TAD BIR RULING NO.

042-13

Article 10, Philippines-Netherlands tax treaty

The Purefoods-Hormel Co., Inc.

21/F JMT Corporate Condominium

ADB Avenue, Ortigas Center

Pasig City

Attention: Celestino L. De Guzman

Gentlemen:

This refers to your Tax Treaty Relief Application dated May 9, 2012 filed on behalf of Hormel
Netherlands B.V. ("Hormel Netherlands"), requesting confirmation that dividends to be paid by The
Purefoods-Hormel Co., Inc. ("Purefoods") are subject to the preferential tax rate of 10 percent, pursuant
to the Convention between the Kingdom of the Netherlands and the Republic of the Philippines for the
Avoidance of Double Taxation and the Prevention of Fiscal Evasion with Respect to Taxes on Income
("Philippines-Netherlands tax treaty"). LibLex

Facts

It is represented that Hormel Netherlands, situated at Parnassustoren, Locatellikade 1 1076 AZ

Amsterdam, The Netherlands, is a resident of the Netherlands within the meaning of Article 4 of the
Philippines-Netherlands tax treaty, per the Declaration of Residence issued by the Inspector of the Tax
Administration of the Netherlands; that Hormel Netherlands is a corporation organized and existing
under the laws of the Netherlands with an authorized capital of Two Hundred Thousand dutch guilders
(NLG200,000), divided into two hundred (200) shares each with a par value of one thousand guilder
(NLG1,000.00); that Hormel Netherlands is not registered either as corporation or as a partnership in the
Philippines per certification issued by the Securities and Exchange Commission dated May 9, 2012; and
that, on the other hand, Purefoods is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the
Philippines with office address at 21/F JMT Corporate Condominium, ADB Avenue, Ortigas Center, Pasig
City, Philippines.

On March 2, 2012, the Board of Directors of Purefoods approved and declared cash dividends
amounting to P1,000,000,000.00 out of the unrestricted retaining earnings of Purefoods in favor of all of
stockholders of record, per Secretary's Certificate dated May 10, 2012; that Hormel Netherlands B.V. is
the beneficial owner of the 242,563,332 common shares, representing 40% of the Purefoods total
shares and that the cash dividends were paid out on May 9, 2012 based on the Secretary's Certificate
dated May 10, 2012. ADCETI

Ruling
Relative thereto, please be informed that Section 14 of Revenue Memorandum Order ("RMO") No. 72-
2010, published in the Manila Bulletin on October 20, 2010, and effective November 4, 2010, provides
that:

"SEC. 14. When and Where to File the TTRA. —

All tax treaty relief applications (updated BIR Forms No. 0901-D, 0901-I, 0901-R, 0901-P, 0901-S, 0901-T,
0901-O and 0901-C) relative to the implementation and interpretation of the provisions of Philippine tax
treaties shall only be submitted to and received by the International Tax Affairs Division (ITAD). If the
forms of any necessary documents are submitted to any other BIR office, the application shall be
considered as improperly filed.

Filing should always be made BEFORE the transaction. Transaction for purposes of filing the TTRA shall
mean before the occurrence of the first taxable event.

Failure to properly file the TTRA with ITAD within the period prescribed herein shall have the effect of
disqualifying the TTRA under this RMO." (Emphasis Supplied) ISHaCD

This condition was emphasized by the Court of Tax Appeals in Mirant (Philippines) Operations
Corporation vs. Commissioner of Internal Revenue (C.T.A. Case No. 6382 dated June 7, 2005) where it
ruled:

"However, it must be remembered that a foreign corporation wishing to avail of the benefits of the tax
treaty should invoke the provisions of the tax treaty and prove that indeed the provisions of the tax
treaty applies to it, before the benefits may be extended to such corporation. In other words, a resident
or non-resident foreign corporation shall be taxed according to the provisions of the National Internal
Revenue Code, unless it is shown that the treaty provisions apply to the said corporation, and that, in
cases the same are applicable, the option to avail of the tax benefits under the tax treaty has been
successfully invoked.

Under Revenue Memorandum Order 01-2000 of the Bureau of Internal Revenue, it is provided that the
availment of a tax treaty provision must be preceded by an application for a tax treaty relief with its
International Tax Affairs Division (ITAD). This is to prevent any erroneous interpretation and/or
application of the treaty provisions with which the Philippines is a signatory to. The implementation of
the said Revenue Memorandum Order is in harmony with the objectives of the contracting state to
ensure that the granting of the benefits under the tax treaties are enjoyed by the persons or
corporations duly entitled to the same.

The Court notes that nowhere in the records of the case was it shown that petitioner indeed took the
liberty of properly observing the provisions of the said order. Petitioner quotes various BIR, as well as
ITAD, Rulings issued to several foreign corporations seeking for a tax relief from the office of the
respondent. However, not any one of these rulings pertains to the petitioner. It must be stressed that
BIR rulings are issued based on the facts and circumstances surrounding particular issue/issues in
question and are resolved on a case-to-case basis. It would be thus erroneous to invoke the ruling of the
respondent in specific cases, which have no bearing to the case of petitioner." (Underscoring ours)
SHIcDT

This decision was also upheld by the Supreme Court in a Resolution (G.R. No. 168531) dated February
18, 2008.

Furthermore, the necessary requirement laid down in RMO 1-2000 is reiterated in subsequent rulings of
the Court of Tax Appeals: Deutsche Bank AG Manila Branch vs. Commissioner of Internal Revenue (C.T.A.
Case No. EB 456 dated May 29, 2009), CBK Power Company Ltd. vs. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
(C.T.A. Case Nos. 6699, 6844 and 7166 dated March 29, 2010) and Manila North Tollways Corporation
vs. Commissioner of Internal Revenue (C.T.A. Case No. 7864 dated April 12, 2011).

In view of the foregoing and considering that the dividends received by Hormel Netherlands were paid
on May 9, 2012 per Certification dated May 10, 2012, while the subject TTRA was only filed on May 9,
2012, in violation of the requirement of RMO 72-2010 that filing of the TTRA should be made BEFORE
the transaction, that is the payment of dividend, this Office holds that the subject TTRA is hereby
denied. Accordingly, said dividend payment shall be subject to tax at the rate of 30 percent as provided
in Section 28 of the Tax Code of 1997, as amended.

Please be guided accordingly. CDHacE

Very truly yours,

(SGD.) KIM S. JACINTO-HENARES

Commissioner

Bureau of Internal Revenue