Sie sind auf Seite 1von 1

People v Castillo (1946)

Facts:

 Nena Tanalega Raymundo and Dr. Leon Castillo were accused of the crime of frustrated murder
by poisoning through reckless imprudence. It was alleged that Mr. Silvinio Belarmino presented
for dispensation 1/3 formula prescription of Dr. Antonio G. Sison at the Escudero Drug Store. Dr.
Castillo and Nena mutually helped each other prepare the said prescription but instead of mixing
the required proportion of Spartein Sulphate, thru carelessness and reckless imprudence, they
mixed and compounded in the formula a toxic dose of Strychnine Suplhate, which is a poisonous
substance.
 As a result of which, Belarmino, upon taking one capsule of the medicine on the very same day,
was poisoned and would have died, had it not been for causes independent of the will of the
accused.
 CFI ruled that they are guilty of frustrated homicide thru reckless imprudence.
 Nena appealed that the CFI erred in holding that a frustrated felony can be committed thru
reckless imprudence.
 CA found them guilty of slight physical injuries thru reckless imprudence.
 It has been shown by the testimony of an expert witness that the intake of that poisonous
substance was sufficient to cause the death of Belarmino, if not for the fact that other two
substances diminished the deadly effect of strychnine sulphate as poision.

Issue: WON Castillo and Nena are guilty of frustrated homicide thru reckless imprudence.

Ruling: NO.

 The offense of frustrated homicide requires the concurrence of the essential requisite of intent to
kill, which is incompatible with the charge of reckless imprudence, although a charge for
physical injuries, serious or less serious, thru reckless imprudence is legally proper under the
law.
 What the accused has committed is a violation of Sec. 2676 (General Violation of Pharmacy
Law) in relation to Sec. 751 (Responsibility for quality of drugs) of the Revised Administrative
Code. The profession of pharmacy demands care and skill; and druggists must exercise care of a
specially high degree, the highest degree of care known to practical men. In other words,
druggist must exercise the highest practical degree of prudence and vigilance, and the most exact
and reliable safeguards consistent with the reasonable conduct of the business, so that human life
may not constantly be exposed to the danger flowing from the substitution of deadly poisons for
harmless medicines. Even though Nena is not a pharmacist but only a pharmacy-clerk, she is still
guilty.
 The offenses penalized under the provisions of section 751 of the Revised Administrative Code,
in connection with the provisions of section 2676 thereof, may be committed not only by
licensed druggists and pharmacists, but also by any other person preparing any drug, chemical,
medicine or poison, under any fraudulent name.

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen