^ 2 2
ft),
774 ^ 3 5 + 77/2 ^ 3 8
ft) , ft) J
Ku = \S2u2k2 233 —
~~ ^ 3 i K, (O-IKT,]
'3"31 OJ-IK'
3"-32
= W
23S 3^35 S2,,2 S2..2
/C 1 /C 3
7 k2
2 2 2
R55 = ~7 d a> - 77^22 S ^J
APPENDIX 4 ' 4/c
2 2
1
S4 4 2 1 54 2 2 2
2itf " ~ ' ~ 2 ' 2 ^
* i =
2 2
82co2 £2S2W2 /t2S2co2w2 2k]
R2 = Rf,~ 8 + .2 2
4w £,,22 « 22 I" " , , 22 4
4fc «i JLU,
1 1 2 U] kxk2 k]k2co23 S4W>2 g4^2^2
7? 3 --2 + ^ 8 W | + ^ S W]W2 + ^ | - ^ + ^2 4 2 - 4](2 4k2
1 „ „ . 1
^ 8 0,^3 + ^ S ^ , * _, O)